Connect with us

Middle East

US, Israel targeted journalists as part of their attacks on Iran

Published

on

Reports indicate that a joint air strike by the US and Israel has targeted the facility housing Channel 2 of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), the nation’s state-run media entity.

The building, located on Alvand Street in the capital city of Tehran, was struck on Sunday.

Despite the strike, IRIB issued a statement confirming that broadcasting operations, including those of Channel 2, remain uninterrupted, with no significant disruptions reported in television transmission.

Technical teams conduct damage assessments

According to the Tasnim News Agency, broadcasts continue as normal. Technical teams from the organization are currently conducting inspections to determine the extent of potential damage resulting from the attack.

Follow-up statements from IRIB’s technological development department noted that only a brief interruption occurred, advising viewers that they may need to rescan their receivers to restore access to the channels.

The department emphasized that the television studios sustained no damage and that the networks are continuing their routine operations without further incident.

Iranian journalist Marzieh Hashemi commented in a social media post earlier today: “Just a few hours ago, the Zionist regime and the US again attacked the IRIB headquarters. The first attack occurred in June 2024 during the 12-day imposed war. The second was last night, and this time was just a few hours ago. Yet we remain at IRIB, working to keep all our channels live.”

It has been reported that at least eight waves of retaliatory strikes have been carried out against hostile targets across the region. In June of last year, Israel targeted the IRIB headquarters in Tehran, an attack that resulted in the deaths of three reporters.

Al-Manar television headquarters struck in Beirut

The Israeli military conducted an air strike on the headquarters of Al-Manar television, located in the Dahiyeh district of southern Beirut.

The broadcaster, known for its close ties to Hezbollah, announced that the building in the Haret Hreik neighborhood had been targeted. Powerful explosions were heard throughout the area during the attack.

Lebanon-based MTV reported that Israel had issued an evacuation warning for the building late Monday prior to the strike.

The escalation in tension follows a rocket and drone attack launched by Hezbollah on a military facility in northern Israel on Monday morning.

The Israeli military stated that the strikes in Beirut were directed at Hezbollah command centers and weapons depots.

In the wide-ranging offensive that the US and Israel have been conducting against Iran since Saturday, reports indicate that numerous individuals have been killed, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and high-ranking military officials.

Despite the ceasefire agreement signed at the end of November 2024, it was reported that Israel has continued its violations in Lebanon, with these attacks claiming hundreds of lives.

Since the launch of Israel’s operations in Lebanon in October 2023, which escalated into a full-scale war in September 2024, more than 4,000 people have been killed and approximately 17,000 have been injured.

US digital blockades against Iranian media outlets

These physical attacks on media organizations recall the digital restrictions previously imposed by the US on Iran-linked news websites.

In 2021, the US government seized dozens of news websites it identified as being linked to Iran, accusing them of “spreading disinformation.”

Access to these sites—including Iran’s state-backed English-language channel, Press TV—was blocked, with notices posted on their domains stating that the sites had been seized.

The US Department of Justice announced it had seized 33 websites used by the Islamic Radio and Television Union (IRTVU), as well as three sites operated by Iraq-based Kata’ib Hezbollah militants, citing violations of sanctions.

The Department alleged that the Iranian government utilized these sites under the “guise of news organizations” to conduct malicious influence operations against the US.

At the time, IRIB accused the US of suppressing freedom of expression. Yemen’s Ansarallah-affiliated Al-Masirah television was subjected to similar restrictions, describing the situation as an “act of piracy with no legal basis.”

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey