Connect with us

Asia

Final stages of Yoon’s impeachment trial: Key issues

Published

on

South Korea’s Constitutional Court has become the site of a fierce political battle as it prepares to rule on the impeachment of President Yoon Suk Yeol in early March.

Since January 14, the court has held 10 hearings to determine whether Yoon committed constitutional violations serious enough to warrant his impeachment in early December with a martial law declaration that was later cancelled. More than two-thirds of the National Assembly voted in favor of his impeachment.

The court is expected to approve or reject the impeachment in early March after a final hearing on February 25.

Nikkei Asia compiled the prominent discussions about the process:

What were Yoon’s orders when he sent troops to the National Assembly?

President Yoon sent troops to the National Assembly after declaring martial law on the night of December 3. This action was interpreted as his intention to neutralize the legislature, which has the constitutional right to demand the lifting of martial law.

Lawyers for the National Assembly said Yoon ordered commanders to remove lawmakers from the main hall, preventing them from passing a motion to lift martial law. Yoon’s lawyers argued that this was done to maintain order in the parliament and to protect people from possible accidents.

Kwak Jong-geun, the former commander of the Special Warfare Command who is currently under arrest, admitted that Yoon had called Kwak to order ‘staff’ out of the main hall because a quorum had not yet been reached. The officer said he did not act on that order.

During Tuesday’s hearing, a lawyer for the assembly said: “[The president] used the national armed forces as his personal troops and involved them in a coup.”

Yoon disputed this and said he never used the term ‘personnel’ to describe the people in question. In Korean, the words for lawmakers, staff, and agents sound similar, though they are different.

Kwak said Kim Yong-hyun, then defense minister, told him to remove the lawmakers from the hall. Kim, on the other hand, said he asked the commanders to remove the agents, not the lawmakers, and that the commanders may have misunderstood. The parliament’s lawyer said such an allegation did not make sense because the former defense minister could simply order them to stand down if they were spies.

Did Yoon order the arrest of politicians?

The second issue was whether Yoon ordered the police chief and military commanders to arrest politicians, judges, and journalists who opposed him.

Parliamentary representatives said Yoon had ordered the police chief, a special forces unit commander, and an official of an espionage agency to arrest a dozen people together. They included Lee Jae-myung, leader of the opposition Democratic Party, House Speaker Woo Won-shik, and Han Dong-hoon, then leader of the ruling People Power Party.

Hong Jang-won, a former deputy director of the National Intelligence Service who was in charge when martial law was declared, said Yoon told him in a phone call to ‘catch them all.’ Hong also said he later received a list from the defense counterintelligence command. Yoon and his lawyers denied the allegation, arguing that it was meaningless because the spy agency had no arrest powers. The lawyers also questioned the authenticity of the memo containing the list. However, the court accepted the note as evidence.

Why did Yoon send soldiers to the election commission?

Yoon argued that he ordered Kim, a former defense minister, to send troops to the National Election Commission’s office building in Gwacheon, south of Seoul, to check the agency’s electronic system because he had a report prepared by the spy agency in 2023 that said it was problematic.

Assembly representatives said Yoon sent troops to take over the commission’s servers because he believed a rumor that the 2024 general election was rigged.

Yoon’s lawyers also alleged Chinese meddling in South Korean elections, citing some media reports but providing no evidence.

Did martial law harm the country and the people?

Kim Yi-su, a senior lawyer for the assembly, said the president’s reckless behavior has deeply hurt the country.

“The collapsing economy is facing a bigger crisis. Political polarization is deepening. And it has left a shameful trauma on the entire military. People want healing and restoration,” he said.

Yoon and his lawyers, on the other hand, claimed it was a ‘peaceful martial law’ and intended only as a temporary warning to the public against ‘massive’ pressure from the opposition Democratic Party. At a hearing earlier this month, the ousted president argued four times that ‘nothing happened’ and that martial law was lifted without harming anyone.

What will happen next?

Both sides will present their final arguments to the Constitutional Court on Tuesday, February 25. The court will then decide whether to uphold the dismissal.

As stipulated by the constitution, the decision requires the approval of six of the eight judges, as one seat on the nine-member court is vacant. If the court upholds the impeachment, Yoon, who is currently suspended, will be immediately removed from office, and a presidential election will be held within 60 days.

If the court rejects the case, Yoon will be reinstated.

Asia

Chinese Politburo signals cautious confidence as Beijing pivots toward targeted tech support

Published

on

The mid-year meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Politburo has long served as a critical evaluation point for Beijing. The session provides the central government with an opportunity to review developments from the first half of the year and steer the country toward a more realistic economic course in the months ahead.

The latest statement from the top leadership signals cautious confidence. The release indicates that policymakers are favoring a stable, targeted approach over the broad-based stimulus measures that characterized previous years. As China manages its economic transition, the post-Covid era of aggressive spending has clearly drawn to a close. In its place, a strategic and structural approach has taken hold, prioritizing resilience and stability over short-term capital injections.

According to the outcomes of the Politburo meeting, the policy orientation will continue to target specific sectors. Financial support will be directed away from the property market and toward high-tech emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. In the real estate sector, the objective remains stabilizing market confidence and keeping debt risks under control.

Infrastructure investment is likewise being reshaped around the concept of “new infrastructure.” The focus is no longer solely on concrete and physical structures; smart power grids, information technology networks, and data infrastructure have taken precedence.

This approach signifies an investment in future competitiveness rather than simply pumping capital into the economy’s more stagnant sectors. Serving as a new driver of growth, digital infrastructure fulfills a dual purpose: supporting domestic demand in the short term while safeguarding technological competitiveness over the long term.

Finally, Beijing is signaling a more conciliatory posture in international trade. The Chinese leadership aims to establish a more balanced trade framework to mitigate concerns voiced by trade partners such as the European Union over what has been termed “China Shock 2.0.”

As the administration prepares for critical leadership changes next year, its primary focus will remain on stability across both economic and social spheres.

China continues to strike a balance between realistic growth targets and systemic restructuring, maintaining policy leeway to absorb potential external shocks. Beijing’s economic strategy reflects a pragmatic assessment of both domestic and international challenges.

Struggling with weak demand, the domestic economy is not yet in a position to anchor national growth independently. Expansion continues to rely heavily on a record trade surplus alongside the impressive export performance of high-tech and clean energy sectors. However, this reliance has drawn pushback from several trading partners.

To stimulate domestic economic activity and ease trade tensions, Beijing unveiled its first standalone five-year plan focused on consumption. Released in July by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, the plan targets an increase in retail sales to 60 trillion yuan (approximately $8.9 trillion) by 2030. This represents an increase of roughly 20% compared to 2025 levels.

To improve profit margins for small businesses, regulatory authorities are tackling the issue of “involution”—described as excessive internal competition—by curbing platform monopolies and preventing destructive price wars. While these structural adjustments may take longer to yield results, they are viewed as a more sustainable and effective alternative to direct cash handouts.

Continue Reading

Asia

Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand

Published

on

Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.

Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.

Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.

Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.

Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.

In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.

The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.

Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.

This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.

The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.

Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.

Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.

Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.

CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange

Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.

As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.

At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.

Continue Reading

Asia

Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister

Published

on

Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests

India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.

The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.

The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.

What triggered the protests?

Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.

Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.

According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.

Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.

The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.

How the movement unfolded

Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.

Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.

The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.

Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.

CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.

Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.

Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.

Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.

In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.

Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.

Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.

Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.

On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.

On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey