Middle East
King Abdullah opposes Trump’s plan for Gaza displacement
King Abdullah II of Jordan, the first Arab leader to visit the White House since US President Donald Trump proposed taking control of Gaza and relocating its two million inhabitants, avoided a public confrontation with Trump but did not endorse his plan.
As King Abdullah II of Jordan sat next to Trump in the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump reiterated his promise to “take” Gaza. Abdullah fidgeted uncomfortably in his chair and emphasized that Jordan, Egypt, and other Arab governments would announce their own plans for post-war Gaza later this month.
US President Trump discussed Gaza with reporters in the Oval Office before his meeting with King Abdullah II of Jordan at the White House.
Referencing his plan to send Palestinians in Gaza to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan, Trump stated that Gaza is not a habitable area and needs to be rebuilt.
Commenting on whether the US will buy Gaza, Trump said, “There is nothing to buy there. We will take it over and keep it in our hands. We will eventually realize this project that will create many jobs for people in the Middle East. I think this place could be a diamond.”
Trump responded to the question of how the US will hold Gaza by saying, “It will be under US authority.”
Arguing that with the US “controlling” Gaza, they can bring stability to the Middle East for the first time in a long time, Trump commented, “Palestinians or people living in Gaza now will live elsewhere in a beautiful and safe way.”
Trump stated that a certain amount of land would be taken from Egypt and Jordan and Palestinians would be resettled there, saying, “Palestinians do not want to be in the Gaza Strip, but they have no other choice.”
Plan to build hotels, office buildings, and residences
Regarding whether Egypt will accept the Gaza plan, Trump said, “I think 99 percent, if not 100 percent, this process can be carried out with Egypt.”
On how Gaza will be utilized after taking over and building Gaza, Trump said, “We will run it very properly. It will have economic development on a very large scale, perhaps on the largest scale in this area. We will build many good things there, including hotels, office buildings, residences, and other things.”
Responding to a question about whether there were any “plans” for the occupied West Bank, Trump said that their agenda was only Gaza and that there was nothing on the West Bank.
King Abdullah spoke cautiously
On the other hand, King Abdullah of Jordan used cautious expressions against Trump’s Gaza statements and refrained from making clear assessments.
King Abdullah stated that Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia and Egypt, will hold talks on how to implement a plan that benefits everyone on the Palestinians and that they should wait for these talks.
“Let us wait for the Egyptians to present their views,” King Abdullah said.
“We need to keep in mind that Egypt and the Arab countries have a plan, and we have been invited by (Saudi Crown Prince) Mohammed bin Salman to talks in Riyadh. I think the main issue is how this can be done in a way that is good for everyone,” King Abdullah said, adding that they want to conclude this process in favor of the United States, Jordan, and other countries in the region.
In his meeting at the White House, King Abdullah, who used a cautious tone against Trump’s statements about the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza, drew attention to his clear statements on this issue in his statement later.
In a statement on his X account, the King of Jordan said that his meeting with Trump was constructive and that they discussed the Gaza issue in detail.
King Abdullah reiterated his opposition to the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
“I reiterated Jordan’s firm position against the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. This is a common Arab position. The reconstruction of Gaza without displacing Palestinians and addressing the dire humanitarian situation must be everyone’s priority.”
‘Palestine belongs to the Palestinians and Jordan belongs to the Jordanians’
Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman al-Safadi said that there is an Arab-Egyptian-Palestinian plan to rebuild the Gaza Strip without displacing Palestinians.
Minister Safadi made the remarks in an interview with Jordanian state television channel Al-Mamlaka TV.
Safadi emphasized the need to continue sending aid to the Gaza Strip and to maintain the ceasefire, adding that there is an Arab-Egyptian-Palestinian plan for the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip without displacing Palestinians.
Stating that his country’s interests are based on the fact that “Jordan belongs to the Jordanians and Palestine belongs to the Palestinians,” Safadi said that King Abdullah II presented “practical ideas” to US President Donald Trump.
Safadi said King Abdullah II emphasized that the establishment of a Palestinian state on Palestinian land is the only way to achieve security and stability in the region, adding that US President Trump emphasized Jordan’s important role in promoting stability in the region.
He said that they are working with intensive Arab coordination to use this moment for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, noting that King Abdullah clearly confirmed that Jordan will not allow the Palestinians to emigrate to their land.
“Our priority is to protect Jordan and Jordanians, and we started our dialogue with Trump from this basis,” Safadi said in an interview with Qatar’s Al Jazeera television.
Safadi emphasized that Arab coordination is capable of presenting an alternative to Trump’s plan and ending the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, adding that Arab coordination is continuing intensively and that they can present an alternative and acceptable plan to Trump’s plan that will keep the Palestinians on their own land in Gaza.
“We have a vision, Trump has a vision, and we believe it is possible to rebuild Gaza without displacing its people,” Safadi said. “We told Trump that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians and Jordan belongs to the Jordanians. We presented to Trump our position to work for a just and comprehensive peace and not to displace the Palestinians.”
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe5 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
