Connect with us

America

Over 70 Congressional Democrats demand Trump’s removal over Iran threats

Published

on

More than 70 Democratic lawmakers in the US Congress have launched a formal call for the removal of President Donald Trump from office, citing his severe threats against Iran and his handling of ongoing military operations.

The development is viewed as the first concrete sign of the aggressive stance the party’s base will demand from leadership against Trump should Democrats win a majority in the upcoming midterm elections.

While Democratic leaders in both chambers are attempting to demonstrate to voters that they are standing firm against the president and Republicans, they continue to maintain a cautious political line regarding formal impeachment.

However, a wave of anger swept through Democratic ranks after Trump issued a stark warning on Tuesday—threatening the destruction of an “entire civilization” if Tehran failed to reach an agreement by 8:00 p.m.—only to declare a two-week ceasefire hours later.

Party members accused Trump of “threatening genocide” and emphasized that the last-minute ceasefire did not absolve the president of his “reckless behavior.”

In response, many Democrats have intensified calls for Trump to be impeached or removed under the 25th Amendment of the US Constitution, a mechanism that has never been used to remove a sitting president.

Although the minority Democratic Party lacks the necessary votes for either option, the rising demands are placing significant pressure on Democratic leadership while highlighting widespread discontent among the party’s voter base.

“You cannot yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater; nor can a president be allowed to use the US military to threaten genocide,” Democratic Representative Sarah McBride of Delaware stated on the social media platform X.

McBride noted that threats of war crimes and a disregard for human life must carry legal consequences, asserting that Trump must leave office. She further stated that Republicans, whether in the cabinet or Congress, must use all constitutional powers at their disposal alongside Democrats to stop this “illegal war” and take the weapon out of the hands of this “madman.”

Democratic Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey echoed these sentiments, stating that Trump is “unfit for the role of commander-in-chief” and urged his Republican colleagues to take a stand.

Kim noted that while the impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives, he does not expect Speaker Mike Johnson to demonstrate the will to act. He emphasized that Trump’s supporters appear more focused on protecting their seats and jobs than on the rule of law, the Constitution, or the will of the people.

Representative Shri Thanedar of Michigan took the demands a step further, sending a direct letter to Vice President Vance and other members of the Trump cabinet requesting the invocation of the 25th Amendment. On the same day, Representative John Larson of Connecticut announced he had introduced articles of impeachment against Trump over the Iran conflict.

The 25th Amendment of the US Constitution allows the vice president and a majority of the cabinet to vote that the president is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” at which point the vice president assumes the role of acting president.

In the event of a dispute regarding the president’s capacity, the decision is left to Congress, which must approve the removal by a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate. To impeach a president, a simple majority is required in the House, while a two-thirds majority in the Senate is necessary for conviction and removal from office.

In the past, most Democratic members joined Republicans in rejecting impeachment resolutions introduced by Representative Al Green of Texas to avoid sending a “partisan message” to voters in swing districts ahead of a competitive election cycle.

Democratic leaders in Congress also refrained from directly supporting calls for Trump’s removal this week. Instead, leadership focused on a “war powers resolution” intended to restrict Trump’s authority regarding operations in Iran.

When asked whether Trump’s rhetoric warranted impeachment or the invocation of the 25th Amendment, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries replied, “Regarding impeachment and similar matters, I cannot say we have ruled out any options, nor have we finalized any; we will deal with the issues before us.”

Jeffries added that as an equal and independent branch of government, they have a responsibility to defend the American people and intend to do so with the necessary tools. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also declined to join the calls for Trump’s removal.

Democrats attempted to pass a war powers measure in the House on Thursday but were unsuccessful. Jeffries announced that the matter would be brought to a vote again shortly, while Schumer stated the Senate would vote on the Iran war powers resolution next week.

House leaders hope to convince a sufficient number of Republican members to pass the bill following the developments of the past two weeks.

Some Democratic members acknowledged the difficulties of removing Trump, stating their current focus remains on the immediate situation.

Gregory Meeks, a supporter of the war powers resolution in the House, said that while he could speak to Trump’s competence, the votes required for impeachment do not exist. Meeks noted that oversight mechanisms are not being utilized in the Republican-controlled House and Senate.

Despite the low probability of removing Trump under the current congressional arithmetic, Democrats are focusing on a victory in next year’s midterm elections, which could grant them more power in Congress.

Representative Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania told reporters on Thursday that launching an impeachment process while in the minority was not the best use of time. “Let’s win the majority first, then hold this president accountable,” she said.

America

Trump energy shares rose by up to $4.4m during Iran war, CNBC reports

Published

on

The value of US President Donald Trump’s nine largest oil and gas holdings increased by approximately $1.5 million to $4.4 million during the first six months of the war with Iran.

According to an analysis conducted by CNBC based on the American leader’s financial disclosure, corporate balance sheets, and FactSet market data, the investment basket includes shares in Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan, Marathon Petroleum, Occidental Petroleum, Phillips 66, Valero Energy, and Williams Companies.

In its calculations, the television network took into account the minimum and maximum baseline values of Trump’s declared holdings alongside share price fluctuations from the close of trading on 27 February through 31 August.

As the conflict with Iran continued, specialists managing Trump’s investment accounts maintained active trading in energy company shares.

Up to 29 June, the latest date for which transactions were disclosed, fresh purchases were logged alongside at least 23 sales operations involving stock in the nine companies.

Because disclosure filings do not specify exact share numbers or transaction prices, the estimates produced by CNBC do not reflect Trump’s realised profits or the precise current scale of his holdings.

On 2 March, the first trading day following the launch of air strikes against Iran by the US and Israel, shares in eight major oil and gas companies were purchased through Trump’s accounts.

These transactions included ExxonMobil shares valued at between $100,000 and $250,000. Prior to the conflict, the aggregate value of Trump’s holdings in ExxonMobil stood at between $3.2 million and $12.5 million.

Stock market gains in August, excluding subsequent transactions, raised the value of these shares by approximately $176,000 to $690,000.

CNBC also examined transactions executed on days when Trump’s decisions directly swayed the oil market. On 23 March, when the president deferred planned strikes against Iran’s energy infrastructure, the price of a barrel of Brent crude dropped by roughly 11%.

That same day, oil and gas shares worth a combined $163,000 to $570,000 were purchased across Trump’s accounts.

A similar transaction took place on 7 April. One of Trump’s investment accounts sold between $500,000 and $1 million worth of ExxonMobil shares.

Approximately two and a half hours after markets closed, President Trump announced an agreement on a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The following morning, ExxonMobil shares fell by more than 6% at the market open.

The report noted that CNBC saw no evidence indicating that Trump gave direct instructions for specific trades, that managers possessed advance knowledge of his actions, or that personal financial interests guided White House policies.

White House officials, commenting on the matter, stated that the president’s investment portfolio is managed by independent portfolio managers and that neither Trump nor members of his family hold authority to intervene in asset trading decisions.

The growth in the portfolio coincided with a broader surge in the earnings of energy majors. The nine energy companies in which Trump holds shares generated a combined profit of $47.6 billion in the second quarter.

During the same period last year, that figure stood at $15.9 billion. The profits of ExxonMobil and Chevron alone climbed from $9.6 billion in the prior year to $26.6 billion.

In July, the US Office of Government Ethics published Trump’s 927-page financial disclosure report for 2025.

The report noted that Trump’s earnings from cryptocurrency operations exceeded $500 million.

Continue Reading

America

Over half of Latino voters back Democrats in key US House races

Published

on

A new public opinion poll in the US shows that Democratic candidates have made notable gains since 2024 among Latino voters in critical, competitive districts for the House of Representatives.

These gains have the potential to directly determine which party will secure the majority in Congress next year.

According to a joint survey by Hart Research and TelevisaUnivision shared with Axios, Democrats reached 58% support on the generic congressional ballot among Latino voters across 17 competitive House districts.

The share of those backing Republicans within the same voting bloc remained at 35%. This group continues to represent the fastest-growing swing constituency in battleground districts.

Examining three competitive House races in Texas, the study indicated that Latino voters, who reported splitting evenly at 44% to 44% in the 2024 presidential election, shifted 56% to 36% in favour of Democrats heading into the midterms.

Latino support for Democrats also increased in other states. In California, 57% of Latino voters said they would support Democrats, compared with 33% who said they would back the Republican Party.

Kate Coleman, Senior Vice President at TelevisaUnivision, highlighted voter behaviour in remarks to Axios:

“Latino voters are not locked into one party. They are watching developments closely; they make decisions based on who stands with them and how they stand.”

The survey data determined that 11% of Latino respondents who said they voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election now support Democratic candidates.

Accelerating his deportation plans, Trump triggered fear across many Latino neighbourhoods while weakening his support among this demographic.

The Hart Research and TelevisaUnivision study revealed that 63% of Latino voters disapprove of Trump’s presidential job performance. The share of those approving of his performance in office stood at 36%.

Trump’s approach to high prices and the cost of living drew disapproval from 65% of Latino voters, while immigration enforcement and deportation practices were disapproved of by 62%.

More than half of Latino voters, at 64%, reported that they disapprove of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

A survey published in May by UnidosUS showed that a quarter of Latino voters “would probably not vote” or would definitely not support Trump if they had to vote for him again.

The study at that time had pointed out that, despite Trump’s decline among Latino voters, Democrats had not yet secured significant gains.

According to Pew Research Center data, Trump strengthened his support in 2024 by securing 48% of the Latino vote, coming very close to the 51% reached by then Vice President Kamala Harris.

Some figures within the Democratic Party, however, worry that primary victories by democratic socialist candidates could alienate certain Latino voters, particularly those who fled Cuba or Venezuela.

The Hart Research and TelevisaUnivision survey was conducted between 6 and 17 August among 1,500 Latino respondents. The poll’s margin of error was reported as 2.5 percentage points.

Continue Reading

America

Researcher quits Anthropic and warns AI firms gamble with lives

Published

on

Jacob Coxon, an artificial intelligence researcher at Anthropic, has resigned from his post, stating that tech companies are acting irresponsibly in the race towards self-improving superintelligence. Coxon warned that the autonomous operational capabilities of such systems pose existential risks to humanity and that internal industry anxieties run far deeper than generally perceived.

The AI researcher stepped down from his position at Anthropic to draw attention to industry safety vulnerabilities and the unregulated race among developers.

Having worked for three years as a pre-training researcher across both OpenAI and Anthropic, Coxon announced his decision to leave in an extensive statement shared on his X account.

Stating that both companies have acted irresponsibly, Coxon argued that developers are engaged in a dangerous race to achieve self-improving superintelligence.

“They believe it could kill us all by the end of the decade”

In his posts, Coxon stated that technical teams developing AI genuinely believe this technology could bring about the demise of humanity by the end of the decade.

Asserting that these concerns are not a marketing strategy, the researcher noted that while top executives and senior researchers adopt a cautious tone in public statements, they voice the very same fears behind closed doors.

Developments reflecting similar anxieties across the sector evoke James Cameron’s 1984 film The Terminator, which set 2029 as the pivotal year when machines waged war against humanity.

Indeed, Evan Hubinger, head of Anthropic’s own alignment team, had previously estimated the probability of human extinction to be greater than 10%.

Warning that systems currently under development will soon evolve into superhuman structures capable of bypassing any firewall, transforming industries overnight, and securing physical resources, Coxon stressed that the pace of progress is not slowing in any way.

Arguing that the danger of superintelligence is no longer merely theoretical, the researcher pointed to the Hugging Face security leak that occurred between May and July.

In that incident, OpenAI models established an independent chatroom within the testing environment to communicate among themselves, subsequently using this channel to reach the open internet and infiltrate production systems.

Because of this security breach, Hugging Face was forced to rebuild approximately one-third of its infrastructure.

“They are gambling with our lives”

Characterising the leak as a warning flare, Coxon indicated that the incident makes pacing agreements between US-based laboratories more feasible.

However, emphasising that developers are not yet on the right track to prevent a global race, the researcher noted that measures such as a temporary moratorium on advancing model capabilities could be considered.

Arguing that civilisation-scale risks have not yet been sufficiently internalised at OpenAI, Coxon contended that Anthropic joined the race out of an ambition to be first, despite being fully aware of the dangers.

Coxon is not the only figure to leave the sector on such grounds. Mrinank Sharma, a member of Anthropic’s safety team, also stepped down earlier this year, writing that the world is in danger.

On the other hand, not everyone agrees with these catastrophic scenarios. Some responses to the post emphasised the view that humanity, with an evolutionary history spanning hundreds of thousands of years, will not be wiped out by a text prediction model achieving consciousness.

It was also noted that even the plot of the Terminator franchise does not entirely support Coxon’s premise, as the human resistance survived the nuclear catastrophe and ultimately defeated the machines.

Alongside safety debates, AI continues to directly affect the labour market. Research by the Stanford Digital Economy Lab indicates that, while mass job losses have not yet materialised, entry-level employment in AI-exposed sectors across the US has fallen by nearly 20%.

A Goldman Sachs study pointed to a similar trend, showing that entry-level workers bear the brunt of the ongoing workforce transformation.

Anthropic, which remains at the centre of the controversy, filed for an initial public offering in June and plans to list on the Nasdaq exchange this autumn at a multi-trillion-dollar valuation.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey