Connect with us

Russia

Putin says Russia did not start war and warns of nuclear risks

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed the traditional plenary session moderated by Fyodor Lukyanov, research director of the Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club, a Russia-based think tank.

Stating that a profound rupture has occurred in world politics, Putin said humanity faces its greatest perils at a time when the international security architecture has collapsed and former legal norms have been abandoned.

Opening the session, Fyodor Lukyanov, research director of the Valdai Discussion Club, noted that the concepts of change, responsibility, and composure stood out during the three-day forum. Recalling that the annual report they prepared this year was titled “No Panic”, Lukyanov said: “Under such complex conditions, we propose avoiding the most erroneous step: succumbing to unnecessary panic.”

Lukyanov noted that international turmoil is gathering pace with every passing day and handed over the floor to the Russian leader.

“We were confronted with war”

Addressing the war in Ukraine, the most urgent issue on the international agenda, Putin evaluated the origins of the crisis. Recalling that certain quarters question Moscow’s rhetoric of peace, Russian President Putin said: “The question ‘Russia speaks of peace, but started the war itself’ is on the minds of many experts. From this podium, I want to state the truth once more. The truth is that we did not want the war, and we did not start it; they began fighting us.”

Stating that for years there was an effort to turn Ukraine into an anti-Russian instrument, Putin pointed to the actions of the Western alliance.

Russian President Putin said: “There was no need to fuel aggressive nationalism and anti-Russian sentiment in Ukraine. NATO should not have attempted to establish a military foothold on our historical lands for its own ends, nor planned bases there. There was no need to encourage radicals in Kyiv toward a coup d’etat, and then equip this illegitimate administration with offensive weapons.”

Stating that the civilian population in the Crimea and Donbass regions was targeted, the Russian leader noted that military intervention was made inevitable.

Putin said: “Plans should not have been made to set up camps for the residents of Donbass and Crimea. People should not have been crushed by tanks, struck by missiles, strafed by aircraft, and burned alive simply because of their ethnic and cultural identity. Russia was deliberately brought to a point where it would be forced to defend itself with arms in the face of this blatant aggression. They dragged us to this line intentionally.”

“Let us live amicably”

Recalling that the goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia was openly proclaimed, Vladimir Putin drew attention to the scale of the threat faced.

Putin said: “Destroying Russia should not have been made into state ideology, nor should the objective of strategic defeat have been set against us. All of this was stated; no one has forgotten. We certainly do not forget. If we all wish to survive, as I have said before, let us live amicably and search together for ways to achieve this.”

Stating that establishing trust is an exceedingly fragile and arduous process, Russian President Putin pointed out that interests can never fully coincide, even among the closest partners.

Noting that for countries in competition and confrontation, balance can only be established through mutual compromise, Putin said: “The former hegemon will have to accept the realities of a multipolar world. Trends in the global economy demonstrate this clearly. The West will have to learn to cooperate with the countries that constitute the global majority, while respecting their fundamental interests.”

“The naivety of Soviet leaders caused immense harm”

Addressing the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the fundamental upheavals experienced over the past 35 years, Russian leader Putin stressed that lessons must be drawn from history.

Recalling that millions of people found themselves across borders overnight, Putin shared his criticisms of the Moscow leadership of that era. Putin said: “One must acknowledge that the figures governing the state during the final years of the Soviet era acted with a certain naivety, excessive goodwill, and perhaps heedlessness. Blind trust in Western partners and the belief that verbal understandings would suffice caused immense harm to the Soviet Union.”

Detailing the errors of past leaders, Vladimir Putin said: “Soviet leaders wished to please the West; Western leaders, however, sought to reshape the world according to their own interests and tear away as large a share as possible from the Soviet legacy. The collapse was, above all, the outcome of imbalances that had accumulated internally and management errors committed across generations. Embracing narrow ideological dogmas rather than pragmatism, sweeping problems under the carpet, and professional inadequacy drove the system to collapse.”

Sharing the 1990 foresight of Egon Bahr, one of the leaders of Germany’s Social Democratic Party, with the audience, Putin drew attention to the warnings issued at that time.

Describing Bahr’s proposals to prevent division in post-Cold War Europe, Putin said: “Bahr was concerned about the continuation of confrontation in Europe following German reunification and the strengthening of anti-cooperation circles within NATO. Bahr warned: ‘If decisive steps are not taken to overcome the division of Europe into hostile blocs, developments could evolve in a negative direction that condemns the Soviet Union to international isolation.'”

“The objective was to dismember the Russian Federation as well”

Stating that Egon Bahr proposed a joint security council encompassing Eastern and Central Europe, in which both Moscow and Washington would participate with broad authorities, Putin noted that the West did not choose this path.

The Russian leader said: “Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the forces that took the reins in the West disregarded the internal political transformations in Russia and continued to view this country as the core backbone of the historical Russian Empire. The objective was to completely isolate and dismember the Russian Federation. This mindset lies at the root of the dangerous situation we face today in Europe and across the world.”

Evaluating the relationship between historical heritage and visions of the future, Putin stated that it is an imperative for nations to respect their past.

Stating, however, that one cannot remain fixated on the past, Russian President Putin said: “Our nation requires a forward-looking perspective. However magnificent the achievements of our ancestors may be, we cannot turn into a museum showcasing past greatness. True state greatness is possible by capturing the spirit of the times and, if possible, moving ahead of the era. While preserving our historical roots, we must focus on the vibrant productive environment of the future.”

“Can we be certain nuclear weapons will never be used? Of course not”

Pointing to the possibility that tensions in world politics could spiral out of control, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted that sensible diplomacy has been abandoned in crisis management.

Emphasising that escalation policies yield reciprocal consequences, Putin warned: “Those who reject realistic diplomacy escalate tensions, call bluffs, and violate red lines in the hope of crushing the opposing side. Yet escalation is never unilateral; provocative steps are met with counter-steps. Arrogance and overconfidence are driving humanity to the edge of the abyss.”

Referring to the existence of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction, Putin recalled a well-known rule of dramatic literature.

Putin said: “In the arsenals of the great powers are weapons capable of destroying all life on earth. Can we be certain these weapons will never be used? Of course not. There is a rule we all know: if a rifle hangs on the stage at the beginning of a play, that rifle will eventually fire. The more irreconcilable the conflict becomes, and the more openly strategic defeat objectives are articulated, the higher the probability that the struggle will move into its most destructive phase.”

“The UN is governed less democratically”

Stating that the global regulatory mechanisms established after the Second World War fail to meet contemporary requirements, the Russian President said there is a need for comprehensive reform in international institutions.

Criticising the current structure of the United Nations, Putin said: “Although the United Nations is the most broadly representative body, in practice it is governed through methods far less participatory and democratic than originally conceived. Western countries, which constitute a numerical minority in the world, dominate the organisation’s mechanisms disproportionately and attempt to monopolise its governance.”

Pointing out that the centre of gravity across the world has shifted, Putin noted that countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East must attain the standing they deserve in decision-making processes.

Recalling that Russia supports an equitable reform of the United Nations, Putin said: “The transformation of the organisation does not consist merely of expanding the Security Council. Renewing the substance of its activities, ensuring geographical justice, and reflecting the will of the global majority within the institutions are essential. Yet such a consensus does not appear easy under present conditions.”

“Artificial intelligence could turn into digital totalitarianism”

Devoting substantial space to the threats technological progress poses to the future of humanity, Vladimir Putin issued warnings regarding the unregulated use of artificial intelligence.

Emphasising that the impact of algorithms on human morality and cultural heritage must be examined meticulously, the Russian leader said: “The proliferation of artificial intelligence carries the danger of uniformisation by making all of society dependent on algorithms programmed by specific centres. Such digital totalitarianism would create a dead end as dangerous as the dark and inhumane totalitarian regimes of the past.”

Stating that developments in biotechnology and genetics have reached levels capable of fundamentally altering human nature, Putin noted that ethical rules must be determined on a global scale.

Addressing technologies that intervene in the realm of human creation, Putin said: “Common principles must be established on existential matters such as personality development, the steering of behaviour, and the programming of ways of thinking. Yet existing international frameworks remain under the control of a narrow segment focused on preserving its own power rather than the progress of all humanity.”

“Had Stanislav Petrov not doubted, disaster was inevitable”

Illustrating the risks of using artificial intelligence in the military domain with a historical event, Russian President Putin recounted the conduct of Soviet officer Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Petrov in 1983. Pointing to the deception produced by early-warning systems, Putin said: “In September 1983, while on duty, Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Petrov received a signal from the early-warning system indicating that the US had launched five intercontinental ballistic missiles. At that time, any algorithm would have immediately treated this as justification for a retaliatory nuclear strike. However, being an experienced officer, Petrov suspected there might be a technical malfunction, and he was proven right. Had an artificial intelligence been in his place, the outcome could have been entirely different.”

Noting that automating war technologies would yield catastrophic results, Putin stressed that machines cannot replace the human conscience. Putin warned: “Human intuition, conscience, and the capacity to take the correct decision in unexpected moments do not exist in machines. Defining the boundaries of artificial intelligence in the security sphere is a matter of survival for humanity. Turning conflicts into computer games and reducing bloodshed to an ordinary mechanical routine leads to the brutalisation of humanity.”

“Eyes have been shut to global catastrophes”

Stating that profound polarisation in world politics has pushed common human problems into the background, the Russian leader noted that issues such as the climate crisis, environmental pollution, poverty, and income inequality are being ignored.

Vladimir Putin said: “In an environment of international tension, urgent global issues concerning all humanity have been sacrificed. The topics of climate, ecology, and poverty, which were continuously debated until recently, have been cast aside. No hope remains that the current international community will resolve these problems on a global scale. If these issues cannot be addressed globally, solutions must be generated on regional platforms.”

Emphasising that the broader Eurasian region constitutes Russia’s fundamental living space, Vladimir Putin noted that the transition to a multipolar order will be painful.

Reiterating at the conclusion of his address that establishing a new balance will take time, Putin concluded: “We will continue to work for the security and prosperity of our own geography, above all our shared home of Eurasia. Although the road ahead is fraught with uncertainty, Russia is determined to build a shared future with all countries willing to cooperate on the basis of equality and mutual respect.”

Russia

Russia relaxes diesel export curbs after talks with Trump

Published

on

Russia has announced that it will ship 500,000 tonnes of diesel fuel to the global market under a partial lifting of its diesel export ban, enacted as part of measures concerning the Ukraine crisis and energy markets.

A statement from the Russian government said the decision was implemented in accordance with understandings reached between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump.

Under the decision, which came into effect on 10 October, an initial phase of 500,000 tonnes of diesel fuel will be supplied to the global market.

“Following the rescinded decision, Russian oil companies, in coordination with the government, will immediately begin signing diesel fuel supply contracts with foreign business partners,” the government statement said.

Assessing the matter, Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandr Novak stressed that the decision would not affect the interests of Russian consumers.

Noting that diesel fuel is produced from Russian crude at domestic refineries, Novak stated that production volumes are sufficient both to meet all domestic market requirements in full and to ship the specified quantities to the global market.

The ban on diesel fuel exports in Russia was initially put into effect on 31 January 2026, covering only non-producing companies.

The government tightened the restrictions on 9 July by expanding them to include direct producers. Previously announced to remain in place until the end of October, the ban was partially relaxed in light of current developments.

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump held a telephone conversation on 9 October. Following the call, US President Trump announced that an agreement had been reached on the supply of Russian diesel.

Trump said Russia had agreed to send more than 300,000 tonnes of fuel to American and global markets in the initial phase, 500,000 tonnes in November, and 1 million tonnes thereafter.

Trump also stated that an additional shipment of 3 million tonnes could follow at a later stage, adding that they expect this agreement to reduce diesel fuel prices rapidly.

Following the conversation, the US Department of the Treasury, on Trump’s instructions, issued a temporary general licence exempting Russian diesel fuel transactions and shipments to the US—previously prohibited under sanctions—until 7 April 2027.

Putin, in a statement after the call, confirmed Russia’s readiness to supply crude oil and petroleum products to American and global markets, noting that this would have a positive impact on the world economy.

Putin also noted that the two leaders discussed prospects for resolving the conflict in Ukraine, the situation surrounding Iran, and bilateral relations, agreeing to maintain contacts through presidential envoys, intelligence agencies, and other institutions.

A statement issued by Novak’s office after the call said Russia was prepared to ship diesel to the US within October.

Novak stated that export volumes could be increased in November and December as refineries emerge from scheduled maintenance.

Novak also conveyed that Moscow views positively Washington’s steps towards stabilising the global energy market and normalising energy trade.

Continue Reading

Russia

Drone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region

Published

on

A drone strike has hit a data centre belonging to Russian internet company Yandex in the town of Sasovo, located in the Ryazan region.

The company announced that a fire triggered by the attack damaged part of the infrastructure and resulted in a complete shutdown of the facility’s operations. No casualties or injuries were reported in the incident.

In a statement, Yandex said competent authorities and relevant teams were working at the scene to remediate the damage.

Owing to the facility being knocked offline, it was noted that some of the company’s online services might temporarily become inaccessible to users.

The company provided no details regarding the financial scale of the damage or when the data centre would be brought back into service.

Shares slide, cloud infrastructure curbs introduced

Following the developments, Yandex shares fell by more than 3.4% as of 10:10 Türkiye time.

A drone threat alert was reportedly communicated to residents of the Ryazan region at 23:48 on the night of 7 October, with the alarm lifted at 02:46 on the morning of 8 October. The facility in Sasovo had commenced operations in 2014.

In an advisory issued via the Yandex Cloud Alerts channel, it was reported that power issues were occurring in the system’s “ru-central1-b” availability zone.

The company stated that efforts to transfer data workloads to other availability zones had been completed and that services in other zones continued to operate normally.

However, it was noted that temporary restrictions could be imposed on the creation of new resources within the cloud infrastructure. According to data from outage-monitoring platform Downdetector, an increase in user complaints concerning Yandex, Yandex Cloud, and the real estate platform CIAN was recorded on the morning of 8 October. Reports were observed to have originated predominantly from Moscow and surrounding regions.

Data centre targeted for first time after logistics warehouses

Whether the attack directly targeted the data centre remains unconfirmed. Nevertheless, as of 8 October, this went on record as the first drone strike directed at data centres in Russia.

Beginning in the summer months of 2026, warehouses belonging to Russia’s leading e-commerce platforms had faced drone attacks.

Fires at several warehouses owned by the company Wildberries caused hundreds of billions of roubles in losses for sellers, after which logistics centres belonging to the company Ozon were also targeted.

Both companies amended their contractual terms, shifting liability for damages arising from attacks onto sellers.

Yandex facilities had previously experienced a widespread outage on 30 March 2025 due to a transformer failure, which temporarily disabled services including Yandex Cloud, Yandex Music, and Yandex Lavka.

Continue Reading

Russia

US and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines

Published

on

Senior officials from Russia and the US have reportedly discussed involving an American investor in the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines.

According to a report by the Reuters news agency based on five sources, those taking part in contacts included Kirill Dmitriyev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and the Russian president’s special representative for investment and economic cooperation with foreign states, and Jared Kushner, son-in-law of the US leader.

Two sources providing information on the scope of the discussions said that while it remains unclear how detailed the consideration of the Nord Stream topic was, the matter nevertheless remains on the agenda.

Kushner reportedly views business-oriented cooperation as an instrument in initiatives aimed at ending the war in Ukraine.

A potential agreement could reportedly offer US investors an opportunity to profit from energy shipments to Europe once the war ends.

White House states no recent contacts have taken place

A White House official told Reuters that no negotiations regarding Nord Stream have been conducted recently.

The official emphasised that any agreement with Russia would require approval from the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and the US Department of the Treasury, adding that such steps must yield benefits for US taxpayers and companies.

Another US official described reaching an understanding in the medium term as unlikely due to existing obstacles.

The natural gas pipelines are subject to US and European Union sanctions. A spokesperson for the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy stated that the approval of the German federal government is mandatory for the pipelines to be brought back into service, adding that the Berlin administration does not support such a step.

The spokesperson also recalled that Germany has secured alternative supplies to Russian gas.

The ownership structure of Nord Stream also features among the issues complicating the ground for negotiations.

In the consortium operating the project, Russian energy giant Gazprom holds a 51% stake, while the combined share of two German partners stands at 31%.

The remaining shares are held by France- and Netherlands-based companies.

A source speaking to the agency stated that the German partners wish to retain their stakes in order to preserve their influence in the project should Gazprom’s shares be sold.

What had American investor Lynch proposed?

The concept of involving a US financier in the Nord Stream projects had also surfaced in 2024.

American investor Stephen Lynch, founder of Monte Valle Partners, who conducted commercial activities in Russia for 20 years, had applied to the US administration for a licence allowing him to bid if the Nord Stream 2 pipeline were put up for auction.

Lynch described this potential move as an opportunity to keep Europe’s energy supply under control until the fossil-fuel era ends, as well as leverage against Russia in peace negotiations.

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party described the possibility of transferring the pipeline to Lynch as an illustration of the German government’s irrational policy.

Separately, The New York Times (NYT) reported earlier this month that Ukraine-related contacts between Russia and the US were expanding to include a multi-billion-dollar oil deal covering Lukoil’s foreign assets.

The assets in question included Lukoil’s refineries in Eastern Europe as well as filling stations in the US.

NYT sources reported that discussions in this framework were also addressed during a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin, Steven Witkoff, and Kushner.

The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines took place in September 2022, with three of the four lines damaged by explosions.

One string of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which had not yet been commissioned at the time, remained intact.

The Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) classified the incident as an act of international terrorism, while Putin claimed that “Anglo-Saxons” were behind the attack.

In investigations into the incident, judicial proceedings were pursued against several Ukrainian citizens, including professional diver Vladimir Juravlyov, suspected of planting explosives off the island of Bornholm, and Sergey Kuznetsov, who allegedly skippered the yacht Andromeda.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey