Connect with us

Middle East

UAE weighs direct military role to break Iranian blockade of Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

The United Arab Emirates is preparing to support the US and other allies in a potential military intervention to forcefully reopen the Strait of Hormuz following recent Iranian provocations, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. Should this maneuver proceed, the UAE could become the first Gulf nation to engage directly in the brewing conflict.

Arab officials indicate that the UAE is spearheading diplomatic efforts to secure a UN Security Council resolution authorizing military action to ensure the passage remains open. An Emirati official noted that diplomats are actively calling on the US, alongside military powers in Europe and Asia, to form a coalition for collective action.

The official emphasized that the Iranian leadership is increasingly prepared to use its leverage over the Strait of Hormuz as a weapon against the global economy. Consequently, the UAE is “actively evaluating” the assumption of a direct military role to guarantee the security of the waterway.

Abu Dhabi weighs mine-clearing and logistics support

Emirati officials are currently assessing specific military contributions, including mine-clearing operations and a range of logistical support services. Some Arab officials have further suggested that the US should intervene on several Iranian-controlled islands within the strategic strait. This includes Abu Musa, an island claimed by the UAE but held by Iran for nearly half a century.

In a statement, the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointed to a separate UN resolution condemning Iranian attacks on Emirati cities and a declaration from the International Maritime Organization denouncing the closure of the strait. The ministry asserted that a “broad global consensus” exists regarding the necessity of protecting freedom of navigation in the region.

Tensions harden across Gulf capitals

The report suggests a shifting tide in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, where leadership is increasingly advocating for sustained pressure until the Iranian regime is neutralized or deposed. However, these nations have yet to commit their own military forces to direct combat.

Bahrain, a close US ally and host to the US Navy’s 5th Fleet, is also expected to support the UN resolution. Despite the push for action, analysts warn that the UAE’s active participation carries significant risks. Transitioning into an overt belligerent against Iran could ignite long-term regional tensions that persist far beyond the immediate conflict.

In response to these developments, Tehran has intensified its campaign against the UAE. After weeks of low-level activity, missile and drone strikes have surged, with approximately 50 ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones targeting the UAE on Tuesday alone. Tehran has explicitly warned that any Gulf nation supporting operations against Iranian territory will see its vital civilian infrastructure targeted, specifically singling out the UAE.

The escalation has already begun to erode the UAE economy. The persistent threat of strikes has disrupted air traffic and tourism, chilled the real estate market, and triggered a wave of furloughs and layoffs. Furthermore, the violence is undermining the UAE’s carefully curated image as a “safe haven” in a volatile region.

Abu Dhabi has retaliated with stringent financial and administrative measures. Emirates airline recently announced it would no longer permit Iranian citizens to enter or transit through the country—a move that follows the government-mandated closure of the Iranian Hospital and the Iranian Club Dubai.

Hormuz: A “matter of vital survival” for Abu Dhabi

The UAE’s pivot is most evident in its resolve to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a passage described as critical for the nation’s energy exports, shipping lanes, and food security. Gulf officials believe that hesitant European and Asian nations will join a clearing operation if it receives the imprimatur of the UN Security Council.

However, the path to a resolution remains fraught. Russia and China are expected to exercise their veto power, while France has proposed a competing draft. Even in the absence of a UN mandate, officials suggest the UAE is prepared to join the war effort.

Military experts caution that a forced reopening of the strait is a formidable undertaking. Such an operation would likely require control over not just the waterway itself, but a 100-mile corridor of surrounding land. Adam Smith, the ranking Democrat on the US House Armed Services Committee, warned that Iran needs only a single drone, mine, or suicide boat to keep the strait under constant threat.

Nevertheless, the UAE possesses significant military and logistical assets. Its strategic bases, the deep-water port at Jebel Ali, and its proximity to the mouth of the strait are vital. These assets could be deployed for island interventions or to provide “shotgun” security for commercial tankers.

The UAE also boasts a small but potent air force. Its US-made F-16s have previously flown alongside US jets in operations against ISIS in Iraq. Backed by surveillance drones and a significant stockpile of US-supplied munitions, the UAE is positioned to alleviate the logistical strain on US and Israeli forces in a prolonged engagement.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey