A new paper published by the World Bank suggests that the billions of dollars spent by rich countries on CO2-intensive products such as red meat and dairy products should be redirected towards more ‘climate-friendly’ options such as poultry, fruit and vegetables.<\/p>\n
The bank argues that this is one of the most cost-effective ways to save the planet from ‘climate change’.<\/p>\n
According to POLITICO, the ‘politically sensitive’ proposal is one of several the World Bank has put forward to reduce pollution from the agriculture and food sector, which it says is responsible for nearly a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.<\/p>\n
We have to stop destroying the planet while we feed ourselves,’ Julian Lampietti, the World Bank’s director of global practice for agriculture and food, told POLITICO.<\/p>\n
The work comes at a strategic diplomatic moment, as signatories to the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius prepare to update their climate plans by the end of 2025.<\/p>\n
While the world needs to accelerate emissions cuts to meet the Paris Agreement’s goals, the World Bank wants officials to pay more attention to the agriculture and food sector, which it says has long been neglected and underfunded.<\/p>\n
To be serious about achieving zero emissions by 2050 – a common goal for developed economies – countries need to invest $260 billion a year in these sectors, the report says. That is 18 times more than countries are currently investing.<\/p>\n
The World Bank argues that governments could partially close this gap by redirecting subsidies for red meat and dairy towards lower-carbon alternatives. The Bank argues that this shift is one of the most cost-effective ways for rich countries to reduce demand for highly polluting foods, which are estimated to produce around 20 per cent of global agri-food emissions.<\/p>\n
As a result, the climate impact will be reflected in the cost of food, he adds.<\/p>\n
Full-cost pricing of animal-based foods to reflect their true planetary costs would make low-emissions food options more competitive,” the report says, suggesting that switching to plant-based diets could save twice as much planet-warming gases as other methods.<\/p>\n
Meat and dairy production account for nearly 60 percent of agri-food emissions, according to the World Bank.<\/p>\n
Lampietti warns against focusing too much on “what not to do” and suggests paying more attention to “what to do”. Food is a ‘deeply personal choice’, Lampietti said, adding that he fears the debate, which should be data-driven, could turn into a culture war.<\/p>\n
The biggest concern is that people start using this as a political football,” he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A new paper published by the World Bank suggests that the billions of dollars spent by rich countries on CO2-intensive products such as red meat and dairy products should be redirected towards more ‘climate-friendly’ options such as poultry, fruit and vegetables. The bank argues that this is one of the most cost-effective ways to save […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4286,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[175],"tags":[2084,2330,2331,2332,1154],"class_list":["post-4285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diplomacy","tag-climate","tag-climate-plan","tag-co2","tag-julian-lampietti","tag-world-bank"],"yoast_head":"\n