Connect with us

Asia

Afghan Taliban warns Pakistan against any attack

Published

on

It has been crystal clear that Pakistan has been the Afghan Taliban’s key foreign sponsors for decades. Relations between them were indestructible. Some Taliban officials also called Pakistan their second home. They were like iron-brothers, and the previous government had always complained about their relations and accused Pakistan for harboring Taliban leadership for the past 20 years.

But since the Taliban seized power in August 2021, its ties with Islamabad have deteriorated amid deadly border clashes and some other issues, especially disagreement over Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, TTP.

Initially Taliban wanted to play a mediator role between Pakistan and TTP and they agreed for a ceasefire but last month, it came to an end and TTP intensified their attacks.

Taliban had earlier also said that Islamabad is permitting its air space to be used by US drones to strike targets in Afghanistan. In return, Pakistan has accused the Taliban of harboring terrorists.

What we get from this discrepancy is that the two long standing alliances, which dates back to the emergence of Taliban in 1999s, are coming under unprecedented strain due to divergence in their interests.

When attacks were intensified in Pakistan, the officials directly accused Afghan Taliban for harboring TTP members, and when border clashes happened, Pakistani officials called on Taliban to strengthen border security, dubbed it as failure. Pakistan had warned to take military action against terrorists in Afghanistan if needed.

Pakistan to attack TTP in Afghanistan soil

The Interior Minister of Pakistan, Rana Sanaullah said that it is the right of Islamabad to act against insurgents’ hideouts “in Afghanistan” if its nation is threatened by such groups.

In an interview with Express News, Sanaullah said Islamabad may attack the TTP hideouts in Afghanistan if Kabul does not take action to dismantle them.

“When these problems arise, we first ask Afghanistan, our Islamic brother nation, to eliminate these hideouts and handover these individuals to us, but if that doesn’t happen, what you mentioned is possible,” Sanaullah said.

Sanaullah did not go further, but since the Taliban took over Afghanistan in 2021, Pakistan has witnessed a sharp rise in terrorism incidents mostly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.

According to the statistics by an Islamabad-based think tank Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS), compared to November in December 2022 the number of militant attacks increased by 44%, and majority of them were claimed by TTP.

In December 2022, the militants carried out 49 attacks, in which 56 people lost their lives, including 32 security forces personnel. 17 civilians were also killed.

In August 2022, Abdul Wali, aka Omar Khalid Khorasani, top commander of TTP, who was allegedly behind some of the deadliest attacks in recent years, was killed in a roadside bomb in eastern Afghanistan. Three of his accomplices were also killed in the incident. TTP vowed revenge.

Taliban says ready to defend from Afghanistan

Reacting to Sanaullah’s statement to attack TTP on Afghanistan soil, the Taliban government said it would not let anyone attack Islamic Emirate.

Taliban defense ministry in a statement said, “Afghanistan is not without its owner, as always, we are ready to defend the territorial integrity and independence of our homeland, and it is mentionable we have a better experience than anyone in defending and protecting our country.”

The Taliban also called Sanaullah’s statement “provocative and baseless”, and requested that any concerns and problems should be resolved through understanding.

Taliban Spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid also said: “No country has the right to attack the territory of another country. No law in the world allows such a violation. If someone is concerned, then he can share it with the Islamic Emirate.”

Mujahid said that the “Islamic Emirate” has enough forces and can take measures to resolve any issues.

Mujahid furthered that Afghanistan wants good ties with Pakistan and the officials of this country should be cautious with their assertions.

TTP forms new cabinet

Recently, the Khorasan Diary (TKD) publication reported that the TTP has announced its new appointments dividing the outfit into various ministries.

“Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has announced its new appointments dividing the outfit into various ministries, Defense, Judiciary, Information, Political affairs, Economic Affairs, Education, a fatwa issuing authority, Intelligence and a department for construction,” TTP said in a statement.

The statement is a direct warning and clear call to fight against the Pakistani military establishment and civilian government.  In a viral video, TTP commander Omar Shahid can be seen threatening to launch a “religious war” against the government of Pakistan.

“We are offering sacrifices in Pakistan jihad following the footsteps of the Prophet’s Companions in the Battle of Badr. God willing, we shall liberate Pakistan and break the shackles of slavery,” Shahid is heard saying in the video.

The end game

It remains to be seen whether Kabul and Islamabad will be able to carve out differences and work for the interests of either the countries, or whether they will make a mistake to lead into cross border clashes.

Afghanistan has openly told Pakistan that don’t make mistakes by attackiuing Afghanistan as it will meet with reaction. The Taliban was serious and said they have experience how to defend from the motherland. In the past 20 years, Taliban fought with the US and former Afghan security forces and also already fought with Pakistani soldiers several times since August 15, 2021.

In case of clashes, both the countries will suffer a lot because war never brings peace. Afghanistan and Pakistan politicians should resolve any issues peacefully and this is the only way forward.

Asia

Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says

Published

on

The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.

According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.

The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.

The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.

The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.

The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.

According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.

Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House

The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.

In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.

In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.

According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.

Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.

Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.

Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.

Continue Reading

Asia

Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices

Published

on

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.

Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.

The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.

According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”

Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).

Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.

During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.

Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.

Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.

The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.

“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.

Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.

Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers

Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.

In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.

Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.

The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.

Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.

Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks

Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.

A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”

The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.

At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.

According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.

Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.

A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.

Continue Reading

Asia

South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants

Published

on

South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.

The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.

Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.

Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”

“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.

Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.

The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.

Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.

Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.

According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.

South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.

South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.

The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.

Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.

After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey