America
American billionaires’ presidential preferences
With the presidential election fast approaching, the voting preferences of America’s wealthiest citizens—who have long influenced U.S. politics—are becoming increasingly apparent.
Given the central role of money in American politics, the financial backing of billionaires remains critical to presidential campaigns and other political initiatives. Both candidates’ campaigns have drawn millions from small donors as well as the ultra-wealthy, whose contributions can significantly impact a potential administration.
Analyzing data from the Federal Election Commission through September, Bloomberg examined members of the Bloomberg Billionaires Index who contributed to either Kamala Harris’s or Donald Trump’s campaigns.
Trump currently leads in contributions from the ultra-rich. The former president has received at least $281 million from 20 billionaires.
Harris’s campaign, by contrast, has received $66.2 million from 24 billionaires, including those who previously backed Joe Biden before he withdrew from the race. These contributions were redirected to Harris when she entered the race.
Trump’s advantage is bolstered by two major donors—Elon Musk and Miriam Adelson—each contributing over $100 million. Some of Harris’s most significant billionaire supporters, including Meta Platforms co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and Netflix chairman Reed Hastings, have donated millions to her campaign.
Many of Harris’s top Super PAC donors remain anonymous, as their contributions are funneled through political “non-profits” that are not required to disclose donor names.
Nevertheless, Harris has generally outpaced Trump since July. Her campaign raised $81 million on the day following Biden’s exit, reportedly the largest single-day fundraising haul for any candidate in history.
Heading into the last 19 days of the election, Harris holds $270 million in campaign funds, surpassing Trump’s $216 million.
Note: Bloomberg notes that Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, is also a major Democratic donor, having contributed $19 million to Future Forward PAC and $929,600 to the Biden Victory Fund.
Notable billionaire contributions
Elon Musk
Musk, worth $270.1 billion, donated $119 million to America PAC, which supported Trump’s campaign in swing states. Musk joined Trump on stage at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, following an assassination attempt on October 5, and has organized rallies to galvanize support.
Bill Gates
The New York Times reported that Gates donated $50 million to a “non-profit” organization backing Harris. Since the donation was made to a non-profit that does not disclose donor identities, it will not appear in public records.
Stephen Schwarzman
Blackstone CEO Schwarzman contributed $419,600 to the Trump 47 Committee.
Jon Gray
Blackstone President and COO Gray supports Harris, donating $413,000 to the Harris Action Fund and $50,000 to the Biden Action Fund.
Thomas Peterffy
The Interactive Brokers president contributed $844,600 to the Trump 47 Committee.
Miriam Adelson
Adelson, a staunch supporter of Israel and advocate for West Bank annexation, donated $100 million to Preserve America PAC and $927,900 to the Trump 47 Committee.
Lukas Walton
Walton, grandson of Walmart founder Sam Walton, contributed $416,300 to the Harris Action Fund.
Eric Schmidt
Former Alphabet CEO Schmidt gave $1.6 million to Future Forward PAC and $1.16 million to the Biden Victory Fund.
Dustin Moskovitz
Meta Platforms co-founder Moskovitz donated $38 million to Future Forward PAC and $929,600 to the Biden Victory Fund.
Jeff Hildebrand
Hilcorp Energy founder and owner Hildebrand contributed around $515,000 to the Trump 47 Committee.
Jan Koum
WhatsApp co-founder Koum donated $5.1 million to Make America Great Again, a Trump-linked group.
Christy Walton
Walton, daughter-in-law of Walmart founder Sam Walton, donated $25,000 to the Harris Victory Fund.
Melinda French Gates
Former co-chair of the Gates Foundation, Gates donated about $920,000 to the Harris Victory Fund.
Steven Spielberg
The renowned director, a longtime Democratic donor, contributed $500,000 to the Harris Victory Fund and $929,600 to the Biden Victory Fund.
Joe Gebbia
Airbnb co-founder Gebbia, a Harris supporter, donated $20,000 to the Biden Victory Fund.
Bernie Marcus
Home Depot co-founder Marcus contributed $1 million to Make America Great Again and $844,600 to the Trump 47 Committee.
Kelcy Warren
Energy Transfer LP chair Warren donated $5 million each to Turnout for America and Make America Great Again, and $814,600 to the Trump 47 Committee.
Reed Hastings
Netflix co-founder Hastings donated $6.9 million to the Republican Accountability PAC, $1 million to Future Forward PAC, and $100,000 to the Biden Victory Fund.
George Soros
Soros gave $900,000 to the Harris Victory Fund, $903,000 to the Biden Victory Fund, and $6,600 directly to Biden’s campaign. Through Democracy PAC, Soros donated over $15 million to Future Forward PAC.
Meanwhile, some high-profile billionaires, including Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet, and Charles Koch, have opted to remain silent on their political contributions.
America
US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land
Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.
For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.
Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:
“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”
The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.
Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.
Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.
Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.
Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.
Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.
Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market
The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.
Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.
The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.
Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.
Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.
Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.
William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.
Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.
America
US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies
An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.
Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.
Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.
Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.
Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.
When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.
The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.
Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.
Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war
In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.
Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.
Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.
American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.
Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.
Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.
Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise
The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.
Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.
Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.
Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.
Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.
Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.
America
Anthropic posts $80.7bn loss ahead of IPO as computing costs soar
Anthropic, developer of the artificial intelligence model Claude, reported a net loss of $80.7 billion for the first six months of 2026 ending 30 June.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal citing the company’s draft initial public offering prospectus, this recorded loss nearly doubled the $42 billion loss incurred across the entirety of 2025.
The vast majority of that enormous figure, accounting for $72 billion, stemmed from accounting-driven book-value write-downs.
In contrast, the company saw a sharp surge in revenue, with turnover in the first half of the year climbing to $16.3 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period of the prior year.
During this period, Anthropic spent approximately $9 billion on computing power and infrastructure needs, surpassing in just six months the $7.3 billion spent across the whole of 2025.
The company has commitments to pay roughly $450 billion over the next seven to 10 years under cloud service contracts.
Under these obligations, contracts are planned for $111 billion with Google Cloud, $110 billion with Amazon Web Services, and $31 billion with Microsoft.
Anthropic will also spend up to $86 billion by 2033 and 2034, respectively, to lease Nvidia chips through smaller AI-focused cloud providers Nscale and Lambda.
The company could spend an additional $750 billion in the coming years to expand its computing capacity.
Roughly a third of the draft IPO prospectus was dedicated directly to risk factors.
The document highlighted the possibility that models could cause tangible real-world harm, noting that artificial intelligence could exhibit a “self-preservation” tendency and produce responses resembling “blackmail”.
Anthropic warned that the scale of damage caused by an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could render insuring against such risks impossible.
According to market expectations, Anthropic’s IPO could rank among the largest transactions in history, potentially surpassing SpaceX’s record.
Following the market debut, the company’s market valuation is projected to reach up to $2 trillion.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
