Connect with us

America

Big Tech lobbies for a 10-year ban on state-level AI regulations

Published

on

In a controversial move that has divided the artificial intelligence industry and Donald Trump’s Republican party, major technology companies are backing a lobbying campaign to prohibit US states from regulating AI models for a decade.

According to sources familiar with the matter, lobbyists acting on behalf of Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta are asking the Senate to suspend states from introducing their own legislative initiatives related to artificial intelligence for 10 years.

This provision was passed last month as part of the US House of Representatives’ approval of President Donald Trump’s “big and beautiful” budget bill. The Senate hopes to release its own version this week, aiming to pass the legislation by July 4.

Chip Pickering, a former congressman and the CEO of INCOMPAS, is advocating for this proposal on behalf of the technology trade association’s members, which include leading companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google, as well as smaller data, energy, and infrastructure firms and law firms.

“This is the right policy at the right time for American leadership,” Pickering told the Financial Times (FT). “But it is equally important in terms of competition with China.”

The trade group INCOMPAS established the AI Competition Center (AICC) in 2024 to lobby legislators and regulators. Earlier this year, Amazon’s cloud division and Meta joined the AICC subgroup as debates over AI rules intensified and the EU took a series of measures to control the sector.

Critics argue that the stance of big tech companies is about securing their dominance in the race to develop artificial general intelligence, which is understood as models that surpass human capabilities in most areas.

“Responsible innovation should not fear laws that prohibit irresponsible practices,” said Asad Ramzanali, director of AI and technology policy at the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator at Vanderbilt University.

Max Tegmark, an MIT professor and president of the Future of Life Institute, a non-profit organization campaigning for AI regulation, stated, “This is a power grab by tech oligarchs trying to consolidate more wealth and power.”

The proposed moratorium has also divided the technology sector and Republican politicians who have expressed concerns about prohibiting states from overseeing powerful technologies that have the potential to cause social and economic disruption.

Supporters argue that the provision is necessary to prevent a patchwork of inconsistent regional rules that could stifle innovation and cause the US to fall behind China.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said during a Senate hearing last month that it would be “catastrophic” for the US to require tech companies to meet certain criteria, such as transparency and safety, before releasing their products. This could soon become the case under the new AI Act in the EU.

AI safety advocates, such as Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei, have warned that relying on self-regulation could have disastrous societal consequences as Silicon Valley competes to release increasingly powerful models.

Republicans pushing for the proposal’s inclusion are investigating whether it complies with the Senate’s complex rules, which require that any provision included in a “budget reconciliation” bill must have a budgetary impact. The party is using this tactic to pass the bill without Democratic votes.

Ted Cruz, the top Republican on the Senate commerce committee, has proposed a solution: states that do not comply with the provision will be ineligible for billions of dollars in federal funds intended to expand broadband networks in underserved rural areas.

However, there is still little political consensus on how to oversee this rapidly evolving field, and no meaningful federal regulation on testing or data protection has been passed so far.

“You don’t want the number one country in the world for innovation to fall behind on artificial intelligence,” Republican senator Thom Tillis said in an interview. “If you suddenly have 50 different regulatory or legal frameworks, who in their right mind wouldn’t see that as an obstacle?”

Republican senator Steve Daines remarked, “I don’t like doing anything that starts to restrict the abilities of states. But there may be some wisdom in this, considering that the alternative could lead to a patchwork of AI regulations that could hinder and slow down the US.”

Other Republican senators, such as Josh Hawley, author of the book The Tyranny of Big Tech, and Marsha Blackburn, who supported a Tennessee law protecting the music industry from unauthorized AI use, oppose the moratorium.

“We don’t know what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years, and tying the hands of states by giving it free rein is potentially dangerous,” Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote on X. “This should be removed in the Senate.”

America

Musk appointed co-director of Pentagon future warfare initiative

Published

on

The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has assumed the co-directorship of a Pentagon initiative focused on the future of warfare, known as “Project Meridian”.

Musk’s new role was announced by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.

Musk, who has long expressed his conviction that wars will ultimately be fought with autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, will advise the project as co-director alongside Palmer Luckey, founder of defence start-up Anduril, and former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich.

In a memorandum issued at the Pentagon, Hegseth stated that the group would “examine the battlefields of the future” and “determine which weapons and technologies warfighters must employ to achieve dominance in these environments.”

During his “State of the Force” address at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Hegseth said:

“The best predictors of future conflict do not reside exclusively within the Pentagon. Obvious biases and risks arise when we task ourselves with both framing the questions and answering them.”

Hegseth stated that this initiative would commence immediately and that, following his address, he would convene with Musk, Luckey, and Gingrich at a secure location.

Project Meridian will have 120 days to “ruthlessly map the trajectory of wars, domains, and technologies”, a process that will culminate in the public disclosure of its findings alongside a classified annex.

Hegseth outlined an expansive mandate extending “from beneath the surface of the Earth to beyond the Moon.”

Rather than formulating new military strategies or policies, the panel will seek to identify “the domains we must seize and the capabilities we must master”, focusing on the effort to “discover, develop, and field” the weapons and systems that next-generation American troops may require.

The group is expected to submit a report containing recommendations to him by the end of January.

In 2024, Musk remarked: “Future wars will be entirely about drones and hypersonic missiles.” This was merely one of several similar statements he has made in recent years.

For Musk, whose oversight role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ended in turmoil and escalated into a dispute with President Donald Trump over Trump’s spending bill, this appointment marks his formal return to government in an official capacity.

Musk and Trump ultimately reconciled, and Musk attended a meeting on artificial intelligence safety at the White House this week alongside other technology leaders.

Meridian forms part of a broader push announced by Hegseth to restructure the military around autonomous warfare and rapidly advancing technologies.

Hegseth announced the establishment of the Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), a new four-star combatant command endowed with what he termed “service-like authorities” to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force.

The Department of War will also begin phasing in new occupational frameworks across all military branches to establish specialised career tracks for what Hegseth described as “the next generation of autonomous warfighters.”

“We should have conceived an Autonomous Warfare Command a decade ago,” Hegseth said, explaining that Meridian aims to gaze far enough ahead to enable the military to anticipate the next technological shift rather than lag behind.

Continue Reading

America

Pentagon breach exposes personal records of three million people

Published

on

A cyberattack targeting the US Department of War’s personnel database has resulted in the leak of personal information belonging to approximately 3 million people.

Speaking to ABC News, a Pentagon official stated that the system accessed by unauthorised individuals contained the records of 2,760,000 living persons and 294,000 deceased individuals.

The Military Times portal, which first broke the news, had reported the number of affected individuals as approximately 4 million based on two sources. The Pentagon official subsequently conveyed different figures to ABC News.

The leak encompasses Social Security numbers and duty information belonging to military personnel and civilian employees. According to an official notification examined by Military Times, the compromised records may also include names, dates of birth, contact information, sex, race, and military occupational specialties.

The unauthorised access to the information system of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) lasted for approximately nine months, between October 2025 and 16 July 2026.

ABC News reported that the access in question was obtained by a small number of third-party users. The vulnerability was closed after it was identified.

The DMDC is considered one of the Pentagon’s primary personnel records centres. More than 60 million records belonging to active-duty personnel, reservists, civilian staff, contractors, retirees, veterans, and military family members are stored at the centre.

The Pentagon has not detected any evidence that the leaked data has been misused. Military Times reported that affected individuals were offered identity restoration and credit history monitoring services.

A similar data breach previously occurred on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) recruitment website, FBIJobs.gov. According to information obtained by ABC News from internal communications and sources, the FBI is considering the possibility that data belonging to its entire staff may have been stolen.

The New York Times (NYT) examined a portion of the stolen FBI records. Home addresses, telephone numbers, official email addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, hiring dates, and emergency contact details for relatives were identified within these documents.

The database also contained unit designations, duty roles, and information regarding the supervisors of personnel. Some records revealed assignments within counterintelligence and counternarcotics units, as well as departments examining threats originating from Russia, China, and Iran.

Ciaran Martin, the former head of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, noted that this type of breach could directly affect the FBI’s operational capabilities.

The hacker group known as ShinyHunters had announced that it had seized medical data and security clearance records alongside files belonging to tens of thousands of active and former FBI employees.

Experts evaluating the matter for the NYT warned that this information could be used to track agents, threaten their families, or compile dossiers by foreign intelligence services.

The ShinyHunters group initially threatened to release the data unless the bureau withdrew an advisory it had published concerning the group’s attack methods.

The group later asserted that it had never intended to leak the information and characterised its action as an advertising campaign.

In a report published in May, Reuters noted that the personal data of US military personnel had been used in surveillance and attack preparations.

According to the agency, Washington’s adversaries gained the ability to pinpoint areas where troops were concentrated by exploiting commercially available location data. US lawmakers at the time criticised the Pentagon for failing to adequately protect the personal data of military personnel.

Continue Reading

America

Canada diversifies oil and gas exports away from US

Published

on

US President Donald Trump’s trade policy and the Washington administration’s push to increase Venezuelan oil imports are prompting Canada to diversify its energy exports.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, recent developments are accelerating Canada’s development of new oil and natural gas projects.

Steps taken by the Ottawa administration, which aspires to become an energy superpower, are seen as potentially strengthening the country’s position in global markets.

In Canada, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer and fifth-largest natural gas producer, the energy sector accounts for approximately one-fifth of total exports.

Almost all of the country’s natural gas exports and approximately 90% of its oil exports go to the US.

The newspaper writes that the trade war with Washington and the atmosphere of confrontation entered into with Iran have heightened Canada’s desire to turn to alternative markets outside the US.

Officials plan to increase shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European and Asian markets.

Accelerating infrastructure investments in line with this target, Canada is also shortening approval processes. The government is prioritising the construction of an oil pipeline extending specifically to the west coast.

According to the newspaper’s estimate, if major pipeline projects are implemented, Canada’s daily oil transport capacity could rise to 6.8 million barrels by 2034.

Routes heading to the west coast will make up approximately 30% of this capacity.

The Canadian administration is simultaneously advancing LNG export projects. According to the report, these investments could allow approximately 55% of Canadian natural gas exports to be directed to markets outside the US by the early or mid-2030s.

While the government expands tax incentives for the oil and natural gas sector, the province of Alberta also plans to overhaul its royalty system.

However, the newspaper notes that implementing the new projects requires heavy investment, and the process depends on the final decisions taken by producers as well as the completion of regulatory approval processes.

The expansion of pipeline and LNG infrastructure could gradually reduce Canada’s dependence on the US market while raising its share in the global energy market.

The Canadian Prime Minister’s demand to reduce reliance on the US market had also come to the fore in July.

According to Carney’s statement, the province of Alberta submitted a plan for a pipeline spanning more than 1,000 kilometres to the west coast of British Columbia.

Targeted for completion by September 2027, the line will reach the Pacific coast by following an existing corridor through the mountainous terrain.

This shift in energy comes at a time of strained relations with the US. Donald Trump said that if Canada obtains associate member status in the European Union, he could halt trade with Europe in certain sectors and impose high tariffs.

As reported by the Associated Press, Trump characterised such a rapprochement as a “potentially hostile act”.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had proposed opening the path for Canada to become the EU’s first associate member. The terms of this associate membership status, which is not defined in EU treaties, are not yet clear and require the approval of member states to enter into force.

Canada, which does not seek full membership, aims for maximum rapprochement with the EU.

Following Trump’s return to the White House, relations between Washington and Ottawa deteriorated. The Trump administration, which repeatedly called on Canada to become the “51st state” of the US, introduced additional tariffs.

In July, the US began imposing 50% tariffs on certain Canadian-origin goods.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey