Connect with us

America

Big Tech lobbies for a 10-year ban on state-level AI regulations

Published

on

In a controversial move that has divided the artificial intelligence industry and Donald Trump’s Republican party, major technology companies are backing a lobbying campaign to prohibit US states from regulating AI models for a decade.

According to sources familiar with the matter, lobbyists acting on behalf of Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta are asking the Senate to suspend states from introducing their own legislative initiatives related to artificial intelligence for 10 years.

This provision was passed last month as part of the US House of Representatives’ approval of President Donald Trump’s “big and beautiful” budget bill. The Senate hopes to release its own version this week, aiming to pass the legislation by July 4.

Chip Pickering, a former congressman and the CEO of INCOMPAS, is advocating for this proposal on behalf of the technology trade association’s members, which include leading companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google, as well as smaller data, energy, and infrastructure firms and law firms.

“This is the right policy at the right time for American leadership,” Pickering told the Financial Times (FT). “But it is equally important in terms of competition with China.”

The trade group INCOMPAS established the AI Competition Center (AICC) in 2024 to lobby legislators and regulators. Earlier this year, Amazon’s cloud division and Meta joined the AICC subgroup as debates over AI rules intensified and the EU took a series of measures to control the sector.

Critics argue that the stance of big tech companies is about securing their dominance in the race to develop artificial general intelligence, which is understood as models that surpass human capabilities in most areas.

“Responsible innovation should not fear laws that prohibit irresponsible practices,” said Asad Ramzanali, director of AI and technology policy at the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator at Vanderbilt University.

Max Tegmark, an MIT professor and president of the Future of Life Institute, a non-profit organization campaigning for AI regulation, stated, “This is a power grab by tech oligarchs trying to consolidate more wealth and power.”

The proposed moratorium has also divided the technology sector and Republican politicians who have expressed concerns about prohibiting states from overseeing powerful technologies that have the potential to cause social and economic disruption.

Supporters argue that the provision is necessary to prevent a patchwork of inconsistent regional rules that could stifle innovation and cause the US to fall behind China.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said during a Senate hearing last month that it would be “catastrophic” for the US to require tech companies to meet certain criteria, such as transparency and safety, before releasing their products. This could soon become the case under the new AI Act in the EU.

AI safety advocates, such as Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei, have warned that relying on self-regulation could have disastrous societal consequences as Silicon Valley competes to release increasingly powerful models.

Republicans pushing for the proposal’s inclusion are investigating whether it complies with the Senate’s complex rules, which require that any provision included in a “budget reconciliation” bill must have a budgetary impact. The party is using this tactic to pass the bill without Democratic votes.

Ted Cruz, the top Republican on the Senate commerce committee, has proposed a solution: states that do not comply with the provision will be ineligible for billions of dollars in federal funds intended to expand broadband networks in underserved rural areas.

However, there is still little political consensus on how to oversee this rapidly evolving field, and no meaningful federal regulation on testing or data protection has been passed so far.

“You don’t want the number one country in the world for innovation to fall behind on artificial intelligence,” Republican senator Thom Tillis said in an interview. “If you suddenly have 50 different regulatory or legal frameworks, who in their right mind wouldn’t see that as an obstacle?”

Republican senator Steve Daines remarked, “I don’t like doing anything that starts to restrict the abilities of states. But there may be some wisdom in this, considering that the alternative could lead to a patchwork of AI regulations that could hinder and slow down the US.”

Other Republican senators, such as Josh Hawley, author of the book The Tyranny of Big Tech, and Marsha Blackburn, who supported a Tennessee law protecting the music industry from unauthorized AI use, oppose the moratorium.

“We don’t know what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years, and tying the hands of states by giving it free rein is potentially dangerous,” Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote on X. “This should be removed in the Senate.”

America

US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land

Published

on

Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.

For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.

Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:

“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”

The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.

Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.

Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.

Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.

Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.

Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.

Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market

The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.

Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.

The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.

Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.

Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.

Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.

William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.

Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.

Continue Reading

America

US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies

Published

on

An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.

Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.

Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.

Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.

Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.

When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.

The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.

Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.

Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war

In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.

Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.

Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.

American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.

Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.

Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.

Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise

The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.

Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.

Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.

Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.

Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.

Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.

Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.

Continue Reading

America

Anthropic posts $80.7bn loss ahead of IPO as computing costs soar

Published

on

Anthropic, developer of the artificial intelligence model Claude, reported a net loss of $80.7 billion for the first six months of 2026 ending 30 June.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal citing the company’s draft initial public offering prospectus, this recorded loss nearly doubled the $42 billion loss incurred across the entirety of 2025.

The vast majority of that enormous figure, accounting for $72 billion, stemmed from accounting-driven book-value write-downs.

In contrast, the company saw a sharp surge in revenue, with turnover in the first half of the year climbing to $16.3 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period of the prior year.

During this period, Anthropic spent approximately $9 billion on computing power and infrastructure needs, surpassing in just six months the $7.3 billion spent across the whole of 2025.

The company has commitments to pay roughly $450 billion over the next seven to 10 years under cloud service contracts.

Under these obligations, contracts are planned for $111 billion with Google Cloud, $110 billion with Amazon Web Services, and $31 billion with Microsoft.

Anthropic will also spend up to $86 billion by 2033 and 2034, respectively, to lease Nvidia chips through smaller AI-focused cloud providers Nscale and Lambda.

The company could spend an additional $750 billion in the coming years to expand its computing capacity.

Roughly a third of the draft IPO prospectus was dedicated directly to risk factors.

The document highlighted the possibility that models could cause tangible real-world harm, noting that artificial intelligence could exhibit a “self-preservation” tendency and produce responses resembling “blackmail”.

Anthropic warned that the scale of damage caused by an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could render insuring against such risks impossible.

According to market expectations, Anthropic’s IPO could rank among the largest transactions in history, potentially surpassing SpaceX’s record.

Following the market debut, the company’s market valuation is projected to reach up to $2 trillion.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey