America
MAGA hawks and doves divided over potential US war with Iran
As cracks within Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) coalition become increasingly visible, a new point of contention has emerged: attacks on Iran.
Amid a debate over the possibility of the US joining Israel in a conflict against Iran, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon have emerged as the faces of MAGA resistance to American involvement.
Carlson and Bannon have long opposed US intervention in foreign conflicts, particularly in the Middle East. This stance has put them at odds with figures like Fox News hosts Sean Hannity and Mark Levin.
Levin and Hannity emerge as MAGA ‘hawks’
These figures celebrated after Israel launched a series of strikes against Iran last week.
Following the announcement of Israel’s attacks, Levin took a victory lap on Hannity’s eponymous Fox News program, telling the host, “The Iranians are about to get a beating, and it’s been coming since Jimmy Carter. They think because it’s Joe Biden’s administration, they’re going to get away with it, they’re going to get nuclear weapons, and the world is going to sit there and not know what to do.”
Levin added that Israel would not “sit back and take it.” He has been campaigning against diplomatic relations with Iran for months, positioning himself as a leading advocate for military action within Trump’s circle.
Carlson to Levin and Hannity: ‘Warmongers’
Carlson and Bannon warned against US involvement in the Iran conflict. Last week, Bannon stated that Israel wants the US to “go on the offense” against Tehran, while Carlson labeled Levin and Hannity as “warmongers.”
Carlson reiterated his views in an interview with Bannon on Monday, saying, “The point is, if it’s hateful to say, ‘Hey, let’s focus on my country where I was born, where my family has lived for hundreds of years, that was the promise we made in the last election, please do that,’ then you’ve really lost your perspective, I guess is what I would say.”
The former Fox News host pointed to a series of domestic policy issues in the US that he would prefer the Trump administration to focus on, including immigration and the fentanyl crisis.
Referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Carlson remarked, “It’s like, a leader of a country who does not have majority support in his own country… wants a course of action that involves the United States, and all of that is ignored because I don’t agree with it. Anyway, I think it’s going to happen. Who cares what I think.”
When Bannon asked, “You think we’re going to join the offensive operation?” Carlson replied, “Yes, we are.”
Bannon responded, “Well, we have to stop that, we can’t, we have to stop it.”
‘Like listening to your ex-wife scream for alimony payments’
Monday’s interview took place while Trump was at the G7 summit in Canada. During the summit, Trump avoided a reporter’s question about what it would take for the US to get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict.
“I don’t want to talk about that,” Trump said while alongside Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. This statement came a day after he told ABC it was “possible” the US would get involved.
On Monday, Carlson directly attacked Levin, stating, “When Mark Levin comes on television, it’s like listening to your ex-wife scream for alimony payments. It’s not attractive at all. That’s why they don’t put him on television. Then Sean [Hannity] insisted, and they gave him some weekend show that nobody watches.”
Hannity and Levin have become Carlson’s primary targets in recent days, especially after they celebrated Israel’s attacks on Hannity’s show last week.
In the days before the attack, Carlson had harshly criticized Levin after the host of The Mark Levin Show called Steve Witkoff, a potential Trump Middle East envoy, a “fifth-column isolationist” and mockingly discussed his handling of nuclear deal negotiations with Iran.
Accusing Fox News of ‘opening the propaganda hose’
On Monday, Carlson accused his former employer, Fox News, of “opening the propaganda hose” to instill a specific narrative in its viewers.
“What they’re doing is what they always do, which is turn the propaganda hose on full blast, wrap the old Fox viewers around the axle, and get them to bow to whatever you want,” he told Bannon.
The interview on Monday came after both MAGA figures drew a clear line regarding the US being drawn into Israel’s war with Iran.
“If you’re going to go it alone, you handle your business or you don’t. You don’t need us. You decide to go it alone,” Bannon said on his podcast last week, referring to Israel.
Carlson also reacted strongly to suggestions of US involvement, writing on X last week, “The real division isn’t between people who support Israel and those who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real division is between those who recklessly encourage violence and those who try to prevent it, between the warmongers and the peacemakers.”
“Who are the warmongers? Anyone who called Donald Trump today and demanded airstrikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran is a warmonger,” Carlson added, taking a veiled shot at Netanyahu.
On Monday, Carlson told Bannon he believes the Iran-Israel conflict will escalate into a “full-scale war” involving many other countries, adding that it would be “very easy” for the US to be drawn in.
“We have so many assets in that region, we’re so dependent on the energy from that region… there’s so much that could go wrong,” Carlson said.
Trump clashes with Carlson
In an unprecedented move, Trump lashed out at commentator Tucker Carlson, a former Fox News host and one of his most reliable media allies, for criticizing his stance on Iran.
“Will somebody please explain to the FAKE TUCKER CARLSON that Iran will NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social network Monday evening.
During a meeting with the British prime minister at the G7 summit, which he left early due to the Middle East crisis, Trump said, “I don’t know what Tucker Carlson said. Let him find a television channel and people will listen.”
Last week, Carlson had called Trump “complicit” in Israel’s all-out war against Iran and criticized the “warmongers” encouraging “direct US involvement in the war.”
Flynn: Israeli victory will strengthen US global dominance
Meanwhile, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, who briefly served as National Security Advisor in the first Trump administration, appeared on Bannon’s podcast, War Room, to argue in support of Israel’s attacks on Iran.
Flynn asserted that Israel should be allowed to “finish the Iran issue” so the US can “turn its full attention to the CCP.”
“Israel’s victory, or the perception of victory, will consolidate Israel’s dominance in the region and strengthen America’s global dominance,” he argued.
Claiming that Israel is defending “Western civilization” against a “psychopathic regime” while fighting its own war, Flynn suggested that an Israeli victory would also expand the scope of the Abraham Accords.
“The issue is China, China, China. Your audience has to understand that,” Flynn said, suggesting that a US capable of establishing a “positive” relationship with Iran would gain an advantage over China, thereby weakening it.
Pushing the ‘new Iranian regime’ toward the Indian subcontinent
Flynn argued that to stabilize the region, it is necessary to support an Israeli victory against the Iranian leadership, which he described as the most “destabilizing” element in the area.
Referring to organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah, and Ansar Allah, Flynn claimed that Iran controls Iraq and Kurdistan.
He asserted that Arab nations in the region are closely watching the Israeli operation, claiming their militaries are incapable of conducting such operations, which he said is also important for the US.
The former advisor noted that an Iran closer to the West and the US would also mean an Iran closer to India, emphasizing that this is why they refer to the region as the “Indo-Pacific basin.”
“The Indo-Pacific basin is the defining element of this century,” Flynn said, warning that if they do not confront China, “the wolf will be inside the house.”
America
Israel looks to Latin America as Isaac Accords seek to expand regional partnerships
As ties between Israel and Latin American countries continue to deepen, the newly launched Isaac Accords are emerging as a framework for expanding cooperation across the region.
The initiative formed the backdrop to a panel discussion on opportunities for Israel in the Western Hemisphere at the 2026 JNS International Policy Summit in Jerusalem on Monday.
The panel, titled “The Coming Isaac Accords: Israel and Latin America,” brought together diplomats and regional experts to discuss developments that could encourage participation in the Isaac Accords, the strategic framework announced in April by Argentine President Javier Milei and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during Milei’s visit to Israel.
Moderated by JNS correspondent Etgar Lefkovits, the discussion featured Panama’s Ambassador to Israel Ezra Cohen, former US Ambassador to Costa Rica Fitzgerald Haney, and Leah Soibel, founder and CEO of Fuente Latina, which provides Middle East news coverage to Spanish-language media outlets.
Soibel said:
“What we need to understand is that the Isaac Accords have an impact that extends far beyond diplomacy. Twenty percent of the US population is Hispanic. By 2050, that figure is expected to reach 30% of the population. This is the demographic group with the lowest levels of antisemitic sentiment.”
The panel also celebrated the victory of pro-US and pro-Israel candidate Abelardo De La Espriella, who defeated his left-wing rival in Colombia’s presidential election on Sunday.
De La Espriella had made the restoration of relations with Israel and the relocation of his country’s embassy to Jerusalem central elements of his campaign platform.
Cohen said that when he looks at a map of Latin America, only four countries are currently governed by left-wing, anti-Israel administrations.
Referring to an earlier panel discussing what participants described as a bleak future for Jews in Europe, Cohen remarked: “When one window closes, another opens. Come to Latin America.”
Haney argued that “Israel’s friends keep winning” and predicted that “we are going to see a lot more positive developments coming out of Latin America.”
He said a colleague in Colombia had sent him a text message promising: “On August 7 at 5 p.m., we will restore relations with Israel.”
Haney noted that this was the date and time when Colombia’s new president is scheduled to take office and predicted that another announcement regarding the relocation of Colombia’s embassy to Jerusalem would follow.
He described Colombia as the latest in a series of Latin American countries turning toward Israel in pursuit of “shared values, shared prosperity and shared security.”
Haney also said that the Israel Allies Foundation, a pro-Israel advocacy group that works with lawmakers, would bring together representatives from 11 legislative bodies across Latin America in Buenos Aires over the weekend to sign a joint declaration of principles.
He noted that the organisation had successfully worked with Brazil’s legislature despite the position of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, whom he described as anti-Israel.
According to Haney, Brazil’s legislature has developed a plan to deepen relations with Israel over the next nine months.
Soibel said that 12 Latin American countries had renewed or strengthened their friendships with Israel and that interest in Israel among Spanish-language content creators, influencers and journalists continues to grow. Her organisation has brought 300 non-Jewish Hispanic journalists to Israel.
The panel also highlighted the launch of a Panama-based Spanish-language edition of JNS. Soibel said the work of pro-Israel organisations remains vital because so few such groups operate in the region, while, in her words, “Iran, Qatar and Hezbollah are conducting propaganda campaigns in Spanish throughout Latin America.”
She continued:
“You could probably count on one hand, perhaps two, the number of organisations and leaders operating across the Spanish-speaking world. That makes this work extraordinarily strategic. Its impact is enormous. Israel and the Jewish people should invest more. There is a large Hispanic-Israeli population in Israel, and many of them were victims of the October 7 attacks. We have stories to tell. What we need now is investment and distribution channels to spread those messages and information.”
The panel concluded on an optimistic note, with participants expressing confidence that Latin America will become an increasingly important pillar of Israel’s global diplomatic strategy in the years ahead.
Milei and Netanyahu launch new accord
Argentine President Javier Milei and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the launch of the Isaac Accords last Saturday.
The initiative establishes a new strategic framework aimed at strengthening cooperation among Argentina, Israel and like-minded partners across the Western Hemisphere, described as “the descendants of Isaac and nations rooted in the Judeo-Christian tradition,” in defence of freedom and democracy and in the fight against terrorism, antisemitism and drug trafficking.
Participating countries will seek to strengthen coordination against what the agreement describes as terrorist organisations, with particular emphasis on “Iran’s efforts to expand terrorist networks and operational presence throughout the Western Hemisphere.”
The initiative also seeks to promote coordination and alignment in international forums while creating a framework for expanded cooperation in innovation, technology, trade and economic openness.
Speaking alongside Netanyahu at a joint press conference, Milei said:
“We expressed our unwavering support for the United States and Israel in their struggle against terrorism and the Iranian regime, not only because it is the right thing to do, but also because our countries are united through shared suffering.”
Milei referred to the 1992 bombing of the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires and the 1994 attack on the AMIA Jewish community centre.
Although Argentine courts have attributed both attacks to Iran, Tehran has consistently denied any involvement.
Netanyahu praised the Argentine leader for demonstrating what he called “moral clarity” by standing with Israel and said he hoped other Latin American governments would join the Isaac Accords, which both leaders described as being inspired by the Abraham Accords.
The Abraham Accords, brokered by Washington in 2020, triggered a wave of normalisation in Arab-Israeli diplomatic relations.
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee attended the signing ceremony and described Milei and Netanyahu as “President Trump’s two closest friends.”
Huckabee added: “I do not think there are two other world leaders whom our president respects as much and with whom he has such a personal relationship.”
During the visit, the two sides also announced the launch of the first direct commercial flights between Buenos Aires and Tel Aviv, scheduled to begin in November.
Milei said the new route would create an “unbreakable bond” between the two countries and reiterated his intention to relocate Argentina’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
“As soon as circumstances permit, we once again reaffirm our commitment to moving the Argentine embassy to Jerusalem,” he said.
America
Iran team leaves thank-you message in Los Angeles locker room after World Cup draw
Iran’s national football team left a message in its locker room at SoFi Stadium, thanking Los Angeles for its hospitality during the World Cup.
The players said they were leaving the city with honor after keeping their hopes of reaching the knockout stage alive with a 0-0 draw against Belgium.
In the handwritten note, published by the Iran Football Federation, the team wrote:
“From the ancient land of Persia thousands of years ago to the civilized Iran of today, the spirit of Iran remains alive and unshaken. Los Angeles, thank you for your hospitality. We arrived in Los Angeles with pride, competed with honor and leave with dignity.”
The note also thanked Iranian supporters who gave their “hearts, voices and souls” to the team throughout its two matches and concluded with a call for peace, respect and friendship among all nations.
Los Angeles hosted both of Iran’s Group G matches, while the team returned to its training base in Tijuana between games.
Iran has been based in Tijuana throughout the tournament and has had to travel back and forth to the United States for matches because of restrictions related to its stay in the country. Entry bans were also imposed on some members of the national team’s coaching staff and officials.
US authorities said the team’s travel arrangements remain under review, while discussions continue over the possible easing of some restrictions.
Iran head coach Emir Ghalenoei has repeatedly criticized the travel restrictions, saying his squad has faced challenges that no other team in the tournament has been required to endure.
After drawing 2-2 with New Zealand in its opening match at SoFi Stadium, Iran will play its final Group G match against Egypt in Seattle.
America
Colombia’s de la Espriella claims narrow presidential victory in runoff election
The first results from Colombia’s presidential runoff election showed that right-wing candidate Abelardo de la Espriella, backed by Donald Trump, had narrowly won the vote.
The victory of de la Espriella, who has no prior political experience, signals a fundamental shift in the government’s approach to tackling the country’s long-running internal armed conflict and rising violence.
Throughout the campaign, de la Espriella pledged to intensify military pressure on illegal armed groups, drug trafficking networks and criminal organizations. He succeeded in defeating left-wing candidate Iván Cepeda, a close ally of incumbent President Gustavo Petro.
Speaking after the initial results were released, de la Espriella said: “Today marks the beginning of a new era for our country. This era is built on the free and democratic will of millions of citizens who chose to believe in a great, secure, prosperous Colombia full of opportunities.”
Cepeda says he will await official results
According to the preliminary count, with more than 99% of ballots tallied in the runoff election, de la Espriella secured approximately 49.7% of the vote, while Cepeda received 48.7%.
Cepeda, who has not yet conceded defeat, said the preliminary results were neither official nor binding.
“When the official count is completed, the final results are known and the necessary verification procedures are finished, we will recognize the official outcome produced by that process,” Cepeda said.
Reuters reported that the verification process showed very little variation from the preliminary counts recorded during the first round of voting on May 31.
De la Espriella, who grew up in Colombia’s Caribbean region, drew particularly strong support from that part of the country. Addressing a large crowd gathered in the coastal city of Barranquilla after the first results emerged, de la Espriella, who has adopted the nickname “El Tigre” (The Tiger), declared: “Tonight is the beginning of a new story for the nation. Tonight a new era begins, a change of order begins.”
He said he would govern for all Colombians, including those who voted for his opponent, and pledged loyalty to and protection of Colombia’s 1991 constitution.
At celebrations in Barranquilla, supporters wore Colombia’s yellow national football jersey and waved Colombian flags.
With images of de la Espriella projected behind the stage, supporters chanted “Stand firm for the homeland” and “Petro out!” as fireworks lit the sky. Some supporters wore hats bearing the slogan “Make Colombia Great Again,” echoing those worn by supporters of US President Donald Trump.
Trump reacted to the results in a Truth Social post, writing: “BIG won!”
One supporter, Patricia, told reporters: “We are tired of the murders in this country and of this government’s bureaucracy. Now we finally have a president from the coastal region.”
Another supporter said: “We are proud of the Tiger. We hope he transforms the country and, above all, creates a new nation where we will have jobs and greater security.”
Supporters of Cepeda, who narrowly lost the election, also voiced concerns on the streets of Barranquilla.
Catalina La Grande, a student and activist who supports Cepeda, told the BBC: “There is a visible sense of unease in the air. Such a narrow margin worries us because it reflects how divided the country is and the enormous challenges we face in defending democracy, peace and human rights.”
Another young voter backing Cepeda, Maria, said the results showed a divided country but noted that the public had remained peaceful.
“Given the level of polarization we are experiencing, the absence of violence in the streets is a positive development,” she said.
The sharp divisions between the candidates have fueled concerns that unrest could emerge if some opposition groups refuse to accept the outcome.
Late on Sunday night, clashes were reported between protesters and police in Cali, Colombia’s third-largest city. Demonstrators reportedly burned US flags, while police used tear gas to disperse large crowds angered by de la Espriella’s victory.
President Gustavo Petro is also reported to be considering challenging the result. In a post on X, Petro said that based on the preliminary count, “no one can be declared president” and alleged that the security of some polling stations had been compromised. He called for an audit of the voting software but provided no evidence to support the claims.
Who is Abelardo de la Espriella?
De la Espriella, who has no political background, is a lawyer and businessman. During his legal career, he represented clients including Alex Saab, an ally of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro who has faced money laundering charges in the US, and David Murcia Guzman, one of Colombia’s most notorious fraudsters.
De la Espriella says he handled those cases in his capacity as a defense attorney.
Often compared to El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele because of his security policies and distinctive beard, de la Espriella and his supporters frequently wear Colombia’s national football jersey at rallies and on social media. Critics accuse him of politicizing the national team shirt.
He is also known for regularly addressing campaign crowds from behind bulletproof glass panels.
Colombia’s internal armed conflict has persisted for decades, but violence has intensified in recent years. Armed groups and criminal organizations, including dissident factions of the FARC, the ELN and the Clan del Golfo, have doubled their membership over the past five years.
Competition for control of lucrative cocaine trafficking routes and illegal mining operations has further escalated the violence. Fighting along the Colombia-Venezuela border last year displaced tens of thousands of people. Cocaine production in the world’s largest cocaine-producing country has reached record levels.
Critics of President Petro argue that his “total peace” strategy, which prioritizes negotiations with armed groups, has failed, claiming that such groups have used ceasefire arrangements to expand their territorial control and influence.
De la Espriella has pledged to cancel all negotiations with illegal armed groups and increase military pressure to restore order.
As part of that agenda, he has promised closer cooperation with the US, the construction of massive prisons in Colombia’s forests, a smaller state apparatus and reforms to the healthcare system.
Having lived and worked in Miami for many years, de la Espriella has held US citizenship since 2023. During the election campaign, he received support from Donald Trump, who said de la Espriella would “stop illegal migration, fight crime and drugs, and restore law and order.”
Before the election, Trump also said de la Espriella would feel “the full support and strength of the United States” behind him.
Although Colombia has historically been one of Washington’s closest allies in the region, relations have become strained in recent years due to sharp disagreements between President Trump and President Petro over migration policy, tariffs and military intervention in Latin America.
De la Espriella’s election also aligns with a broader trend across Latin America, where security concerns have pushed politics to the right. His victory was welcomed by other conservative leaders across the region.
Argentine President Javier Milei said Colombians had “chosen the path of economic freedom, prosperity and uncompromising security” and had declared that enough was enough to transnational organized crime and drug trafficking.
Chile’s José Antonio Kast said: “A new era of freedom is beginning for Colombia, one that will allow the country to regain security and prosperity.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
