Connect with us

America

MAGA hawks and doves divided over potential US war with Iran

Published

on

As cracks within Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) coalition become increasingly visible, a new point of contention has emerged: attacks on Iran.

Amid a debate over the possibility of the US joining Israel in a conflict against Iran, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon have emerged as the faces of MAGA resistance to American involvement.

Carlson and Bannon have long opposed US intervention in foreign conflicts, particularly in the Middle East. This stance has put them at odds with figures like Fox News hosts Sean Hannity and Mark Levin.

Levin and Hannity emerge as MAGA ‘hawks’

These figures celebrated after Israel launched a series of strikes against Iran last week.

Following the announcement of Israel’s attacks, Levin took a victory lap on Hannity’s eponymous Fox News program, telling the host, “The Iranians are about to get a beating, and it’s been coming since Jimmy Carter. They think because it’s Joe Biden’s administration, they’re going to get away with it, they’re going to get nuclear weapons, and the world is going to sit there and not know what to do.”

Levin added that Israel would not “sit back and take it.” He has been campaigning against diplomatic relations with Iran for months, positioning himself as a leading advocate for military action within Trump’s circle.

Carlson to Levin and Hannity: ‘Warmongers’

Carlson and Bannon warned against US involvement in the Iran conflict. Last week, Bannon stated that Israel wants the US to “go on the offense” against Tehran, while Carlson labeled Levin and Hannity as “warmongers.”

Carlson reiterated his views in an interview with Bannon on Monday, saying, “The point is, if it’s hateful to say, ‘Hey, let’s focus on my country where I was born, where my family has lived for hundreds of years, that was the promise we made in the last election, please do that,’ then you’ve really lost your perspective, I guess is what I would say.”

The former Fox News host pointed to a series of domestic policy issues in the US that he would prefer the Trump administration to focus on, including immigration and the fentanyl crisis.

Referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Carlson remarked, “It’s like, a leader of a country who does not have majority support in his own country… wants a course of action that involves the United States, and all of that is ignored because I don’t agree with it. Anyway, I think it’s going to happen. Who cares what I think.”

When Bannon asked, “You think we’re going to join the offensive operation?” Carlson replied, “Yes, we are.”

Bannon responded, “Well, we have to stop that, we can’t, we have to stop it.”

‘Like listening to your ex-wife scream for alimony payments’

Monday’s interview took place while Trump was at the G7 summit in Canada. During the summit, Trump avoided a reporter’s question about what it would take for the US to get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict.

“I don’t want to talk about that,” Trump said while alongside Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. This statement came a day after he told ABC it was “possible” the US would get involved.

On Monday, Carlson directly attacked Levin, stating, “When Mark Levin comes on television, it’s like listening to your ex-wife scream for alimony payments. It’s not attractive at all. That’s why they don’t put him on television. Then Sean [Hannity] insisted, and they gave him some weekend show that nobody watches.”

Hannity and Levin have become Carlson’s primary targets in recent days, especially after they celebrated Israel’s attacks on Hannity’s show last week.

In the days before the attack, Carlson had harshly criticized Levin after the host of The Mark Levin Show called Steve Witkoff, a potential Trump Middle East envoy, a “fifth-column isolationist” and mockingly discussed his handling of nuclear deal negotiations with Iran.

Accusing Fox News of ‘opening the propaganda hose’

On Monday, Carlson accused his former employer, Fox News, of “opening the propaganda hose” to instill a specific narrative in its viewers.

“What they’re doing is what they always do, which is turn the propaganda hose on full blast, wrap the old Fox viewers around the axle, and get them to bow to whatever you want,” he told Bannon.

The interview on Monday came after both MAGA figures drew a clear line regarding the US being drawn into Israel’s war with Iran.

“If you’re going to go it alone, you handle your business or you don’t. You don’t need us. You decide to go it alone,” Bannon said on his podcast last week, referring to Israel.

Carlson also reacted strongly to suggestions of US involvement, writing on X last week, “The real division isn’t between people who support Israel and those who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real division is between those who recklessly encourage violence and those who try to prevent it, between the warmongers and the peacemakers.”

“Who are the warmongers? Anyone who called Donald Trump today and demanded airstrikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran is a warmonger,” Carlson added, taking a veiled shot at Netanyahu.

On Monday, Carlson told Bannon he believes the Iran-Israel conflict will escalate into a “full-scale war” involving many other countries, adding that it would be “very easy” for the US to be drawn in.

“We have so many assets in that region, we’re so dependent on the energy from that region… there’s so much that could go wrong,” Carlson said.

Trump clashes with Carlson

In an unprecedented move, Trump lashed out at commentator Tucker Carlson, a former Fox News host and one of his most reliable media allies, for criticizing his stance on Iran.

“Will somebody please explain to the FAKE TUCKER CARLSON that Iran will NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social network Monday evening.

During a meeting with the British prime minister at the G7 summit, which he left early due to the Middle East crisis, Trump said, “I don’t know what Tucker Carlson said. Let him find a television channel and people will listen.”

Last week, Carlson had called Trump “complicit” in Israel’s all-out war against Iran and criticized the “warmongers” encouraging “direct US involvement in the war.”

Flynn: Israeli victory will strengthen US global dominance

Meanwhile, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, who briefly served as National Security Advisor in the first Trump administration, appeared on Bannon’s podcast, War Room, to argue in support of Israel’s attacks on Iran.

Flynn asserted that Israel should be allowed to “finish the Iran issue” so the US can “turn its full attention to the CCP.”

“Israel’s victory, or the perception of victory, will consolidate Israel’s dominance in the region and strengthen America’s global dominance,” he argued.

Claiming that Israel is defending “Western civilization” against a “psychopathic regime” while fighting its own war, Flynn suggested that an Israeli victory would also expand the scope of the Abraham Accords.

“The issue is China, China, China. Your audience has to understand that,” Flynn said, suggesting that a US capable of establishing a “positive” relationship with Iran would gain an advantage over China, thereby weakening it.

Pushing the ‘new Iranian regime’ toward the Indian subcontinent

Flynn argued that to stabilize the region, it is necessary to support an Israeli victory against the Iranian leadership, which he described as the most “destabilizing” element in the area.

Referring to organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah, and Ansar Allah, Flynn claimed that Iran controls Iraq and Kurdistan.

He asserted that Arab nations in the region are closely watching the Israeli operation, claiming their militaries are incapable of conducting such operations, which he said is also important for the US.

The former advisor noted that an Iran closer to the West and the US would also mean an Iran closer to India, emphasizing that this is why they refer to the region as the “Indo-Pacific basin.”

“The Indo-Pacific basin is the defining element of this century,” Flynn said, warning that if they do not confront China, “the wolf will be inside the house.”

America

Trump administration targets 60 nations with new tariff draft under Section 301

Published

on

The US administration is proposing new tariffs of at least 10% on imports from 60 trading partners, following an investigation into goods allegedly produced using forced labor.

According to a Bloomberg report citing sources within the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), the specific tariff rates will vary based on individual countries’ legislative frameworks regarding forced labor and their capacity to enforce those laws.

Under the drafted regulations, a 10% tariff rate will apply to imports from the European Union, Mexico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, and several other nations. Conversely, goods arriving from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, and Brazil will be subject to a 12,5% tariff.

The USTR stated that the lower tariff rate will apply to products from nations that prohibit forced labor or have committed to doing so. The agency emphasized that states failing to establish such prohibitions or lacking the capacity to effectively enforce them will face the higher tariff rate.

Bloomberg reported that this step represents a continuation of President Donald Trump’s policy to reinstate across-the-board tariffs on all countries, which had previously been ruled unconstitutional.

The proposed tariffs are the result of investigations initiated under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Commenting on the development, Deborah Elms, Head of the Trade Policy Group at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, said, “This is highly significant because Section 301 is an extremely powerful tool and is highly unlikely to be overturned. This opens the door to a range of new tariff and non-tariff measures.”

The report noted that the tariffs are being introduced at what could be a turning point for the global economy.

Financial markets are already navigating a sensitive period due to rising gas and oil prices driven by conflict in Iran.

The new tariffs will not take effect immediately. Before implementation, a review and evaluation period will be conducted, which may lead to modifications in the draft proposal.

According to the timeline reported by Bloomberg, written comments on the tariffs must be submitted by July 6. Additionally, the Section 301 Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing on July 7.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer argued that forced labor practices in partner nations force American workers to compete on an unequal playing field. “We will no longer tolerate this unfairness,” Greer said.

On the other hand, the USTR proposed certain tariff exemptions that could affect apparel and textile imports. While these goods could enter the US at reduced tariff rates, quotas would be determined based on the respective countries’ existing textile exports to the US.

Beef, tomatoes, bananas, coffee, orange juice, and several other food products will be entirely exempt from the tariffs. Furthermore, double taxation will not be imposed on metals, specific fuel types, and chemicals that are already subject to other duties.

In May, the US Court of International Trade ruled that the 10% tariff on foreign imports promoted by President Donald Trump was unlawful. Defending the White House’s objectives following the court ruling, Trump characterized the judges as “radical left-wing” and remarked, “Nothing surprises me. We always find different ways. We make a decision and act in another way.”

In February, the US Supreme Court also ruled that tariffs established by Trump were contrary to the law. The court concluded that the president had exceeded his authority in imposing those duties. Trump, however, claimed that the court was under foreign influence.

Continue Reading

America

Google seeks approval to release 32 million mosquitoes in US disease-control project

Published

on

Google is seeking federal approval to release nearly 32 million mosquitoes in California and Florida as part of a biological pest-control initiative known as the Debug project.

The little-known program aims to combat disease-carrying mosquitoes by releasing millions of sterile male mosquitoes into the environment, an approach designed to stop “bad bugs with good bugs.”

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mosquitoes are classified as the world’s deadliest animals. Of the more than 3,500 mosquito species that exist globally, only Aedes aegypti is responsible for transmitting dengue fever, Zika virus and chikungunya, diseases that sicken hundreds of millions of people each year.

In a statement published on the official website of the Debug project, Google described the issue as a difficult problem to solve, noting that many mosquito-borne diseases lack effective vaccines or treatments.

The statement argued that relying on pesticides is not a sustainable solution because such chemicals become less effective over time and can be toxic. It also said that eliminating standing water alone is insufficient because it is impossible to identify every breeding site used by mosquitoes.

For those reasons, Google said a new approach is required and that it found a solution in what it describes as “good” mosquitoes of the same species.

The project website explains the method as follows:

“Good bugs are the same mosquito species as the bad bugs that spread disease. Our good bugs are male mosquitoes carrying Wolbachia, a naturally occurring bacterium found in nature. This bacterium prevents them from producing offspring with wild female mosquitoes. Male mosquitoes do not bite and cannot spread disease, so the good bugs will stop the bad bugs from reproducing. Over time, fewer bad mosquitoes will remain.”

Scientists involved in the Debug project emphasized that the technique relies entirely on a naturally occurring bacterium, contains no chemicals or toxins, and does not involve genetic modification.

Researchers said similar approaches have been used safely for decades to control other pests. They added that the Debug team is combining scientific and engineering expertise with support from international partners in an effort to suppress disease-carrying mosquito populations.

Project scientists said their approach differs from previous eradication programs because it applies the Sterile Insect Technique on a larger scale through the use of data analytics, sensors and automation.

According to information published in the project’s frequently asked questions section, program officials are working closely with national and local governments, community leaders and research institutions.

Officials said they meet with residents in areas targeted for deployment before operations begin in order to better understand local concerns and priorities.

Google is therefore continuing to pursue federal authorization to implement the project in both California and Florida.

A notice published in the Federal Register shows that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing Google’s applications for an Experimental Use Permit under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

According to details contained in the filing, nearly 16 million mosquitoes would be released in Florida during the first year of the project.

A further 16 million mosquitoes would be released in California during the second year.

Members of the public can obtain additional information and submit comments through the federal rulemaking portal by visiting regulations.gov and entering docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-3951.

Continue Reading

America

US Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence

Published

on

US Marine Corps personnel tested a new counter-drone defense system during military exercises held in the Philippines in April.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the system is designed to avoid the continuous use of expensive missiles and instead relies on a coordinated set of countermeasures.

The system consists of two armored vehicles known collectively as MADIS (Marine Air Defense Integrated System).

One vehicle is equipped with an advanced radar system, while the other carries the Stinger air defense missile system. Both vehicles are also fitted with a small cannon, a machine gun and electronic warfare equipment.

According to the report, MADIS is intended to provide military personnel with multiple options for engaging drones, including cannon fire, missiles and electronic warfare tools.

The objective is to reduce dependence on high-cost weapons when protecting military units and other strategic assets.

US Marine Corps officials told WSJ that one of the system’s most effective features is its ability to fire specially manufactured 30-millimeter ammunition equipped with precision fuzes that detonate as they approach a target.

Steven Sawyer, a former ammunition technician at the NATO Support and Procurement Agency, told the newspaper that 30-millimeter rounds are generally less accurate than missiles but are significantly cheaper to use.

Sawyer said that even if five such rounds were required to destroy a drone, the total cost would remain around $11,250.

By comparison, a single Stinger missile costs about $430,000, while Coyote interceptor missiles used in conflicts in the Middle East are priced between $100,000 and $125,000 each.

Sawyer added that 30-millimeter ammunition has proven effective against Shahed-family drones, which cannot be neutralized through electronic warfare methods.

At the same time, he stressed that US defense companies continue to face difficulties producing sufficient quantities of the ammunition. According to Sawyer, the precision fuzes are highly sophisticated electromechanical devices and only a limited number of manufacturers can produce them at scale.

WSJ noted that countering large numbers of inexpensive drones has become one of the most pressing challenges facing modern militaries.

The US military has encountered the problem directly during operations in the Middle East, where it has been forced to expend limited stocks of extremely costly precision-guided munitions.

Previously, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Chinese scientists had developed a combat algorithm known as HG-STR based on a “kill them all” concept.

The algorithm was said to enable swarms of fixed-wing drones to autonomously scan the battlefield and destroy enemy targets even if communications are disrupted and lines of sight are obstructed.

In April, The New York Times, citing three sources within defense and intelligence agencies, reported that the Pentagon assessed Russia’s and China’s drone development programs to be more advanced than those of the United States.

The assessment regarding China’s drone capabilities was reportedly based on analysis of a military parade held in China in September 2025.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey