Connect with us

Middle East

Two US soldiers killed in Syria attack by suspected ISIS infiltrator

Published

on

Two US soldiers and one US interpreter were killed in an attack on a meeting between forces linked to the new administration and American forces in the Palmyra region of Syria.

In a statement following the attack, which occurred Saturday in the desert near the historic Syrian city of Palmyra, HTS Interior Ministry spokesman Nureddin al-Baba said that three members of the Syrian security forces who engaged the attacker were also wounded.

According to a Syrian official who spoke to the Associated Press, the individual who carried out the attack that resulted in the deaths of three US citizens in Syria had joined the new Syrian administration’s internal security forces as a base security guard two months ago and had recently been reassigned to another post due to suspicions of potential ISIS links.

According to an Enab Baladi correspondent, US forces openly entered deep into the Badiya region in a convoy of about 15 military vehicles. The convoy was escorted by HTS forces from the al-Tanf base on the border strip.

The correspondent stated that US forces conducted a joint patrol accompanied by the new Syrian army stationed in Palmyra.

Al-Baba said that Syria’s new authorities faced shortages in security personnel and were therefore forced to recruit staff quickly following the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad.

“We were shocked to have taken over all of Syria within 11 days, which placed a great responsibility on us in terms of security and administration,” al-Baba said.

The attacker was among 5,000 members who had recently joined a new unit of the internal security forces established in the desert region known as Badiya, one of the areas where ISIS remnants are still active.

Al-Baba said the leadership of the internal security forces had recently begun to suspect there was an informant leaking information to ISIS and had started evaluating all members in the Badiya region.

Meanwhile, in a statement to the state’s official news channel al-Ikhbariya, al-Baba said the Internal Security Command had previously warned allied forces in the Syrian desert region about the possibility of security breaches or ISIS attacks, but he noted that coalition forces did not heed these warnings.

Al-Baba said the competent authorities are working to confirm the attacker’s organizational affiliations, and the assessment will focus on whether the attacker had a direct connection to ISIS or had merely adopted its ideology.

Al-Baba asserted that the attacker held no leadership role within internal security and was not a guard for any leaders.

The investigation raised suspicions about the individual who carried out the attack, but authorities decided to continue monitoring him for a few more days to determine if he was an active member of ISIS and, if so, to identify the network with which he was communicating.

At the same time, “as a precaution,” the man was reassigned to guard the base’s equipment, a position further away from the leadership and the patrols of the US-led coalition forces, he said.

Al-Baba said that on Saturday, the man stormed a meeting between US and Syrian security officials who were having lunch together and opened fire after clashing with Syrian guards. The attacker was shot and killed at the scene.

Following the attack, HTS forces “launched large-scale operations in the Badiya region” and dismantled a number of ISIS cells, he said. The Interior Ministry later announced in a statement that five suspects had been arrested in the city of Palmyra.

US President Donald Trump stated that the attack was “carried out by ISIS in an extremely dangerous area against the US and Syria,” adding that the response would be very harsh.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump added that Syrian President Ahmed al-Shara (Abu Mohammad al-Jolani) was “outraged and extremely saddened” by the attack.

The US Embassy in Syria condemned the “terrorist” ambush that targeted the joint patrol between the US and the Syrian government in central Syria. The embassy expressed its sorrow over the killing of three US soldiers and an accompanying civilian and wished a speedy recovery to the wounded Syrian soldiers.

It also emphasized Washington’s determination to “defeat terrorism” in cooperation with its Syrian partners.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry reiterated its support for the Syrian government’s efforts to “increase stability and security in the country and combat terrorism.” In a statement, the ministry said, “We offer our most sincere condolences to the families of the victims who lost their lives in the attack, as well as to our partners in the International Coalition established to fight the Islamic State organization, the governments of Syria and the US.”

The Qatari Foreign Ministry reaffirmed the state’s firm position of rejecting violence, terrorism, and criminal acts, regardless of their motives or justifications. It extended its condolences to the families of the victims, the governments and peoples of the US and Syria, and wished the injured a swift recovery.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey