Connect with us

Middle East

Details remain vague in 21-point Gaza plan for Trump-Netanyahu meeting

Published

on

The 21-point plan proposed for Gaza will be discussed during the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House today. However, many critical details of the plan remain ambiguous.

According to the White House schedule, President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will meet for lunch today, followed by a bilateral meeting and a joint press conference. The program will begin with a welcome ceremony; the press conference is scheduled to take place at 8:15 PM. During his fourth visit to Washington since resuming office in January, Netanyahu aims to fortify his country’s most critical alliance in the face of growing international isolation.

The meeting is expected to address a 21-point framework aimed at ending the Gaza war, establishing a post-war governance mechanism, and securing the return of hostages. The 21-point plan, obtained by the Washington Post and confirmed by two government officials briefed by the administration, consists of interconnected topics related to security, administration, reconstruction, and prisoner exchange:

  1. All Israeli military operations in Gaza cease immediately and “battle lines” are frozen.
  2. Within 48 hours of Israel’s acceptance, all living prisoners are released and the remains of captives returned.
  3. Israel will free 250 prisoners serving life sentences and 1,700 Gazans detained since 7 October 2023.
  4. For every Israeli captive whose remains are released, Israel will release the remains of 15 deceased Palestinians from Gaza.
  5. Immediately upon agreement, full humanitarian aid flows into Gaza; infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage), hospitals, bakeries, and rubble removal will be rehabilitated.
  6. Aid distribution will be handled by the UN and other neutral international bodies, without interference by Israel or Hamas.
  7. A transitional governance structure of qualified Palestinians and international experts will manage day-to-day public services in Gaza.
  8. That governance will be supervised by a new international body established by the U.S. with partners.
  9. The Palestinian Authority will assume control only after completing internal reforms.
  10. Hamas’s offensive weaponry will be destroyed; militants who commit to peaceful coexistence will be offered amnesty.
  11. Safe passage will be provided for Hamas members who choose to exit Gaza.
  12. Gaza will be redeveloped economically, with special zones and reduced tariffs.
  13. No one will be forced to leave Gaza; those who leave may return.
  14. Hamas will have no role in Gaza governance; all tunnels and offensive infrastructure will be destroyed.
  15. Regional partners will provide security guarantees and cooperate in enforcing the plan.
  16. A temporary international stabilization force will be deployed in Gaza, with training of a Palestinian security force.
  17. Israel will progressively hand over territory to the stabilization force and withdraw, maintaining only a “perimeter presence.”
  18. Israel agrees to refrain from future strikes on Qatar and acknowledges Qatar’s mediating role in prior talks.
  19. A program of “de-radicalization” will be initiated, including interfaith dialogue and narrative change.
  20. After redevelopment and PA reforms, conditions may permit a credible pathway to Palestinian ‘statehood.’
  21. The US will open a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to define a “political horizon” for peaceful coexistence.

According to the report, most of the 21 points have not yet been presented to Hamas and are considered a “broad framework”; critical details, such as how governance, security, reconstruction, and rehabilitation will be implemented, have not been defined. The plan does not clarify the sequence of the numerous interconnected steps beyond the initial ceasefire and prisoner exchange. Fundamental questions remain unanswered, such as who will finance the reconstruction, who will enforce disarmament and how, how aid will be distributed in practice, and where displaced Palestinians will live while reconstruction is underway.

Behind-the-scenes contacts: Witkoff and Kushner’s initiatives

It is reported that US special representative Steve Witkoff held a meeting with Netanyahu at a hotel for about two hours on Sunday to persuade him of the plan. The President’s son-in-law and former senior advisor, Jared Kushner, was also present at the meeting. Sources close to the process state that despite Netanyahu’s reservations about Hamas’s disarmament and the role of the Palestinian Authority in post-war Gaza, a basis for progress on the plan is being sought. According to the Hebrew press, the meeting was “positive,” and there is talk that Netanyahu may support the plan at the White House.

Optimistic rhetoric but cautious notes

In addition to some reports in the Israeli press, a post on X by Axios reporter Barak Ravid, citing an unnamed senior US official, suggests that the US and Israel have reached a “very, very close” agreement on the plan; however, Hamas’s approval is required for the plan to proceed. Reuters noted that it could not independently verify these claims with its own sources.

In statements over the weekend, Trump pointed to the opportunity for a “historic agreement” in the Middle East, stating that the goal is not just a ceasefire in Gaza but a broader regional peace. He also expressed hope of securing Netanyahu’s consent for the plan during Monday’s meeting.

Controversial topics

However, significant disagreements exist in the background of the Washington negotiations. According to Israel Hayom, Qatar advocates for a full withdrawal in the early stages of the agreement, while Saudi Arabia and the UAE condition their contributions on the disarmament of Hamas. Israel, on the other hand, seeks a long-term presence in the Philadelphi Corridor and a security buffer zone. The role to be given to the Palestinian Authority in the transitional administration is subject to Israel’s limited support and the Gulf countries’ backing, contingent on “comprehensive reform.” The package also includes topics such as the rehabilitation of refugee camps in the West Bank, the termination of UNRWA, structural reform in the Palestinian Authority, and deradicalization in education.

The Qatar file: Seeking to limit influence and a compromise formula

Meanwhile, Israel wants to limit Qatar’s influence in the “day after” scenario due to deteriorating relations and Doha’s international campaigns. Washington, however, is hesitant about this stance. As of Sunday, negotiators were working on a compromise formula regarding Qatar’s share in reconstruction and administration. Furthermore, Israel is demanding that the Israeli army’s freedom of action to neutralize threats from Gaza, should Hamas rearm, be explicitly written into the text; mediators warn that this could cause Hamas to walk away from the table.

Middle East

Israel military weighs legal steps against Gaza documentary makers

Published

on

Israel’s Chief of General Staff, Eyal Zamir, has instructed officials to examine criminal and legal steps against the production team of the documentary “NAZA”, which focuses on testimonies from soldiers and intelligence personnel who served in Gaza operations.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu targeted the production, describing it as “unacceptable”, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers published a joint statement backing the directors.

Maintaining that the documentary slandered the military, Chief of General Staff Zamir asserted that the work had no intention of uncovering the truth.

“In light of the available data, this production is not a work that constructively criticises the military,” Zamir said. “On the contrary, it relies on blood libels, a deliberate distortion of the reality on the ground, and baseless accusations directed at our soldiers and commanders.”

Zamir further claimed that the military was presented as an entity acting unlawfully and that the arguments of anti-Israel circles were adapted for the film.

The Israeli military is establishing a new multidisciplinary, inter-agency working group involving domestic and international experts to counter such allegations.

Meanwhile, the military’s most senior legal official, Itai Ofir, is reviewing the legal procedures that could be initiated against the documentary’s producers.

The military leadership contends that the testimonies lack credibility because the identities, ranks, and operational details of the personnel interviewed in the film were concealed.

Rejecting the assertion that targets were selected by artificial intelligence, military officials stated that all strikes and target approvals were decided by human hands within the framework of military directives.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the production in a video message shared on Telegram.

“This situation is appalling,” Netanyahu said, voicing his reaction. “While resisting antisemitic incitement conducted globally, it is unacceptable for a similar approach to arise from within ourselves. Two Israeli directors presenting the Israeli military as war criminals are being applauded at the Venice Film Festival.”

The 80-minute production was awarded the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival and received a 25-minute standing ovation in the auditorium at the end of the screening.

In reactions emerging from the cabinet, Minister of Culture and Sports Miki Zohar accused directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor of “high treason”.

“The self-hatred displayed by these producers, who risk harming their own country to win the praise of antisemitic circles worldwide, is beyond comprehension,” Zohar said. Announcing that he would launch an initiative to revoke the directors’ citizenship, Zohar stated that direct accusations of treason could be brought against the individuals.

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also addressed the directors, stating: “You are a source of shame for the entire people of Israel. Get out of here.” Under current Israeli legislation, the culture minister does not have the authority to unilaterally revoke citizenship; decisions in this direction can be made only as a result of legal processes involving the Ministry of Interior and judicial bodies.

Following the mounting backlash, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers, including Ari Folman, Shlomi Elkabetz, Ran Tal, and Michal Aviad, signed a joint declaration of solidarity. The text emphasised that “the primary duty of art and the profession of journalism is to hold up a mirror to the society from which it arises.”

Produced in partnership with The Guardian and JW Films, “NAZA” conveys testimonies from 24 military and intelligence personnel whose identities were kept concealed and who took part in surveillance, targeting, and air strike decisions in Gaza.

Deriving its name from a Hebrew military acronym that designates the number of civilians expected to lose their lives during an operation and corresponds to the concept of “collateral damage”, the film documents that targets were determined using artificial intelligence and mass surveillance networks.

Describing high-tech weaponry and AI-assisted targeting mechanisms, one interviewed soldier made the comparison: “Because everything runs on remote control, the process resembles a video game.”

Another soldier described the deaths on the ground as “unbelievably fun”.

Director Yuval Abraham said: “The intelligence personnel we interviewed stated that the mass deaths were not an accident, but on the contrary rested upon a designed and systematic choice.”

Abraham and Szor stated that the production did not scrutinise individual soldier violations, but directly examined the institutional chain of command and operational doctrines.

The two directors had previously made the Oscar-winning documentary “No Other Land”, which addressed the displacement of Palestinians and settler violence in the occupied West Bank, alongside Palestinian filmmakers Basel Adra and Hamdan Ballal.

While the Ministry of Health in Gaza announced that the number of Palestinians who have lost their lives in the attacks exceeded 73,700, the actual death toll is projected to be far above this figure due to destroyed healthcare infrastructure and casualties lost beneath the rubble.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Saudi Arabia asks UK for military aid to counter Houthis in Yemen

Published

on

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is considering responding to requests for military assistance directed at Yemen from the Saudi Arabian government.

According to sources speaking to Bloomberg, the prime minister has received various requests for diplomatic and military support from Saudi Arabia.

The sources stated that Saudi Arabia’s requests include providing operational support to its military to repel the advance of Ansarullah (the Houthis) along Yemen’s Red Sea coast towards the strategically vital Bab el-Mandeb Strait, as well as assistance in defending against attacks on oil infrastructure.

Under pressure to take action because of the economic difficulties generated by the war with Iran, Burnham is also concerned about creating the impression that he supports Donald Trump’s war against Iran, given that the UK public overwhelmingly opposes the war.

Reports had emerged that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked Donald Trump to conduct air strikes against the Yemeni resistance.

At present, the UK has approved the deployment of only British military advisers to Saudi Arabia.

This comes despite Saudi Arabia’s request for operational support to halt operations carried out by Yemeni forces along the coastline.

Former UK prime ministers Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer had provided more comprehensive support to Saudi Arabia against the Yemeni resistance.

The prime minister was also warned by UK officials that the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is of vital importance to global maritime transport and the economy, and that the capture of this strait by the Houthis must be prevented.

Earlier on Monday, Bloomberg reported that Saudi Arabia was seeking to increase the volume of oil shipments transiting the Strait of Hormuz after shutting down its East-West crude pipeline.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Saudi exportable crude stocks risk depletion within a week

Published

on

Saudi Arabia risks exhausting its exportable crude stockpiles if the East-West pipeline to the Red Sea fails to resume operations, according to reports.

Citing companies purchasing Saudi crude as well as market traders, the Reuters news agency reported that such an outcome could trigger a severe contraction in global oil supply.

Oil flows through the pipeline were halted following drone strikes. The government in Riyadh has not yet issued an official statement regarding the extent of the damage or the expected duration of repair works.

Sources familiar with the matter have offered differing estimates regarding the repair timetable.

One source speaking to Reuters noted that works could take five to six weeks, while another source stated that the damage could be repaired more quickly and that partial oil flows could be restored before repairs are entirely completed.

Stocks at Yanbu port reach critical threshold

Traversing the Arabian Peninsula to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, the pipeline carries approximately 4 million barrels of oil per day. This volume represents roughly 4% of global oil supply.

The line previously provided Saudi Arabia with an alternative export route, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz where maritime traffic has faced disruptions due to regional conflict in the Middle East.

Three sources closely tracking shipment schedules indicated that, following the stoppage, oil reserves at Yanbu port would suffice to sustain exports for only five to seven days.

A fourth source stated that additional reserves held in Egypt at the Red Sea port of Ain Sokhna and the Mediterranean terminal of Sidi Kerir afford buyers shipments for several more days.

Storage capacities stand at approximately 35 million barrels at Yanbu, 18 million barrels at Ain Sokhna, and 20 million barrels at Sidi Kerir.

However, sources stressed that these facilities are not currently filled to maximum capacity and warned that these inventories will be entirely depleted if the pipeline is not brought back online.

Output at lowest level in 30 years

According to International Energy Agency data, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea transit corridors pushed Saudi oil supply in August to its lowest level in 30 years.

Data submitted by the Riyadh government to OPEC show that the kingdom’s crude production fell from 10.9 million barrels per day in February to 6.2 million barrels per day in August.

In July, the Houthis in Yemen announced the launch of a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia. On 8 September, the Saudi Ministry of Energy announced that operations had been suspended at several energy facilities in the southern part of the country.

On the same day, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement condemning Houthi strikes targeting facilities in the cities of Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jizan, and Najran.

Riyadh authorities reported that 73 civilians, including women and children, were injured in the attacks. US President Donald Trump stated that Iran might be behind this attack on Saudi Arabia.

In oil markets, Brent crude futures recorded their sharpest single-day gain since late July on Thursday, 10 September.

The price of November Brent crude contracts rose by 6.3% to reach $107.6 per barrel. Prices retreated below the $105 mark the following day.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey