Diplomacy
New CIA assessment suggests lab leak as probable COVID-19 origin

The CIA has concluded in a new assessment that COVID-19 “probably” originated from a laboratory leak in China, marking a significant shift in the understanding of the pandemic’s origins.
The U.S. intelligence agency stated with “low confidence” that the virus leaked from a research facility, revising its previous stance that there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions.
“The CIA assesses with low confidence that, based on available reports, it is more likely that the COVID-19 pandemic is of research origin than natural origin,” the agency announced on Saturday. “The CIA continues to assess that both research-related and natural-origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible.”
For the past four years, the U.S. intelligence community, comprising 18 agencies, has been investigating whether COVID-19 emerged naturally from a Wuhan fish market or leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The CIA’s position now aligns with the FBI and the Department of Energy in attributing the virus’s origin to the Wuhan laboratory. However, the agency emphasized its “low confidence” in this assessment and stated it would continue evaluating new intelligence reports or open-source information that could alter their conclusion.
This assessment became public shortly after John Ratcliffe’s appointment as CIA director. In a Breitbart interview following his confirmation as President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the intelligence agency, Ratcliffe expressed his belief that intelligence and common sense “dictate that Covid’s origin is a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” He committed to ensuring “the public is aware that the agency [CIA] is going to get into the game.”
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz noted that those previously dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” for suggesting COVID-19 resulted from a laboratory leak were “right all along,” adding: “We can’t stop the next pandemic without understanding how the last one happened!”
According to a U.S. official who spoke to the Financial Times, Bill Burns, who headed the CIA during the Biden administration, directed the CIA assessment team to take a position on COVID-19’s source but did not influence the outcome. This directive coincided with National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan’s instruction for the intelligence community to reexamine the pandemic’s origins as the Biden administration prepared to transition.
The U.S. official emphasized that the CIA was reviewing its assessment before Ratcliffe’s appointment as director.
Senator Tom Cotton, Republican chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, stated: “I said from the beginning that Covid probably originated in the Wuhan laboratories. Communist China covered it up and the liberal media protected them. I am pleased that the CIA concluded in the final days of the Biden administration that the most plausible explanation for the origin of Covid is the laboratory leak theory, and I commend Director Ratcliffe for fulfilling his promise to announce this conclusion. The most important thing to do now is to make China pay for the disease it has unleashed on the world.”
The Chinese Embassy in Washington strongly opposed this characterization, stating: “The so-called U.S. report, without any concrete evidence, fabricates misleading conclusions, smears and stigmatizes China. This report is still an old routine of political manipulation to trace the source and has no credibility.”
Diplomacy
Armenia signals potential complete withdrawal from CSTO

Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanyan announced that Yerevan might decide to withdraw entirely from the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) if member states fail to “demonstrate a clear political stance” regarding Azerbaijan’s actions. Kostanyan emphasized that Armenia is no longer making insinuations but is speaking very openly.
According to the Novosti-Armenia news agency, Kostanyan stated, “Ultimately, if our partners in the CSTO, including the Russian Federation, do not make the political statements that were mentioned several years ago after the aggression against the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia, then Armenia will make a final decision.”
The Deputy Minister also underscored that Armenia, as a sovereign state, will determine the right time for its next steps.
Membership was frozen
Relations between Armenia, Russia, and the CSTO deteriorated following the conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh, after which Yerevan formally requested support from its allies.
Following this process, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan repeatedly criticized the CSTO for not assisting Yerevan.
Pashinyan described the organization as a “bubble alliance,” claiming it was “planning a war” against Armenia alongside Baku.
Last February, Prime Minister Pashinyan announced that Armenia had frozen its participation in the CSTO. By May, the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that the country would refuse to finance the organization’s activities.
Intelligence report points in the same direction
In January of this year, a public report released by the Armenian Foreign Intelligence Service stated that the country has no intention of returning to full participation in the CSTO in the near future.
The report noted, “We find it highly unlikely that the reasons that led to Armenia suspending its membership will change in 2025. Based on this situation, the organization’s prestige continues to be seriously questioned and has become a ’cause for reflection’ for other member countries.”
Diplomacy
BRICS internal trade volume hits the $1 trillion mark

Kirill Dmitriev, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation and CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), announced that the internal trade volume among BRICS countries has reached $1 trillion.
In a statement on his Telegram channel, Dmitriev noted that surpassing this significant milestone confirms the strengthening of economic ties between member states and the bloc’s growing role in shaping the new global economic architecture.
He also emphasized that Russia continues to strengthen trade relations, particularly through the BRICS Business Council, in line with the directives of President Vladimir Putin.
BRICS’ share will continue to grow, Putin says
During a plenary session at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on June 20, Russian President Vladimir Putin recalled that at the beginning of the 21st century, BRICS countries accounted for only one-fifth of the global economy, whereas today this figure has reached 40%.
The Russian leader stated that this share will continue to grow, describing it as a “medical fact.” According to Putin, this growth will primarily be driven by the countries of the Global South.
In April, Maxim Oreshkin, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration of Russia, also said that the BRICS countries, operating on principles of consensus, have become a key force in the world economy.
BRICS expansion agenda
Initially composed of five countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—BRICS expanded in 2024 with the inclusion of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Ethiopia, and Egypt.
In January of this year, Indonesia became the bloc’s tenth full member.
Diplomacy
Xi Jinping to miss BRICS summit in Rio for the first time

Chinese President Xi Jinping will not attend the upcoming BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro next week.
According to multiple sources cited by the South China Morning Post on Tuesday, this marks the first time Xi will miss the gathering of leaders from major emerging economies.
Officials familiar with the matter stated that Beijing informed the Brazilian government of a scheduling conflict. Premier Li Qiang is expected to lead the Chinese delegation in Xi’s place, a similar arrangement to the 2023 G20 summit in India.
Chinese officials involved in the preparations suggested Xi’s absence is due to his two meetings with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva within the past year. The first occurred during the G20 summit and a state visit to Brasília last November, while the second took place at the China-CELAC forum in Beijing this May.
Xi has never before missed a BRICS summit. In 2023, he was scheduled to deliver a speech at the meeting in South Africa but, at the last minute, sent Commerce Minister Wang Wentao instead. Beijing provided no official explanation for the change.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Xi participated in BRICS meetings virtually, with Russia hosting in 2020 and China in 2021.
On Tuesday, the Brazilian Foreign Ministry told the Post it “would not comment on the internal deliberations of foreign delegations.” The Chinese embassy in Brazil did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
However, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun told the Brazilian newspaper Folha de S.Paulo, “information regarding participation in the summit will be shared at the appropriate time.” Guo added that China supports Brazil’s BRICS presidency and aims to “promote deeper cooperation” among member nations. “In a volatile and turbulent world, the BRICS countries are maintaining their strategic resolve and working together for global peace, stability, and development,” he said.
In Brasília, officials have not concealed their disappointment regarding Xi’s absence. A source informed the Post that Lula had traveled to Beijing in May as a “show of goodwill” and had hoped “the Chinese president would reciprocate the gesture by attending the Rio summit.”
There was also speculation that Lula’s invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a state dinner after the BRICS summit may have influenced Beijing’s decision, as Xi might have been “perceived as a supporting actor” at the event.
Lula’s special adviser for international relations, Celso Amorim, met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing, where he clearly expressed Brazil’s desire to host Xi. “I told them, ‘BRICS without China is not BRICS,'” Amorim stated, recalling that then-President Hu Jintao attended the first BRICS summit in Brazil despite a major earthquake in China at the time. “He only stayed for one day, but he came.”
Amorim emphasized the particular importance of Xi’s attendance in the current global context, citing the “US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization” as a “violation of international rules.”
Premier Li is expected to arrive in Brazil next weekend for the summit, which is scheduled for July 6 and 7 in Rio.
-
Middle East1 week ago
US to launch major bombing campaign against Iran this weekend, Hersh reports
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Former diplomat warns forcing Iran out of the NPT is the greatest danger
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iran targets Mossad and Unit 8200 in missile attack on Tel Aviv
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Former CIA analyst says Israel used ceasefire talks as a trap
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iranian missile attack causes heavy damage across Israel
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iran signals NPT withdrawal amid rising tensions with Israel
-
Russia2 weeks ago
Russia alleges UK-Ukraine plot for false flag attack on US Navy in Baltic Sea
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Iran’s uranium enrichment program since 1979