Connect with us

America

Court challenge could force an end to Trump’s trade wars this month

Published

on

US President Donald Trump’s trade wars could be forced to end this month, even without dozens of trading partners having to make concessions.

The decision rests with the US Court of International Trade (CIT), a little-known, New York-based federal court that adjudicates cases related to trade and customs law.

The court will hear oral arguments in a case questioning Trump’s use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) last month to impose sweeping new tariffs, and his subsequent 90-day suspension of the highest levies applied to approximately 60 trading partners.

If the court grants the plaintiffs’ request for an emergency preliminary injunction, the trade negotiations that the Trump administration is currently rushing to complete with dozens of countries could be upended.

Opponents of the tariffs, according to a report in POLITICO, argue that Trump has violated the Constitution and hope the US Court of International Trade will grant a preliminary injunction by the end of the month.

Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel for the Liberty Justice Center, a conservative constitutional rights group representing VOS Selections (a New York-based wine and spirits company) and other small businesses suing over Trump’s tariffs, stated that many businesses will not survive if the tariffs are not lifted, as the case could potentially reach the Supreme Court.

An injunction would also jeopardize Trump’s efforts to use the threat of country-specific “reciprocal” tariffs to negotiate new trade deals with dozens of nations.

Trump announced the first of these deals with the United Kingdom on Thursday, though many details remain unclear. The White House has also been negotiating an agreement with China to reduce tariffs and establish a bilateral mechanism to resolve long-standing trade disputes.

To justify previous tariffs on China and the largely suspended 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, Trump had declared a national emergency due to immigrants and fentanyl crossing the border. However, the VOS case challenges the reciprocal tariffs Trump announced on April 2.

The Coalition for a Prosperous America, a group representing manufacturers who support import protection, praised Trump’s decision to use emergency law to implement his trade agenda as a “bold and long-overdue reset of the global trading system.”

But figures like former Republican Senator John Danforth argue that Trump is using a “flimsy pretext” to usurp the taxing and trade powers vested in Congress by the founders.

“This is the biggest issue our country has faced since its founding. This is about the concentration of power in one hand and James Madison’s idea of spreading power across various branches of government,” Danforth said in an interview.

Danforth, along with a group including former Republican senators George Allen and Chuck Hagel, and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, submitted an amicus brief criticizing Trump’s decision and urging the CIT to issue a preliminary injunction preventing the administration from collecting tariffs while the cases are pending.

The brief states, “Since the founding of the Republic, the power to tax – like the power to raise revenue – has belonged exclusively to Congress. This is not a formality. This country was born out of the slogan ‘No taxation without representation,’ meaning that the power to tax, raise revenue, and determine the economic obligations of the people must belong to the elected representatives of the people.”

Danforth argued that the argument in their brief goes to the very heart of the matter. “This isn’t about the appropriateness of tariffs or some legal issues. It’s a constitutional issue. The question is, ‘Can the President seize the power to tax from [Congress]?’ but I would also add to that the power to control foreign trade,” the former senator said.

Schwab, lead counsel for the VOS case in the CIT on Tuesday, said they presented a series of arguments they believe the court will find persuasive.

“[Fundamentally,] we do not believe that the IEEPA grants the president the authority to impose tariffs or implement customs duties,” Schwab stated.

The plaintiffs also contest Trump’s assertion that a “large and persistent annual merchandise trade deficit” justifies imposing tariffs as a national emergency, given that the US has had a trade deficit for 50 years. Schwab said this gave Congress ample time to act if its members deemed it necessary.

The plaintiffs also advance several more technical legal arguments. One is the “major questions doctrine,” which requires an explicit delegation of authority from Congress when the executive branch takes actions exceeding an undefined threshold of “economic and political significance.” The plaintiffs argue that Trump’s tariffs clearly surpass this threshold.

Another somewhat related argument is the “nondelegation doctrine,” which states that Congress cannot delegate its legislative powers to the executive branch without providing an intelligible principle to guide the executive’s discretion.

Schwab stated, “Here, what the Trump administration is essentially saying is that they have the authority to impose tariffs without any oversight, and they can do it whenever they want, at whatever rate they want. If the court interprets [the IEEPA] this way, we believe it will find it unconstitutional.”

America

US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land

Published

on

Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.

For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.

Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:

“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”

The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.

Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.

Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.

Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.

Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.

Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.

Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market

The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.

Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.

The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.

Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.

Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.

Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.

William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.

Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.

Continue Reading

America

US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies

Published

on

An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.

Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.

Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.

Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.

Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.

When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.

The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.

Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.

Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war

In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.

Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.

Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.

American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.

Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.

Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.

Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise

The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.

Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.

Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.

Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.

Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.

Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.

Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.

Continue Reading

America

Anthropic posts $80.7bn loss ahead of IPO as computing costs soar

Published

on

Anthropic, developer of the artificial intelligence model Claude, reported a net loss of $80.7 billion for the first six months of 2026 ending 30 June.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal citing the company’s draft initial public offering prospectus, this recorded loss nearly doubled the $42 billion loss incurred across the entirety of 2025.

The vast majority of that enormous figure, accounting for $72 billion, stemmed from accounting-driven book-value write-downs.

In contrast, the company saw a sharp surge in revenue, with turnover in the first half of the year climbing to $16.3 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period of the prior year.

During this period, Anthropic spent approximately $9 billion on computing power and infrastructure needs, surpassing in just six months the $7.3 billion spent across the whole of 2025.

The company has commitments to pay roughly $450 billion over the next seven to 10 years under cloud service contracts.

Under these obligations, contracts are planned for $111 billion with Google Cloud, $110 billion with Amazon Web Services, and $31 billion with Microsoft.

Anthropic will also spend up to $86 billion by 2033 and 2034, respectively, to lease Nvidia chips through smaller AI-focused cloud providers Nscale and Lambda.

The company could spend an additional $750 billion in the coming years to expand its computing capacity.

Roughly a third of the draft IPO prospectus was dedicated directly to risk factors.

The document highlighted the possibility that models could cause tangible real-world harm, noting that artificial intelligence could exhibit a “self-preservation” tendency and produce responses resembling “blackmail”.

Anthropic warned that the scale of damage caused by an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could render insuring against such risks impossible.

According to market expectations, Anthropic’s IPO could rank among the largest transactions in history, potentially surpassing SpaceX’s record.

Following the market debut, the company’s market valuation is projected to reach up to $2 trillion.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey