Middle East
Israeli soldiers admit to routine looting in southern Lebanon amid command oversight failures
Israeli soldiers serving in southern Lebanon have admitted to large-scale looting of civilian homes and businesses, describing the theft of private property as a “widespread” and “routine” practice. According to a report by the Haaretz newspaper, based on testimonies from both soldiers and commanders, items being taken include televisions, motorcycles, carpets, furniture, and various personal belongings.
The report indicates that commanders, including high-ranking officers overseeing military operations in Lebanon, are aware of the looting. Despite this knowledge, officials have reportedly failed to take preventive measures to halt the activity. Soldiers were observed loading seized items into military vehicles or setting them aside without any attempt at concealment.
One soldier described the scale of the looting as “insane,” stating: “Televisions, cigarettes, tools—whatever is there. Anyone who takes something puts it in a vehicle immediately or leaves it to the side. This isn’t happening deep inside the base, but it isn’t being hidden either. Everyone sees and understands what is being done.”
Military authorities acknowledge insufficient oversight
In official statements, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claimed that disciplinary and punitive measures are in place, asserting that soldiers undergo Military Police inspections at the border when returning to Israel. However, Haaretz reported that several Military Police checkpoints established to prevent looting in southern Lebanon have been dismantled, while those remaining active conduct no inspections.
Sources describing the disciplinary environment within units stated that some commanders completely ignore the situation, while others issue verbal warnings against looting without initiating any criminal proceedings. One soldier summarized the situation in his unit: “No one says anything or reacts. Battalion and brigade commanders are aware of everything.”
Another soldier emphasized that a culture of impunity encourages the behavior. “If one person were dismissed, imprisoned, or if Military Police were stationed at the border, this would stop instantly,” he said. “But when no punishment is given, the message is very clear.”
Long deployments for reservists weaken discipline
Some soldiers noted that commanders are reluctant to punish reservists who have been serving for extended periods since the start of operations in Gaza. One testimony cited in the report stated: “People here have served more than 500 days in reserve units. Commanders cannot put these reservists in prison. They realize discipline has weakened but lack the power to fix the situation.”
Soldiers also noted that looting activities are fueled by the systematic destruction of homes and villages in southern Lebanon. Explaining the logic used by personnel, one soldier remarked: “What difference does it make if I take it? This place is going to be blown up soon anyway.”
Gaza destruction models transferred to Lebanese theater
The Israeli military is reportedly using significant quantities of explosives to level villages in southern Lebanon. A report by The Guardian on April 12 also noted that the IDF has been booby-trapping and destroying houses with the aim of completely displacing border villages.
These demolition activities have reportedly intensified following instructions from Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz to destroy “all houses” in border villages. The report states Katz issued this order with the intent that the destruction be carried out “in accordance with the model implemented in Rafah and Beit Hanoun in Gaza.” Data shared indicates that the Israeli military has destroyed 90% of residential buildings in Rafah during the offensive that began in October 2023.
The expansion of looting in Lebanon is also attributed to the fact that occupying units are often not engaged in continuous, high-intensity combat. According to the Haaretz analysis, soldiers spend long periods in empty villages and towns previously abandoned by residents, allowing them to move freely through civilian areas. The newspaper added that images appearing on social media showing soldiers destroying property represent only “the tip of the iceberg.”
Despite a ceasefire reached between Hezbollah and Israel last week, Israeli occupation forces reportedly continue to hold a “buffer zone” reaching up to 10 kilometers deep into Lebanese territory. The report states that through this strategy, Israel aims to annex Lebanese land, seize control of water resources, expand the region by building new settlements, and take possession of Lebanon’s offshore natural gas deposits.
According to data from Lebanese health authorities, Israeli attacks have displaced more than one million people and killed over 2,000. During the conflict, 16 Israeli soldiers were killed, while two civilians died, including one killed by Israeli army friendly fire.
As of 2024, six new criminal investigations have reportedly been launched against Israeli soldiers on charges of looting or property destruction, though none of these investigations have yet proceeded to the trial stage.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe6 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy6 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe2 weeks agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Middle East2 weeks agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
America2 weeks agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Europe6 days agoRome protests AfD poster depicting South Tyrol as independent state
