America
Return to ‘McCarthyism’: UC Berkeley discloses 160 names to the Trump administration
The University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley) has provided the names of 160 faculty members and students to the Trump administration as part of an investigation into “antisemitic incidents.” A targeted academic described this action as a “practice from the McCarthy era.”
UC Berkeley, a top public institution, sent a letter to affected campus members last week, explaining that university lawyers had added their names to reports submitted to the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The Department of Education is targeting universities nationwide as part of Donald Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian activism, international students, and academic freedom.
Renowned feminist theorist Judith Butler received a letter from UC Berkeley’s chief campus counsel, David Robinson, stating that the OCR was investigating “allegations of antisemitic harassment and discrimination” and had requested the “submission of extensive documents.”
Butler, a Jewish academic who is critical of Israel, said she questioned Robinson about the disclosures on Friday but received no information regarding the specific allegations.
“We have the right to know the accusations against us, who made them, to review them, and to defend ourselves. But none of that has happened, so we are living in a Kafkaesque world… This is a major breach of trust,” Butler stated.
Butler also recalled that UC Berkeley was the center of the free speech movement in the 1960s, adding, “We are a place where controversial public issues can be freely discussed. We have different views on the Israel-Palestine issue. We need to listen to them even if they make us uncomfortable. This is the spirit of this place that I have defended and endorsed for 30 years. That is why this situation is so sad and shameful.”
UC Berkeley officials confirmed on Friday that 160 individuals, including faculty, students, and staff, had received warning letters about the disclosure of their information, and said the decision to send the information to the Trump administration was made by the general counsel of the University of California system.
Butler said she learned that the list of names also included international students, lecturers, and part-time faculty members.
“The consequences of this compliance could be truly terrible for the lives of many people, most of whom are much more vulnerable than I am,” said Butler, who is semi-retired but continues to have some responsibilities as a professor in the graduate school. “International students, in particular, could suffer from many things, such as deportation, expulsion, job loss, harassment, and surveillance.”
Butler also stated that she was told the university’s normal procedures for handling complaints had been suspended. This situation appears to have stripped faculty members of their right to respond to allegations or receive basic information about the investigations.
“This means that allegations sent to the administration, including anonymous ones, are simply being forwarded without adjudication… We don’t know if we ourselves are being accused of antisemitism or if our names are merely associated with an allegation,” Butler said.
Butler stated that UC Berkeley’s counsel refused to share the contents of the files sent to the Trump administration with her. A spokesperson for UC Berkeley declined to comment on Butler’s allegations, deferring to the office of the university president.
Rachel Zaentz, a spokesperson for the UC president, said, “Like all public universities, the University of California is subject to oversight by state and federal agencies. Our campuses regularly receive requests for documents in connection with government audits, compliance reviews, or investigations. While fulfilling its legal obligations, UC is committed to protecting the privacy of our students, faculty, and staff to the fullest extent possible.”
Butler questioned why the university did not resist the government’s demands, citing the presidents of other institutions who have stated they would not bow to certain federal requests in order to protect academic freedom.
“This is shocking… Did you consider not complying with this request?” Butler asked.
America
Unauthorised AI agents access customer accounts at major US banks
Incidents have been detected at the largest US banks in which unauthorised artificial intelligence agents gained access to customer accounts.
According to a report by Axios based on sources, some of these AI agents attempted to take actions that were not included in user instructions.
Institutions facing risks arising from such agents include leading lenders such as Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, and Citi.
In some cases, AI software entered customer accounts using usernames and passwords directly with user consent.
In contrast, security rules at most banks require users to log in to their accounts personally.
According to Axios, in other instances, AI agents designed to carry out tasks on behalf of customers contacted bank call centres directly or tried to take independent steps without receiving any instruction from the user.
Bank executives worry that such software with access to credentials could make unauthorized purchases or transfer funds.
Following these risks, banks are moving to restrict third-party AI agents from accessing their platforms. While Morgan Stanley has begun blocking such software, JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citi are also introducing similar restrictions.
Banks are also considering offering a financial access model that gives AI agents read-only permissions while completely cutting off transaction capabilities.
Sources speaking to Axios point out that it is extremely difficult for banks to determine whether an agent is acting on user instructions or accessing the account entirely on its own initiative.
Regulators hold emergency meeting with systemically risky banks
According to reports by Bloomberg and the Financial Times citing sources, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell held an extraordinary meeting in April with top executives of the country’s largest banks over concerns about cyber threats that could be posed by a new AI model developed by Anthropic.
Sources providing details on the talks stated that US officials wanted to gauge bank awareness regarding risks tied to the Claude Mythos model and inspect the measures they have taken to protect their systems.
Senior executives from Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Morgan Stanley attended the meeting.
Organised at short notice, the summit indicated that regulatory authorities view this new breed of cyber attack as one of the greatest threats to the financial sector.
All of the banks represented at the table are classified as systemically important institutions within the global financial architecture.
Axios reported that leading AI firms, including Anthropic and OpenAI, harbour concerns that an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could take place over the next 6 to 12 months.
America
US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land
Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.
For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.
Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:
“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”
The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.
Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.
Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.
Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.
Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.
Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.
Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market
The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.
Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.
The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.
Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.
Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.
Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.
William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.
Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.
America
US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies
An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.
Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.
Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.
Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.
Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.
When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.
The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.
Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.
Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war
In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.
Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.
Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.
American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.
Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.
Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.
Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise
The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.
Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.
Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.
Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.
Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.
Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSWP urges backing for Gulf trade routes bypassing Strait of Hormuz
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEU and China reach preliminary deal to curb hybrid car imports
-
America2 weeks agoThiel targets Pope and Obama over AI in new ‘Antichrist’ lectures
-
Europe2 weeks agoLSE study finds post-bailout Greece turned into a cafe economy
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia relaxes diesel export curbs after talks with Trump
-
America2 weeks agoEnergy firms enlist ex-US officials to tap Venezuelan oil
