Connect with us

Diplomacy

Schiller Institute warns of nuclear war, calls for new global security architecture

Published

on

At a conference organized by the Schiller Institute in Berlin, a warning was issued that the world is facing the threat of a total nuclear war. Speakers pointed to the collapse of the unipolar order and the rise of a multipolar world led by BRICS, emphasizing that the only way out is a new global architecture that considers the security and development interests of all nations. The conference called for cooperation between BRICS and Europe on projects for Africa’s development, such as the “Oasis Plan” and “Agenda 2063.”

During the international conference held by the Schiller Institute in Berlin, it was warned that the world is on the brink of a total nuclear war and that history is approaching an irreversible point.

The event, titled “Cooperation Between BRICS and Europe to Implement the Oasis Plan and Agenda 2063 for Africa,” addressed the collapse of the unipolar world order and the rise of a multipolar world led by the BRICS nations.

Politicians, academics, and former intelligence officials who spoke at the conference stressed that the only way out of the current geopolitical tensions is to build a new global architecture that respects the security and development interests of all countries.

In her opening speech, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder and president of the Schiller Institute, stated that the world has never been closer to a “punctum saliens,” or “turning point,” where a global nuclear war catastrophe could become inevitable.

Zepp-LaRouche argued that the roots of the current crisis date back to 1971, when US President Nixon dismantled the Bretton Woods system, transitioning to unregulated monetary policies. She said that predictions that this process would lead to a new depression, fascism, and world war are being realized today.

“It is possible to intervene in history by having a good plan and mobilizing enough power to implement it,” said Zepp-LaRouche, calling for action against pessimism.

‘Russian-German reconciliation is shattered’

In one of the conference’s most striking speeches, analyst Dmitriy Trenin from the Institute of World Military Economy and Strategy at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics stated that Europe has become the “main adversary” for Russia in the proxy war in Ukraine.

Trenin argued that this situation emerged as Russia began to gain the upper hand in Ukraine and the US, under a potential Trump administration, shifted its focus to Asia. “Europe is trying to consolidate itself as a power center by casting Russia in the role of the enemy at the gate,” he said.

Calling the assumption that Russia would attack Europe “absurd,” Trenin emphasized that the current situation is far more dangerous than the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

“The Russian-German reconciliation no longer exists; it is shattered, and this is a tragedy. This crisis occurred due to preventable steps, such as NATO’s expansion towards Ukraine, the disregard for the Minsk Agreement, and the sabotage of the peace draft in Istanbul. If we do not make a joint effort at the 11th hour, this crisis will not stop until it is staring into the abyss,” he stated.

The rise of China and the new world order

Chinese academic Professor Zhang Weiwei noted that the world is already multipolar and that the GDP of the BRICS countries, based on purchasing power parity, has surpassed that of the G7.

Criticizing Europe for its dependence on the US and its “deep mistrust” of China, Zhang said, “Europe talks, China does.”

Highlighting China’s successes in areas such as poverty alleviation, infrastructure projects in Africa, and the greening of the Taklamakan Desert, Zhang said that Chinese philosophy is based on the principle of “unite and prosper,” contrary to the West’s “divide and rule” approach.

“Western philosophy says ‘friend or foe,’ while Chinese philosophy says ‘friend or potential friend.’ That is what makes all the difference,” Zhang remarked.

‘A new scramble for Africa is underway’

African speakers, who joined the conference via video message, expressed both hopes and concerns about the continent’s future.

Dr. Naledi Pandor, President of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, said that this conference brought the voice of freedom, justice, and peace to Berlin, in contrast to the historic “Berlin Conference” that endorsed colonialism.

Stating that Africa believes in a multipolar world and a reformed United Nations, Pandor emphasized that the continent’s development plan, “Agenda 2063,” and the Schiller Institute’s “Oasis Plan” complement each other. She stressed that the global community must shift from a conflict-oriented agenda to a development-oriented one.

Kenyan academic Patrick Lumumba took a more critical stance, stating that a “new scramble” is taking place in Africa involving many actors such as the US, China, Russia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

“This situation is reminiscent of the Berlin Conference of 1884. The only difference is that the language is sweeter. Africa is open to manipulation due to its internal divisions and weak institutions,” Lumumba assessed.

Questioning whether multipolarity would mean replacing old hegemons with new ones, Lumumba asked, “Who will be the hegemon within BRICS? China? India? Will African countries be pawns again?”

The war lobby and a call to action

Meanwhile, former CIA analyst Ray McGovern described the structures fueling war in the US as the “Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-Media-Academia-Think Tank Complex (MICIMATT).”

McGovern stated that the cornerstone of this structure is the media, noting that corporations profiting from war control the media, which is why alternative media networks are of vital importance.

“We must remember the Noah principle: No more prizes for predicting rain. The prizes go to those who build arks,” McGovern said, emphasizing that being informed is not enough; action is required.

Throughout the conference, the prevailing message was that hope should not be lost despite the current dangers and that active efforts must be made for peace.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche concluded her speech with quotes from German poet Friedrich Schiller’s piece Deutsche Größe, stating, “The true victory is not to conquer with the sword, but to liberate minds with the lightning of truth,” and called for a struggle for justice and freedom of reason for all peoples.

Diplomacy

South Korea pulls part of embassy staff from Ukraine amid POW dispute

Published

on

The South Korean government has decided to withdraw part of its embassy staff from Ukraine.

According to the Yonhap news agency, Foreign Ministry spokesman Park Doo-sun cited the Kyiv administration’s failure to take “positive steps” in the dispute that began with the leak of information concerning the handover of North Korean prisoners of war as the justification for the move.

The spokesman also listed the ongoing threat of air strikes, which complicates the safety of diplomats, among the reasons.

Following the withdrawal of part of the personnel, essential diplomatic contacts will continue under the leadership of the charge d’affaires ad interim to Ukraine. All consular staff tasked with protecting South Korean citizens will remain in Ukraine.

Prior to this move, the Seoul administration decided on 8 October to withdraw its ambassador. The Foreign Ministry stated at the time that it was ready to continue consultations with Kyiv to resolve the emerging issues constructively.

Tensions between the two countries began with a speech delivered by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

Zelenskyy announced that two captured soldiers from the North Korean army had been handed over to South Korea.

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, meanwhile, accused Kyiv of breaching a confidentiality agreement.

Lee said the disclosure of this information endangered the prisoners’ families and stability on the Korean Peninsula.

Seoul expects a public apology

Dmytro Lytvyn, an adviser to the Ukrainian president, denied the existence of a confidentiality agreement.

The South Korean Foreign Ministry summoned Ukrainian Charge d’Affaires Andriy Veshkin on 28 September and issued a note of protest against Lytvyn’s remarks.

President Lee Jae-myung warned in a statement on 2 October that they would take additional measures against Kyiv if Ukrainian authorities did not acknowledge the agreement and make a public apology. Lee stated that Ukraine itself had initially requested that the transfer of the prisoners be kept confidential.

Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi said the dispute stemmed from differing interpretations of the confidentiality regime.

Tykhyi noted that Seoul, based on its constitution which recognises the entire Korean Peninsula as its own territory, requested that the prisoners be handed over “like its own citizens”.

Describing the handover as a “gesture of goodwill”, Tykhyi stated that they were conducting closed-door negotiations to resolve differences of opinion.

Ambassador Park Ki-chang returned to Seoul on 10 October. According to a report by The Korea Times newspaper citing the ministry, recalling the ambassador served as a diplomatic protest against the leak of information regarding the prisoners.

The newspaper wrote that South Korea had last taken a similar step in 2008 by withdrawing its ambassador to Japan.

Moscow warned foreign diplomats

On 3 October, the Russian Foreign Ministry reiterated its warning to foreign nationals, including diplomatic mission staff, against remaining in Ukraine.

The ministry recalled its advice to leave Kyiv, citing ongoing strikes against military targets.

The ministry noted that those who failed to heed the warnings would bear responsibility for the potential consequences.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in a statement on 24 September that they had no information regarding Kyiv handing over two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul.

Peskov, noting that prisoner matters fall under the authority of the Defence Ministry and intelligence services, said, “Contacts through the special services are continuing.”

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Ex-BND head Hanning tied to former Mossad chief amid spy inquiry

Published

on

August Hanning, who led Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) between 1998 and 2005, was arrested on 6 October on allegations that he obtained roughly 2,000 classified agency documents and used them during contacts with intelligence officers from a foreign state.

Accused of high treason and espionage on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, the former spy chief is alleged to have procured the documents from former BND employee Manfred D.

Prosecutors stated that the leaked records included internal briefing notes presented to senior German officials, though the Berlin government has not yet publicly disclosed which country received the classified data.

According to an exclusive report by Jake Green for The Cradle, seized email exchanges revealed extensive ties between the arrested Hanning and former Mossad director Danny Yatom.

The correspondence shows that the two former intelligence directors built an ongoing network of contacts following their public service, combining commercial ventures, efforts to secure political influence, and intelligence links.

This dynamic has triggered debate that using personal connections and official access for private gain has left Germany’s intelligence apparatus vulnerable.

Intelligence notes for 10,000 euros and campaign proposals

According to the reviewed emails, Hanning told Yatom in a 2018 message that he could prepare an “overall assessment based on information obtained from senior German officials and intelligence agencies” concerning an unidentified candidate.

The former BND head committed to completing the report by 13 July in exchange for 10,000 euros.

Contacts between the two men subsequently expanded to cover domestic political processes in Germany. Ahead of the September 2021 federal election, Yatom asked Hanning to approach leading candidates.

Describing CIY Global as a “political campaign company”, the former Mossad chief noted that he aimed to introduce its capabilities to German politicians, and he mentioned his intention in the same exchange to transfer documents concerning a cybersecurity firm.

Cybersecurity partnership and surveillance operations across Europe

The partnership between Yatom and Hanning reached beyond political lobbying initiatives into the cybersecurity sector.

Hanning reportedly served as a consultant for World Health Energy Holdings, a cybersecurity company linked to Yatom.

Firms of this type, established or managed by former intelligence personnel, provide commercial platforms on the international market for Israeli-origin surveillance, cyber intelligence, and political influence capabilities.

The operational presence of private Israeli-based surveillance technologies across Europe has recently entered judicial records through scandals in Poland, Spain, and Greece.

Polish prosecutors announced on 12 October that data collected under the previous government via Pegasus spyware against political opponents had been transferred out of the country, adding that manufacturer NSO Group maintained access to the technical infrastructure.

In Spain, the 2022 CatalanGate investigation established that at least 65 people, including politicians, lawyers, and civil society representatives, were targeted using Pegasus or Candiru software, with Citizen Lab researchers publishing strong evidence linking the operation to Spanish authorities.

In Greece, the surveillance operation targeting journalist Thanasis Koukakis and Member of the European Parliament Nikos Androulakis was determined to have used Predator software, linked to Intellexa, a company founded by former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian.

In the German espionage investigation, the traffic between Hanning and Yatom involving paid reporting, contacts with electoral candidates, and commercial partnerships does not yet provide conclusive legal evidence regarding the final destination of the roughly 2,000 classified documents.

Nevertheless, the disclosed correspondence gives German investigators a concrete line of inquiry to assess whether classified state secrets reached commercial networks tied to Israeli intelligence.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Trump dismisses US envoy to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has dismissed Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador in Athens, following serious press reports concerning her conduct.

White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia told reporters during her first briefing that Guilfoyle had been asked to resign.

“She was doing a good job, but we didn’t like what we read in the press,” Trump said. “She was not a member of my family. I think she dated my son a long time ago.”

In a social media post, Guilfoyle stated: “These claims are unfounded, and I will resolutely defend my name, reputation, and integrity.” She added that she was particularly proud of the embassy’s work.

According to Kathimerini, her removal came as no surprise in Washington. Days of successive disclosures and vigorous exploitation of the matter by Democrats had been inflicting political damage on the White House ahead of the sensitive midterm elections.

The US State Department was instructed not to comment, with crisis management transferred entirely to the White House.

Reports indicate that most of the president’s team swiftly favoured Guilfoyle’s dismissal, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio was reportedly uneasy with the demonstratively warm public welcome she had staged for him.

Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee have called for an investigation.

“Her resignation does not absolve her of responsibility,” the lawmakers wrote, adding: “While American families struggled to make ends meet, she used her position as a Trump administration official to enrich herself.”

Chargé d’Affaires Josh Huck will assume ambassadorial duties until a successor is chosen.

Meanwhile, Guilfoyle’s departure is expected to cause delays in agreements between Greece and the US.

These include the so-called “Rubio package”, comprising approximately $4 billion in arms deals finalised only days before the secretary of state’s arrival.

Several procedural steps still remain before the contracts can be signed.

In Athens, opposition parties are demanding answers. Dimitris Mantzos of PASOK called for a detailed briefing on the agreements reached during Rubio’s visit.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey