Connect with us

Asia

South Korean leader Lee clashes with Israel as Hormuz tanker crisis threatens energy security

Published

on

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung’s recent diplomatic confrontation with Israel is driven by factors beyond a standard defense of human rights, according to regional analysts. The shift in rhetoric appears increasingly tied to critical energy security concerns and a strategic signal directed at Donald Trump.

At least 26 South Korean tankers are currently believed to be stranded near the Strait of Hormuz. Analysts suggest this logistical crisis alone explains why President Lee engaged in a high-stakes diplomatic dispute with Israel last week.

The controversy erupted on Friday after Lee commented on video footage purportedly showing Israeli soldiers pushing a body off a rooftop.

“We need to verify whether this is true and, if so, what actions have been taken,” Lee wrote. He further stated that there is “no difference” between such wartime killings and the Holocaust or the “comfort women”—a reference to Korean women forced into sexual slavery by Japanese forces during World War II.

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded swiftly, accusing Lee of trivializing the genocide of the Jewish people on the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day. Israeli officials further alleged that the South Korean leader was amplifying a “fake account” notorious for spreading anti-Israel disinformation.

Israel maintained that the video, which it claimed was “investigated and handled appropriately months ago,” depicted an adult militant killed during an operation in the West Bank rather than a child, as some reports had suggested.

Lee responded to the criticism hours later, stating: “The only thing that can be considered a slight consolation is that this involved a corpse rather than a living person.” He added, however, that “treating a corpse in such a manner remains a violation of international law.”

Tankers in limbo

South Korea, the world’s 10th largest economy, is heavily dependent on oil transported through the Strait of Hormuz. Prior to the current conflict, the strait served as a conduit for approximately 25% of all seaborne petroleum trade, making it the world’s most vital energy chokepoint.

Nam Sung-wook, a security analyst and former head of the South Korean Institute for National Security Strategy, told the South China Morning Post that approximately 26 South Korean tankers are currently stalled in the region. Nam, now a distinguished professor at Sookmyung Women’s University, noted that the potential closure of the strait during a US-Israeli conflict with Iran is becoming an increasingly urgent economic threat for Seoul.

Lee Jun-han, a professor of political science at Incheon National University, observed that South Korea “cannot be blamed for adding its voice to growing international calls for a ceasefire and an end to human rights violations.”

However, Jhee Byong-kuen, a professor of political science at Chosun University, offered a more strategic interpretation. “(Lee) was indirectly signaling to Washington that South Korea will not be dragged into a war it does not want,” Jhee said.

This comes as Trump increasingly voices frustration with allies he perceives as “free-riders” who do not sufficiently support Washington’s military efforts, specifically targeting South Korea alongside Japan and the European Union.

Seoul’s damage control

As the diplomatic row intensified over the weekend, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs not only questioned Lee’s motives for sharing the video but also pointed out his silence regarding “recent Iranian and Hezbollah terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens.”

Seoul’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs attempted to de-escalate the situation on Saturday, reframing Lee’s remarks as an expression of “universal human rights” rather than a specific stance on any individual conflict. The ministry reiterated that South Korea condemns terrorism and maintains deep empathy for the victims of the Holocaust.

President Lee issued his own final statement on Sunday via social media, writing: “The sovereignty of every nation and universal human rights must be respected, and aggressive war must be rejected.”

“Empathy applies not only to individuals but also to international relations… If you want to be respected in return, you must respect others,” he added.

Experts maintain that at the core of the dispute is the potential economic devastation an extended conflict could inflict on the South Korean economy.

Domestic political reaction

The incident has sparked significant debate within South Korea’s domestic political sphere.

The conservative People Power Party accused Lee of “showing off over a conflict thousands of kilometers away” while “ignoring human rights violations in North Korea.” The party characterized the tension with Israel as a “diplomatic disaster.”

In response, Lee’s ruling Democratic Party defended the statements. They pointed to South Korea’s recent co-sponsorship of a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution regarding North Korea as evidence that the president’s commitment to human rights principles remains consistent.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey