Connect with us

Asia

Takaichi wins warm words from Trump on China but no firm guarantees

Published

on

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi drew attention for her rapport with US President Donald Trump during her first visit to Washington as Japan’s leader, but analysts say it remains unclear whether she secured firm commitments on China.

Takaichi entered the meeting with a clear objective: to dissuade Trump from striking a deal with Beijing that could leave Tokyo strategically exposed. Japanese officials had hoped to use the run-up to a planned Trump-Xi Jinping summit as leverage, but those expectations were disrupted by two developments: the outbreak of war with Iran on Feb. 28 and the abrupt postponement of Trump’s anticipated meeting with the Chinese leader later this month.

The Takaichi administration had seen the now-delayed Trump-Xi talks as a window to influence Washington’s position in advance. The prime minister aimed to press Trump on the importance of the US-Japan alliance and the need to counter what Tokyo describes as China’s “coercive measures.”

At the outset of his meeting with Takaichi, Trump described Japan-China relations as “tense” and said, “When I meet President Xi in China, I will speak positively about Japan.”

Ryo Sahashi, a professor of international politics at the University of Tokyo, described Trump’s remark as a “moderately positive signal,” while cautioning against overstating its significance. Any supportive language toward Japan in a future Trump-Xi meeting, he suggested, would remain limited in practical impact.

Not a strategic partner, but a variable in negotiations

Japan currently appears to occupy a relatively privileged position among US allies, particularly when contrasted with Trump’s criticism of NATO partners before, during, and after his meeting with Takaichi.

“This is not only due to Takaichi’s personal diplomacy but also reflects Trump’s long-standing and somewhat distinct perception of Japan. Tokyo has learned how to read and effectively leverage this perception,” Sahashi said. While this may not resolve tensions between China and Japan directly, he added, it could “offer Tokyo a diplomatic advantage as US-China relations evolve.”

Some analysts interpret Trump’s remarks as providing short-term reassurance that Japan’s position will not be ignored in US-China dealings. Others take a more skeptical view.

Misato Matsuoka, an associate professor specializing in US-Japan relations at Teikyo University, said the praise could function as a negotiating tool within a broader US-China bargaining framework. “By highlighting Japan’s cooperation, Trump is indirectly pressuring China to present its own concessions,” she said.

Under this interpretation, Japan is viewed “less as an autonomous strategic partner and more as a variable within a wider negotiation process.”

Taiwan emerges as a focal point

Taiwan became one of the most sensitive issues in the aftermath of the meeting, as differences emerged between Japanese and US accounts of the discussions.

A White House readout stated that “the two leaders affirmed that maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is an indispensable element of regional security and global prosperity,” adding that they supported the peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues and opposed unilateral attempts to change the status quo, including through force or coercion.

Although China was not mentioned explicitly, the statement added that the US and Japan would coordinate in third countries to address challenges posed by “strategic competitors” — a phrase widely understood as referring to China and to multilateral initiatives involving partners such as the Philippines and Australia.

By contrast, Japan’s Foreign Ministry statement made no reference to Taiwan. It said only that the two leaders “exchanged views on China-related issues and confirmed close cooperation between Japan and the United States,” while also noting coordination with “like-minded countries.”

Asked about the discrepancy at a regular press briefing on Monday, Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara declined to comment on diplomatic exchanges. He stressed that the readout had been issued “solely by the US side” and reiterated that both leaders confirmed their commitment to close cooperation on China-related matters.

Japan’s relations with China have deteriorated sharply since Takaichi told parliament on Nov. 7 that Japan would defend Taiwan against China and could become militarily involved. Beijing responded forcefully, imposing economic pressure measures and restrictions on Japan.

US officials have expressed concern over the dispute, but Trump has avoided offering explicit backing to Takaichi, wary that doing so could complicate his plans for a broader trade agreement with Xi.

Asia

Chinese Politburo signals cautious confidence as Beijing pivots toward targeted tech support

Published

on

The mid-year meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Politburo has long served as a critical evaluation point for Beijing. The session provides the central government with an opportunity to review developments from the first half of the year and steer the country toward a more realistic economic course in the months ahead.

The latest statement from the top leadership signals cautious confidence. The release indicates that policymakers are favoring a stable, targeted approach over the broad-based stimulus measures that characterized previous years. As China manages its economic transition, the post-Covid era of aggressive spending has clearly drawn to a close. In its place, a strategic and structural approach has taken hold, prioritizing resilience and stability over short-term capital injections.

According to the outcomes of the Politburo meeting, the policy orientation will continue to target specific sectors. Financial support will be directed away from the property market and toward high-tech emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. In the real estate sector, the objective remains stabilizing market confidence and keeping debt risks under control.

Infrastructure investment is likewise being reshaped around the concept of “new infrastructure.” The focus is no longer solely on concrete and physical structures; smart power grids, information technology networks, and data infrastructure have taken precedence.

This approach signifies an investment in future competitiveness rather than simply pumping capital into the economy’s more stagnant sectors. Serving as a new driver of growth, digital infrastructure fulfills a dual purpose: supporting domestic demand in the short term while safeguarding technological competitiveness over the long term.

Finally, Beijing is signaling a more conciliatory posture in international trade. The Chinese leadership aims to establish a more balanced trade framework to mitigate concerns voiced by trade partners such as the European Union over what has been termed “China Shock 2.0.”

As the administration prepares for critical leadership changes next year, its primary focus will remain on stability across both economic and social spheres.

China continues to strike a balance between realistic growth targets and systemic restructuring, maintaining policy leeway to absorb potential external shocks. Beijing’s economic strategy reflects a pragmatic assessment of both domestic and international challenges.

Struggling with weak demand, the domestic economy is not yet in a position to anchor national growth independently. Expansion continues to rely heavily on a record trade surplus alongside the impressive export performance of high-tech and clean energy sectors. However, this reliance has drawn pushback from several trading partners.

To stimulate domestic economic activity and ease trade tensions, Beijing unveiled its first standalone five-year plan focused on consumption. Released in July by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, the plan targets an increase in retail sales to 60 trillion yuan (approximately $8.9 trillion) by 2030. This represents an increase of roughly 20% compared to 2025 levels.

To improve profit margins for small businesses, regulatory authorities are tackling the issue of “involution”—described as excessive internal competition—by curbing platform monopolies and preventing destructive price wars. While these structural adjustments may take longer to yield results, they are viewed as a more sustainable and effective alternative to direct cash handouts.

Continue Reading

Asia

Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand

Published

on

Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.

Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.

Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.

Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.

Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.

In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.

The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.

Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.

This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.

The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.

Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.

Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.

Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.

CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange

Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.

As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.

At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.

Continue Reading

Asia

Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister

Published

on

Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests

India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.

The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.

The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.

What triggered the protests?

Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.

Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.

According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.

Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.

The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.

How the movement unfolded

Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.

Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.

The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.

Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.

CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.

Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.

Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.

Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.

In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.

Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.

Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.

Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.

On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.

On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey