Connect with us

Middle East

Talks collapse in Damascus: Shara and Abdi deadlock over control of Hasakah

Published

on

The integration and ceasefire process announced on Sunday between the de facto administration led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)—which currently controls the vast majority of Syria—and the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) holding the northeast has reached an impasse.

While clashes on the ground have intensified, high-level talks held yesterday in Damascus failed to produce a concrete consensus.

Reports indicate that Syrian President Ahmed Shara (formerly known as Abu Mohammad al-Jolani) and SDF General Commander Mazlum Abdi were unable to reach a mutual agreement on the terms of the accord.

“PKK pressure” in meeting lasting over five hours

According to information reflected in Arab and Kurdish media, the meeting in Damascus was attended by the US Ambassador to Ankara and Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack, Defense Minister Murhef Abu Kasra of the HTS-led transition government, and Foreign Minister Assad Sheibani.

It was alleged that the primary obstacle during the meeting, which lasted more than five hours, was political influence exerted over the SDF.

Journalist Abdulmalik Abbud, known for his proximity to the new administration in Damascus, highlighted the pressure facing Mazlum Abdi in his reporting on the talks.

Abbud reported that Abdi is facing “immense pressure from the PKK leadership to step back from the agreement,” which had been mediated by the US under the patronage of Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) leader Masoud Barzani.

Shara’s offer to Abdi: Deputy Minister of Defense

According to details from the meeting, Ahmed Shara offered Mazlum Abdi the position of Deputy Minister of Defense in the forthcoming government, on the condition that the SDF rejects PKK pressure, remains neutral, and completes the integration agreement.

Furthermore, Shara requested that Abdi nominate a candidate for governor for the strategic Hasakah province, located on the border with Türkiye and Iraq in northeastern Syria.

The Hasakah knot remains untied

The negotiation reportedly deadlocked over the issue of military control in Hasakah. Allegedly, Mazlum Abdi demanded that Hasakah remain entirely under the administration of the SDF and its civil wing.

Shara rejected this demand, emphasizing that the agreement could only be finalized on the condition that forces attached to the Ministry of Interior enter Hasakah to assume security duties.

It was stated that Mazlum Abdi requested a five-day extension to consult with his field commanders, but Shara turned down this request. Shara reportedly demanded a final response by the end of the day, warning that international parties would otherwise be notified that “Abdi has withdrawn from the agreement and the Damascus administration will resolve the Hasakah issue by force.”

PYD: We are being forced into total surrender

Following the meeting, statements from the SDF side emphasized that the proposal on the table constituted “surrender” rather than compromise.

Speaking to Rudaw, PYD Presidential Council Member Foza Yusuf said, “Our colleagues are still on their way back. However, the meeting ended negatively. Damascus is saying, ‘You will surrender everything, and the situation will revert to pre-2011.’ They are unwilling to accept our existence in any form.”

Drawing attention to the gravity of the situation on the ground, Yusuf stated, “There are clashes everywhere. None of the decisions Shara made yesterday were implemented on the ground. Total surrender is being imposed on us. We will never accept this.”

YPJ General Commander Rohilat Afrin, who was part of the delegation attending the meeting, accused the Damascus administration of “intransigence.”

Referring to the 14-point agreement text announced on Sunday, Afrin noted, “Previously, they said they could implement this agreement within a month.

However, following the attacks in Deir ez-Zor and Raqqa, they demanded immediate acceptance of their conditions. They wanted to present this as a fait accompli, which was evidently planned in advance,” she said.

Trump-Shara call: Promise “not to enter Hasakah”

As tensions spiked on the ground, a telephone conversation took place between US President Donald Trump and Ahmed Shara.

An official statement from the Syrian Presidency indicated that recent developments in Syria were discussed, and support for the country’s unity and its “fight against terrorism” was affirmed.

However, sources speaking to Al Monitor shared different details regarding the content of the call. According to these sources, Trump requested an “end to the clashes in northern Syria” and extracted a promise from Shara that “government forces would not enter the city of Hasakah.”

This contact occurred at a time when Syrian Kurdish groups have ramped up criticism of their US allies, and Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican close to Trump, has reacted against operations targeting the SDF east of the Euphrates.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey