Connect with us

AMERICA

Policymakers gather in Washington as Middle East tensions swell

Published

on

The spring meetings of the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are taking place in Washington from 17-19 April.

Finance ministers and central bank governors from around the world are attending the spring meetings, and among the topics on the agenda are debt relief for countries in difficulty, the Ukraine issue and what to do with Russia’s confiscated assets.

Of course, the interest rate/inflation cycle and the fate of possible interest rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve are also on the agenda. Equity markets were thrown into a bit of turmoil this week when Fed Chairman Jay Powell signalled that the Fed was in no hurry to cut interest rates.

According to IMF President Kristalina Georgieva, the Fed is doing the right thing. “The Fed is not yet ready to cut, and rightly so,” Georgieva told Bloomberg on Thursday.

Noting that the key question at the Washington meetings is “how long the Fed will keep rates high”, the IMF chief said “all countries are talking about it and all eyes are on the US”.

Georgieva argued that the strengthening of the dollar was “of course worrying” and said that the economy was “somewhat overheating”, partly due to the US fiscal stance.

Georgieva added that she remains optimistic that conditions in the US will allow the Fed to start cutting interest rates later this year.

Georgieva calls for fiscal tightening

Georgieva also called on advanced economies, which have greatly increased their debt levels in recent years, to tighten their fiscal policies to deal with the pandemic crisis.

“Countries urgently need to build fiscal resilience for the next shock. It is important to rebuild fiscal buffers,” she said.

According to Georgieva, she argued that central banks struggling with inflation could also “get some help from the fiscal side”.

Georgieva’s comments before the start of the meetings were also relatively “pessimistic”. According to her, “a stagnant and disappointing decade” lies ahead. Without a course correction,” the IMF chief said, “we are heading for the tepid twenties”.

Georgieva’s comments echoed the findings of the IMF’s World Economic Outlook report. The report said: “Faced with a variety of headwinds, the outlook for future growth has also deteriorated. Looking ahead five years, global growth is projected to slow to just over 3 percent by 2029. Our analysis suggests that by the end of the decade, growth could be about one percentage point below the pre-pandemic (2000-19) average. This threatens to reverse improvements in living standards, while the imbalance of the slowdown between richer and poorer countries could limit prospects for global income convergence,” the report says.

The report stresses that a prolonged low-growth scenario, coupled with higher interest rates, could threaten debt sustainability and limit the ability of governments to tackle economic stagnation and invest in “social or environmental initiatives”.

Development of poor countries will have to wait for another spring

Half of the world’s 75 poorest countries have seen their income gap with the richest economies widen for the first time this century, marking a historic reversal in development, the World Bank said in a report published on Monday.

According to the report, the gap between per capita income growth in the poorest countries and per capita income growth in the richest countries has continued to widen over the past five years.

Ayhan Kose, deputy chief economist at the World Bank and one of the report’s authors, told Reuters: “For the first time we see that there is no convergence. They are getting poorer. We are seeing a very serious structural regression, a reversal in the world … so we are ringing alarm bells here,” Mr Köse told Reuters.

The report said 75 countries eligible for grants and interest-free loans from the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) risked a lost decade of development without ambitious policy changes and significant international support.

Köse said that growth in many IDA countries had already started to decline before the COVID-19 pandemic, but that 2020-2024 will see the weakest half-decade of growth (3.4 per cent) since the early 1990s.

More than half of the IDA countries are in sub-Saharan Africa, 14 in East Asia and eight in Latin America and the Caribbean. Thirty-one of these countries have a per capita income of less than $1,315 per year. These include the Democratic Republic of Congo, Afghanistan and Haiti.

Conversely, in addition to the ‘tactical’ considerations that the Fed must take into account when determining its interest rate policy, fluctuations in bond markets indicate that a significant rethink may be required regarding the eventuality of interest rates once the latest inflationary wave has passed.

The two-year US Treasury yield, which is highly sensitive to short-term Fed policy, has risen in recent months as might be expected. However, longer-term yields have followed the same pattern.The 10-year US Treasury bond, which stood at 3.87% at the beginning of February, was yielding 4.63% two days ago.With the exception of a few weeks last autumn, long-term yields have not been this high since 2007.

In 2009, when the economic crisis was devastating the global economy, long-term Treasuries offered higher yields than in 2016, when they were ‘reasonably healthy’. The consensus view at the Fed was that a policy of 5 per cent or higher interest rates would constrain economic activity and put inflation on a downward path.Inflation data and bond market behaviour undermine this view. There is a widespread view that high interest rates may not be as much of a drag on the economy as had been thought, but rather reflect a ‘new normal’.

AMERICA

Biden plans to write off Ukraine’s $4.6bn debt ahead of Trump

Published

on

President Joe Biden’s administration has officially notified Congress of its intention to forgive Ukraine’s $4.65 billion debt, a move tied to ongoing efforts to support the country amid its conflict with Russia.

This debt represents half of the $9 billion provided to Kyiv as part of the $61 billion aid package approved by Washington in April. Unlike other forms of assistance, this funding was issued as conditionally repayable loans, with provisions allowing the United States President to cancel up to 50% of the debt if deemed necessary.

In a statement, the U.S. State Department explained that the debt cancellation is intended to “help Ukraine win” and serves the national interests of the U.S., the EU, G7+, and NATO.”

According to Bloomberg, President Biden is determined to maximize aid to Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office. However, the decision to write off the debt has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans.

Republican Senator Rand Paul argued that the Biden administration’s decision places undue financial burden on the American public. He pledged to demand a vote in the Senate to challenge the proposal.

Despite this, Bloomberg notes that any effort to overturn the debt cancellation would require approval from both houses of Congress, a scenario that appears unlikely given the Democratic majority in the Senate. Furthermore, President Biden holds veto power, making reversal of the decision even more challenging.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced plans to exhaust all remaining aid approved by Congress before President Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emphasized that one of the administration’s key goals is to position Ukraine as strongly as possible—both militarily and at the negotiating table.

Pentagon officials reported that $9.3 billion in military aid is currently in the pipeline. Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh confirmed plans for weekly arms deliveries to Kyiv, with the aim of expediting aid distribution before the presidential transition.

On November 20, the Pentagon unveiled an additional $275 million military aid package for Ukraine, further underscoring the administration’s commitment to strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Donald Trump taps Howard Lutnick to lead Commerce Department

Published

on

Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Wall Street investor and campaign donor Howard Lutnick as the new head of the U.S. Department of Commerce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of implementing the sweeping tariffs promised during his presidential campaign.

Lutnick, who co-chaired Trump’s transition team, had previously been considered for the role of Treasury Secretary. He is also the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent investment firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, Trump declared that Lutnick would be “directly responsible” for leading the Commerce Department and overseeing the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The USTR, established in 1974 to manage negotiations with U.S. trading partners, traditionally reports directly to the president. If confirmed by the Senate, the 63-year-old Lutnick will play a pivotal role in aiding U.S. businesses and executing Trump’s proposed tariffs on international trade partners.

Trump has outlined plans for a 60% tariff on imports from China and a global tariff of up to 20%, signaling a major shift in U.S. trade policy.

Lutnick, despite lacking prior government experience, has been a steadfast advocate for Trump’s economic agenda. During a New York campaign rally, Lutnick remarked, “When was America great? At the turn of the century, our economy was floundering! That was 125 years ago. We had no income tax and all we had were tariffs.”

While Lutnick has emerged as a major donor to Trump, he has also supported establishment Democrats and Republicans in the past, including Chuck Schumer and Jeb Bush. He contributed to both Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 campaigns, hosting a fundraiser for her in 2015. Lutnick maintains a personal friendship with the Clintons, noting their attendance at a Cantor Fitzgerald fundraiser in September 2022.

Lutnick has also maintained a long-standing relationship with Trump, even appearing on The Celebrity Apprentice in 2008. He disclosed to the Financial Times in October that he has donated over $10 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and another $500,000 to the transition team, totaling approximately $75 million.

Treasury Secretary selection process still uncertain

The position of Treasury Secretary, one of the most significant roles in Trump’s administration, remains undecided. Lutnick’s name has been floated for the role, though he faces competition from hedge fund manager Scott Bessent, private equity billionaire Marc Rowan, and former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh.

Marc Rowan, the CEO of Apollo Global Management, has emerged as a leading contender and is expected to meet with Trump to present his case. Rowan’s supporters cite his extensive expertise in financial markets, though competition remains fierce.

Forecasting site Polymarket currently lists Warsh as the favorite for Treasury Secretary, followed by Bessent, Rowan, and William Hagerty. If unsuccessful in his bid for Treasury Secretary, Bessent is reportedly vying for the chairmanship of the National Economic Council.

Trump names Mehmet Oz to run Medicare and Medicaid

Trump also announced on Tuesday his nomination of Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Describing Oz as “one of the most talented physicians” capable of “making America healthy again,” Trump expressed confidence in Oz’s ability to reduce waste and fraud within the nation’s largest government agency.

Dr. Oz, a former heart surgeon and Columbia University professor, rose to prominence as Oprah Winfrey’s health expert before hosting his own popular talk show. However, his career has been controversial, with critics accusing him of promoting scientifically dubious theories and unproven treatments.

Oz’s political experience includes a 2022 Senate race in Pennsylvania, where he was endorsed by Trump but ultimately lost to Democrat John Fetterman.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

U.S. may start its plan to separate Google from Chrome

Published

on

The Department of Justice (DOJ) may move forward with plans to force the sale of Google’s Chrome web browser as part of its ongoing antitrust case against Alphabet (Google).

According to sources familiar with the case, the department intends to ask the judge—who ruled in August that Google illegally monopolized the search market—to address concerns related to artificial intelligence (AI) and the Android smartphone operating system. This information was reported by Bloomberg.

Antitrust officials, along with participating state attorneys, are expected to recommend that federal Judge Amit Mehta impose data licensing requirements on Google. These officials have indicated that Chrome, the world’s most widely used browser, is a critical gateway for many users accessing Google Search. For this reason, they are urging the judge to mandate the sale of Chrome.

Officials stated that a Chrome sale could be considered later if other settlement measures fail to foster a more competitive market. Currently, Google Chrome commands a dominant 61% share of the U.S. browser market, according to StatCounter, a web traffic analysis service.

Over the past three months, state attorneys interviewed numerous companies to prepare their recommendations. Officials noted that some recommendations are still under review, and details may evolve before submission.

While a proposal to force Google to sell its Android platform was considered, officials have since stepped back from this more aggressive option.

If Judge Mehta adopts these recommendations, the ruling could significantly reshape the online search market and influence the emerging artificial intelligence industry.

The case, originally filed during the Trump administration and continued under President Joe Biden, represents one of the most aggressive efforts to regulate a major tech company in decades. The last comparable attempt was Washington’s unsuccessful bid to break up Microsoft in the early 2000s.

Chrome plays a crucial role in Google’s advertising business by providing user data that enhances ad targeting, a primary revenue source. Additionally, Google has been leveraging Chrome to promote Gemini, its new AI bot. Gemini has the potential to evolve from a simple answer bot to a comprehensive assistant, supporting users across the web.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh estimates that Chrome could be worth $15–20 billion if sold, considering its more than 3 billion monthly active users. However, Bob O’Donnell of TECHnalysis Research notes that Chrome’s value depends on its integration with other services, stating: “It’s not directly monetizable. It acts as a gateway to other things. Monetization would depend on how buyers link Chrome to their services.”

Google has strongly opposed the DOJ’s recommendations. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, criticized the move as government overreach, arguing: “This agenda goes far beyond the legal issues in this case and will harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at a critical time.”

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt echoed this sentiment in an interview with CNBC. He emphasized the value of Chrome in enhancing the Google ecosystem, stating: “Singling out these companies won’t fundamentally solve the broader issues.”

In a blog post, Google warned that under new ownership, Chrome might no longer remain free or receive the same level of investment, potentially leading to a shift in its business model.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey