ASIA
Afghanistan: Ban on women education brutal and injustice

Taliban banned university education for women across Afghanistan, provoking condemnation from all segments of Afghan societies as well as foreign countries, and the United Nations over another assault on human rights.
Despite promising a softer rule when the Taliban seized power on 15 August 2021, they have ratcheted up restrictions on all aspects of women’s lives, ignoring international outrage as well as Afghan women howl for fundamental rights to education and work.
“You all are informed to immediately implement the mentioned order of suspending education of females until further notice,” the Ministry of Higher Education said in a letter issued to all government and private universities.
The Taliban has not given a reason for the ban, but confirmed that this letter suspending university level education for women until further notice is authentic.
Tuesday’s decision by the Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers come as part of their continued crush on women’s right to education and freedom as most teenage girls across the country have already been banned from secondary school education since last year.
Taliban security forces on Wednesday morning immediately approached universities across Kabul, and provinces to implement the degree and enforced a ban on higher education for women by blocking their access inside the universities. Taliban forces heavily guarded four universities in Kabul, and stopped some women from entering inside the buildings. Some female students wept and consoled each other outside one of the Kabul campuses.
A Spokesman for Kabul University, Rahimullah Nadeem, confirmed that classes for women had stopped, and some women were allowed to enter the campus for some administrative work only.
Taliban not keeping promises on women’s rights
Despite initially promising a more moderate approach, respecting rights for women and girls’ and to let them study and work, Taliban reacted exactly on the opposite side, said a former female lawmaker in the previous Afghan parliament.
“During the negotiations, the Taliban members promised to us and to the world that women can become government officials, able to work in private and social sectors, go to universities and schools, but now that situation is different,” Fawzai Koofi, who was also a member of Afghan peace team, told Harici.

Fawzai Koofi, a former female lawmaker in the Afghan parliament.
Koofi furthered that in contrast to what they have promised, “Taliban now become more oppressive and tougher everyday on their policies towards women and the last nail on the coffin of women’s right was banning girls from education and universities.”
The Taliban don’t see any obligation or any accountability towards human rights at all, and the world, which has been engaged with the Taliban, and giving them money, is also not serious in this issue, according to her.
Human rights and women’s rights are not the priority for the world either because they are giving money to the Taliban and allowing them to travel. The world has only a security-centric approach in engagement with the Taliban, she added.
“The time is ripe for putting a real pressure on Taliban, including meaningful and condition based sanctions, travel ban, and also its time for the people of Afghanistan to stand. I am surprised that the parents really didn’t react and they are silent,” Koofi added.
World urges Taliban to reverse university ban decision
The United Nations and several countries, including the US, EU, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan have condemned the order, which takes Afghanistan back to the Taliban’s first period of rule when girls could not receive formal education.
“A new law further violates the right to equal education and deepens the erasure of women from Afghan society,” the UN’s Special Rapporteur to Afghanistan said.
Strongly condemning the Taliban’s decision to suspend higher education for Afghan women, Tomas Niklasson, Special Envoy of the European Union for Afghanistan said that “gender persecution is a crime against humanity.”
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken late Tuesday said that no other country in the world bars women and girls from receiving an education. “The Taliban cannot expect to be a legitimate member of the international community until they respect the rights of all in Afghanistan,” he warned. This decision will come with consequences for the Taliban.
Meanwhile, US Chargé d’Affaires to Afghanistan, Karen Decker called on the Afghan men to stand up with Afghan women, emphasizing that “now is the time. What are you waiting for?”
“They are failing their children and grandchildren, but I promise you this: America will not give up its advocacy for Afghan women and girls and will continue to look for ways to offer Afghan girls (and boys) the future Afghan men seem determined to erase,” Decker said.
Decker used “incomprehensible, indefensible and anti-Islamic” words to describe the Minister of Higher Education’s decree suspending education for Afghan girls.
Islamic countries said education is a fundamental human right
Turkey, Qatar, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the four Muslim countries, have expressed their disappointment at the university ban and called on the Taliban to reconsider their decision.
Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry said that the Taliban’s ban on university education for women is contradictory to “giving Afghan women their full legal rights, foremost of which is the right to education, which contributes to supporting security, stability, development and prosperity for Afghanistan and its brotherly people.”
The Qatari Foreign Ministry said that Doha expresses deep concern and disappointment with the Afghan caretaker government’s decision to suspend girls’ and women’s studies in Afghan universities.
“As a Muslim country in which women enjoy all their rights, especially education, the State of Qatar calls on the Afghan caretaker government to review its decision in line with the teachings of the Islamic religion concerning women’s rights.”
Turkey also voiced concern about the Taliban’s decision to ban women from attending universities, emphasizing that education is a fundamental human right that all should benefit from it without discrimination. Turkey called on the Taliban to review the decision and take necessary steps about it.
Pakistan Foreign Minister said that Islamabad was disappointed to learn about the suspension of university and higher education for female students in Afghanistan.
“Pakistan’s position on this issue has been clear and consistent. We strongly believe that every man and woman has the inherent right to education in accordance with the injunctions of Islam. We strongly urge the Afghan authorities to revisit this decision,” Pakistan FM said.
Afghan politicians, including former President Hamid Karzia, ex-appointed man for peace and reconciliation, Abdullah Abdullah and several other officials called on the Taliban to reopen universities for women.
Women persisting the ban
A number of women staged protests in the capital Kabul, in eastern Nangarhar and some other provinces against the Taliban’s decision to ban them from going to universities.
Protesters from the Afghanistan Women’s Unity and Solidarity group said they came out on the streets of Kabul to raise their voices against the closure of the girls’ universities.
“Don’t let our education be political. Don’t make education political,” the small demonstrations were chanting in Kabul before being dispersed by the Taliban members.
The women called the silence of the international community “shameful.”
“In Islam, education is a divine command for both men and women, who are the Taliban to take this right from us,” said a university student in Kabul.
Meanwhile, male students in Nangarhar University staged a protest alongside women against the Taliban’s decision on girl’s education. The students also walked away from their exam in a show of solidarity with the female students and said they will not write any exam until their female classmates are not attending.
Following Nangarhar, male students in Kandahar also walked away from their exam in a show of solidarity with the female students.
Numerous lecturers from different universities in Afghanistan have also resigned from their jobs in protest of the Taliban ban on women and girl’s university education.
Afghan cricket players annoyed by university closures
Many players of the Afghan National Cricket Team on Wednesday took to social media to vent their anger over Taliban’s decision over suspending girls’ and women’s education in universities.
Former National Cricket team captain, Mohammad Nabi said that Afghanistan has a vital need for women’s education, and Afghanistan’s future can only be guaranteed by educated men and women.

Afghan cricket players, (R) Mohammad Nabi and (L) Rashid Khan.
Afghan National Cricket team star, Rashid Khan said that a “woman is a teacher and educator of generations,” and said that “education is obligatory to men and women.”
Another cricket player, Hazratullah Zazai called on the authorities to not deprive “this (women) oppressed group of humanity” from their right to education.”
Gulbuddin Naib, the National team’s all-rounder said that “learning knowledge is a duty for both men and women.”
“We highly support the call of our sisters and women for reopening schools and universities,” said national team’s star Rahmanullah Gurbaz.
In March, the Taliban drew criticism from many Afghan families and the foreign governments for making a U-turn on a previous commitment to open educational institutions to girls beyond grade six. Instead, on the first day of the new school year, the Taliban announced that high schools would remain closed for girls until further notice.
Besides exclusion for girls from secondary school and universities, the Taliban also banned women from parks and gyms.
ASIA
Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.
Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.
Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”
The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.
The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.
China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.
Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.
Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.
ASIA
Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”
This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”
Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.
Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.
Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.
According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.
“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.
South Korea in a similar situation
South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.
Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”
South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.
Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.
Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.
At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.
Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.
Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.
If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.
Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”
Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”
Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.
The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.
Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.
Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”
ASIA
South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.
Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.
Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”
The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.
Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.
Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.
Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.
The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.
Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.
Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?
-
EUROPE4 days ago
F-35 debate intensifies across Germany and Europe
-
EUROPE1 week ago
Europe plans for US absence in NATO with 5-10 year strategy
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
China’s AsiaInfo expands with DeepSeek-powered AI
-
EUROPE1 week ago
French defense industry gears up for war amid EU strategic autonomy push
-
AMERICA1 week ago
Trump’s tariffs drive Nvidia to invest heavily in US manufacturing
-
DIPLOMACY5 days ago
Trump’s proposed fees on Chinese ships threaten US maritime industry
-
DIPLOMACY2 weeks ago
US, Britain, and Türkiye excluded from EU armament fund
-
ASIA1 week ago
India shelves $23 billion plan to rival China’s factories