Connect with us

America

Balances in 2024 and projections to 2025 for Latin America and the Caribbean

Avatar photo

Published

on

Analysing the most important issues that occurred in a region over an entire year, just like making a weather forecast for a trip that has not yet begun or is just beginning, is not only a challenge, it is a risk. We then assume this risky task with the certainty that many important things will be left out of this review. We also warn about the feasibility of the scenarios that may – or may not – materialize during 2025. Our intention is only to offer an approximation to some of the most notable events in the Political, Economic, Social and Security and Defense spheres in a rich and complex region: Latin America.

Political issues

2024 was the year in which the largest number of voters went to the polls in the world, and, indeed, the political agenda of 2024 in Latin America and the Caribbean, in general, and in Venezuela in particular, was marked by the presidential election. In addition to Venezuela (July 28), El Salvador (February 4), Paraná (May 5), Dominican Republic (May 19), Mexico (June 2), Uruguay (October 27 and November 24) celebrated general elections. In October, Brazil and Chile held municipal and regional elections.

Thus, at the end of 2024, the political map in South America has been made up of 6 of the 10 most important countries under the command of different “leftists”: Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Uruguay and Venezuela. While the countries governed by the right and the extreme right are: Argentina, Ecuador, Paraguay and Peru (the latter country began being left-wing, but, after the coup against Pedro Castillo, it turned to the right). It should be noted that we do not include in this list: Guyana, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Aruba, Curacao, Bonaire, or French Guiana, countries and territories strongly subject to European neocolonialism and American imperialism, which is why their political influence is relative, in the region.

In the political sphere, without a doubt the re-election of President Nicolás Maduro is the greatest achievement for Venezuela, since – despite the constant attacks and coup attempts – the continuity of the political project begun at the end of the last century with the victory of President Hugo Chávez in December 1998, and the subsequent establishment of the Bolivarian Revolution, has remained standing, facing threats and emerging politically victorious. Maduro’s leadership has been reaffirmed in the presidential elections of July 28. Chavismo also has a majority in the Legislative Branch.

In Brazil, Lula’s government has shown its fragility both internally, by losing massively in the municipal elections, where the right was left in control of 13 of the 15 most important cities in the country, and externally, by not participating in the meeting of the BRICS, in Kazan, Russia, due to health problems, but above all, by not supporting Venezuela’s entry into the multilateral bloc. With these and other political positions, Lula demonstrated that he is not in a position to be “the older brother” of Venezuela or any country in South America, which is mostly progressive or left-wing, and although they are not totally anti-capitalist, they are anti-imperialist.

On the other hand, in Mexico, the MORENA Party made history again by electing a woman as president for the first time. In the June 2024 elections, Claudia Sheinbaum won with the largest number of votes in the country ‘s democratic history. In these elections, new representatives were also elected to integrate the Senate, the Chamber of Deputies and other federal and local authorities.  MORENA, together with allied parties, obtained the majority of positions and seats.

It is worth noting that Mexico plays a very important role in regional politics, given its influence on Central America, where the greatest political tensions occur in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. Furthermore, Mexico is now a political counterweight to the interests of the United States in South America, as well.

Argentina has played an opposite role for the region in 2024, since the arrival of Javier Milei has provided spaces and air for imperialist pretensions and for the resurgence of fascist, neo-fascist, even Naziist movements in the region, which come to support the idea of ​​white supremacy and Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA), which Milei transformed into “Make Argentina Great Again.” Domestically, Milei has demonstrated his own political strength and has maintained with positive image and popular support. Proof of this is that, even without a parliamentary majority, the Argentine Congress approved laws and legislative powers, with which Milei has managed to apply his ultra-liberal government program delivered to the superpowers and their allies. The current Argentine president has strengthened, like no other government before, his alliance with the United States and Israel.

Another issue that has divided and challenged, in 2024, the Latin American left is the confrontation between Evo Morales and the current president of Bolivia, Luis Arce. At the end of October, the former president, coca grower leader and until then presidential candidate was attacked by Bolivian police and military, who made an attempt on his life. The Bolivian Justice has disqualified Morales from participating in the presidential elections of August-October 2025. With Evo out of the presidential race and Arce without popular support, the return of the right in Bolivia seems inevitable.

Economic matters

According to the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEPAL), the economies of our region, during 2024, continue to be trapped in a trap from which they cannot escape: low capacity for growth. Latin America’s GDP growth this year was 2.2%, and 1% when the 2015-2024 decade is considered. This indicates a stagnation of GDP per capita, in some cases as a result of economic recession. Several of the strongest countries have faced different macroeconomic, fiscal and monetary challenges.

Brazil: In 2024 the South American giant suffered one of the largest devaluations of a monetary cone in the world. The Real, the Brazilian currency, lost between 25-30% of its value against the dollar. The trigger was the presentation and distrust of the fiscal adjustment proposed by the Lula administration. Despite Lulista’s economic policy called “National Consumerism” by its detractors, Brazil has one of the highest tax burdens in the world. In addition, the Brazilian government has not significantly increased the minimum wage, which will begin in 2025 at $250. According to several economic analysts, the real enemy of the Brazilian government is “the Brazilian government”, since what continues to rise is the operating expenses of the gigantic Brazilian public apparatus.

Mexico: The second largest economy in Latin America had a 3% devaluation of its currency in 2024, after learning of the victory of Donald Trump in the United States, who will formally assume the White House on January 20, 2025. The Mexican currency went from 16 to 20 pesos per dollar in one year. However, in just a few weeks, the Mexican peso has managed to stabilize. Meaning that, despite this slight devaluation, the Mexican currency remains strong against the dollar compared to other countries in the region. Mexico enjoys one of the lowest inflation rates in Latin America (5%) and one of the highest basic salaries (approximately $450).

Argentina: The first year of Javier Milei’s government has been a truly shock therapy for the Argentine economy. The ultra-liberal (anarcho-capitalist) left all prices of all goods and services to the discretion of the market, causing an increase in poverty levels, which exceeded 50% of the population, during the first half of 2024. The fall in the inflationary indices were mainly due to lower demand, that is, lower consumption capacity. Milei also eliminated protection barriers in favor of the international speculative market and began a process of privatization of state companies favoring international capital, which generated “trust” in the market in its management, and a reduction in the exchange gap between the dollar and the Argentine peso. The peso became “stronger” and Argentina more expensive. Finally, salary wages did not increase at the same rate. In November, an Argentine family needed an income of $1,000 to not be considered poor. The current minimum wage is $280, one of the lowest basic salaries in the region.

Venezuela: The country closes a positive year in economic matters, thanks to the increase in its oil production, which in several months of 2024 exceeded one million barrels per day (BPD). The Venezuelan government also managed to control inflation and sustainably maintain the reactivation of its economic apparatus. The salary issue continues to be a pending issue to be solved, since the announcement made on the 1st. May, (Workers’ Day in Venezuela and other countries in Latin America and the world), did not satisfy the working class that faces a dollarized economy daily. It is worth noting the economic line that Venezuela follows, with the holding in Caracas of the XXV World Forum on Special Economic Zones and the Transition to New Economic Models. This forum is a space specially designed to explore economic and financial investments with China.

At the multilateral level, this year saw the completion of the MERCOSUR-European Union Agreement. On December 6, in Montevideo, Uruguay, and after 25 years of negotiations, the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) and the European Union (EU) signed a Letter of Intent to reach a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), a requirement prior to the Treaty, through which each Member State will establish which products will have their tariffs affected and which will not.

Social issues

Cyclical advances and setbacks have allowed inequality to continue to be a persistent problem in the region. The gap between rich and poor has widened, generating social and political tensions. Extreme poverty had increased with the pandemic to 13% and decreased to 10% in 2023, but is still above 8.5% in 2024. One in three households in the lowest income quintile lacks access to social protection, according to the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEPAL).

172 million people in Latin America and the Caribbean do not have sufficient income to cover their essential needs and, among them, 66 million cannot purchase a basic food basket, indicates the Social Panorama Report of Latin America and the Caribbean 2024.

In several Latin American countries, political instability is a recurring phenomenon. Internal conflicts, institutional crises and corruption are realities that have affected governability and democratic stability in the region. This phenomenon is increased by the conditions of economic slowdown in the region.

Latin America continues to be a region of origin, transit and destination of migrants and refugees. The economic, political and social crises, as well as economic conditions in countries such as Venezuela, Colombia, Nicaragua and Haiti, Costa Rica, Honduras and El Salvador, have caused a considerable migratory flow, generating tensions and challenges in terms of social inclusion and human rights. .

The increase in intraregional migration is largely driven by Venezuelan emigration. It is estimated that in June 2023 there were more than 6 million Venezuelan migrants and refugees in the region, living mainly in Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Chile and Brazil. The improvement in Venezuela’s economy has led to a return of Venezuelan immigrants to the country. The Venezuelan government also has strengthened the program “Vuelta a la Patria” (Return to the Homeland) and the care of Venezuelan immigrants abroad. The Bolivarian government also created the Vice Ministry of Comprehensive Care for Migration, which depends on the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry, and reinvigorated the Great Mission Return to the Homeland.

The effects of climate change are having a significant impact in Latin America, exacerbating the vulnerability of populations already affected by poverty and social exclusion. Droughts, floods and extreme weather events are affecting the food security, health and well-being of entire communities in the region.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic still persist, which has had a devastating impact on Latin America, both in terms of public health and the economy and social well-being. The health crisis has revealed the deficiencies of public health systems, the fragility of social protection networks and the vulnerability of the most disadvantaged sectors of the population.

National Security and Defense Issues

In 2024, Latin America and the Caribbean did not see open conventional war conflicts. However, certain issues were present on the regional agenda that could have escalated into a war and threatened the security of the region:

Border tensions: Territorial disputes between Nicaragua and Costa Rica in the San Juan River region; the controversy over the delimitation of the maritime border between Chile and Peru; the tensions between Guatemala and Belize due to the territorial dispute over the territory of Belize; tensions between Argentina and Chile regarding the demarcation of the border in the Patagonia region; and the border dispute over the Essequibo between Venezuela and Guyana. They are all part of imperial interests for control of the natural resources of our region.

Internal conflicts: In Colombia, despite the peace processes signed with the FARC and the ELN, armed groups and tensions continue to exist in several Colombian regions; Political tensions in Venezuela have been a focus of conflict in recent years, after the application of unilateral coercive measures imposed by the US and European countries. This year Maduro suffered an attempted coup d’état, following the election results of July 28; the crisis in Haiti that has generated political and social instability, as well as a wave of violence in the country; and the attempted coup d’état in Bolivia, denounced by President Luis Arce.

Imperialist pretensions. Trump has expressed his interest in militarily invading Mexico and Panama. Fact that allows us to appreciate the interest of American dominance towards the region. In addition, he has promised to undertake stabilization actions against the economies of the countries Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela through unilateral coercive measures, the so-called “sanctions.” We remember that, respecting the principle of free sovereignty of States, in Public International Law no State is able to sanction another.

The Aragua Train (El Tren de Aragua). This transnational criminal organization has been the subject of regional security concerns, especially in the United States. Although it was created in Venezuela, in the state of Aragua, from which it takes its name, currently its area of ​​criminal activity occurs outside of Venezuela. Trump has blamed the “Aragua Train” for practically all crime in the United States. This has been difficult to prove and even to believe, but it can be presumed that it will be part of the Trump Administration’s Domestic Security Agenda.

Arms race. In 2024, the military policy of the governments of Latin America and the Caribbean, in order to strengthen their National Defense policies, was oriented mainly towards the maritime and air areas. They strengthened their maritime military power, countries such as Chile, Mexico and Nicaragua worked on remodeling their naval fleet, while Guyana received an ocean patrol vessel from England. For their part, Colombia, Peru and Uruguay strengthened their air power with the purchase of CAZA brand aircraft; Honduras with the purchase of 6 Airbus H145 helicopters; and Costa Rica with the acquisition of two drones granted by the US. However, according to Statistica, the statistics portal for macro data from Spain, the countries that generate the greatest military spending in Latin America and the Caribbean are Brazil, Mexico, Colombia , Chile and Argentina.

Likewise, the political relations of the countries in the region in military matters during 2024 reflected agreements on Security and Defense between countries such as Mexico-Brazil, Argentina-El Salvador, Colombia-The United Nations Organization (UN). However, there was also the presence of relations with international actors outside the region with agreements between Trinidad and Tobago-United States, the talks for the Colombia-North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreement and Argentina’s interest in joining NATO.

It is striking how there have been negotiations and military operations in countries that share a border with Venezuela, which receive or negotiate with external actors in the region that could encourage an invasion. Colombia negotiates its entry into NATO, which is a threat to the Security of Venezuela; Trinidad and Tobago signed a Security Agreement with the United States; and Guyana received a patrol vessel from England.

In the face of growing competition between the United States, Russia and China, Latin America and the Caribbean has once again become a strategic priority, as can be seen from recent documents from the current US administration, and from Trump’s own public pronouncements.

The greatest foreign military influence in the region is the United States, through its military bases, Joint Operations and the Southern Command. Then, there is Russia, which has supplied weapons and military equipment, as well as technical assistance for the maintenance and modernization of its defense systems to Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Argentina, among other countries. In third place is China, because its relations with the countries in the region are mainly economic.

In 2024, Latin America experienced a boom in the purchase of weapons. The new arms race, as part of the military industry, drives other competitions, for example, the space race and nuclear development. Regarding this last issue, President Milei announced that Argentina will build its IV Nuclear Power Plant, and that his country wishes to become a regional and world power in the development of nuclear energy.

To close the arms issue, we must keep in mind that the countries of the region sold sovereignty and bought military-technological dependence, by acquiring weapons and military equipment from the United States and Europe; since they have not bought the best and the most modern, but rather planes and weapons that are “left over” or are no longer used by the superpowers. It is also worth remembering that, since World War II, the Americans and Europeans have been historical allies, for Which in the event of any war would have no qualms about acting against Latin America and cutting off vital supplies, spare parts, equipment, etc.

Projections: What’s coming for 2025

In 2025, even with the arrival of reinforcements (Mexico and Uruguay), most left or center-left governments will face the challenge of strengthening themselves internally and externally to face the arrival of Donald Trump to the White House, on January 20.

It is likely that many of Trump’s threats will remain in the discursive or rhetorical order, however, the future is uncertain and the Republican may cause some surprises or scares, both in Latin America and in other regions. For now, the great beneficiary of Trump’s return is clearly Milei, or it should be, since the Argentine president has shown himself, from minute 1, determined to obey and flatter Trump, in alarming and outrageous measures. Let us remember that, while several Latin American leaders and presidents, including Lula, Petro, Boric and Cristina Fernández, expressed their support for the Democratic Party candidate, Kamala Harris; Milei, in the United States, openly supported Trump. This is something that the Republican leader will not easily forget.

In that sense, 2025 will find Latin America waiting for threats from Donald Trump, who has stated that he wants to invade Mexico, with the excuse of fighting drug trafficking, and Panama, to control the strategic canal.

In economic matters, CEPAL projects that in 2025, the region will not be able to escape the trap of low economic growth either. However, the region’s weakness is not only caused by an unfavorable economic context, but also by the persistence of a growing rejection of political parties and the traditional way of doing politics.

Latin American economies depend largely on the stability of their commercial exchange. In that sense, 2025 regional economies will depend on the health of the economy of their main trading partners: China and the United States mainly. China’s Ministry of Commerce, for example, has just launched an investigation into imported beef, especially from Brazil (40%) and Argentina (15%). Any trade measure by China will impact these latin american economies.

MERCOSUR-European Union Agreement. It is still early to know where this bicontinental agreement will lead. It should be considered that, as we previously mentioned, Latin America has been experiencing a process of economic slowdown; many of its countries already have fiscal policies of market opening to encourage foreign investment, but nothing of that has helped. Thus, it seems that the low economic capacity for European investment in MERCOSUR does not ensure the economic growth of the active member countries of the South American bloc.

In short, 2025 is projected as a year in which the correlation of forces in Latin America and the Caribbean will continue to be favorable to the right and the extreme right.

Latin American integration will continue to be an issue to work on, given that the political scenario will be under the strong influence of the United States government. Countries in the region will experience pressure from foreign powers due to the current international dynamics, where there are two power blocs: China, Russia and allies, on the one hand, and the United States, the European Union and allies, on the other.

The open wounds between Venezuela, Brazil and Colombia can begin to heal, if the United States pressures these three countries at the same time. However, the positions of Brazil and Colombia with respect to the United States do not seem to want to confront the North American country.

The developing regional conflicts, for example the Bolivian case, do not seem to be decreasing in intensity. In any case, we must be alert to the continuous imperialist attacks against Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Trump has already threatened to stop buying Venezuelan oil and to increase unilateral coercive measures.

It is even likely that the North American president, Donal Trump, will serve as a platform to validate a parallel government by recognizing Edmundo González Urrutia as president of Venezuela.

Conclusions

Any analysis of our region must be done with the understanding that, like other regions of the world, Latin America is in the middle or crossed by the fight for global hegemony between the United States and China. The growing presence of the Asian giant in the most precious area of ​​influence for the United States, wrongly called by Americans “backyard,” is undoubtedly an element that adds greater political tension to the region.

At the political level, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela continue to set anti-imperialist guidelines and, for this reason, are the main focus of attacks by the United States and its allies. Specially Venezuela, which as soon as Maduro was re-elected, had to face a coup d’état and questions about the electoral process of Latin American leaders and countries that were supposed to be allies and that when there were doubts about the electoral processes in their countries, they received recognition of Venezuela, immediately and without giving rise to destabilizing attempts.

We can particularly mention the painful role (painful for the left) played by Lula in Brazil; Cristina Fernandez in Argentina; Gustavo Petro in Colombia; Gabriel Boric in Chile; all supposedly consider themselves leftist. It seems that they, and other “left” leaders, have not become aware that only the unity of the people and governments in the face of imperialism will make us strong as a region and as States.

And that joining media trends, or even Fake-News, only makes themselves and their progressive or “left-wing” proposals weaker. Once again we mention Lula as an example of this, since his refusal to approve Venezuela’s entry into the BRICS caused him to be rejected by the majority of the progressive and left-wing sectors of Brazilian society, as well as the largest social movement in Brazil and Latin America: the Movement of Landless Rural Workers (MST).

In another order, although there are political and economic tensions that have represented dangers to the Security and Defense of the region, for example, due to the increase in irregular migration, crime and regional arms race; Without a doubt, the role of the Argentine president, Javier Milei, in opening the doors of the United States, the United Kingdom and even the NATO, represents an unprecedented threat to Latin America.

Finally, the influence and interference that the Trump Administration may cause in and against Latin America is indeed a great uncertainty. In part it will depend on how other world conflicts develop and the role that the United States, China, Russia, Turkey, Israel, and others, want and can play in them. For all this, in the face of the global disorder that prevails in the world today, Venezuela will always call for the solidarity of the people and will insist on Latin American and Caribbean unity.

America

US national debt hits record $40 trillion as borrowing accelerates

Published

on

The US national debt has reached a record $40 trillion as borrowing expanded at a historic pace.

The development has heightened investor concern over the state of US public finances, despite Donald Trump’s pledge to bring spending under control.

Gross federal debt crossed the threshold on Tuesday, according to Treasury Department data published on Wednesday.

Calculations by the Financial Times show that debt climbed by $3 trillion over the past year, registering the fastest rate of increase in history outside the pandemic period.

Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget think tank, said:

“This is like a giant, flashing ‘check engine’ light. It doesn’t mean your engine will melt down tomorrow, but it is a clear sign that things have gotten quite out of hand. And it’s not just the size of the number; it’s the speed at which we’ve reached it.”

The US national debt has surged over the past two decades, climbing from below $6 trillion at the start of the century (about $12 trillion in 2026 dollar terms) as massive public spending during the financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic compounded enormous budget deficits.

In the past 10 years alone, the total debt load has doubled. Debt held by the public—a key gauge tracked by markets that excludes intra-governmental holdings—now exceeds $32 trillion, roughly equal to the size of the US economy.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office expects debt held by the public to surpass the post-Second World War record of 106% of GDP by the end of the decade and to reach 120% by 2036.

As borrowing increased, investors began demanding a higher premium to hold US bonds.

This has driven interest rates higher, leaving debt servicing costs larger than national defence spending.

The situation has created unease in Washington. On Wednesday, prior to the release of the debt data, the Treasury Department announced it would double its buybacks of long-term government debt in a bid to halt a recent sell-off.

Last week, the US paid its highest borrowing costs since 2001 to sell 30-year bonds.

Wednesday’s 10-year Treasury auction produced the highest yields since 2007 as investors fretted over the scale of the debt.

Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, said: “That is an awful lot of money being borrowed. It is going to feed on itself with interest expenses. If interest rates rise because of concerns about the high debt load, that will lead to even more interest expense. It’s a vicious cycle.”

Trump returned to office in 2025 promising to rein in “wasteful” government spending.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pledged to reduce the budget deficit to 3% of GDP by the end of Trump’s term.

However, measures to trim spending in some areas were offset by broad tax cuts in the president’s signature 2025 fiscal legislation, the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which will add more than $4 trillion to the debt by 2034.

Trump also requested an increase of more than 50% in annual defence spending, seeking $1.5 trillion in the largest budget request in US history.

The deficit fell to 5.9% of GDP in 2025 from 6.3% the previous year. The CBO expects the deficit to decline to 5.8% this year. The US national debt comprises years of accumulated deficits compounded by interest charges.

Analysts noted that both US political parties missed opportunities during periods of economic expansion to take significant steps toward curbing spending.

Calculations by the Congressional Joint Economic Committee indicate that over the past year, total national debt grew by roughly $7.9 billion a day, or approximately $91,000 per second.

Budget specialists said they hoped crossing the $40 trillion threshold would spur politicians from both parties to take meaningful steps to bring borrowing back under control.

Michael Peterson, head of the Peterson Foundation, a think tank dedicated to returning debt to a sustainable trajectory, said:

“My hope is that this serves as a national alarm and wake-up call to address our fiscal future. If we keep borrowing this much, we are going to face a day of reckoning in financial markets… People will wake up one day and decide: ‘You know what? I’m more worried about the United States now. I’m going to demand higher interest rates, or I’m going to put my money somewhere else.'”

Continue Reading

America

Independent US oil firms set to sign output deals in Venezuela

Published

on

Several independent US oil producers are expected to sign production contracts with Venezuela’s state-owned oil company in the coming days.

According to sources who spoke to Politico on condition of anonymity because details of the event have not yet been made public, a signing ceremony involving several small US producers and Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) was scheduled to take place in Houston on Tuesday (18 August) evening.

One source said Venezuela’s oil minister and the head of PDVSA’s exploration division were scheduled to attend the ceremony. Another source added that the event could be postponed until Wednesday morning.

The White House, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, was not expected to be officially involved in Tuesday’s ceremony.

However, the development follows a visit by senior officials to Caracas in late April, where they signed memorandums of understanding that established the framework for formal production agreements in the country, which holds some of the world’s largest oil reserves.

Despite the tailwind provided by high crude prices, negotiations had stalled over key details such as dispute resolution, while officials in Caracas contended with two devastating earthquakes in June that claimed thousands of lives.

Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, announced new regulations last month that offer more favourable fiscal terms to international oil companies.

According to an industry source close to the negotiations, the signing of the contracts comes after the Trump administration renewed pressure on Rodríguez to ensure PDVSA concludes agreements with American firms.

The source said these efforts included outreach by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to discuss how increased oil revenues could assist the country following the devastating earthquake earlier this summer.

The source added:

“Delcy reached a renewed awareness that increased oil production is the way to rebuild after the earthquakes and to achieve what her government wants to do for the people suffering from the earthquakes.”

David Goldwyn, president of the international energy consultancy Goldwyn Global Strategies, said investments from independent oil producers and boosting output from existing fields would serve as the “primary source of new oil growth for the next few years” for Venezuela.

“While the oil majors are trying to buy time to see how the political situation clarifies and whether they can cherry-pick the best assets, independent companies can de-risk their projects in the short term,” Goldwyn said.

However, Goldwyn noted that these investments would add no more than 300,000 barrels per day to the country’s oil production over the next year, falling far short of the multi-million-barrel increase that officials in Caracas and Washington wish to see.

“Until the framework improves, electricity is restored, and the political picture becomes clear, all we will see is incremental production growth,” the strategist said.

Continue Reading

America

US-Brazil rift widens over proposed sanctions and trade tariffs

Published

on

Diplomatic tensions between the two countries remain at a peak as the US government considers new sanctions targeting a judge on Brazil’s Supreme Court.

According to sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the Financial Times (FT), the Trump administration is evaluating new measures against Justice Alexandre de Moraes, whom it sanctioned last year on human rights grounds before subsequently rescinding that decision.

Washington’s renewed focus on the magistrate threatens to widen the rift between Brazil and the US across trade and political spheres, casting a shadow over upcoming elections in Latin America’s largest nation.

A little over a year ago, De Moraes was subjected to sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Act. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused him at the time of engaging in a “repressive censorship campaign, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions,” including measures directed at former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.

Bolsonaro, an ally of Donald Trump, was sentenced last year to 27 years in prison for plotting a coup.

However, sanctions targeting the judge, his wife, and a company owned by his family were lifted in December following a meeting and phone conversations between Trump and his Brazilian counterpart, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

According to a source familiar with the matter who requested anonymity, US interest in De Moraes was revived partly due to a case that ignited a debate over press freedom in Brazil.

The judge authorized police raids against a journalist and two sources as part of an investigation into media coverage concerning a Supreme Court justice and his family.

De Moraes defended the action, arguing that the information in question had been illegally obtained and disclosed, thereby endangering the safety of the justice’s family.

The judge gained global prominence several years ago following a public conflict with Elon Musk, which briefly led to the billionaire’s X platform being blocked in Brazil.

Supporters say he “helped protect Brazilian democracy against a wave of misinformation.”

However, critics, including the Trump administration, view him as violating free speech rights.

“He went after the president’s supporters. Not just Elon Musk, but MAGA supporters in Brazil as well. Even if we want to build good relations with Brazil, it is clear that this man is an adversary,” said a person familiar with the US government’s thinking.

Another person stated that the reimposition of Magnitsky sanctions is “under evaluation,” noting that such sanctions entail the freezing of US-based assets and a prohibition on American companies and individuals conducting business with targeted parties.

While it remains unclear whether or when a decision will be reached, any such move would intensify an escalating retaliatory spiral between the two most populous countries in the Americas.

Tensions initially erupted more than a year ago when Trump imposed a 50% tariff on Brazil while demanding that prosecution proceedings against Bolsonaro be dropped.

That tariff was subsequently invalidated by the US Supreme Court.

A brief period of de-escalation since then has drawn to a close, with the US applying a 25% import tariff on numerous Brazilian products in July.

Last month, Brazil denied entry to two Trump envoys over concerns regarding potential interference in its upcoming October elections. Washington rejects those allegations.

Lula, who is seeking re-election for a fourth presidential term, suggested that the US might act to support his main opponent, Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, the jailed former leader’s son.

The 80-year-old president has also engaged in a sharp public exchange of words with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

On Sunday, thousands of supporters gathered to welcome Lula at a stadium in Sao Bernardo do Campo, an industrial suburb of Sao Paulo, for the official launch of his election campaign.

Lula originally achieved prominence in the area during the late 1970s as a union leader heading metalworkers’ strikes.

Speaking at the venue, Lula said, “I thank the working men and women of this country who believed that someone like themselves could achieve more than someone different from them. As long as I am alive, I will not stop fighting, and I will not allow the right [to prevail].”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey