Europe
BSW rules out AfD coalition but weighs issue-by-issue cooperation
Having qualified to enter the state parliament in Saxony-Anhalt by securing 5.3% of the vote, the BSW is seeking to clarify the question of cooperation with the AfD.
Having previously announced that it would not join the “firewall” (Brandmauer) policy maintained by mainstream parties, above all the CDU, against the AfD, the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) says it remains open to talks with all parties.
The BSW’s lead candidate in Saxony-Anhalt, Thomas Schulze, stated on Deutschlandfunk that if the AfD’s lead candidate, Ulrich Siegmund, runs for office, the BSW will maintain its stance of abstaining in the third round of voting in the state parliament.
Schulze said the BSW should not be accused of serving as a “stepping stone”, adding that it is actually the other parties that act as such.
“I see the AfD as a party elected by 44% of the people here. And I have to take that into account. For me, that is democracy,” the BSW candidate said.
Schulze pointed out, for instance, that common ground exists with the AfD on the demand to lift sanctions against Russia.
The BSW’s other lead candidate, Claudia Wittig, likewise did not rule out the possibility of a form of partnership in Saxony-Anhalt on election night.
Meanwhile, the party’s founding leader, Sahra Wagenknecht, came out last week against her party forming a coalition with the AfD in Saxony-Anhalt.
In an extensive interview on the podcast “{ungeskriptet} by Ben”, she attributed this rejection both to the BSW’s lack of governing experience and to political differences between it and the AfD.
When asked why she refused to form a coalition with the AfD, Wagenknecht addressed the situation within her own party first.
Noting that the BSW will enter the Saxony-Anhalt State Parliament for the first time and has numerous candidates who have never worked as professional politicians, Wagenknecht considers entering an immediate coalition with a politically far more experienced party to be fundamentally problematic.
According to her, this applies not only to the AfD, but also to the CDU. As a young party, the BSW faces the risk of being politically victimised in such a coalition government.
In this regard, Wagenknecht is clearly drawing lessons from the BSW’s experiences in Thuringia.
She now views its participation in the coalition government there as a mistake, accusing parts of the state organisation of failing to defend the BSW’s core principles adequately.
However, Wagenknecht did not justify the decision to reject a coalition solely on strategic grounds. She also pointed to significant political differences with the AfD.
In particular, she criticised what she assessed to be authoritarian tendencies within the party. She noted that in a joint coalition, the BSW might be unable to block decisions taken by an AfD-led ministry effectively, yet would still have to bear political responsibility for them.
Wagenknecht cited a hypothetical interior ministry under AfD leadership as an example.
At the same time, she voiced doubts as to whether the AfD currently possesses a sufficient number of suitable personnel to run a state government.
In this context, Wagenknecht drew a clear distinction between a coalition and cooperation on individual policy projects.
In her view, voting in favour of motions or legislative proposals alongside the AfD makes sense if there are shared points of substantive agreement and the required parliamentary majority can be secured.
She thus distinguished the course followed by the BSW from a traditional “firewall” strategy.
For a long time, Wagenknecht has advocated involving the AfD in political decision-making processes commensurate with its parliamentary strength, whilst nonetheless avoiding entering into lasting governing cooperation.
Wagenknecht instead proposed a different governing model for Saxony-Anhalt. She argued that, following the elections, a supra-party figure should ideally be elected minister-president.
This figure would then need to form a cabinet: in Wagenknecht’s view, professional competence should be the primary determining factor in assembling the cabinet roster.
Such a government would have no fixed coalition majority. Instead, the government would need to secure a majority in the state parliament for each individual bill. Depending on the issue, different parties could take part in this process, including the AfD and the BSW.
In this manner, Wagenknecht hopes both to prevent the formation of another “firewall coalition” against the AfD and to prevent the AfD from establishing unilateral dominance.
At the same time, she makes clear that an absolute majority for the AfD is undesirable.
Nevertheless, Wagenknecht rejected the political ostracisation of the AfD. She stated that after the state parliamentary elections, the BSW intends to offer talks to all parties represented in parliament, and she anticipated that discussions with the AfD will also take place.
The position for Saxony-Anhalt is therefore clearly established: the BSW rules out a formal coalition with the AfD, but does not rule out talks or common parliamentary majorities on specific issues.
Wagenknecht’s preferred model would be a supra-party state government operating with shifting majorities.
Whether other parties, above all the AfD, would be open to such a model, however, remains open to question.
Europe
EU rejects US proposal to resume Russian gas flows through Ukraine
The European Commission has rejected a peace plan proposal from the US administration that entails resuming Russian natural gas purchases via Ukraine.
Commission spokesperson Paula Pinho stressed that Brussels has not changed its stance.
Pinho recalled that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had previously stated clearly that no restrictions on Russia would be lifted until the conflict comes to an absolute end.
The New York Times reported that the US president’s new peace proposal includes Europe returning to large-scale Russian gas purchases through Ukraine.
According to the report, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner raised the matter during talks in Kyiv last month with Ukrainian and European officials, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Sources contacted by the newspaper noted that some European and Ukrainian officials believe Washington would seek to secure a share of Russian gas exports.
Under this plan, the objective is to channel a share of the profits to American companies or the US government.
Russian President Vladimir Putin had said Moscow was ready to work on supplying fuel to European nations, but noted that a signal must come from the other side.
Putin stated that Moscow must evaluate the feasibility and necessity of fuel flows to the Western market, adding that they would not wait for Europe to shut the door ostentatiously on energy supplies.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov remarked that European nations rejecting Russian gas would make them dependent on the US and deprive them of the ability to diversify their supply sources.
Peskov noted that the US sells gas at very high prices and that if European nations pay more for energy, their industries will suffer.
The EU plans to halt liquefied natural gas imports from Russia entirely by 1 January 2027 and pipeline gas by 30 September 2027.
Von der Leyen had previously announced that the bloc would reduce Russian gas imports to zero by the end of 2027.
Russia halted gas flows to Europe via Ukraine as of 1 January 2025, when the five-year contract between Gazprom and Naftogaz of Ukraine expired.
Putin had stated that Kyiv refused to extend the transit agreement. Following the closure of the Ukrainian route, the TurkStream pipeline remained the only operational corridor carrying Russian pipeline gas to Europe.
Europe
Serbian prosecutor in Trump Tower inquiry targeted by Israeli spyware
A prosecutor investigating corruption allegations surrounding a real estate project linked to US President Donald Trump in Serbia was targeted with spyware, a new investigation has revealed.
The findings, published by the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab alongside the Serbia-based digital rights group SHARE Foundation, showed that Rade Bajić, who served at the Prosecutor’s Office for Organized Crime, was selected as a target.
Bajić became a target of the Pegasus spyware developed by Israel-based NSO Group after he publicly spoke out about political interference and abuses of power.
The prosecutor stated that on 13 August, he received a warning alert from Apple cautioning him against state-sponsored or mercenary spyware attacks.
Project cancelled, but investigation and pressure continue
The probe centres on a plan to transform the historic complex in Belgrade that housed the former Yugoslav Ministry of Defence headquarters into a luxury Trump Tower skyscraper.
Linked to US President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, the real estate development drew fierce backlash amid political pressure disputes and allegations that the site’s protected heritage status had been unlawfully revoked.
The investment firm founded by Kushner announced late last year that it was pulling out of the project, citing respect for the Serbian public and the city of Belgrade.
Recalling his investigation into claims that senior government officials had improperly lifted the historic military complex’s protected status, former prosecutor Bajić said: “In my opinion, my role in this case was the sole reason for the illegal spyware attack.”
Target list widens to university and judicial figures
The spyware scandal in Serbia has widened, sweeping in political opposition figures, civil society, and academic circles.
It was also confirmed that an iPhone belonging to University of Belgrade Rector Vladan Đokić was infiltrated by Pegasus spyware.
Đokić, who refused to back the government’s crackdowns on student demonstrations, has become one of the prominent figures of the protest movement.
Police raided his office on 31 March, seizing his computers and servers. Đokić had also been touted as a likely leader for a student-backed opposition list ahead of early general elections scheduled for Sunday.
Shortly before the report was published, a pro-government tabloid released audio recordings allegedly capturing Đokić discussing his political ambitions, putting him directly in the crosshairs.
While the source of the recordings remained undisclosed, Đokić stressed that the breach of his phone represented a grave assault on his personal privacy, safety, and the dignity of the rector’s office, demanding that those responsible be punished.
State institutions silent on allegations
Speaking to Politico, SHARE Foundation policy advisor Andrijana Ristić noted that surveillance operations had spread from civil society and journalists to student activists, politicians, and finally to members of academia and the judiciary.
Ristić stated that the lack of state action despite formal criminal complaints has fuelled this escalation.
Citizen Lab senior researcher John Scott-Railton emphasized that technology from NSO Group, which claims to turn over a new leaf every time an abuse is uncovered, is being deployed directly for repression.
Scott-Railton pointed out that targeting individuals who defend freedom against corruption was no coincidence.
The Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs left questions unanswered, though officials had previously denied allegations of cyber espionage.
NSO Group, which maintains that it sells its products exclusively to governments and was blacklisted by the US government in 2021 over human rights abuses, also made no comment.
Apple confirmed that it had sent mass threat notifications to users on 13 August, but provided no specific details regarding the cases of Bajić or Đokić.
In September, Citizen Lab and the SHARE Foundation disclosed that at least 14 individuals, including student activists and opposition figures, had received similar spyware alerts.
Europe
Macron rejects interior minister’s resignation over violent unrest
French Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez tendered his resignation amid some of the country’s most violent street unrest in recent years. President Emmanuel Macron rejected the resignation.
According to a statement from the Elysée Palace, Macron made the decision because law enforcement required uninterrupted command under current conditions. Macron instructed Nuñez to roll out new methods on the ground as quickly as possible.
The president also demanded that all necessary measures be taken to ensure transparency regarding the lapses in intelligence and foresight that led to the violence.
How many people were on the streets during Saturday’s protests?
The demonstrations were organised on 17 October over the rising cost of living and discontent with the government’s social policies. According to the Interior Ministry, approximately 550,000 people took part, while trade unions put the figure at 800,000.
Hundreds of thousands marched peacefully on Saturday. However, clashes with law enforcement broke out in Paris, Lyon, Marseille, and other cities, where shops were looted and buildings set on fire.
In Marseille, protesters stormed the city hall. As they forced their way in, they shouted, “This is a revolution, we are taking the Bastille!”, and went on to loot numerous stores.
In Lyon, the office of a tourism company housed in a 19th-century building was vandalised and torched. In Limoges, a 19th-century city hall was set ablaze.
Damage incurred by French businesses is reportedly estimated in the hundreds of millions of euros.
Citing Nuñez reported approximately 1,800 detentions and more than 500 injuries among police officers, gendarmes, and firefighters. Reuters reported that Nuñez stated 2,400 people had been detained nationwide and around 1,000 security personnel injured.
During the demonstrations in Paris, one person suffered a fatal heart attack while being detained.
Macron: We feel anger and shame
In a televised address, Macron said that nothing could justify the events. “There is nothing that can justify, explain, or excuse this. Tonight, we all feel anger and shame,” he said.
In the same speech, he stressed that peaceful demonstrators had legitimate grievances and should not be equated with those resorting to violence. He also noted that the protesters’ voices must be heard and that the government had already begun efforts to address them.
Macron said that legitimate demands must not be conflated with violence, and that violence should not prevent those demands from being heard.
Right demands state of emergency, Macron holds off
Right-wing politicians demanded the declaration of a state of emergency.
Macron declined to do so, stating that the government could allow local authorities to ban protests if necessary to protect public buildings and businesses.
Marine Le Pen, who is expected to run as the candidate for the far-right National Rally in next year’s presidential election, called for restraint. Le Pen said the situation in the country must not be treated as normal.
Meanwhile, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader of the far-left France Unbowed, stated that Macron must meet the demands of high school students staging demonstrations.
Macron’s term in office ends in 2027.
Throughout his nearly decade-long presidency, the country has frequently witnessed widespread protests, alongside persistent criticism over economic weakness and mounting public debt.
-
Europe2 weeks agoFrance and Germany urge EU market kill switch against trade threats
-
Europe2 weeks agoBill to drop NATO membership goal submitted to Ukrainian parliament
-
Europe2 weeks agoMarine Le Pen unveils fiscal programme pledging French budget cuts
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
Middle East2 weeks agoCIA report warns Israel faces growing risk of civil conflict
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye delivers Korkut air defence systems to Ukraine, report says
