Connect with us

Europe

More than 1,100 artists launch boycott of Eurovision 2026 over Israel participation

Published

on

More than 1,100 artists, including Roger Waters and Peter Gabriel, have signed an open letter calling for a boycott of the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest to protest Israel’s participation in the annual event.

In December, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) held a vote to permit Israel’s participation in the competition, which is scheduled to take place in Vienna next month.

The decision prompted several countries, including Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Slovenia, to announce their withdrawal from Eurovision.

In that vote, 65% of EBU representatives supported changes to the voting and promotion rules, opposing continued debate regarding Israel’s participation. Approximately 23% voted against the measures, while 10% abstained.

The boycott campaign is being spearheaded by an organization called No Music For Genocide, which encourages artists and music rights holders to remove their content from streaming platforms in Israel.

The current campaign by No Music For Genocide calls on artists, broadcasters, and the general public to boycott the 2026 edition of the contest.

“We refuse to allow Eurovision to be used to whitewash and normalize Israel’s genocide, siege, and brutal military occupation against Palestinians,” the letter, published Tuesday, stated.

In addition to Waters and Gabriel, the open letter was signed by Brian Eno, Hot Chip, Sigur Rós, Massive Attack, and Kneecap.

Signatories also include past winners of the competition, such as Emmelie de Forest, who won the 2013 Eurovision for Denmark with the song “Only Teardrops,” and Irish singer Charlie McGettigan, who won the 1993 contest with “Rock ‘n’ Roll Kids.”

The letter further expressed support for Palestinian calls to boycott the event until the EBU bans Israel’s public broadcaster, Kan, from participating.

“Until the EBU bans the complicit Israeli broadcaster KAN, we support Palestinian calls for public broadcasters, artists, viewing party organizers, crew members, and fans to boycott Eurovision,” the letter stated.

The campaign also argued that Israel should receive the same treatment as Russia, citing the EBU’s decision to exclude Russia following the invasion of Ukraine.

The letter praised European countries that have chosen not to broadcast the event or decline to send an artist to represent them.

“Just as artists stood against oppression in South Africa, we stand together now,” the letter continued.

Organizers also sharply criticized the EBU, claiming the organization has “shattered the illusion of ‘neutrality’ it claims for Eurovision through its hypocritical responses to the crimes of Russia and Israel.”

In 2022, the EBU stated that Russia’s participation would “bring the competition into disrepute.”

The letter continued: “We refuse to remain silent while Israel’s genocidal violence stifles and silences Palestinian lives. While children in Israeli prisons are subjected to beatings for humming a melody. When almost every stage, studio, bookstore, and university in Gaza has been reduced to rubble, beneath which slaughtered bodies still await recovery and proper burial.”

The Irish rap group Kneecap wrote on social media: “We have paid a price for speaking up—canceled shows, lawsuits, visa bans—and we would do it all again tomorrow. Silence is complicity. No stage for genocide. Free Palestine.”

No Music For Genocide organizers added that during the 53 years Israel has been part of Eurovision, it has maintained systems of “apartheid, torture, land theft, and military occupation” against Palestinians.

Israel has participated in 47 Eurovision contests since its debut in 1973, winning the title four times. This year, Israel is set to be represented by Noam Bettan, who will perform the song “Michelle” when taking the stage in Austria.

At the time, Israeli President Isaac Herzog stated that his country “deserves to be represented on every world stage” and expressed hope that the contest would remain an event that promotes “culture, music, friendship between peoples, and cross-border cultural understanding.”

In the United Kingdom, the BBC announced it would broadcast the contest, stating it supports the “collective decision taken by EBU members.” The German broadcaster SWR also confirmed its participation.

Europe

Right-wing calls to ban left parties and groups mount in Europe

Published

on

Youth protests spreading across European nations, particularly in France, are serving as an occasion for right-wing parties and governments to escalate demands for bans.

In France, for example, right-wing conservative politicians such as Senate President Gérard Larcher and presidential candidate Bruno Retailleau of The Republicans (LR) are now openly demanding that the party La France Insoumise (LFI) be banned.

Matthieu Valet, a Member of the European Parliament from Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN), said at the party congress held in Orléans on 24–25 October: “We will dissolve all anti-fascist organisations.”

Polls unanimously show that RN candidate Marine Le Pen leads the vote for the presidential election in April 2027.

In Spain, the rising right-wing party Vox submitted a draft bill to parliament in December 2025 aimed at dissolving organisations linked to the anti-fascist movement.

Vox is polling at 19% in recent surveys, and the party hopes to enter government by forming a coalition with the conservative Popular Party (PP) following the elections on 29 November.

In such a scenario, banning anti-fascist organisations in Spain could become possible.

Acts of violence linked to protests are currently being used increasingly to threaten left organisations with bans.

Belgium offers another example. Since last year, Interior Minister Bernard Quintin has been attempting to ban organisations that threaten “national security or the foundations of the rule of law”.

In this context, government officials cite “Antifa” as an example. Even in the autumn of 2025, Georges-Louis Bouchez, president of Quintin’s Reformist Movement (MR), openly called for the “dissolution of Antifa”.

When property damage occurred on the fringes of student protests in Liège in early October this year, Quintin once again pointed to “Antifa-type” organisations in light of plans to ban such groups.

In June, Defence Minister Theo Francken of the New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) also claimed, without providing evidence, that the opposition Workers’ Party of Belgium (PTB-PVDA) was responsible following property damage on the fringes of protests in Brussels.

PTB-PVDA supports the protests gaining momentum in Belgium against the government’s policies of militarisation and social spending cuts.

According to polls, the party is currently the second strongest in the country with 23% of the vote nationwide, and the strongest in the Brussels-Capital Region with 26%.

In Germany, the possibility of banning The Left (Die Linke) was raised by the influential mainstream newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

A recent editorial in the newspaper asked: “Why not ban Die Linke?”

Meanwhile, banning youth demonstrations is currently under discussion. As in Belgium, isolated violent incidents on the margins of peaceful protests are cited as justification, discrediting the demonstrations as a whole.

Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt is not only levelling blanket accusations against “left-wing groups” without providing evidence; he is also attributing instances of property damage to “agitators emerging from the migrant community”.

The Interior Minister of the state of Hesse, Roman Poseck, acknowledged that those detained on Saturday on assault charges were “predominantly German citizens”, but nonetheless claimed that they were “predominantly of migrant background”.

These statements therefore attribute responsibility for violence to leftists on the one hand, and to people of non-German origin on the other.

A representative from the Federal Ministry of the Interior under Dobrindt also attended a conference where White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller equated anti-fascists (“Antifa”) broadly with terrorism and categorised them as “enemies of civilisation”.

According to an investigation by the online portal FragDenStaat, this representative was Christian Klos, head of the Public Security Directorate.

Klos reportedly appeared in Washington as part of a “morning panel” on “The Threat Landscape of Far-Left Terrorism”.

What he said there remains unclear: FragDenStaat reported that the Federal Ministry of the Interior refused to publish several preparatory documents related to the presentation, citing their classified status.

However, it is now known that the Interior Ministry took part in a preparatory workshop in the US in May with two officials at the “relevant specialist division level”.

In addition, the federal government confirmed in early October that a follow-up event to the Washington conference would be held this autumn.

The event’s focus will be the “sharing of professional experience among security and law enforcement agencies from various countries”, centring specifically on “manifestations, developments, and challenges in the field of violent left-wing extremism”.

The US Department of State had hosted a conference on 16 July with the participation of representatives from more than 60 countries across North and South America, Europe, and parts of Asia.

The focus of the conference was the “international resurgence of far-left political terrorism”.

Alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Stephen Miller set the tone of the conference.

In a speech, Miller claimed that leftists were “fundamentally driven by envy, hatred, and malice”, adding that no one at anti-fascist demonstrations looked like a “normal human being”.

Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has played a prominent role for years in crackdowns on left-wing organisations.

While serving as CSU general secretary in 2011 and 2012, his rhetoric caused astonishment even within his own party.

In August 2011, for instance, he demanded that authorities “examine whether proceedings to ban Die Linke should be initiated”.

In January 2012, he stated that he believed “in the medium term, we must make every effort to also launch proceedings to ban [the party Die Linke]”.

At the time, Gerda Hasselfeldt, then leader of the CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag, expressed her surprise: “At present, I see no grounds for proceedings to ban Die Linke.”

Even after taking office as Federal Interior Minister, Dobrindt continued to stand out with striking rhetoric.

In June 2025, during the presentation of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution report, he displayed graphs with different scales, implying that the number of “far-left extremists” in Germany exceeded that of right-wing extremists.

In December 2025, he suggested that “left-wing extremists” could engage in “espionage or sabotage” activities on behalf of foreign powers.

Continue Reading

Europe

Low EU gas stocks risk stoking global prices, IEA report warns

Published

on

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has stated that the global gas market could remain tight “until later in 2027” as European gas storage levels stand at their lowest point in a decade ahead of the winter season.

Presenting its “Global Gas Security Review 2026” report, the IEA noted that depleted storage inventories will heighten Europe’s reliance on global liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies to meet peak demand, particularly in the event of a colder-than-expected winter.

“Under colder-than-average weather conditions and prolonged disruptions to LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz, EU gas storage levels could drop to below 10% of working capacity by the end of March 2027,” the report said.

Depleted stock levels could intensify competition for the limited volume of flexible LNG cargoes with countries in Asia and South America that have limited storage options, putting upward pressure on prices this winter.

The IEA noted, “Low storage levels in Europe could also significantly increase gas injection requirements to replenish stocks through the summer of 2027, potentially extending tightness in the global market well into next year.”

With the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz cutting more than 60 billion cubic metres of supply from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, Asian and European prices have already reached their highest levels since the 2022-23 gas supply crisis.

The report stated that an increase in LNG supply, particularly from North America, alongside more flexible trading arrangements, has helped cushion the impact of the Hormuz supply shock.

The report forecasts that global LNG supply will drop in 2026 by a record 3%, or around 20 billion cubic metres, compared with 2025.

Global gas demand is expected to fall by roughly 1.5%, or nearly 65 billion cubic metres, driven by lost demand across the Middle East, declining industrial gas consumption in Europe, and power sectors switching from gas to coal across multiple Asian countries.

The IEA said, “These findings highlight the importance of strengthening international cooperation on gas supply security, even as global markets become more flexible.”

The EU was expected to fill its underground gas storage facilities to at least 90% ahead of the winter season.

However, after that requirement was relaxed because of the ongoing crisis, the average fullness rate stood at just 74.6% as of 1 November.

This shortfall was primarily driven by lower-than-normal inventories in Germany and the Netherlands.

The IEA observed that because storage levels for this time of year are at their lowest since 2013, the EU has become uniquely dependent on LNG shipments.

In the event of an exceptionally cold winter, EU storage fullness could drop below 10% by March, leaving the bloc vulnerable to “additional cold spells, technical failures, or other supply disruptions”.

However, the Paris-based energy security agency added that these challenges could extend well beyond the winter months.LNG

Continue Reading

Europe

Pro-Ukraine Republicans in US Congress dwindle after departures

Published

on

The number of influential Republicans advocating support for Ukraine in the US Congress is expected to decline following the midterm elections.

According to reporting by Politico, several senior figures, including former Senate Republican majority leader Mitch McConnell, are set to leave Congress.

Michael Sawkiw, head of the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus, described the departing lawmakers as “real heavyweights” among Ukraine’s supporters.

An unnamed adviser to a Republican member of the House of Representatives said these departures could reduce the number of comprehensive legislative bills drafted in Kyiv’s favour.

The adviser noted concerns that Congress may no longer retain a coalition capable of drafting legislation that could secure the approval of Donald Trump’s administration while simultaneously conducting back-channel contacts to persuade the White House.

New candidates keep military aid at arm’s length

Mitch McConnell had advocated providing military aid and sharing intelligence with Ukraine.

However, several candidates seeking the seats of departing Republicans remain distant toward Kyiv. Andy Barr, who launched a candidacy to replace McConnell, had voted against legislation supporting Ukraine.

Nevertheless, the report stated that Republicans could retain their roles as channels of communication with Trump and as providers of the majorities required to override a presidential veto.

The death of Senator Lindsey Graham, an architect of sanctions against Russia, was also reported to have caused grief among Ukraine supporters. The House member’s adviser pointed to Senator Katie Britt among Graham’s possible successors, noting that Britt had supported initiatives imposing restrictions on Russia.

According to the report, pro-Ukraine Republicans may attempt to block the White House’s agenda before the current congressional term concludes.

Concerns that Republican losses in the midterms could affect Ukraine aid and NATO had surfaced previously.

It is noted that if Congress curtails Trump’s domestic authority, he could turn his focus toward foreign policy. An unnamed NATO diplomat remarked that the US president’s posture could harden under such circumstances.

Other sources speaking to Politico suggested that Trump could respond to an electoral defeat by drawing down the American military presence in Europe, trimming contributions to the NATO budget, curbing the PURL programme involving weapons procurement for Ukraine, and pursuing closer ties with Russia.

Jennifer Kavanagh, an expert at the think tank Defense Priorities, pointed out that European nations would struggle to compensate for any reduction in US support across electronic warfare, air defence, intelligence, aerial refuelling, and logistics.

Race continues for House and Senate

In the US congressional midterm elections, voters will head to the polls to decide all 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 35 of the 100 seats in the Senate.

The outcome will determine which party holds the majority in both chambers of Congress for two years.

According to opinion polls cited by Reuters, Democrats appear to have a chance of winning a majority in the House of Representatives, whereas their odds of seizing control of the Senate are judged to be low.

It is noted that if Democrats secure a majority, they could open investigations into Trump, constrain spending priorities, and block various initiatives.

The US leader, however, will continue to retain broad powers over trade, foreign policy, and the federal bureaucracy.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey