Europe
More than 1,100 artists launch boycott of Eurovision 2026 over Israel participation
More than 1,100 artists, including Roger Waters and Peter Gabriel, have signed an open letter calling for a boycott of the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest to protest Israel’s participation in the annual event.
In December, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) held a vote to permit Israel’s participation in the competition, which is scheduled to take place in Vienna next month.
The decision prompted several countries, including Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Slovenia, to announce their withdrawal from Eurovision.
In that vote, 65% of EBU representatives supported changes to the voting and promotion rules, opposing continued debate regarding Israel’s participation. Approximately 23% voted against the measures, while 10% abstained.
The boycott campaign is being spearheaded by an organization called No Music For Genocide, which encourages artists and music rights holders to remove their content from streaming platforms in Israel.
The current campaign by No Music For Genocide calls on artists, broadcasters, and the general public to boycott the 2026 edition of the contest.
“We refuse to allow Eurovision to be used to whitewash and normalize Israel’s genocide, siege, and brutal military occupation against Palestinians,” the letter, published Tuesday, stated.
In addition to Waters and Gabriel, the open letter was signed by Brian Eno, Hot Chip, Sigur Rós, Massive Attack, and Kneecap.
Signatories also include past winners of the competition, such as Emmelie de Forest, who won the 2013 Eurovision for Denmark with the song “Only Teardrops,” and Irish singer Charlie McGettigan, who won the 1993 contest with “Rock ‘n’ Roll Kids.”
The letter further expressed support for Palestinian calls to boycott the event until the EBU bans Israel’s public broadcaster, Kan, from participating.
“Until the EBU bans the complicit Israeli broadcaster KAN, we support Palestinian calls for public broadcasters, artists, viewing party organizers, crew members, and fans to boycott Eurovision,” the letter stated.
The campaign also argued that Israel should receive the same treatment as Russia, citing the EBU’s decision to exclude Russia following the invasion of Ukraine.
The letter praised European countries that have chosen not to broadcast the event or decline to send an artist to represent them.
“Just as artists stood against oppression in South Africa, we stand together now,” the letter continued.
Organizers also sharply criticized the EBU, claiming the organization has “shattered the illusion of ‘neutrality’ it claims for Eurovision through its hypocritical responses to the crimes of Russia and Israel.”
In 2022, the EBU stated that Russia’s participation would “bring the competition into disrepute.”
The letter continued: “We refuse to remain silent while Israel’s genocidal violence stifles and silences Palestinian lives. While children in Israeli prisons are subjected to beatings for humming a melody. When almost every stage, studio, bookstore, and university in Gaza has been reduced to rubble, beneath which slaughtered bodies still await recovery and proper burial.”
The Irish rap group Kneecap wrote on social media: “We have paid a price for speaking up—canceled shows, lawsuits, visa bans—and we would do it all again tomorrow. Silence is complicity. No stage for genocide. Free Palestine.”
No Music For Genocide organizers added that during the 53 years Israel has been part of Eurovision, it has maintained systems of “apartheid, torture, land theft, and military occupation” against Palestinians.
Israel has participated in 47 Eurovision contests since its debut in 1973, winning the title four times. This year, Israel is set to be represented by Noam Bettan, who will perform the song “Michelle” when taking the stage in Austria.
At the time, Israeli President Isaac Herzog stated that his country “deserves to be represented on every world stage” and expressed hope that the contest would remain an event that promotes “culture, music, friendship between peoples, and cross-border cultural understanding.”
In the United Kingdom, the BBC announced it would broadcast the contest, stating it supports the “collective decision taken by EBU members.” The German broadcaster SWR also confirmed its participation.
Europe
UK underwater deterrent facing scrutiny as all active Astute-class submarines remain in port
All five of the Royal Navy’s active Astute-class nuclear-powered attack submarines are reportedly held in port for repairs or maintenance, leaving the UK with no operational vessels of this class ready for deployment.
According to a report by The Telegraph, which cited naval sources, although a sixth submarine of the same class has officially joined the fleet, it is not yet ready for deployment.
The current situation means that the UK temporarily lacks any nuclear-powered attack submarines cleared for active operations. Ryan Ramsey, a former nuclear submarine commander, described the development as a serious warning signal. “We look vulnerable,” Ramsey said. “The Russians know we can’t get our submarines to sea. When you cannot provide a deterrent at sea, you lose credibility in the eyes of the Russians.”
Lord Alan West, the former First Sea Lord and former security minister, also described the state of the submarine fleet as unacceptable and deeply concerning.
The UK Ministry of Defence stated in response to the reports that it does not normally comment on the operational status of the submarine fleet. Emphasizing that British waters remain protected at all times through a range of measures, the ministry added that strengthening underwater capability continues to be a top priority.
Astute-class nuclear submarines are tasked with protecting the UK’s Vanguard-class strategic ballistic missile submarines, which carry the country’s nuclear deterrent, as well as the aircraft carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales during their deployments.
Separately, the UK’s Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, General Gwyn Jenkins, admitted in an interview with the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet in April that the Royal Navy was not sufficiently prepared for a potential war.
While noting that the navy possesses the resources to conduct combat operations and that personnel stand ready to carry out orders, Jenkins added: “But are we as ready as we should be? I think not.” He indicated that efforts to improve readiness levels remain ongoing.
Previously, The Sun newspaper reported that only two of the UK’s six Type 45 destroyers were operational. One of these active vessels, HMS Dragon, was deployed to the Mediterranean to protect British military bases in Cyprus.
The Telegraph also reported that due to a shortage of available ships, the government in London was forced to utilize a German vessel.
The state of the Royal Navy has been described in the British parliament as a “national embarrassment,” while US President Donald Trump has criticized the fleet, referring to it as a “toy navy,” according to reports by The Guardian.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that Russia has no intention of fighting a war with Europe, dismissing such claims as nonsense. Putin has maintained that Western governments are escalating the situation to portray Russia as an adversary.
Europe
Middle East energy shock threatens 1.3 million EU jobs as industrial giants warn of regulatory drag
Morten Wierod, the Chief Executive Officer of ABB, the Swiss-Swedish multinational industrial technology giant, has warned that Europe could face mass unemployment unless it urgently deregulates its economy in the face of an energy shock triggered by war in the Middle East.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Wierod stated that European policymakers are failing to show the necessary sense of urgency regarding reforms, noting that rising gas prices are undermining the European Union’s competitiveness against the United States.
“I hope we don’t have to see a much more severe crisis that leads to mass unemployment. Such a crisis should not be a mandatory prerequisite to gain that sense of urgency,” Wierod said.
ABB, a global leader in electrotechnical and industrial automation, employs approximately 110,000 people worldwide and generates $33.2 billion in revenue. The company operates critical infrastructure businesses, including electrical distribution, building management, robotic equipment for manufacturing facilities, and data center support. Its technologies are utilized in one out of every four data centers globally.
Wierod argued that the single market and the EU as a whole must completely eliminate, rather than merely simplify, excessive regulations to stimulate economic growth. He also criticized Brussels’ plans to reduce dependence on foreign technologies, warning that this approach will lead to unforeseen consequences and rising costs.
“When you build regulation around the ‘Made in Europe’ debate, we always see that there are side effects,” Wierod stated.
Nevertheless, Wierod acknowledged that Europe possesses strong assets, including a skilled workforce, access to high-quality education, and extensive experience in crisis management. He cited the region’s success in reducing its reliance on Russian gas from 35% to less than 10% within a single year as an example of this capability.
However, Wierod pointed out that rising gas prices—driven by supply disruptions in the Middle East caused by the war between the US and Iran—have increased competitive pressures on Europe. “I am not worried that there will be no gas in Europe. There will be gas, but it will be at a higher price,” Wierod said, adding that elevated prices will persist until 2027.
Following operations by the US and Israel, Iran announced the suspension of trade through the Strait of Hormuz. The strategic waterway carries 15% to 20% of global oil, condensate, and petroleum products, as well as more than 30% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies.
Roxana Minzatu, the European Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, also warned earlier this week that rising energy prices could lead to the loss of up to 1.3 million jobs across the EU.
According to European Commission estimates reported by Reuters, the automotive sector is expected to suffer the largest employment decline, with a projected loss of 600,000 jobs. The construction, metallurgy, chemical, and transport sectors could lose 56,000 jobs combined. Additionally, approximately 85,000 jobs in battery manufacturing projects and 58,000 jobs in solar panel manufacturing are reportedly at risk.
European Commission data shows that in 2023, 68% of medium-sized enterprises reported a shortage of qualified personnel, and in 2024, 77% of firms identified this shortage as an obstacle to investment.
According to information obtained by Politico, the Commission plans to include a distinct, dedicated block in its recommendations for the first time, emphasizing the necessity of investing in education, vocational training, adult learning, and staff reskilling.
Data from Eurostat indicates that the EU’s manufacturing sector employs approximately 30 million people. In 2023, the sector accounted for one-quarter of the EU economy’s €9.9 trillion net turnover.
In an analysis published in March, The Wall Street Journal reported that the energy crisis stemming from the war between the US and Iran could drag the European economy into a recession. The newspaper forecast that this development would come as a “bitter surprise” for Europe, noting that most of the announced support measures require large and immediate public expenditures.
Europe
German lawmakers block over €1 billion in defense contracts in procurement crackdown
Two German lawmakers have blocked or forced the renegotiation of defense procurement contracts valued at more than €1 billion, exerting strict parliamentary oversight over the military’s budget spending.
According to a report by the Financial Times, Andreas Mattfeldt of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Andreas Schwarz of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) serve on the Budget Committee of the Bundestag, Germany’s federal parliament.
The committee holds the authority to approve all military procurement projects valued at over €25 million.
In January, the two lawmakers vetoed a €600 million contract intended for Munich-based electronics group Rohde & Schwarz to supply a mobile intelligence system. The parliamentarians objected to the contract being awarded directly without a competitive bidding process.
One month later, they blocked a €462 million direct agreement with defense contractors Rheinmetall and MBDA. The contract was aimed at developing a laser system designed to protect naval vessels from drone attacks.
In February, the lawmakers also successfully lowered the maximum cost of three contracts intended for the procurement of kamikaze drones. Later in April, they halted the planned purchase of 900 diesel fuel tanker containers for the German armed forces, the Bundeswehr. The representatives intervened after discovering that the price of the tankers had doubled compared to a similar purchase made five years prior.
“We have brought about a paradigm shift because we are responsible for the immense amount of money entrusted to us by taxpayers,” Mattfeldt said in an interview with the Financial Times. “I want to be able to say that we have contributed to the Bundeswehr getting the best equipment at the best price.”
Schwarz, who, like his colleague, previously served as a municipal mayor, added: “We do not get involved in ideologies; we use our common sense.” While colleagues and aides jokingly refer to the pair as “the two Andys,” the two lawmakers have nicknamed themselves “the A-Team.”
Budget committee powers stem from past cost overruns
The extraordinary powers of the budget committee over defense procurement date back to 1981. At the time, parliament reacted to severe cost overruns in the Tornado fighter jet program by decreeing that all military projects exceeding 50 million deutsche marks must receive legislative approval.
Today, that threshold stands at €25 million, a limit that one official described as “completely outdated.”
A spokesperson for the German Ministry of Defense said: “Parliamentary control over major acquisitions is an important oversight tool in our democracy.”
-
Middle East2 weeks agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Middle East2 weeks agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
America2 weeks agoUS seeks new tungsten supplies after Iran war drains military stockpiles
-
America1 week agoUS Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia moves to privatize major oil port operator amid widening budget deficit
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina launches long-duration Tiangong mission ahead of planned Moon landing
-
Europe7 days agoUkraine reburies OUN leader Melnyk as Poland and Israel condemn honoring of wartime nationalist figures
