Connect with us

Middle East

Reuters reveals suppression of humanitarian warnings by US Embassy officials in Jerusalem

Published

on

USAID personnel drafted a warning for the Joe Biden administration in early 2024 characterizing northern Gaza as an “apocalyptic wasteland” due to a catastrophic lack of food and medical supplies, according to former US officials and internal documents reviewed by Reuters.

The internal communication, prepared three months after the October 7, 2023, Al-Aqsa Flood operation and the subsequent Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip, detailed findings from a two-phase UN inspection mission conducted in January and February.

The report described harrowing scenes, including human femurs and other skeletal remains visible on roadways and corpses left in abandoned vehicles. It identified “catastrophic humanitarian needs,” particularly regarding food and clean drinking water.

Embassy cites “balance” as grounds for suppression

According to four former officials and the documents reviewed by Reuters, US Ambassador to Jerusalem Jack Lew and his deputy, Stephanie Hallett, blocked the memo from wider distribution within the US government, concluding it “lacked balance.”

The news agency is the first to publicly disclose the existence of this memo and the reasons for its suppression. Both Hallett and Lew declined to comment on the matter.

Former officials stated that this February 2024 document was one of five memos sent during the first half of the year documenting the deterioration of health, food, and hygiene conditions for Palestinians resulting from the Israeli military operation. Reuters reviewed one of these documents, while the other four were described by the former officials.

Impact on Washington decision-making

Three former US officials noted that the descriptions were unusually blunt and would have likely captured the attention of high-ranking officials had the message circulated widely within the Biden administration.

They suggested such reports could have deepened scrutiny of the National Security Memorandum issued by Biden that month, which conditioned US intelligence and arms supplies on Israel’s compliance with international law.

“While memos are not the only means of providing humanitarian information, the Ambassador’s acknowledgment would have meant recognizing the reality of the situation in Gaza,” said Andrew Hall, a crisis operations specialist at USAID at the time.

The US Embassy in Jerusalem oversaw the language and distribution of Gaza-related correspondence, including those from other regional embassies. One former senior official noted that Lew and Hallett frequently told USAID management that the memos contained information already widely covered in the media.

The report indicates that while these memos were being prepared in early 2024, the White House and other top US officials were aware of the general decline in the humanitarian situation in northern Gaza via National Security Council reports. Humanitarian organizations were also warning of an imminent risk of famine.

In January 2024, the embassy approved the wider distribution of a separate memo regarding food insecurity across Gaza, which was subsequently included in the President’s Daily Brief. That document analyzed the risk of famine in northern Gaza and the potential for severe food insecurity elsewhere due to a lack of shipments.

However, according to six former officials, top US leadership often lacked consistent first-hand information due to restricted access to the region during intense combat between Israel and Hamas.

“To put it simply, humanitarian expertise was repeatedly sidelined, blocked, and ignored,” said a former member of USAID’s Middle East disaster response team.

Distrust of third-party data

Because USAID has not had personnel on the ground in Gaza since 2019, much of its reporting relied on information from UNRWA and international aid organizations funded by the US government.

This reliance on third parties caused some Biden administration officials to view USAID reports with skepticism, according to three former officials. They noted that Biden’s Middle East envoy, Brett McGurk, and his aides frequently questioned whether USAID had verified the information and why the data often diverged—sometimes significantly—from Israel’s version of events. One former official remarked that the recurring question was: “Well, where are these emaciated children?”

Two former officials stated that Hallett occasionally requested that memos be reframed or edited. She reportedly questioned the necessity of a memo focused on health, arguing that most of the information was already in the public domain. Furthermore, Hallett allegedly deemed USAID disaster team memos “too sensitive” for release during ongoing ceasefire and hostage exchange negotiations.

According to data from the Palestinian Ministry of Health, the death toll in Gaza has exceeded 71,000 since the conflict began on October 7, 2023.

Although President Donald Trump announced a Gaza peace plan alongside Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office last September, hostilities have not ceased. Approximately 481 people have lost their lives since that ceasefire declaration, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey