Middle East
Shara proposes Trump Tower in Damascus for US meeting

Ahmed Shara, Syria’s interim President, reportedly presented a proposal during his recent Gulf tour aiming to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump. This offer allegedly includes the construction of a Trump Tower in Damascus, the normalization of relations with Israel, and granting the US access to Syria’s oil and natural gas resources.
Still designated a terrorist by the US, Shara is actively seeking an agreement to normalize relations with Washington, secure the lifting of sanctions, and achieve international recognition. His proposal is framed as a strategic offer that addresses both US economic interests and regional stability.
According to a Reuters report, Jonathan Bass, an American businessman and staunch Trump supporter, is working with several Gulf countries and Syrian figures to facilitate a meeting between Ahmed Shara and Trump. This potential encounter, though considered a low probability, would occur during Trump’s planned visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.
Syria has prioritized the lifting of US sanctions to initiate its recovery process following more than 14 years of continuous conflict. However, implementing the conditions set by Washington continues to pose substantial challenges within the country.
Jonathan Bass contends that Shara’s presence in the same room as Trump, despite Shara’s past affiliation with Al-Qaeda and his continued presence on the US terror list, could potentially soften the White House’s outlook on Damascus and alleviate tensions along the Syria-Israel front.
Bass remarked, “Shara wants a business deal for his country’s future,” further explaining that this proposal encompasses energy cooperation, joint action against Iran, and direct engagement with Israel. Bass recounted, “He told me he wants a Trump Tower in Damascus. He wants peace with his neighbors. What he said was good for both the region and Israel.” Bass also conveyed that Shara personally identified with Trump, noting, “Both have survived assassination attempts in the past.”
Syrian government officials and the presidential office have not commented on the matter. However, the Syrian Presidency announced that Shara held a meeting with Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman last Sunday.
A source close to Shara indicated that a meeting with Trump remains a possibility, although it is currently unclear whether an official invitation has been extended. The source added, “Whether the meeting takes place will only be known at the last minute.”
A direct meeting between Ahmed Shara and Trump during Trump’s Middle East tour is considered improbable due to the demanding schedule, Trump’s evolving priorities, and a notable lack of consensus within his own team concerning Syria policy.
However, sources indicate that while a high-level US-Syrian meeting is planned during Trump’s visit, it is not expected to be a direct encounter between Trump and Shara.
Charles Lister, Director of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute, commented, “Direct contact with Trump is viewed as the most effective approach, primarily because numerous ideological obstacles exist within the administration.”
Washington has yet to develop a comprehensive and consistent policy regarding Syria. Nevertheless, according to three distinct sources, including a US official, the US administration has recently been framing its relations with Syria predominantly through the lens of counter-terrorism.
This approach was also evident in the meeting between the US and Syrian Foreign Minister Esad Hasan Al-Shaybani in New York last month. The inclusion of a high-ranking counter-terrorism official from the State Department in the US delegation was interpreted as a clear signal of this focus.
Sources indicate that US officials conveyed to Al-Shaybani their assessment that the steps taken, particularly concerning the removal of foreign fighters serving in the Syrian army from high-ranking positions and their maximal expulsion, were deemed insufficient.
Furthermore, the US Treasury Department also communicated its own demands to the Damascus administration, consequently elevating the total number of Washington’s conditions to over 12.
James Hewitt, Spokesperson for the White House National Security Council, stated that the actions undertaken by Syria’s interim administration will largely determine whether the US will extend support or ease sanctions.
One of the primary objectives of Syria’s overtures to Washington is to convey that the country poses no threat to Israel. Notably, since the change of government in Damascus at the end of 2024, Israel has intensified its air strikes on Syria.
Israeli ground forces have occupied certain areas in the country’s southwest. While Tel Aviv asserts these actions are intended to protect minority communities in Syria, the Damascus administration perceives the attacks as a significant escalation of tension.
Last week, Shara confirmed that indirect talks with Israel were conducted via the United Arab Emirates. Reuters had previously reported that these contacts aimed to de-escalate regional tensions.
Jonathan Bass also stated that Shara had conveyed certain messages through him that could potentially pave the way for direct contact with Israel.
However, despite these overtures, Israel initiated new air strikes targeting areas near the presidential palace in Damascus. Tel Aviv asserted these attacks were carried out to protect the Druze minority in Syria.
Bass remarked, “Shara extended an olive branch to Israel, and Israel responded with a missile,” and he added, “Trump is needed to mend this relationship.”
Middle East
Plight of refugees in Iran

As the process of deporting Afghan migrants from Iran intensifies, Iranian officials say that in the past week, more than 120,000 people have entered Afghanistan from Iran, both forcibly and voluntarily.
The district governor of Taybad in Iran says that nearly 8,000 undocumented Afghan citizens enter Afghanistan daily through the Dogharun border alone.
Meanwhile, some deported immigrants say they left all their assets in Iran and were forced to return home empty-handed.
Hossein Jamshidi, the district governor of Taybad, told Iranian media that in the past week alone, more than 95,000 undocumented citizens and about 25,000 documented migrants from all over Iran have been identified and returned to Afghanistan from this border.
Dogharoon border is the largest crossing point for the deportation of Afghan migrants from Iran. Every day, thousands of migrants, most of whom were living in Iran without documents, are now transported in large convoys, in dozens of passenger buses from all over Iran, to this border point zero.
But in this side of the border!
But on this side of the border, at the Islam Qala crossing, thousands of people, including women and children, are standing in long lines in the scorching sun, wearing only a few layers of clothing, waiting to cross the border and enter Afghan territory.
Many of these migrants say they have nowhere to go and have been forced to leave all their belongings on the other side of the border, on Iranian soil, and return empty-handed.
The Taliban have called for the establishment of a “coordinated mechanism” with the Iranian government for the return of refugees.
UN agencies have called for increased financial assistance following the significant expulsion of Afghan refugees from neighboring countries.
The Norwegian government has expressed concern about the deportation of migrants in recent days and has allocated nearly $1 million to support them.
Middle East
US proposes $30 billion deal to Iran for halting uranium enrichment

The administration of US President Donald Trump is reportedly discussing the possibility of providing Iran with up to $30 billion in financial access to develop its peaceful nuclear program as part of efforts to return to negotiations with Tehran.
According to a CNN report citing sources familiar with the matter, this offer requires Tehran to completely halt uranium enrichment, a condition emphasized as “non-negotiable.”
Under the proposed plan, the funds would not be provided by the US but by Arab nations. An administration official stated, “The US is ready to lead these negotiations. Someone will have to pay for the implementation of the nuclear program, but we will not make such a commitment.”
Other proposals on the table
American officials have indicated that other offers are also being considered. These include the potential lifting of some sanctions against Iran and granting Tehran access to $6 billion of its frozen assets in foreign banks.
Another idea involves US allies in the Persian Gulf covering the cost of building new infrastructure to replace the Fordow nuclear facility, which was damaged in US attacks. This new facility would also lack uranium enrichment capabilities.
Washington’s “comprehensive peace” initiative
Steve Witkoff, Trump’s Special Representative for the Middle East, told CNBC that the US aims to achieve a “comprehensive peace agreement.”
A White House statement emphasized that all proposals are designed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Following the events of the past two weeks, which include mutual attacks with Israel and a US strike on Iran’s nuclear sites, the White House hopes Tehran will accept Washington’s terms.
Experts are skeptical, fearing the offer could backfire
Conversely, Iran experts cited by CNN believe these events will further convince the country’s leadership of the necessity of possessing nuclear weapons.
Earlier this week, the Iranian parliament approved the suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Even before the US attack on the night of June 22, the Iranian government had already significantly restricted agency officials’ access to its facilities.
According to IAEA data from mid-May, Iran possessed approximately 409 kilograms of highly enriched uranium.
Bloomberg reported that this amount is theoretically sufficient to produce ten nuclear warheads. The agency’s Director General, Rafael Grossi, stated that the location of this material is unknown.
While Tehran claims it moved its uranium stockpiles from the attacked facilities beforehand, the IAEA assesses that a significant portion of the stocks may have survived the strike.
Middle East
US intelligence contradicts Trump’s claim of destroying Iran’s nuclear program

According to a classified military intelligence report obtained by CNN and the New York Times (NYT), US attacks on Iran’s three major uranium enrichment facilities did not eliminate the main components of Tehran’s nuclear program but only set it back by several months.
American officials who reviewed the report stated that the document, which includes a preliminary assessment of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran and the subsequent American attack, contradicts President Donald Trump’s declaration that the program was “completely destroyed.”
The report, prepared by the Pentagon, emphasized that the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities was largely limited to the destruction of above-ground structures. It was determined that while the entrances to two underground facilities were filled with debris, the bunkers themselves remained intact.
Furthermore, it was reported that enriched uranium stockpiles might have been moved from the facilities before the attacks and that the centrifuges were “largely undamaged.” The report also noted that the US managed to damage the power grid of the nuclear facility built into a mountain at Fordo, but the facility itself did not sustain serious damage.
Timeline for a nuclear bomb extended
Before the military operation, US intelligence agencies estimated it would take Tehran at least three months to hastily produce a low-yield, primitive nuclear weapon. According to the NYT, military intelligence now predicts this timeline will extend to about six months.
The Times of Israel reported that Israeli intelligence also believes the US and Israeli attacks did not completely destroy Iran’s nuclear program, only setting it back “several years.”
Professor Jeffrey Lewis, an arms expert from the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, concurred with the US military intelligence assessment. According to Lewis, Iran could quickly rebuild its nuclear program using uranium stockpiles in the intact underground bunkers. The expert suggested that, in this scenario, it could take Iran five months to produce a nuclear bomb.
White House reacts strongly to leak
President Donald Trump had previously announced that the American attacks had resulted in the complete destruction of Iran’s nuclear facilities.
White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, however, described the intelligence assessment cited by CNN and the NYT as “false.” Leavitt stated the document was classified and had been leaked to the press by a “low-ranking, unidentified loser.”
In a statement on the social media platform X, Leavitt remarked, “The leak of this so-called assessment is a blatant attempt to humiliate President Trump and discredit the brave fighter pilots who carried out a flawless mission to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when fourteen 30,000-pound bombs are precisely dropped on their targets: Total destruction.”
Trump also accused CNN and the NYT of collaborating to downplay one of the most successful military attacks in history. On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump wrote, “The nuclear facilities in Iran have been completely destroyed!”
According to the NYT, the publication of the intelligence findings overshadowed President Trump’s victory at the NATO summit. The fact that the report was prepared by the Pentagon, which personally carried out the attacks, further underscored the situation’s significance.
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
US to launch major bombing campaign against Iran this weekend, Hersh reports
-
America2 weeks ago
Big Tech lobbies for a 10-year ban on state-level AI regulations
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Iran-Israel war: Why US discusses regional conflict with Pakistan
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Japan diverges from G7, urging restraint in Israel-Iran conflict
-
America2 weeks ago
Israel’s nuclear arsenal used as a tool of blackmail, says expert
-
Asia2 weeks ago
China pledges aid and signs friendship treaty at Central Asia summit
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Is Israel done with ‘the devil it knows’?
-
America2 weeks ago
US to require foreign students to make social media profiles public for visas