Connect with us

Diplomacy

Trump’s ‘Peace Board’ blueprint grants US-backed authority total control over Gaza

Published

on

The “Peace Board,” officially established by US President Donald Trump in Davos, Switzerland last week, is developing comprehensive plans for a US-backed administration to govern Gaza, according to a draft resolution.

Drop Site obtained an unsigned document dated January 22, 2026, titled “Resolution No. 2026/1,” from three independent sources in regular contact with US and Israeli officials regarding the reconstruction of Gaza. These sources confirmed that the document’s contents align with ongoing discussions in Israel and the US concerning the implementation of proposed administrative structures for the Gaza Strip.

The resolution, the first of its kind from the “Peace Board,” outlines the structure of a US-backed governing authority that would assume total legislative, executive, and judicial control over Gaza, including “emergency powers.” The stated objective of the “Peace Board” is to transform Gaza into a “demilitarized, deradicalized, and terror-free zone that poses no threat to its neighbors.”

The copy of the document obtained by Drop Site remains unsigned, with a blank space designated for Donald J. Trump to sign in his capacity as “Chairman of the Peace Board.” It remains unclear whether the resolution has been officially adopted or if the version obtained reflects the final text.

Metadata indicates the document was initially created by the State Department in mid-December. Its date coincides with Trump’s attendance at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he presided over the formal launch of the board.

The draft resolution establishes a hierarchical structure for the “Peace Board.” While Trump serves as chairman, an executive board will hold “the same authority, power, and capabilities as the Peace Board and shall assume all powers necessary and appropriate to implement the Comprehensive Plan.” This Executive Board would be empowered to “enact new laws, and amend or repeal existing civil and criminal statutes” in Gaza.

The resolution lists nine members of the executive board: seven were announced by the White House on January 16, while two others had not yet been publicly disclosed. The previously announced members include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, businessman Mark Rowan, World Bank President Ajay Banga, and Deputy National Security Advisor Robert Gabriel.

The document reveals two new names: White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles and Martin Edelman, a real estate attorney and special advisor to the United Arab Emirates government. Simultaneously, a Gaza Executive Board will be established, featuring several members serving in advisory roles.

The draft resolution also creates the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), described as a “vetted, technocratic, apolitical committee” of Palestinians operating under the strict supervision of a High Representative. Nikolay Mladenov, the former Bulgarian defense and foreign minister and ex-UN Middle East envoy, has been appointed High Representative. Ali Shaas, a former Palestinian Authority official, will head the NCAG.

While no Palestinians were included on the “Peace Board” itself, Trump has granted a seat to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who currently faces war crimes charges and an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court.

Critics describe the board as an attempt to bypass United Nations oversight—or even position itself as a private alternative to the UN—operating in an environment where it is accountable solely to Trump.

“Regrettably, the Peace Board and its subsidiary structures are neither representative nor accountable,” said Martin Griffiths, former UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs. “This is evident in the unlimited powers granted to President Trump.”

The most striking example of this imbalance is found in the resolution’s approach to Palestinians, whose participation is reduced to the “lowest and most technical level.” The draft resolution states that only those who “continuously support and act” toward creating a Gaza that is “demilitarized, deradicalized, and poses no threat to its neighbors” will be eligible to “participate in governance, reconstruction, economic development, or humanitarian activities in Gaza.”

The resolution prohibits the participation of any individual or entity deemed to have a “history of cooperation, infiltration, or influence with Hamas or other terrorist groups,” or those who have supported them. While the process for these determinations is not explicitly detailed, the Executive Board and High Representative will establish “eligibility standards for participation in the development of the New Gaza,” applying them on a case-by-case basis with Trump’s approval.

The Peace Board blueprint envisions the creation of “humanitarian zones” and “controlled civilian protection corridors” patrolled by an International Stability Force (ISF). Access will be restricted to individuals approved by the Executive Board and the High Representative, with boundaries determined by unspecified “operational and security requirements.”

The “interim” ISF will be led by US Major General Jasper Jeffers. The Board Chairman (Trump) will have the authority to approve or replace commanders and vet future lead nations.

Although the resolution states that “no one will be forced to leave Gaza” and those wishing to leave “may do so freely and return,” it explicitly notes that access to resources, aid, and political participation in Gaza will be contingent upon compliance with the “Comprehensive Plan” and the Board’s authority.

Griffiths criticized the resolution for reducing Palestinians to “implementers of others’ decisions,” noting they are “once again denied mastery over their own destiny.” He added that while Israel has a “seat at the top table,” Palestinians remain “dispossessed and excluded.”

“They are found nowhere but at the very bottom of this power pyramid,” Griffiths added.

The resolution stipulates that all provisions will take effect immediately upon signing.

Diplomacy

CSTO strips Armenia of voting rights over two-year budget debt

Published

on

Members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) have stripped Armenia of its voting rights and its ability to appoint representatives to official positions due to a two-year debt to the organization’s budget.

Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, “This decision was taken based on the organization’s charter due to Armenia’s failure to fulfil its obligations for several years.”

Prior to the CSTO leaders’ summit in Moscow, Peskov had stated that member states would “react” to the Caucasus country’s non-participation in the organization’s activities.

Ahead of the Moscow summit, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said his country’s “interest has run out” regarding the CSTO. Through his press spokesperson, he announced that he would travel to Türkiye on 11 November to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) instead of going to Russia.

The CSTO leaders’ meeting was held with the participation of Russian President Vladimir Putin alongside the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.

The leaders jointly took the decision to revoke Armenia’s voting rights.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the participants also signed a joint declaration.

The declaration stated: “We confirm our unconditional commitment to the goals set out in the CSTO treaty and charter towards creating favourable and stable conditions for the comprehensive development of member states.”

Pashinyan had frozen Yerevan’s de facto participation in the CSTO in February 2024, citing the organization’s failure to aid the Armenian side during the armed clashes in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023.

Having referred to the CSTO as a “soap-bubble alliance” since that time, Pashinyan accused the organization’s members of “planning war” together with Baku. He stated that Armenia would not return to active work within the alliance at least “over the next five years”, adding that he would welcome it if the country were expelled from membership.

Relations between Armenia and Russia grew tense once again in the spring of 2026, after Yerevan moved closer to the European Union (EU) and the Kremlin responded with a trade war.

In May, Pashinyan refused to travel to Moscow to attend the Victory Day parade and declared that he did not support Russia on the Ukraine issue.

In response, Putin called on Yerevan to determine its foreign policy course through a referendum, advising Armenian authorities not to forget the fate of Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

US urges Russia to draft proposals for new European security pact

Published

on

The US administration has reportedly called on Russia to submit proposals for a prospective security treaty with Europe that would include measures to ease tensions between European nations and Moscow.

According to a report by news site Axios citing sources familiar with the matter, the US side conveyed the request during trilateral negotiations held in Abu Dhabi.

During the talks, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that the Russian delegation prepare a fresh proposal outlining its security concerns and demands.

The US delegation reportedly asked that this proposal clarify what kind of “symmetrical steps” Moscow is prepared to take to de-escalate tensions and “provide non-aggression guarantees to Europe”.

Another source familiar with the White House’s approach said the Trump administration aims to run the processes for a new European security architecture and a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine simultaneously.

Under this plan, the actual implementation of the security understandings would take effect only after the signing of an accord ending the conflict in Ukraine.

Assessing the approach to the process, the source said: “[Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy will not agree to any compromise without knowing what will happen next regarding security guarantees. Putin also wants to see the exact same picture clearly. This is precisely why the security portfolio is so decisive.”

The same official noted that the US will not reach a security agreement with Russia without the support of Europe and Ukraine, adding that Washington will not grant Moscow veto power over European security decisions.

Vladimir Medinsky, aide to the Russian president and head of the delegation in the Ukraine negotiations, previously stated that the fundamental objective was building a comprehensive new security system in Europe.

Medinsky noted that the structure in question must take on the character of “a fair, new, modern Yalta and Potsdam that carries the spirit of Helsinki 1975 and responds to contemporary realities”.

The Russian official argued that if such a system were established, peace lasting for decades, or even centuries, could be secured in Europe.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also announced that Moscow possesses its own position paper on how a new security architecture in Eurasia should take shape.

Lavrov stated that Russia hopes the Washington administration will “maintain its determination to pursue dialogue aimed at achieving an honest balance of interests where nobody’s security is impaired”.

Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the country has no intention of attacking Europe.

Pointing out that they have no reason to fight NATO countries, Russian President Vladimir Putin previously said: “We have no interest whatsoever, neither geopolitical nor economic, political nor military.”

In a statement in October, Putin said Russia has no plans to attack anyone “in 2029, in 2030, or in the year 2050”.

On the other hand, Putin claimed that “all NATO countries are fighting Russia” and stated that the Russian military is currently the most combat-ready armed force in the world.

Following the contacts in Abu Dhabi, Kushner announced that he and Witkoff would travel to Moscow.

Explaining that they plan to meet Putin during the visit to discuss European participation in negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict, Kushner argued that the parties could make “far greater progress” if the Russian leader consents to such involvement.

Yury Ushakov, aide to the Russian president, stated that the US special envoys will arrive in Moscow on 12 November, with the planned meeting with the Russian president scheduled for the first half of the day.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks

Published

on

US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.

According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.

This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.

US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.

Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”

According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.

Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.

Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.

In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.

Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.

Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.

Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.

Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.

On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.

Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.

On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”

The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”

Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.

On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.

According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”

Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey