Diplomacy
Ukraine secures improved terms in natural resources deal with US

Ukraine and the US have reached an agreement on the utilization of Ukraine’s natural resources. The Financial Times, citing Ukrainian officials, reported that Washington had abandoned the toughest conditions in the originally proposed agreement.
The US is no longer claiming the potential $500 billion in revenues from the exploitation of Ukraine’s underground resources.
Kyiv managed to obtain more favorable terms and presented the deal as an opportunity to strengthen and expand cooperation with the US, the FT‘s source said.
This is expected to contribute to the recovery of the Ukrainian economy after three years of war.
According to the final text of the agreement, dated 24 February and obtained by the Financial Times, the parties agreed to create a special fund.
Ukraine will transfer 50% of its future mining, oil and natural gas revenues to this fund. The fund’s resources will be invested in projects within the country, but its activities will not extend to existing state resources.
Therefore, it will not affect the work of Naftogaz and Ukrnafta, Ukraine’s largest oil and gas producers.
Despite the agreement, the deal does not include provisions on US security guarantees, which Kyiv had previously insisted on.
In addition, issues such as the US share in the fund and joint ownership of assets have not yet been resolved and require additional negotiations.
The final text of the agreement states that the US aims to support Ukraine’s economic development in the long term.
Kyiv, on the other hand, emphasizes that the agreement is of a “framework nature” and that the actual distribution of revenues will begin only after the fund is established.
According to FT sources, the agreement has been approved by Ukraine’s justice, economy and foreign ministers.
The agreement now needs to be ratified by the Ukrainian Parliament.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy plans to visit Washington in the coming weeks to sign the document together with US President Donald Trump.
“This will be an opportunity for the President (Zelenskyy) to have a general official meeting and determine the next steps,” the FT quoted a Ukrainian official as saying.
Zelenskyy included the funding deal in his “victory plan” presented in September last year. Donald Trump, on the other hand, said he expected access to Ukraine’s natural resources in exchange for US assistance.
During the talks, Washington offered Kyiv several deal options. One of the proposed options envisaged that the US would have full control over the fund created under the agreement.
However, Ukraine found this demand unacceptable and it was removed from the text of the final agreement.
Diplomacy
BlackRock halts work on Ukraine reconstruction fund amid Trump uncertainty

US-based BlackRock, the world’s largest investment company, has reportedly halted its efforts to find investors for a planned reconstruction fund for Ukraine.
According to a report by Bloomberg that cited sources familiar with the matter, the decision is driven by uncertainties surrounding US President Donald Trump’s position on Ukraine.
The fund was scheduled to be unveiled at a conference on Ukraine’s reconstruction on July 10-11, an event attended by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Sources indicated that the initiative was close to securing initial support from entities linked to the governments of Germany, Italy, and Poland.
However, with the possibility of Trump returning to the White House in January, BlackRock has decided to temporarily suspend its discussions with institutional investors, citing uncertainty about future support for Ukraine.
Alternative plan from France
Bloomberg has also learned that France is now developing an alternative plan, which includes creating a new fund to replace the initiative that BlackRock has suspended. The effectiveness of this new plan without US participation, however, remains a significant question.
A BlackRock representative stated that the company completed its pro bono advisory work for the Ukraine project in 2024 and currently has “no active commitments” to the Ukrainian government.
“The only discussions that influence BlackRock’s decisions are those the firm has with its clients,” the representative emphasized.
The fund’s $15 billion target
BlackRock Vice Chairman Philipp Hildebrand, who was previously involved in the negotiations, had announced plans to attract at least $500 million from governments, international development banks, and other public donors, along with approximately $2 billion from private investors.
According to Hildebrand, uniting investors under a single consortium would have enabled the direction of at least $15 billion in equity and debt investments toward Ukraine’s reconstruction.
The World Bank estimates that the total cost for Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction exceeds €500 billion. Rebuilding the country’s port infrastructure alone is projected to require at least €1 billion.
Diplomacy
BRICS summit condemns attack on Iran, demands Gaza ceasefire

At the 17th BRICS Summit, which began Sunday in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, military attacks against Iran were condemned, and a call was made for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza.
As the summit continued, US President Donald Trump threatened new tariffs on countries supporting BRICS policies.
A joint statement released by the group declared that the military attacks on Iran were a “violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations (UN).”
Trump threatens tariffs on countries supporting BRICS
While the BRICS summit was underway, US President Donald Trump announced on the social media platform Truth Social that a 10% additional tariff would be imposed on countries that decide to support the group’s “anti-American policy.” Trump stated, “There will be no exceptions.”
Previously, Trump had threatened to impose a 100% tariff on the products of BRICS countries if they created an alternative currency to the dollar.
The US President had said, “BRICS has zero chance of replacing the American dollar in international trade. Any country that tries to do so can wave goodbye to America.” After this threat, Trump claimed that BRICS was “dead.”
Attack on Iran a ‘violation of international law’
The BRICS communiqué expressed “deep concern” over the escalating security situation in the Middle East and the deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities.
The group emphasized its support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at resolving regional challenges and called on the UN Security Council (UNSC) to address the issue.
Call for immediate ceasefire in Gaza, compliance in Lebanon
The statement also reiterated concern over the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories as Israel’s attacks on the Gaza Strip continue.
The text condemned all violations of international law, particularly international humanitarian law and human rights law, drawing special attention to the use of starvation as a method of warfare.
The parties were urged to engage in further negotiations in good faith to achieve an immediate, permanent, and unconditional ceasefire. Additionally, “unwavering” support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) was affirmed.
The communiqué expressed satisfaction with the ceasefire in Lebanon and called on all parties to “strictly adhere to its terms.”
Ongoing violations of the ceasefire and of Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity were condemned.
The statement called on Israel to “respect the terms agreed upon with the Lebanese government and withdraw its occupying forces from all Lebanese territory.”
‘We are committed to Syria’s territorial integrity’
BRICS also affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of Syria. It called for a Syrian-led, peaceful, and inclusive political process based on the principles of UNSC Resolution 2254.
The partial occupation of some parts of Syria was strongly condemned, with a call for Israel to withdraw its forces without delay. The threat posed by the presence of foreign terrorist fighters in Syria was also condemned.
BRICS has a responsibility to defend international law, Araghchi declared
Speaking at the summit, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasized that BRICS has a responsibility to defend international law and multilateralism, and to support the fundamental principles of the UN, from the equality of states to the rejection of the use of force and the peaceful resolution of disputes.
Araghchi stated that the attack on Iran was “a result of the absolute impunity granted by the US and some European countries for the Israeli regime to commit crimes without accountability.”
Stating that both Israel and the US must be held accountable for their violations of international law, Araghchi warned that the consequences of this attack would not be limited to his country but would spread throughout the entire region and even beyond.
The Iranian minister expressed that “the security dilemma in the region will not be resolved as long as Israel’s illegal tendencies are encouraged by its supporters.”
Noting that residential areas and military bases were targeted in the attacks, and that military leaders, soldiers, academics, and scientists were killed, Araghchi stressed Tehran’s determination to document the war crimes committed.
Araghchi added that “Iran will not abandon its demand for justice and compensation” and that his country “will continue to defend itself with all its might against any future attacks.”
The unipolar world is a thing of the past, says Putin
Participating in the summit via video conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the world is witnessing profound changes and that the unipolar system of international relations “is a thing of the past.”
Calling for the strengthening of cooperation among BRICS countries, Putin expressed his hope for expanding the use of national currencies.
Putin stated that all member countries “stand for the principles of equality, good neighborliness, and traditional values,” adding, “The influence and position of BRICS are growing every year, and it has rightfully become one of the main centers of the global system.”
The Russian leader noted that the group “significantly surpasses” other blocs like the G7 in terms of purchasing power parity.
The UNSC must be reformed, says Lula da Silva
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva warned that the UN is in danger of “losing credibility and becoming paralyzed.”
Lula da Silva called for the UNSC to be reformed by “adding new permanent members from the Global South.” He stated that this is not just a matter of justice but also “a guarantee for the survival of the UN.”
The Brazilian leader also warned of a potential nuclear catastrophe and urged world leaders not to ignore the “genocide” committed by Israel in the Gaza Strip.
He emphasized that a solution is only possible “with the end of the occupation and the establishment of a Palestinian state.”
Lavrov supports Araghchi
On the sidelines of the summit, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Araghchi. Lavrov reiterated his country’s position condemning the illegal attacks against Iran, including those on peaceful nuclear facilities.
Emphasizing the importance of taking effective steps to prevent the escalation of tensions in the region, Lavrov stated that Russia is ready to assist, including at the UNSC level.
The global rise of BRICS
BRICS was initially coined as the acronym BRIC by Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O’Neill to describe the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
These countries formed an informal club in 2009. With the inclusion of South Africa in 2010, the group became known as BRICS. The group expanded in 2023 with the addition of Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE, and Indonesia joined at the beginning of 2025.
Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), stated during the summit in Brazil that the era of the Global South has begun.
Dmitriev noted that BRICS countries account for half of global economic growth, about 45% of the world’s population, and approximately 40% of global GDP, while the G7’s share remains at 29%.
Diplomacy
Juan Carrero condemns global indifference to tragedies in Gaza and Congo

In a speech at the International Peace Coalition meeting organized by the Schiller Institute, Juan Carrero, President of the s’Olivar Foundation in Spain, stated that the world has become “morally dead” by ignoring major tragedies in Gaza, Syria, and Africa. He argued that this moral decay fuels the madness of war.
Carrero noted that resisting countries like Iran possess something far more powerful than nuclear weapons, saying, “This is honor.”
Describing the analyses at the meeting as “sensible, courageous, and enlightening,” Carrero highlighted the Schiller Institute’s consistent emphasis on the importance of morality alongside its geostrategic analyses.
‘Moral death is worse’
Carrero stated that moral corruption has always been at the root of the destructive collapse of empires and all war frenzies in history. “Those pursuing a delusional expansionist project aim to bring about regime change in Iran. This is the last of the seven regime changes they have planned. They claim to be very concerned about Iran obtaining a nuclear bomb,” he said.
Carrero emphasized that Iran and many other countries resisting the latest follies of the collapsing Anglo-Western empire possess something far more powerful than nuclear weapons, reiterating, “This is honor.” He added that Iran does not see the assassination of its generals or nuclear scientists in their homes with their families as a failure. He continued:
“Each of them is a martyr whose blood will give life to their people. On this matter, both heroic military leaders and political activists agree with the advocates of the non-violence movement. There is something much worse than physical death, and that is moral death.”
‘The world is morally dead’
Carrero asserted that a world that ignores the tragedies in Gaza, Syria, or Africa because they are not thought to directly trigger a nuclear catastrophe is a “worthless and morally dead” world.
“The same applies to a world that does not care about Africa because the conflicts there are not waged with weapons of mass destruction or weapons that could destroy our Anglo-Western way of life,” Carrero assessed.
In his speech, Carrero pointed to a series of “follies” that should not be tolerated, including the “Greater Israel project,” the “desire for Russia’s collapse,” and the quest by “the genocidal Paul Kagame to annex the vast eastern territories of the Democratic Republic of Congo.”
Specifically addressing the situation in Congo, Carrero noted that the country has 7 million refugees, millions of victims, and hundreds of thousands of cases of rape. He stated that heroic leaders like Victor Ingabir, who could end this madness, are systematically killed or imprisoned.
“Despite the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights ruling in his favor, Paul Kagame has abducted him once again, and no one can reach him,” Carrero said.
Carrero concluded his speech by presenting a video message from the 1980 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, which included a call to “disarm the armed consciences and stop the wars and lies.”
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
NATO summit focuses on arms race in the Silicon Valley age
-
Europe2 weeks ago
Israel-Iran conflict postpones EU plan for Russian oil sanctions
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Erdoğan to meet Trump at NATO summit to mend relations
-
Europe2 weeks ago
Germany to expand military with 11,000 new personnel this year
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Japan’s prime minister skips NATO summit amid alliance strain
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
BRICS internal trade volume hits the $1 trillion mark
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
German arms industry expands presence in India amidst geopolitical shifts
-
America2 weeks ago
Pentagon divided over military priorities in Asia and the Middle East