Connect with us

Asia

What does Iran wants from the Taliban?

Published

on

The Islamic Republic of Iran is one of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries, which shares a common language, culture and religion with the people of Afghanistan. Iran, especially after the “Islamic Revolution” in that country, has had close relations with the governments and people of Afghanistan. But in most cases, Tehran has intervened in Afghanistan’s internal affairs to secure his own interests.

Iran’s government, which is more ideological, has always been afraid of the functioning of democratic governments based on modern values ​​in Afghanistan. With the coming to power of the People’s Democratic Party, which had the support of the former Soviet Union, the Islamic Revolution took place in Iran under the leadership of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and the “monarchy regime” fell. Iran’s Mullahs’ government was worried about the implementation of such a regime in Afghanistan.

Although the Democratic Party of Afghanistan was also a regime with leftist ideas and influenced by “communism”, it was not like Iran. This issue forced Iran to start supporting Shiite Islamist groups to create obstacles for the current government of Afghanistan.

Of course, he also achieved some successes in this regard. The groups that had the support of the Iranian government played a large role in the civil wars. But despite the new order in Afghanistan and the presence of NATO forces led by the United States of America, Iran did not play a significant role in Afghanistan’s internal relations.

At first, Iran tried to raise its position in Afghan relations by financially supporting the office of the previous president of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai. However, the US played a key role in major national decisions and Iran’s efforts failed. Iran changed its approach and returned to the trick of the seventies and provided financial and arms support to the Taliban group against the Afghan government and American forces. In some cases, it also provided shelter for Taliban leaders.

Although the Taliban and Iran did not have a good relationship after the killing of the diplomats of this country in Mazar-e-Sharif by the Taliban, but with regard to the “enemy of an enemy is a friend” category, Iran established relations with the Taliban to secure its interests and supported them in this way.

Iran lobbied for the Taliban group and dragged Russia’s foot into the issue in order to be able to ground the US in Afghanistan. The government of Iran, with the support of the Taliban, was hindering the progress in dam construction and containment of Afghanistan’s waters.

After the Taliban came to power

With the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan in 2014, Iran has openly supported the Taliban. With the signing of the Doha agreement between the Taliban and the United States, Iran increased its support to the Taliban against the forces of the previous Afghan government. But the question that arises is what did Iran want from the Taliban and what does it still want?

Although the main reasons why Iran supported the Taliban have not been made public, it is most likely that Iran supports the Taliban for several reasons and wants to be closer to them;

Lack of water: Iran is currently facing a shortage of water resources. If the dam construction project expands on the waters that flow to Iran, the problem of water shortage in the neighboring provinces of Afghanistan will double, which is a big challenge for the government of that country. Although the Taliban have stated from time to time that they control the waters of Afghanistan, in practice they have left a lot of water for Iran.

Expansion of ISIS activities: Iran is worried about the expansion of Islamic State (IS) militants in Iran due to its common land border with Afghanistan. The IS group, whose scope of activities has expanded from Iraq and the Middle East to some parts of Afghanistan, has deep opposition to the Shiites Muslims and Iran government is mostly controlled by the Shittes. Therefore, the only suitable option to prevent IS from entering Iran is the Taliban.

Drug trafficking: Afghanistan has played a major role in the production of drugs in the world and in the region. With the return to power of the Taliban regime, the production and smuggling of drugs to neighboring countries has increased. Iran is worried about drug production and smuggling to that country. Proximity to the Taliban is a mechanism used by Iran to smuggle drugs.

Durability of the Taliban government: Currently, the strengthening and stability of the Taliban government is in the interest of Iran. Because the level of dissatisfaction with Iran’s government has increased within that country, and any development along with human freedoms in Afghanistan will increase the concerns of Iran’s government. On the other hand, Iran and the Taliban, two ideological systems, Sunni and Shia, seek their survival in close relations.

Finally, Iran wants the Taliban to support its interests in Afghanistan as a proxy group. The Iranian government knows very well that it has no way out without having relations with the Taliban group.

In order to have support at the regional level and not be marginalized, the Taliban prefer to maintain relations with Iran. In order to expand its relations with the Taliban, and especially with Donald Trump’s inauguration as United States president, Iran sent its foreign minister to the Taliban so that the Taliban would stand by Iran in future events that will take place between the United States and Iran. Even though the Taliban do not have such ability, for Iran, even the weakest friend is better than none at the moment.

Asia

OECD forecasts slower Chinese economic growth due to trade war

Published

on

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) announced that the Chinese economy will grow by 4.3% next year, lowering its previous forecast by 0.1 percentage points in light of ongoing global trade conflicts.

The Paris-based group stated that “significant trade barriers” and “diminished confidence and increased policy uncertainty” are exerting downward pressure on global economic growth rates this year and next. It noted that the global slowdown trend will be most pronounced in China, Canada, Mexico, and the US.

The 38-member OECD’s outlook report this week follows US President Donald Trump’s imposition of double-digit tariff increases on imports from many countries this year. Most of the targeted countries are in Asia, with the largest increases aimed at China.

The OECD’s outlook report stated that China’s exports “will be constrained by newly implemented tariffs,” while imports will fall as production becomes increasingly localized. The report said, “Tariffs will disproportionately affect private companies, including foreign firms that are major exporters.” The US absorbed 13.5% of China’s direct merchandise exports last year.

The OECD added that China’s consumption is negatively impacted by “still-high precautionary savings due to the trauma created by the pandemic and the correction in the real estate sector,” despite support from this year’s durable goods trade-in program.

The report noted that China’s infrastructure investment is “stable,” while consumer price inflation is “low” and producer prices are trending downwards. The OECD did not change its economic growth forecast for China for this year, keeping it at 4.7%. Authorities in Beijing are targeting economic growth of “around 5%.”

Trump’s highest tariff increases, including those targeting China, have been suspended pending the conclusion of US negotiations with individual countries. However, other tariff increases, which the US leader said were implemented to address unfairness in America’s foreign trade balance, have already taken effect.

The OECD report warned that further “fragmentation” of trade, including new tariff increases and retaliatory measures, could exacerbate the growth slowdown and disrupt cross-border supply chains in large parts of the world.

OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann said, “The global economy has entered a more uncertain path from a period of resilient growth and falling inflation.” Inflation is expected to persist, especially where “trade costs are significantly high” or labor markets are tight.

The report projects the US economy will grow by 1.6% this year and 1.5% next year. These figures are below the 2.4% forecast for this year made in December and the 2.1% projection for 2026. According to OECD estimates, the global economy will grow by 2.9% this year and next. This is below the 3.3% forecast for both years made in December.

Song Seng Wun, an economic advisor at Singapore-based financial services company CGS, said, “On the surface, the OECD’s forecast is a reasonable one that takes into account the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory measures that could affect business confidence. This situation can affect your employment and investment decisions.”

The OECD projected that India will be the only major economy in the G20 group to record growth above 6% this year and next. Indonesia, one of the G20’s top-performing countries, is expected to grow by 4.7% this year and 4.8% next year.

Continue Reading

Asia

Lee Jae-myung inaugurated as South Korea’s new president, vows unity and economic revival

Published

on

South Korea’s new President Lee Jae-myung pledged to “build a new country of hope” as he was sworn into office at the National Assembly on Wednesday, following his victory in the elections.

Lee, from the Democratic Party (DP), addressed the South Korean people in his inaugural speech in Seoul, saying, “Regardless of whom you supported in this election, I will be a president who embraces everyone and serves all citizens.”

Before the ceremony, Lee Jae-myung visited the Seoul National Cemetery to pay tribute to Korean soldiers who died in wars.

Lee, who officially began his five-year term, acknowledged that Asia’s fourth-largest economy faces an “intertwined network of crises in diplomacy, national security, and democracy.”

He promised to fundamentally change the outdated economic development model, which he blamed for fueling inequality and hindering growth. He said he would address the urgent economic problems facing the country by focusing on cost-of-living issues affecting middle- and low-income families and the struggles of small business owners.

He emphasized that they would revive growth by adopting a pragmatic and market-oriented approach to the economy and strengthen advanced technologies.

South Korea’s economy is under pressure due to Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies and intense competition from Chinese exporters. It is also approaching the July deadline set by the White House for negotiations on import tariffs, which Washington cites as the cause of the large trade imbalance between the two countries.

Message of dialogue with North Korea

In foreign policy, Lee Jae-myung reiterated his pre-election promise to communicate with North Korea, saying, “We will keep communication channels open with the North and achieve peace on the Korean peninsula through dialogue and cooperation.”

“It is better to win without fighting than to win through conflict, and the most reliable security is peace that makes war unnecessary,” he added. However, he also pledged to respond to possible “nuclear and military provocations.”

Lee reaffirmed South Korea’s commitment to its alliance with the US, stating they would enhance trilateral cooperation involving Japan and pursue a practical and national interest-based approach in relations with neighboring countries. Lee described his conservative predecessor’s foreign policy towards China and Russia as “unnecessarily hostile.”

White House concerned

Lee is expected to pursue “pragmatic diplomacy” with Beijing while negotiating an agreement on tariffs with the US president, at a time of intensified competition between the US and China.

US Senator Marco Rubio congratulated Lee on his election victory and said the two countries “share an unwavering commitment to an alliance based on a mutual defense treaty, shared values, and deep economic ties.” He also stated that the two countries are “modernizing the alliance to meet the demands of today’s strategic environment and address new economic challenges.”

The White House stated that Lee’s election was “free and fair” but that the US is concerned about and opposes China’s interference and influence in democracies worldwide.

Early election

The country is navigating a prolonged political crisis triggered in December by then-President Yoon Suk Yeol’s brief declaration of martial law. An early election was called after Yoon was impeached by a court decision.

The National Election Commission announced this morning, following its meeting, that Lee won yesterday’s presidential election. According to official results, Lee won 49.42% of the votes, while Kim Moon-soo, the candidate of the ruling People Power Party (PPP), received 41.15%. Voter turnout reached 79.4%, the highest level in 20 years.

Lee’s victory has shifted both the presidency and control of the National Assembly from conservatives to liberal parties after several years of divided government.

The Bank of Korea last week lowered its growth forecast for this year from 1.5% to 0.8%, following a slight contraction in the economy in the first quarter due to a sharp slowdown in exports. South Korea’s benchmark Kospi stock index rose over 2.4% in morning trading. Investors anticipate that Lee will introduce governance reforms to increase the power of minority shareholders and reduce the influence of families controlling the country’s largest industrial groups.

From mayor to president

Lee, a 61-year-old former human rights lawyer, described Tuesday’s election as a “judgment day” against Yoon’s martial law and the People Power Party’s failure to stop this unfortunate move.

Lee began his political career in 2010 when he was elected Mayor of Seongnam, where he gained attention for his social welfare projects. He served as Governor of Gyeonggi Province from 2018 to 2021 and was noted for his effective measures against the COVID-19 pandemic. He narrowly lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon Suk Yeol.

In 2024, he survived an assassination attempt and, in the same year, played an active role in the resistance against Yoon’s declaration of martial law.

Lee has also faced past accusations of making false statements during his election campaign, and legal proceedings on this matter are ongoing. However, according to the South Korean constitution, a sitting president cannot be prosecuted, so the cases have been postponed.

Lee Jae-myung’s presidency could herald significant changes for South Korea in both domestic and foreign policy.

Continue Reading

Asia

China accuses US of severely violating trade truce

Published

on

China has accused the US of “severely violating” the trade truce and vowed to take strong measures to protect its interests as tensions between the two powers reignite.

In early May, China and the US reached an agreement during talks in Geneva to temporarily reduce mutual tariffs, which had climbed as high as 145%.

US officials have grown increasingly concerned about the slowdown in China’s rare earth exports since the May 12 agreement, while President Donald Trump claimed on Friday that China had “completely violated” the deal.

However, on Monday, China’s Ministry of Commerce stated that Washington had implemented “a series of discriminatory and restrictive measures” in recent weeks. These actions, according to the ministry, undermined the Geneva consensus and harmed “China’s legitimate rights and interests.”

The ministry declared, “If the US insists on its own path and continues to harm China’s interests, China will continue to take strong and decisive measures to protect its legitimate rights.”

Among the US measures cited in the statement are warnings against the global use of Huawei chips, the suspension of chip design software sales to Chinese firms, and the cancellation of visas for Chinese students.

US officials had anticipated that the agreement reached on May 12 would lead China to lift its export restrictions on rare earth elements, which were announced in early April. However, China did not alter its export regime and continued to slow shipments to the US.

These critical minerals are extensively used in American automotive, electronics, and defense supply chains. The slowdown in exports to the US elevates the threat of work stoppages within the US manufacturing sector.

China’s Ministry of Commerce asserted, “The US has unilaterally initiated new trade frictions.” The ministry further added, “Instead of questioning its own actions, it accused China of violating the consensus.”

Trump informed reporters on Friday that he hoped to resolve the dispute in a phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump has yet to act on this idea, which he has mentioned several times in recent months.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey