Connect with us

Diplomacy

Why has the US changed its approach to Bangladesh?

Published

on

US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu visited Bangladesh last week. When Lu visited Bangladesh last year, he was beating the US drum for ‘democracy’ ahead of elections that were expected to favour Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the ruling Awami League. The mood was different last time.

Washington had threatened visa restrictions on officials ‘suspected of obstructing a free vote’. But Hasina was elected for a fourth consecutive term in an election boycotted by the Islamist opposition. Both the US and the UK criticised the elections as ‘not free and fair’.

However, the US appears to have changed its stance on the Hasina government, which it sees as close to China. Lu returned to Dhaka this month with a very different message, focusing on strengthening economic ties and tackling climate change.

Unlike his visit in 2023, the diplomat also skipped meetings with opposition leaders and ‘rights groups’ in a country that Washington has previously said is ‘rapidly sliding into authoritarianism’.

It seems that the United States has, however reluctantly, accepted the reality on the ground and hit the reset button on the relationship,’ Ali Riaz, a professor of politics and government at Illinois State University, told Nikkei Asia.

After a meeting with Bangladesh’s foreign minister, Lu acknowledged that Washington’s earlier warnings about the elections had raised tensions and stressed the need to ‘move forward’ and ‘rebuild trust’.

Bangladesh’s state minister for information and broadcasting, Mohammad Ali Arafat, said of Lu’s three-day visit: ‘I can say that during Lu’s trip, he focused on talking about economic partnership and Bangladesh’s role in the US Indo-Pacific policy. There was no discussion about the opposition, democracy, human rights, politics or elections.

Analysts say Bangladesh is one of the biggest exporters of garments to the US and Washington sees the country of 164 million, sandwiched between India and Myanmar, as a valuable ally in its efforts to contain China’s growing regional influence.

Just a month after the January election, which Washington contested, US President Joe Biden sent a letter to Hasina expressing a ‘sincere desire’ to work together on a range of issues and to ‘partner … in our shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific’.

‘The United States attaches increasing strategic importance to Bangladesh at a time of heightened great power rivalry,’ said Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Centre in Washington. It sees Bangladesh as a strategic state bordering the Indian Ocean and one that has strengthened its ties with Beijing while maintaining a close relationship with New Delhi,’ Kugelman told Nikkei.

But a week after Lu’s May 14-16 visit, the US government sanctioned retired Bangladeshi army chief Aziz Ahmed and his immediate family on corruption charges.

The Ahmed case is a reminder that US policy in Bangladesh has not put aside the values element,’ said Kugelman: ‘But I wouldn’t exaggerate the impact on the relationship. This is a fairly light punishment – much lighter than economic sanctions – and it targets a retired military leader, not the current government.

Illinois State’s Riaz said Washington wants to exert some influence over the Bangladeshi government while prioritising its commercial and geopolitical interests.

It seems that these concerns are pushing the US to work on the low-hanging fruit and avoid strained relations in the near future,’ Riaz added.

Diplomacy

BlackRock halts work on Ukraine reconstruction fund amid Trump uncertainty

Published

on

US-based BlackRock, the world’s largest investment company, has reportedly halted its efforts to find investors for a planned reconstruction fund for Ukraine.

According to a report by Bloomberg that cited sources familiar with the matter, the decision is driven by uncertainties surrounding US President Donald Trump’s position on Ukraine.

The fund was scheduled to be unveiled at a conference on Ukraine’s reconstruction on July 10-11, an event attended by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Sources indicated that the initiative was close to securing initial support from entities linked to the governments of Germany, Italy, and Poland.

However, with the possibility of Trump returning to the White House in January, BlackRock has decided to temporarily suspend its discussions with institutional investors, citing uncertainty about future support for Ukraine.

Alternative plan from France

Bloomberg has also learned that France is now developing an alternative plan, which includes creating a new fund to replace the initiative that BlackRock has suspended. The effectiveness of this new plan without US participation, however, remains a significant question.

A BlackRock representative stated that the company completed its pro bono advisory work for the Ukraine project in 2024 and currently has “no active commitments” to the Ukrainian government.

“The only discussions that influence BlackRock’s decisions are those the firm has with its clients,” the representative emphasized.

The fund’s $15 billion target

BlackRock Vice Chairman Philipp Hildebrand, who was previously involved in the negotiations, had announced plans to attract at least $500 million from governments, international development banks, and other public donors, along with approximately $2 billion from private investors.

According to Hildebrand, uniting investors under a single consortium would have enabled the direction of at least $15 billion in equity and debt investments toward Ukraine’s reconstruction.

The World Bank estimates that the total cost for Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction exceeds €500 billion. Rebuilding the country’s port infrastructure alone is projected to require at least €1 billion.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

BRICS summit condemns attack on Iran, demands Gaza ceasefire

Published

on

At the 17th BRICS Summit, which began Sunday in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, military attacks against Iran were condemned, and a call was made for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza.

As the summit continued, US President Donald Trump threatened new tariffs on countries supporting BRICS policies.

A joint statement released by the group declared that the military attacks on Iran were a “violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations (UN).”

Trump threatens tariffs on countries supporting BRICS

While the BRICS summit was underway, US President Donald Trump announced on the social media platform Truth Social that a 10% additional tariff would be imposed on countries that decide to support the group’s “anti-American policy.” Trump stated, “There will be no exceptions.”

Previously, Trump had threatened to impose a 100% tariff on the products of BRICS countries if they created an alternative currency to the dollar.

The US President had said, “BRICS has zero chance of replacing the American dollar in international trade. Any country that tries to do so can wave goodbye to America.” After this threat, Trump claimed that BRICS was “dead.”

Attack on Iran a ‘violation of international law’

The BRICS communiqué expressed “deep concern” over the escalating security situation in the Middle East and the deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities.

The group emphasized its support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at resolving regional challenges and called on the UN Security Council (UNSC) to address the issue.

Call for immediate ceasefire in Gaza, compliance in Lebanon

The statement also reiterated concern over the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories as Israel’s attacks on the Gaza Strip continue.

The text condemned all violations of international law, particularly international humanitarian law and human rights law, drawing special attention to the use of starvation as a method of warfare.

The parties were urged to engage in further negotiations in good faith to achieve an immediate, permanent, and unconditional ceasefire. Additionally, “unwavering” support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) was affirmed.

The communiqué expressed satisfaction with the ceasefire in Lebanon and called on all parties to “strictly adhere to its terms.”

Ongoing violations of the ceasefire and of Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity were condemned.

The statement called on Israel to “respect the terms agreed upon with the Lebanese government and withdraw its occupying forces from all Lebanese territory.”

‘We are committed to Syria’s territorial integrity’

BRICS also affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of Syria. It called for a Syrian-led, peaceful, and inclusive political process based on the principles of UNSC Resolution 2254.

The partial occupation of some parts of Syria was strongly condemned, with a call for Israel to withdraw its forces without delay. The threat posed by the presence of foreign terrorist fighters in Syria was also condemned.

BRICS has a responsibility to defend international law, Araghchi declared

Speaking at the summit, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasized that BRICS has a responsibility to defend international law and multilateralism, and to support the fundamental principles of the UN, from the equality of states to the rejection of the use of force and the peaceful resolution of disputes.

Araghchi stated that the attack on Iran was “a result of the absolute impunity granted by the US and some European countries for the Israeli regime to commit crimes without accountability.”

Stating that both Israel and the US must be held accountable for their violations of international law, Araghchi warned that the consequences of this attack would not be limited to his country but would spread throughout the entire region and even beyond.

The Iranian minister expressed that “the security dilemma in the region will not be resolved as long as Israel’s illegal tendencies are encouraged by its supporters.”

Noting that residential areas and military bases were targeted in the attacks, and that military leaders, soldiers, academics, and scientists were killed, Araghchi stressed Tehran’s determination to document the war crimes committed.

Araghchi added that “Iran will not abandon its demand for justice and compensation” and that his country “will continue to defend itself with all its might against any future attacks.”

The unipolar world is a thing of the past, says Putin

Participating in the summit via video conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the world is witnessing profound changes and that the unipolar system of international relations “is a thing of the past.”

Calling for the strengthening of cooperation among BRICS countries, Putin expressed his hope for expanding the use of national currencies.

Putin stated that all member countries “stand for the principles of equality, good neighborliness, and traditional values,” adding, “The influence and position of BRICS are growing every year, and it has rightfully become one of the main centers of the global system.”

The Russian leader noted that the group “significantly surpasses” other blocs like the G7 in terms of purchasing power parity.

The UNSC must be reformed, says Lula da Silva

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva warned that the UN is in danger of “losing credibility and becoming paralyzed.”

Lula da Silva called for the UNSC to be reformed by “adding new permanent members from the Global South.” He stated that this is not just a matter of justice but also “a guarantee for the survival of the UN.”

The Brazilian leader also warned of a potential nuclear catastrophe and urged world leaders not to ignore the “genocide” committed by Israel in the Gaza Strip.

He emphasized that a solution is only possible “with the end of the occupation and the establishment of a Palestinian state.”

Lavrov supports Araghchi

On the sidelines of the summit, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Araghchi. Lavrov reiterated his country’s position condemning the illegal attacks against Iran, including those on peaceful nuclear facilities.

Emphasizing the importance of taking effective steps to prevent the escalation of tensions in the region, Lavrov stated that Russia is ready to assist, including at the UNSC level.

The global rise of BRICS

BRICS was initially coined as the acronym BRIC by Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O’Neill to describe the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China.

These countries formed an informal club in 2009. With the inclusion of South Africa in 2010, the group became known as BRICS. The group expanded in 2023 with the addition of Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE, and Indonesia joined at the beginning of 2025.

Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), stated during the summit in Brazil that the era of the Global South has begun.

Dmitriev noted that BRICS countries account for half of global economic growth, about 45% of the world’s population, and approximately 40% of global GDP, while the G7’s share remains at 29%.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Juan Carrero condemns global indifference to tragedies in Gaza and Congo

Published

on

In a speech at the International Peace Coalition meeting organized by the Schiller Institute, Juan Carrero, President of the s’Olivar Foundation in Spain, stated that the world has become “morally dead” by ignoring major tragedies in Gaza, Syria, and Africa. He argued that this moral decay fuels the madness of war.

Carrero noted that resisting countries like Iran possess something far more powerful than nuclear weapons, saying, “This is honor.”

Describing the analyses at the meeting as “sensible, courageous, and enlightening,” Carrero highlighted the Schiller Institute’s consistent emphasis on the importance of morality alongside its geostrategic analyses.

‘Moral death is worse’

Carrero stated that moral corruption has always been at the root of the destructive collapse of empires and all war frenzies in history. “Those pursuing a delusional expansionist project aim to bring about regime change in Iran. This is the last of the seven regime changes they have planned. They claim to be very concerned about Iran obtaining a nuclear bomb,” he said.

Carrero emphasized that Iran and many other countries resisting the latest follies of the collapsing Anglo-Western empire possess something far more powerful than nuclear weapons, reiterating, “This is honor.” He added that Iran does not see the assassination of its generals or nuclear scientists in their homes with their families as a failure. He continued:

“Each of them is a martyr whose blood will give life to their people. On this matter, both heroic military leaders and political activists agree with the advocates of the non-violence movement. There is something much worse than physical death, and that is moral death.”

‘The world is morally dead’

Carrero asserted that a world that ignores the tragedies in Gaza, Syria, or Africa because they are not thought to directly trigger a nuclear catastrophe is a “worthless and morally dead” world.

“The same applies to a world that does not care about Africa because the conflicts there are not waged with weapons of mass destruction or weapons that could destroy our Anglo-Western way of life,” Carrero assessed.

In his speech, Carrero pointed to a series of “follies” that should not be tolerated, including the “Greater Israel project,” the “desire for Russia’s collapse,” and the quest by “the genocidal Paul Kagame to annex the vast eastern territories of the Democratic Republic of Congo.”

Specifically addressing the situation in Congo, Carrero noted that the country has 7 million refugees, millions of victims, and hundreds of thousands of cases of rape. He stated that heroic leaders like Victor Ingabir, who could end this madness, are systematically killed or imprisoned.

“Despite the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights ruling in his favor, Paul Kagame has abducted him once again, and no one can reach him,” Carrero said.

Carrero concluded his speech by presenting a video message from the 1980 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, which included a call to “disarm the armed consciences and stop the wars and lies.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey