Connect with us

AMERICA

The bells of an imperialist intervention tolls for Haiti

Published

on

Some headlines by the American and the British media, covered throughout the month of October were quite interesting per se: “Intervening in Haiti, Again”, “Nations consider sending troops to Haiti, despite troubled past foreign intervention” or, “The history of US intervention in Haiti is stopping US officials from intervening” so on and so forth.

The bells of a new imperialist intervention, indeed tolls for Haiti. The Haitian government has authorized the Prime Minister Ariel Henry to request a military assistance, in context of a humanitarian crisis risk (which we will explain what these risks mean shortly). And one of the first official reactions from the United Nations (UN), was to impose sanctions on the infamous gang leader and a former policeman known as Jimmy “Barbecue” Chérizier. But what is worse is that the Biden administration hinted for a “non-UN” military intervention in Haiti, in a coalition with Mexico and Canada. Finally, the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau held a meeting, and discussed on an coalition intervention, with the pretext of “restoring the order”.

Yet another invasion

Haiti had always caused a concern for the white, slave-owning nations in the region all the way since it gained independence in 1804 after a revolt of African slaves when it was a French colony based on sugar cane plantations. And when the US invaded Haiti first in 1915, it has used the “instabilities” in the country as a pretext and ruled it as its colony for around 19 years. Of course, the main motivation for this occupation had been economic and colonialist interests; along with ideological motivations such as white supremacism and a fear of revolution.

Both the direct American military administration, and the governmental body it has left behind in the capital Port-au-Prince after the withdrawal of the American troops in 1934, has ensured that Haiti would not be able to get back on its feet for quite some time. And François Duvalier, who took over the government in 1957, has established a violent dictatorship with the support of especially the United States, but was forced into exile together with his family, in a popular uprising back in 1986.

Haiti’s later history was shaped with the struggle between the popular movements and international coalitions (together with collaborationist dictators). The ‘democratic’ elections, that were planned for the year 1987, were postponed up to 1990 by pro-Duvalier establishment circles. And when a former Catholic priest that can arguably be called a left-wing populist, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, came out from the elections, a sudden military coup d’etat has hit the country. Then the former US President Bill Clinton has once more deployed troops to Haiti in 1994, and overthrew the military junta in order to bring Aristide back to power.

Aristide was overthrown a second time in 2004, and the United States has deployed an international military force in the country again, this time in coalition with France and Canada, and ensured that elections were held. And after that, a UN Peacekeeping Force led by Brazil, was deployed into the country for 6 months at first; however this deployment was extended all the way until 2017…

Interestingly, one of the ugliest examples of this imperialist intervention were the so-called “international aid” campaigns after the tragic earthquake of 2010. It was revealed that a total of 13.5 billion USD, was collected together with the support of numerous NGOs, and celebrity campaigns including Hollywood stars. And how much of this great sum actually made it into Haitian institutions? Perhaps a few cents! The Journalist Jonathan Katz, who authored a book on the so-called humanitarian aid to Haiti, finds out that most of the money promised as humanitarian aid by the donor countries, never even left these countries in the first place. Noting that most of the humanitarian aid are urgent aid (food packages, first aid kits etc.), Katz points out that not a single penny out of these billions of dollars we hear about in such campaigns, are never used for the reconstruction of the country in need.

Let us also note that much of that American humanitarian aid, is a revenue source for some other American companies. After the earthquake that killed around 220 thousand people, the per unit cost of the housing to be built by American contractors was determined to be around 33 thousand USD at the time, while the actual cost of a house that could be built by domestic contractors was only one-fifth that of the American contractors. In other words, the US has somewhat turned this earthquake into an opportunity and made its own companies a fortune through the “humanitarian aid funds”, without earning the Haitian institutions a single penny.

Gang wars and the US involvement

And the UN peacekeeping force has publicly elected a former pop singer with the open support of the former US Secretary of State, Michel Martelly who immediately got corrupt. Martelly suddenly appointed a banana plantation owner Jovenel Moïse, as his successor in 2015, and was elected into office in November 2016.

Moïse dissolved the parliament in 2020, and allegedly collaborated with the local gangs to repress his political opponents. In the end Moïse was a victim to assassination in 2021. And his replacement Ariel Henry was rumored to have ties to the assassination plot of Moïse, was appointed into office instead of being elected, which caused severe public backlash.

Finally, a gang called “G9 Family and Allies” headed by a former policeman named Jimmy “Barbeque” Chérizier, blockaded the largest fuel terminal in the capital city back in mid-September, and this crisis has been escalating ever since. Barbeque demanded Henry to either step down, or to co-rule with him.

Jimmy Chérizier had been in charge of the police force’s infamous Unit for the Maintenance of Order. This unit was essentially in charge of suppressing the public riots and was actually doing a “good job” at it. Speaking to the EP in 2019, Barbeque said that the leader who inspired him was François Duvalier.

Being expelled from the agency in December 2018, Chérizier is now accused of involving in many massacres during the years 2017, 2018 and 2019, in which dozens of people were brutally murdered. Alongside being known for committing acts of terrorism and massacres against the political opponents of Moïse, Chérizier was also accused of many incidents of rape. It was alleged that Barbeque had the political support from Moïse, and while still having numerous supporters within the police force.

Chérizier on the other hand, denies the allegations, and claims he is waging an “armed revolution”. According to Chérizier, it is not possible for him to organize massacres that target the impoverished communities in particular, stating: “I would never massacre anyone who belongs to the same social class as me. I live in the ghetto. I have that ghetto life in me”. He said that this “armed revolution” was aimed all against the government, the opposition and the “Haitian bourgeoisie”. Barbeque, who involved the public in a mass looting he carried out with his own militia, called on “The money in these banks, shops and supermarkets is your money, go and get what is yours”. As a result, Barbeque gives a bad impression of a Robin Hood, with a dark background and creates the image of an unreliable man.

On the other hand, Haitians seem to have already taken up arms against this possible imperialist occupation. As groups gathered in front of the French Embassy in Port-au-Prince protesting against the occupation, some groups were seen carrying Chinese and Russian flags. Reacting to the UN force, the protesters were calling on: “The only thing that the UN brought here is kidnapping, rape and cholera”. One of the protesters said they would fight against the UN, if they decide to send troops to Haiti. The human rights activist Pierre Esperance said that the United States has turned a blind eye to the gang violence against the opposition for many years and even helped governments that support these violent gangs.

On the other hand, protests were held all over the United States, expressing the support for the Haitian people against a possible American intervention in Haiti.

AMERICA

Microsoft urges Trump to address Russian and Chinese ‘cyber threats’

Published

on

Microsoft President Brad Smith has called on Donald Trump to take decisive action against cyber-attacks originating from Russia, China, and Iran, citing an alarming rise in state-sponsored hacking targeting U.S. government officials and election campaigns.

Speaking to The Financial Times (FT), Smith, who also serves as the company’s executive vice president and chief legal officer, emphasized that cybersecurity “deserves to be a more prominent issue in international relations.” He urged the incoming Trump administration to send a strong message to deter hostile nations.

“I hope the Trump administration will push harder against nation-state cyberattacks, particularly from Russia, China, and Iran. We cannot tolerate the level of attacks we have seen today,” Smith stated.

Rise in ransomware attacks

Smith pointed to a surge in ransomware attacks on U.S. companies, frequently carried out by criminal organizations that he said are often “tolerated … and in some cases, even facilitated” by the Russian government.

Adding to the concerns, U.S. law enforcement officials last week accused China of conducting a widespread cyber espionage campaign, infiltrating multiple American telecommunications networks ahead of the election.

According to Microsoft, its customers face more than 600 million cyber-attacks daily, underscoring the urgent need for robust defensive measures.

Progress under Biden administration

Smith acknowledged that the Joe Biden administration has made “tremendous progress in strengthening cybersecurity defenses.” However, he stressed the need for additional measures to deter and dissuade other nations from engaging in such activities.

A recent Microsoft study revealed that nation-state groups and criminal gangs are increasingly collaborating, sharing tools, and conducting joint operations to target vulnerable systems.

In his testimony before the U.S. Senate in September, Smith highlighted that Russia, China, and Iran have ramped up digital efforts to interfere in global elections, including those in the United States.

Microsoft faces security criticism

Despite its advocacy for stronger cybersecurity measures, Microsoft itself has faced scrutiny over its own security practices.

In March, a report by the U.S. Cybersecurity Review Board criticized the company’s security culture, describing it as “inadequate.” The report highlighted several “avoidable mistakes” that allowed Chinese hackers to access hundreds of email accounts hosted on Microsoft’s cloud systems, including those of senior U.S. government security officials.

In response, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella pledged to prioritize security “above all else,” including linking employee compensation to improved security outcomes. The company has also begun implementing changes to its Windows operating system to enable faster recovery from incidents such as the global IT outage caused by a flawed CrowdStrike security update in July.

Call for exporting digital technologies to the Middle East and Africa

Beyond cybersecurity, Smith commented on the potential impact of a second Trump administration on the technology sector. He noted that anticipated changes to merger and acquisition regulations in the U.S. could be offset by heightened scrutiny in other regions.

Smith also renewed his call for the U.S. government to “help accelerate the export of key American digital technologies” to regions like the Middle East and Africa. This appeal comes in the wake of export controls imposed by the Biden administration on artificial intelligence chips over fears they could be diverted to China.

“We really need to standardize processes so that American technology can get to these other parts of the world as quickly as Chinese technology,” Smith stated.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Biden plans to write off Ukraine’s $4.6bn debt ahead of Trump

Published

on

President Joe Biden’s administration has officially notified Congress of its intention to forgive Ukraine’s $4.65 billion debt, a move tied to ongoing efforts to support the country amid its conflict with Russia.

This debt represents half of the $9 billion provided to Kyiv as part of the $61 billion aid package approved by Washington in April. Unlike other forms of assistance, this funding was issued as conditionally repayable loans, with provisions allowing the United States President to cancel up to 50% of the debt if deemed necessary.

In a statement, the U.S. State Department explained that the debt cancellation is intended to “help Ukraine win” and serves the national interests of the U.S., the EU, G7+, and NATO.”

According to Bloomberg, President Biden is determined to maximize aid to Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office. However, the decision to write off the debt has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans.

Republican Senator Rand Paul argued that the Biden administration’s decision places undue financial burden on the American public. He pledged to demand a vote in the Senate to challenge the proposal.

Despite this, Bloomberg notes that any effort to overturn the debt cancellation would require approval from both houses of Congress, a scenario that appears unlikely given the Democratic majority in the Senate. Furthermore, President Biden holds veto power, making reversal of the decision even more challenging.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced plans to exhaust all remaining aid approved by Congress before President Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emphasized that one of the administration’s key goals is to position Ukraine as strongly as possible—both militarily and at the negotiating table.

Pentagon officials reported that $9.3 billion in military aid is currently in the pipeline. Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh confirmed plans for weekly arms deliveries to Kyiv, with the aim of expediting aid distribution before the presidential transition.

On November 20, the Pentagon unveiled an additional $275 million military aid package for Ukraine, further underscoring the administration’s commitment to strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Donald Trump taps Howard Lutnick to lead Commerce Department

Published

on

Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Wall Street investor and campaign donor Howard Lutnick as the new head of the U.S. Department of Commerce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of implementing the sweeping tariffs promised during his presidential campaign.

Lutnick, who co-chaired Trump’s transition team, had previously been considered for the role of Treasury Secretary. He is also the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent investment firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, Trump declared that Lutnick would be “directly responsible” for leading the Commerce Department and overseeing the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The USTR, established in 1974 to manage negotiations with U.S. trading partners, traditionally reports directly to the president. If confirmed by the Senate, the 63-year-old Lutnick will play a pivotal role in aiding U.S. businesses and executing Trump’s proposed tariffs on international trade partners.

Trump has outlined plans for a 60% tariff on imports from China and a global tariff of up to 20%, signaling a major shift in U.S. trade policy.

Lutnick, despite lacking prior government experience, has been a steadfast advocate for Trump’s economic agenda. During a New York campaign rally, Lutnick remarked, “When was America great? At the turn of the century, our economy was floundering! That was 125 years ago. We had no income tax and all we had were tariffs.”

While Lutnick has emerged as a major donor to Trump, he has also supported establishment Democrats and Republicans in the past, including Chuck Schumer and Jeb Bush. He contributed to both Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 campaigns, hosting a fundraiser for her in 2015. Lutnick maintains a personal friendship with the Clintons, noting their attendance at a Cantor Fitzgerald fundraiser in September 2022.

Lutnick has also maintained a long-standing relationship with Trump, even appearing on The Celebrity Apprentice in 2008. He disclosed to the Financial Times in October that he has donated over $10 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and another $500,000 to the transition team, totaling approximately $75 million.

Treasury Secretary selection process still uncertain

The position of Treasury Secretary, one of the most significant roles in Trump’s administration, remains undecided. Lutnick’s name has been floated for the role, though he faces competition from hedge fund manager Scott Bessent, private equity billionaire Marc Rowan, and former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh.

Marc Rowan, the CEO of Apollo Global Management, has emerged as a leading contender and is expected to meet with Trump to present his case. Rowan’s supporters cite his extensive expertise in financial markets, though competition remains fierce.

Forecasting site Polymarket currently lists Warsh as the favorite for Treasury Secretary, followed by Bessent, Rowan, and William Hagerty. If unsuccessful in his bid for Treasury Secretary, Bessent is reportedly vying for the chairmanship of the National Economic Council.

Trump names Mehmet Oz to run Medicare and Medicaid

Trump also announced on Tuesday his nomination of Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Describing Oz as “one of the most talented physicians” capable of “making America healthy again,” Trump expressed confidence in Oz’s ability to reduce waste and fraud within the nation’s largest government agency.

Dr. Oz, a former heart surgeon and Columbia University professor, rose to prominence as Oprah Winfrey’s health expert before hosting his own popular talk show. However, his career has been controversial, with critics accusing him of promoting scientifically dubious theories and unproven treatments.

Oz’s political experience includes a 2022 Senate race in Pennsylvania, where he was endorsed by Trump but ultimately lost to Democrat John Fetterman.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey