Connect with us

AMERICA

The big surprise of the Venezuelan elections: Brazil still hasn’t recognised Maduro’s victory

Published

on

After President Nicolas Maduro was declared elected for the third time in Venezuela, the countries of the Americas were divided over the results.

While Latin American countries led by Argentina and Chile officially claimed that Maduro had ‘stolen the election’, countries such as Cuba and Nicaragua were quick to congratulate the Venezuelan leader on his victory.

This is not surprising, since it is no secret that Argentine leader Javier Milei has been speaking out against Maduro and Bolivarian Venezuela for months, as has the Cuban leadership’s support for Maduro.

What is surprising is that three countries known for their ‘left’ governments have still not recognised Maduro’s victory: Lula’s Brazil, Obrador’s Mexico and Petro’s Colombia.

Three countries are preparing a statement on the ‘lack of transparency’ of the elections

According to Bloomberg, Brazil is in talks with Mexico and Colombia to issue a joint statement demanding that Venezuela count all the votes and publish the results from each electoral district.

The foreign ministries of the three countries, led by leftist presidents with historically close ties to Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro, refused on Monday to recognise the outcome of Sunday’s election until Caracas takes steps to ensure the transparency of the process.

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is unhappy with the situation in Venezuela and believes that Maduro ‘systematically failed to fulfil his promises of transparency’ during the electoral process, officials told Bloomberg.

To underline its dissatisfaction, Brazil’s foreign ministry instructed the country’s ambassador in Caracas not to attend Monday’s ceremony organised by Venezuela’s electoral authority to certify the results.

Brazil and Colombia have been criticising the ‘election’ for months

Lula said last week that Maduro should learn that ‘when you lose an election, you have to go away and prepare for another one’.

Lula also warned that Venezuela’s economic future ‘depends on a clean election, recognised as legitimate by the international community’.

In March, Colombia and Brazil took the unusual step of criticising Venezuela after some members of the Venezuelan opposition said they had been prevented from registering as candidates for the 28 July elections.

In a statement at the time, Colombia’s foreign ministry warned the Maduro government that preventing opposition candidates from taking part in the vote could ‘undermine the confidence of the international community’.

Brazil’s foreign ministry also said it was following the process ‘with concern’, especially as Venezuela had yet to issue a statement on the blocking.

Both countries argued that the opposition’s problems had raised ‘concerns about free and fair elections.

In separate statements, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil accused Colombia and Brazil of interfering in his country’s internal affairs.

Opposition: We have proof we defeated Maduro

Venezuela’s opposition says it has proof that rival Edmundo González defeated Maduro in the presidential election.

González and opposition leader Maria Corina Machado told reporters on Monday that they had received more than 70 per cent of the vote tallies, which show that González received more than 6 million votes, compared with more than 2 million for Maduro.

González and Machado made their claims hours after Venezuela’s Maduro-controlled electoral council announced that the president had won the election with 51 per cent of the vote to González’s 44 per cent.

According to the opposition, the results did not include vote counts from individual polling stations, which election observers said were crucial to determining the accuracy of the vote count.

Opposition also takes to the streets

The announcement of Maduro’s victory just after midnight on Monday sparked angry protests in the capital Caracas and across Venezuela, with people banging pots and pans throughout the night and into the late morning.

Demonstrators clashed with police, who fired tear gas to disperse the crowds. At least one person was killed in the northern province of Yaracuy, according to Voice of America.

Machado called on opposition supporters to organise demonstrations in Caracas on Tuesday.

US ‘concerned’, Biden to meet Lula

We have serious concerns that the announced result does not reflect the will or the votes of the Venezuelan people,’ said US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

On the other hand, the Biden administration said on Monday that ‘electoral manipulation’ had destroyed ‘any credibility’ of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s claim of re-election victory, leaving the door open to new sanctions against the country, Reuters reported.

US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said senior aides to President Joe Biden had demanded that Maduro release a detailed breakdown of the vote and that failure to do so would make the international community reluctant to accept the announced result.

The officials did not announce any new “punitive measures” but said Washington would review its sanctions policy against Caracas based on Maduro’s future actions.

“We may be facing a new scenario. We will take that into account as we look at where we can go with sanctions against Venezuela,” one official said.

They argued that the Maduro government had resorted to ‘repression and electoral manipulation’ and said that ‘any credibility of the so-called election results has been destroyed’.

A senior US official said the administration was in contact with Brazil and other Latin American governments about the political situation in Venezuela.

Biden will meet with Brazilian President Lula on Tuesday afternoon, the White House said in a statement.

EU officials meet to discuss Venezuela election

European diplomats will discuss Maduro’s victory in Venezuela’s presidential election today (30 July).

The Council of Europe’s working group on Latin America and the Caribbean will meet at 10.00 Brussels time.

Josep Borrell, the European Union’s top diplomat, wrote in a message on X: ‘The Venezuelan people voted peacefully and in large numbers for the future of their country. Their will must be respected,’ he said.

Borrell added that it was vital to ensure ‘full transparency in the electoral process’, including a detailed vote count and access to voting records at polling stations.

Simon Stano, spokesman for the EU’s diplomatic service, said: ‘We are assessing the election process and results in close contact with national, regional and international actors on the ground. However, we are concerned by allegations of flaws and shortcomings,’ said Simon Stano, spokesperson for the EU diplomatic service.

Elon Musk calls Maduro a ‘dictator’, Maduro responds

Following the presidential election in Venezuela, which saw Maduro and his allies triumph, X owner Elon Musk took to social media to accuse the Venezuelan leader of committing ‘massive electoral fraud’.

Shame on dictator Maduro,” Musk said on Monday.

Musk also retweeted a comment on X from Argentine President Javier Milei, whom he described as his ‘friend’. ‘The numbers have declared the victory of an overwhelming opposition and the world expects the government to concede defeat after years of socialism, misery, collapse and death,’ Milei had said.

Maduro responded by calling Musk ‘the arch-enemy of peace in Venezuela’.

Arguing that Elon Musk was ‘the representative of a fascist ideology, unnatural, anti-society’, Maduro said: ‘Elon Musk is desperate; control yourself. Whoever fights with me will dry up,” he replied, ‘You want to fight? Let’s do it. Elon Musk, I am ready. I’m not afraid of you, Elon Musk. Let’s fight wherever you want,” Maduro said, accusing Musk of wanting to “come with his rockets and his army and invade Venezuela’.

AMERICA

Biden plans to write off Ukraine’s $4.6bn debt ahead of Trump

Published

on

President Joe Biden’s administration has officially notified Congress of its intention to forgive Ukraine’s $4.65 billion debt, a move tied to ongoing efforts to support the country amid its conflict with Russia.

This debt represents half of the $9 billion provided to Kyiv as part of the $61 billion aid package approved by Washington in April. Unlike other forms of assistance, this funding was issued as conditionally repayable loans, with provisions allowing the United States President to cancel up to 50% of the debt if deemed necessary.

In a statement, the U.S. State Department explained that the debt cancellation is intended to “help Ukraine win” and serves the national interests of the U.S., the EU, G7+, and NATO.”

According to Bloomberg, President Biden is determined to maximize aid to Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office. However, the decision to write off the debt has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans.

Republican Senator Rand Paul argued that the Biden administration’s decision places undue financial burden on the American public. He pledged to demand a vote in the Senate to challenge the proposal.

Despite this, Bloomberg notes that any effort to overturn the debt cancellation would require approval from both houses of Congress, a scenario that appears unlikely given the Democratic majority in the Senate. Furthermore, President Biden holds veto power, making reversal of the decision even more challenging.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced plans to exhaust all remaining aid approved by Congress before President Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emphasized that one of the administration’s key goals is to position Ukraine as strongly as possible—both militarily and at the negotiating table.

Pentagon officials reported that $9.3 billion in military aid is currently in the pipeline. Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh confirmed plans for weekly arms deliveries to Kyiv, with the aim of expediting aid distribution before the presidential transition.

On November 20, the Pentagon unveiled an additional $275 million military aid package for Ukraine, further underscoring the administration’s commitment to strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Donald Trump taps Howard Lutnick to lead Commerce Department

Published

on

Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Wall Street investor and campaign donor Howard Lutnick as the new head of the U.S. Department of Commerce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of implementing the sweeping tariffs promised during his presidential campaign.

Lutnick, who co-chaired Trump’s transition team, had previously been considered for the role of Treasury Secretary. He is also the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent investment firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, Trump declared that Lutnick would be “directly responsible” for leading the Commerce Department and overseeing the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The USTR, established in 1974 to manage negotiations with U.S. trading partners, traditionally reports directly to the president. If confirmed by the Senate, the 63-year-old Lutnick will play a pivotal role in aiding U.S. businesses and executing Trump’s proposed tariffs on international trade partners.

Trump has outlined plans for a 60% tariff on imports from China and a global tariff of up to 20%, signaling a major shift in U.S. trade policy.

Lutnick, despite lacking prior government experience, has been a steadfast advocate for Trump’s economic agenda. During a New York campaign rally, Lutnick remarked, “When was America great? At the turn of the century, our economy was floundering! That was 125 years ago. We had no income tax and all we had were tariffs.”

While Lutnick has emerged as a major donor to Trump, he has also supported establishment Democrats and Republicans in the past, including Chuck Schumer and Jeb Bush. He contributed to both Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 campaigns, hosting a fundraiser for her in 2015. Lutnick maintains a personal friendship with the Clintons, noting their attendance at a Cantor Fitzgerald fundraiser in September 2022.

Lutnick has also maintained a long-standing relationship with Trump, even appearing on The Celebrity Apprentice in 2008. He disclosed to the Financial Times in October that he has donated over $10 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and another $500,000 to the transition team, totaling approximately $75 million.

Treasury Secretary selection process still uncertain

The position of Treasury Secretary, one of the most significant roles in Trump’s administration, remains undecided. Lutnick’s name has been floated for the role, though he faces competition from hedge fund manager Scott Bessent, private equity billionaire Marc Rowan, and former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh.

Marc Rowan, the CEO of Apollo Global Management, has emerged as a leading contender and is expected to meet with Trump to present his case. Rowan’s supporters cite his extensive expertise in financial markets, though competition remains fierce.

Forecasting site Polymarket currently lists Warsh as the favorite for Treasury Secretary, followed by Bessent, Rowan, and William Hagerty. If unsuccessful in his bid for Treasury Secretary, Bessent is reportedly vying for the chairmanship of the National Economic Council.

Trump names Mehmet Oz to run Medicare and Medicaid

Trump also announced on Tuesday his nomination of Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Describing Oz as “one of the most talented physicians” capable of “making America healthy again,” Trump expressed confidence in Oz’s ability to reduce waste and fraud within the nation’s largest government agency.

Dr. Oz, a former heart surgeon and Columbia University professor, rose to prominence as Oprah Winfrey’s health expert before hosting his own popular talk show. However, his career has been controversial, with critics accusing him of promoting scientifically dubious theories and unproven treatments.

Oz’s political experience includes a 2022 Senate race in Pennsylvania, where he was endorsed by Trump but ultimately lost to Democrat John Fetterman.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

U.S. may start its plan to separate Google from Chrome

Published

on

The Department of Justice (DOJ) may move forward with plans to force the sale of Google’s Chrome web browser as part of its ongoing antitrust case against Alphabet (Google).

According to sources familiar with the case, the department intends to ask the judge—who ruled in August that Google illegally monopolized the search market—to address concerns related to artificial intelligence (AI) and the Android smartphone operating system. This information was reported by Bloomberg.

Antitrust officials, along with participating state attorneys, are expected to recommend that federal Judge Amit Mehta impose data licensing requirements on Google. These officials have indicated that Chrome, the world’s most widely used browser, is a critical gateway for many users accessing Google Search. For this reason, they are urging the judge to mandate the sale of Chrome.

Officials stated that a Chrome sale could be considered later if other settlement measures fail to foster a more competitive market. Currently, Google Chrome commands a dominant 61% share of the U.S. browser market, according to StatCounter, a web traffic analysis service.

Over the past three months, state attorneys interviewed numerous companies to prepare their recommendations. Officials noted that some recommendations are still under review, and details may evolve before submission.

While a proposal to force Google to sell its Android platform was considered, officials have since stepped back from this more aggressive option.

If Judge Mehta adopts these recommendations, the ruling could significantly reshape the online search market and influence the emerging artificial intelligence industry.

The case, originally filed during the Trump administration and continued under President Joe Biden, represents one of the most aggressive efforts to regulate a major tech company in decades. The last comparable attempt was Washington’s unsuccessful bid to break up Microsoft in the early 2000s.

Chrome plays a crucial role in Google’s advertising business by providing user data that enhances ad targeting, a primary revenue source. Additionally, Google has been leveraging Chrome to promote Gemini, its new AI bot. Gemini has the potential to evolve from a simple answer bot to a comprehensive assistant, supporting users across the web.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh estimates that Chrome could be worth $15–20 billion if sold, considering its more than 3 billion monthly active users. However, Bob O’Donnell of TECHnalysis Research notes that Chrome’s value depends on its integration with other services, stating: “It’s not directly monetizable. It acts as a gateway to other things. Monetization would depend on how buyers link Chrome to their services.”

Google has strongly opposed the DOJ’s recommendations. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, criticized the move as government overreach, arguing: “This agenda goes far beyond the legal issues in this case and will harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at a critical time.”

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt echoed this sentiment in an interview with CNBC. He emphasized the value of Chrome in enhancing the Google ecosystem, stating: “Singling out these companies won’t fundamentally solve the broader issues.”

In a blog post, Google warned that under new ownership, Chrome might no longer remain free or receive the same level of investment, potentially leading to a shift in its business model.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey