Connect with us

Diplomacy

Azerbaijan denies US claims regarding participation in Gaza ISF

Published

on

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev denied allegations that his country had agreed to send troops to the International Stability Force (ISF), which is intended to be established as part of US President Donald Trump’s Gaza plan.

The statement by the US Permanent Representative to the United Nations (UN), Mike Waltz, regarding Azerbaijan’s agreement to participate in the ISF was met with a backlash in Baku. Speaking on a television program, Aliyev announced that this declaration by the Washington administration did not reflect the truth and that they had conveyed their objections through diplomatic channels.

“Nature of the operation is unclear”

Aliyev confirmed receiving requests regarding participation in a stability operation in Gaza but drew attention to the fact that the process is fraught with uncertainties.

The Azerbaijani President said, “Naturally, before making a decision, we need to clearly understand what the authority of the operation will be and what kind of activities are planned.”

Recalling that his country had previously taken part in peacekeeping operations in Iraq, Kosovo, and Afghanistan, Aliyev stated that the situation in Gaza differs.

Aliyev posed the question, “As for the situation in the Gaza Strip, in our opinion, it is still unclear by whom the authority will be given and what its nature will be. Will these be ‘peacekeeping’ operations, or ‘peace enforcement’ operations?”

“We will not participate in combat operations”

Emphasizing that the Baku administration does not look favorably upon missions defined as “peace enforcement” that involve the risk of conflict, Aliyev used the following expressions:

“Naturally, we are not ready for the latter and have never considered participating. Until now, we have never engaged in combat activities, and I do not intend to participate in combat operations outside Azerbaijan.”

“We have no intention of risking the lives of Azerbaijanis”

Aliyev stated that security risks are at the forefront of the reservations they conveyed to the US side. Recalling that Azerbaijan is a country that has been attacked and suffered heavy casualties, Aliyev said that they do not want to risk the lives of their citizens.

Arguing that they had not received sufficient support from the international community in the past, Aliyev said, “We were abandoned to our fate when we were in a difficult situation. No one protected us. Furthermore, despite the respect and sympathy we hold for Palestine, Palestine did not particularly protect us either.”

Aliyev added that they are grateful for the decisions taken and the support within the framework of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and that Azerbaijan has always supported the Palestinian state within the UN and the Non-Aligned Movement.

“Non-Arab countries should not be thrust forward”

Advocating the view that Arab countries should play a priority role in the solution of regional problems, Aliyev expressed that it would not be correct for non-Arab Muslim countries to come to the fore in this process.

Aliyev made the assessment, “I have always argued that the issues of Arab countries should be resolved by Arab countries. I deeply believe that non-Arab Muslim countries should not be thrust forward. This does not bode well.”

Stating that they follow the Arab League’s stance and OIC decisions, Aliyev said, “Displaying unnecessary activity and being thrust forward is not the best way.”

Diplomatic note to the US administration

Reacting to Mike Waltz’s statement, Aliyev announced that they had notified the US administration through diplomatic channels.

Aliyev said, “The statement by the US Permanent Representative to the UN claiming that Azerbaijan gave consent surprised us. We did not give consent, and we informed the US administration through diplomatic channels that such baseless declarations are unacceptable and create a wrong impression.”

Implying that this statement might be a tactic to draw other countries into the process, Aliyev used the following expressions: “Perhaps there was an attempt to draw others into the process by saying ‘Azerbaijan accepted’; I do not rule this out. However, if so, this is absolutely unacceptable.”

Stating that the Baku administration had presented a list consisting of more than 20 questions to Washington, Aliyev emphasized that participation in any mission is out of the question before these questions are clarified.

What did Waltz say?

The US Permanent Representative to the UN, Mike Waltz, had stated that President Trump’s peace plan envisages the creation of the ISF.

Waltz had claimed, “I do not want American soldiers to be there. Therefore, we will have international forces. Indonesia, Azerbaijan, and other countries have already agreed to participate.”

Washington knocked on the doors of 70 countries

According to a report published by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) last month, the US Department of State sent official letters to more than 70 countries requesting troops or financial support for the ISF.

The report stated that regional countries, including the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, are in contact with the US regarding the provision of financing for the deployment of troops to Gaza. A US official conveyed to the newspaper that 19 of the countries approached were willing to provide troops, logistical support, or equipment.

According to the newspaper, the countries in talks with the US are putting forward the condition of deploying their units only to regions of Gaza under Israeli occupation. However, it is reported that the Washington administration is trying to convince these countries to also operate in areas under Hamas control and defined as the “red zone.”

Peace Council announcement postponed

On the other hand, the expected announcement regarding the “Peace Council” planned to be created for Gaza in the first days of 2026 has been postponed.

US President Trump announced that he had postponed the said announcement following the operation against Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. The Israeli press wrote that the announcement is foreseen to be made in mid-January.

The Maariv newspaper reported that the postponement was based on “technical” reasons and that the decision to establish the Peace Council has not changed. However, as with the Stability Force, it is stated that disagreements regarding the authority, duties, and participants of the Peace Council continue.

Diplomacy

South Korea pulls part of embassy staff from Ukraine amid POW dispute

Published

on

The South Korean government has decided to withdraw part of its embassy staff from Ukraine.

According to the Yonhap news agency, Foreign Ministry spokesman Park Doo-sun cited the Kyiv administration’s failure to take “positive steps” in the dispute that began with the leak of information concerning the handover of North Korean prisoners of war as the justification for the move.

The spokesman also listed the ongoing threat of air strikes, which complicates the safety of diplomats, among the reasons.

Following the withdrawal of part of the personnel, essential diplomatic contacts will continue under the leadership of the charge d’affaires ad interim to Ukraine. All consular staff tasked with protecting South Korean citizens will remain in Ukraine.

Prior to this move, the Seoul administration decided on 8 October to withdraw its ambassador. The Foreign Ministry stated at the time that it was ready to continue consultations with Kyiv to resolve the emerging issues constructively.

Tensions between the two countries began with a speech delivered by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

Zelenskyy announced that two captured soldiers from the North Korean army had been handed over to South Korea.

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, meanwhile, accused Kyiv of breaching a confidentiality agreement.

Lee said the disclosure of this information endangered the prisoners’ families and stability on the Korean Peninsula.

Seoul expects a public apology

Dmytro Lytvyn, an adviser to the Ukrainian president, denied the existence of a confidentiality agreement.

The South Korean Foreign Ministry summoned Ukrainian Charge d’Affaires Andriy Veshkin on 28 September and issued a note of protest against Lytvyn’s remarks.

President Lee Jae-myung warned in a statement on 2 October that they would take additional measures against Kyiv if Ukrainian authorities did not acknowledge the agreement and make a public apology. Lee stated that Ukraine itself had initially requested that the transfer of the prisoners be kept confidential.

Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi said the dispute stemmed from differing interpretations of the confidentiality regime.

Tykhyi noted that Seoul, based on its constitution which recognises the entire Korean Peninsula as its own territory, requested that the prisoners be handed over “like its own citizens”.

Describing the handover as a “gesture of goodwill”, Tykhyi stated that they were conducting closed-door negotiations to resolve differences of opinion.

Ambassador Park Ki-chang returned to Seoul on 10 October. According to a report by The Korea Times newspaper citing the ministry, recalling the ambassador served as a diplomatic protest against the leak of information regarding the prisoners.

The newspaper wrote that South Korea had last taken a similar step in 2008 by withdrawing its ambassador to Japan.

Moscow warned foreign diplomats

On 3 October, the Russian Foreign Ministry reiterated its warning to foreign nationals, including diplomatic mission staff, against remaining in Ukraine.

The ministry recalled its advice to leave Kyiv, citing ongoing strikes against military targets.

The ministry noted that those who failed to heed the warnings would bear responsibility for the potential consequences.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in a statement on 24 September that they had no information regarding Kyiv handing over two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul.

Peskov, noting that prisoner matters fall under the authority of the Defence Ministry and intelligence services, said, “Contacts through the special services are continuing.”

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Ex-BND head Hanning tied to former Mossad chief amid spy inquiry

Published

on

August Hanning, who led Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) between 1998 and 2005, was arrested on 6 October on allegations that he obtained roughly 2,000 classified agency documents and used them during contacts with intelligence officers from a foreign state.

Accused of high treason and espionage on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, the former spy chief is alleged to have procured the documents from former BND employee Manfred D.

Prosecutors stated that the leaked records included internal briefing notes presented to senior German officials, though the Berlin government has not yet publicly disclosed which country received the classified data.

According to an exclusive report by Jake Green for The Cradle, seized email exchanges revealed extensive ties between the arrested Hanning and former Mossad director Danny Yatom.

The correspondence shows that the two former intelligence directors built an ongoing network of contacts following their public service, combining commercial ventures, efforts to secure political influence, and intelligence links.

This dynamic has triggered debate that using personal connections and official access for private gain has left Germany’s intelligence apparatus vulnerable.

Intelligence notes for 10,000 euros and campaign proposals

According to the reviewed emails, Hanning told Yatom in a 2018 message that he could prepare an “overall assessment based on information obtained from senior German officials and intelligence agencies” concerning an unidentified candidate.

The former BND head committed to completing the report by 13 July in exchange for 10,000 euros.

Contacts between the two men subsequently expanded to cover domestic political processes in Germany. Ahead of the September 2021 federal election, Yatom asked Hanning to approach leading candidates.

Describing CIY Global as a “political campaign company”, the former Mossad chief noted that he aimed to introduce its capabilities to German politicians, and he mentioned his intention in the same exchange to transfer documents concerning a cybersecurity firm.

Cybersecurity partnership and surveillance operations across Europe

The partnership between Yatom and Hanning reached beyond political lobbying initiatives into the cybersecurity sector.

Hanning reportedly served as a consultant for World Health Energy Holdings, a cybersecurity company linked to Yatom.

Firms of this type, established or managed by former intelligence personnel, provide commercial platforms on the international market for Israeli-origin surveillance, cyber intelligence, and political influence capabilities.

The operational presence of private Israeli-based surveillance technologies across Europe has recently entered judicial records through scandals in Poland, Spain, and Greece.

Polish prosecutors announced on 12 October that data collected under the previous government via Pegasus spyware against political opponents had been transferred out of the country, adding that manufacturer NSO Group maintained access to the technical infrastructure.

In Spain, the 2022 CatalanGate investigation established that at least 65 people, including politicians, lawyers, and civil society representatives, were targeted using Pegasus or Candiru software, with Citizen Lab researchers publishing strong evidence linking the operation to Spanish authorities.

In Greece, the surveillance operation targeting journalist Thanasis Koukakis and Member of the European Parliament Nikos Androulakis was determined to have used Predator software, linked to Intellexa, a company founded by former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian.

In the German espionage investigation, the traffic between Hanning and Yatom involving paid reporting, contacts with electoral candidates, and commercial partnerships does not yet provide conclusive legal evidence regarding the final destination of the roughly 2,000 classified documents.

Nevertheless, the disclosed correspondence gives German investigators a concrete line of inquiry to assess whether classified state secrets reached commercial networks tied to Israeli intelligence.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Trump dismisses US envoy to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has dismissed Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador in Athens, following serious press reports concerning her conduct.

White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia told reporters during her first briefing that Guilfoyle had been asked to resign.

“She was doing a good job, but we didn’t like what we read in the press,” Trump said. “She was not a member of my family. I think she dated my son a long time ago.”

In a social media post, Guilfoyle stated: “These claims are unfounded, and I will resolutely defend my name, reputation, and integrity.” She added that she was particularly proud of the embassy’s work.

According to Kathimerini, her removal came as no surprise in Washington. Days of successive disclosures and vigorous exploitation of the matter by Democrats had been inflicting political damage on the White House ahead of the sensitive midterm elections.

The US State Department was instructed not to comment, with crisis management transferred entirely to the White House.

Reports indicate that most of the president’s team swiftly favoured Guilfoyle’s dismissal, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio was reportedly uneasy with the demonstratively warm public welcome she had staged for him.

Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee have called for an investigation.

“Her resignation does not absolve her of responsibility,” the lawmakers wrote, adding: “While American families struggled to make ends meet, she used her position as a Trump administration official to enrich herself.”

Chargé d’Affaires Josh Huck will assume ambassadorial duties until a successor is chosen.

Meanwhile, Guilfoyle’s departure is expected to cause delays in agreements between Greece and the US.

These include the so-called “Rubio package”, comprising approximately $4 billion in arms deals finalised only days before the secretary of state’s arrival.

Several procedural steps still remain before the contracts can be signed.

In Athens, opposition parties are demanding answers. Dimitris Mantzos of PASOK called for a detailed briefing on the agreements reached during Rubio’s visit.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey