Diplomacy
BRICS ministers champion multilateralism amid Trump trade war
The foreign ministers of the expanded BRICS group of countries, initially formed by Brazil, Russia, India, and China, pledged to strengthen multilateralism and promote peace amid intensifying global conflicts and increasing economic turbulence stemming from US trade policies.
At the opening of the meeting held in Rio de Janeiro on Monday, Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira stated the bloc should serve as “a force for good” in an increasingly fragmented world.
“The path to peace is neither easy nor straight,” Vieira said. “BRICS must lead by example, reaffirming our belief in a multipolar world where security is everyone’s right, not a minority’s privilege,” he added.
Vieira emphasized the expanded role of the group, which has reached 11 full members with its recent expansion, representing approximately half of the world’s population and about 40% of global GDP.
“With its geographical and cultural diversity, BRICS is uniquely positioned to promote dialogue, development, and stability,” he remarked.
The summit took place at a time when trust in international institutions has decreased and armed conflicts have become widespread due to aggressive trade measures implemented under the leadership of US President Donald Trump.
BRICS ministers were negotiating a joint statement that criticized “unilateral measures” related to trade and reaffirmed the central role of multilateral negotiations, which the bloc of leading developing markets has long advocated.
Although China was reportedly pushing for stronger language in response to US tariffs on Chinese goods, which recently reached up to 145%, a source told the South China Morning Post that the final statement would criticize this move but “would not use confrontational language.”
Meanwhile, according to Reuters, Brazilian officials are expected to shelve plans for a single currency and focus on promoting trade in local currencies to reduce dependence on the US dollar.
Ahead of the summit, the Chinese Foreign Ministry described BRICS as a new “cooperation backbone” for the Global South.
On Wednesday in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated China would work with BRICS members to build a “more comprehensive” partnership, promote multilateralism, and support “justice and equality” in the global order.
Guo said, “The BRICS cooperation mechanism emerged during the collective rise of the Global South and meets the international community’s expectations to preserve world peace, promote common development, and improve global governance.”
At Monday’s meeting, Vieira condemned the violence in Gaza, calling Israel’s military operations “devastating” and demanding the full withdrawal of Israeli forces, the release of hostages, and the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid.
Regarding Ukraine, Brazil’s top diplomat called for “a diplomatic solution based on the principles of the UN Charter.”
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov met during the summit, pledging to strengthen cooperation through BRICS to accelerate the reshaping of the global order.
Wang praised the “unity and cooperation” of BRICS members and said the group would contribute to building “a more just and rational global governance system.”
Lavrov agreed, stating that China, Russia, other BRICS members, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization “are active participants in this transformation and are at the forefront of the movement for justice and equality.”
Additionally, climate finance was one of the focal points of Monday’s discussions. Brazil rejected attempts to shift financial obligations to developing countries, emphasizing that wealthy nations should fulfill their responsibility to finance climate adaptation and mitigation efforts.
The day began with officials arriving at Brazil’s historic foreign ministry building, Itamaraty Palace, in Rio.
While Russia and China sent their top diplomats, one person’s absence was notable: Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar did not attend the meeting.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is assessing how to respond to an armed terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 that killed more than 25 people.
India blamed Pakistan for the incident and announced it would give “an appropriate response.” Jaishankar was represented by New Delhi’s BRICS sherpa Dammu Ravi.
China, a close ally of Pakistan and a founding member of BRICS, called for a neutral investigation and urged South Asian countries to de-escalate tensions.
Farwa Aamer from the Asia Society, a US-based non-profit organization, suggested that Jaishankar’s absence from the BRICS meeting could have both practical and strategic reasons.
While staying in place after the Kashmir attack could be a factor, Aamer said, “part of it could be to convey the seriousness of the issue from India’s perspective to other BRICS members and the international community, especially China, which recently supported Pakistan.”
Tensions between India and China have long complicated BRICS dynamics, and there are concerns that bilateral issues could spill over into the bloc’s agenda.
Nevertheless, Aamer said there is “an interest in the group moving as cohesively as possible,” and this will largely depend on the 17th BRICS leaders’ summit in Rio in July.
BRICS ministers will continue bilateral consultations until Tuesday, and the outcomes are expected to shape the discussions in July.
Diplomacy
South Korea pulls part of embassy staff from Ukraine amid POW dispute
The South Korean government has decided to withdraw part of its embassy staff from Ukraine.
According to the Yonhap news agency, Foreign Ministry spokesman Park Doo-sun cited the Kyiv administration’s failure to take “positive steps” in the dispute that began with the leak of information concerning the handover of North Korean prisoners of war as the justification for the move.
The spokesman also listed the ongoing threat of air strikes, which complicates the safety of diplomats, among the reasons.
Following the withdrawal of part of the personnel, essential diplomatic contacts will continue under the leadership of the charge d’affaires ad interim to Ukraine. All consular staff tasked with protecting South Korean citizens will remain in Ukraine.
Prior to this move, the Seoul administration decided on 8 October to withdraw its ambassador. The Foreign Ministry stated at the time that it was ready to continue consultations with Kyiv to resolve the emerging issues constructively.
Tensions between the two countries began with a speech delivered by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Zelenskyy announced that two captured soldiers from the North Korean army had been handed over to South Korea.
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, meanwhile, accused Kyiv of breaching a confidentiality agreement.
Lee said the disclosure of this information endangered the prisoners’ families and stability on the Korean Peninsula.
Seoul expects a public apology
Dmytro Lytvyn, an adviser to the Ukrainian president, denied the existence of a confidentiality agreement.
The South Korean Foreign Ministry summoned Ukrainian Charge d’Affaires Andriy Veshkin on 28 September and issued a note of protest against Lytvyn’s remarks.
President Lee Jae-myung warned in a statement on 2 October that they would take additional measures against Kyiv if Ukrainian authorities did not acknowledge the agreement and make a public apology. Lee stated that Ukraine itself had initially requested that the transfer of the prisoners be kept confidential.
Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi said the dispute stemmed from differing interpretations of the confidentiality regime.
Tykhyi noted that Seoul, based on its constitution which recognises the entire Korean Peninsula as its own territory, requested that the prisoners be handed over “like its own citizens”.
Describing the handover as a “gesture of goodwill”, Tykhyi stated that they were conducting closed-door negotiations to resolve differences of opinion.
Ambassador Park Ki-chang returned to Seoul on 10 October. According to a report by The Korea Times newspaper citing the ministry, recalling the ambassador served as a diplomatic protest against the leak of information regarding the prisoners.
The newspaper wrote that South Korea had last taken a similar step in 2008 by withdrawing its ambassador to Japan.
Moscow warned foreign diplomats
On 3 October, the Russian Foreign Ministry reiterated its warning to foreign nationals, including diplomatic mission staff, against remaining in Ukraine.
The ministry recalled its advice to leave Kyiv, citing ongoing strikes against military targets.
The ministry noted that those who failed to heed the warnings would bear responsibility for the potential consequences.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in a statement on 24 September that they had no information regarding Kyiv handing over two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul.
Peskov, noting that prisoner matters fall under the authority of the Defence Ministry and intelligence services, said, “Contacts through the special services are continuing.”
Diplomacy
Ex-BND head Hanning tied to former Mossad chief amid spy inquiry
August Hanning, who led Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) between 1998 and 2005, was arrested on 6 October on allegations that he obtained roughly 2,000 classified agency documents and used them during contacts with intelligence officers from a foreign state.
Accused of high treason and espionage on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, the former spy chief is alleged to have procured the documents from former BND employee Manfred D.
Prosecutors stated that the leaked records included internal briefing notes presented to senior German officials, though the Berlin government has not yet publicly disclosed which country received the classified data.
According to an exclusive report by Jake Green for The Cradle, seized email exchanges revealed extensive ties between the arrested Hanning and former Mossad director Danny Yatom.
The correspondence shows that the two former intelligence directors built an ongoing network of contacts following their public service, combining commercial ventures, efforts to secure political influence, and intelligence links.
This dynamic has triggered debate that using personal connections and official access for private gain has left Germany’s intelligence apparatus vulnerable.
Intelligence notes for 10,000 euros and campaign proposals
According to the reviewed emails, Hanning told Yatom in a 2018 message that he could prepare an “overall assessment based on information obtained from senior German officials and intelligence agencies” concerning an unidentified candidate.
The former BND head committed to completing the report by 13 July in exchange for 10,000 euros.
Contacts between the two men subsequently expanded to cover domestic political processes in Germany. Ahead of the September 2021 federal election, Yatom asked Hanning to approach leading candidates.
Describing CIY Global as a “political campaign company”, the former Mossad chief noted that he aimed to introduce its capabilities to German politicians, and he mentioned his intention in the same exchange to transfer documents concerning a cybersecurity firm.
Cybersecurity partnership and surveillance operations across Europe
The partnership between Yatom and Hanning reached beyond political lobbying initiatives into the cybersecurity sector.
Hanning reportedly served as a consultant for World Health Energy Holdings, a cybersecurity company linked to Yatom.
Firms of this type, established or managed by former intelligence personnel, provide commercial platforms on the international market for Israeli-origin surveillance, cyber intelligence, and political influence capabilities.
The operational presence of private Israeli-based surveillance technologies across Europe has recently entered judicial records through scandals in Poland, Spain, and Greece.
Polish prosecutors announced on 12 October that data collected under the previous government via Pegasus spyware against political opponents had been transferred out of the country, adding that manufacturer NSO Group maintained access to the technical infrastructure.
In Spain, the 2022 CatalanGate investigation established that at least 65 people, including politicians, lawyers, and civil society representatives, were targeted using Pegasus or Candiru software, with Citizen Lab researchers publishing strong evidence linking the operation to Spanish authorities.
In Greece, the surveillance operation targeting journalist Thanasis Koukakis and Member of the European Parliament Nikos Androulakis was determined to have used Predator software, linked to Intellexa, a company founded by former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian.
In the German espionage investigation, the traffic between Hanning and Yatom involving paid reporting, contacts with electoral candidates, and commercial partnerships does not yet provide conclusive legal evidence regarding the final destination of the roughly 2,000 classified documents.
Nevertheless, the disclosed correspondence gives German investigators a concrete line of inquiry to assess whether classified state secrets reached commercial networks tied to Israeli intelligence.
Diplomacy
Trump dismisses US envoy to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle
US President Donald Trump has dismissed Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador in Athens, following serious press reports concerning her conduct.
White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia told reporters during her first briefing that Guilfoyle had been asked to resign.
“She was doing a good job, but we didn’t like what we read in the press,” Trump said. “She was not a member of my family. I think she dated my son a long time ago.”
In a social media post, Guilfoyle stated: “These claims are unfounded, and I will resolutely defend my name, reputation, and integrity.” She added that she was particularly proud of the embassy’s work.
According to Kathimerini, her removal came as no surprise in Washington. Days of successive disclosures and vigorous exploitation of the matter by Democrats had been inflicting political damage on the White House ahead of the sensitive midterm elections.
The US State Department was instructed not to comment, with crisis management transferred entirely to the White House.
Reports indicate that most of the president’s team swiftly favoured Guilfoyle’s dismissal, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio was reportedly uneasy with the demonstratively warm public welcome she had staged for him.
Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee have called for an investigation.
“Her resignation does not absolve her of responsibility,” the lawmakers wrote, adding: “While American families struggled to make ends meet, she used her position as a Trump administration official to enrich herself.”
Chargé d’Affaires Josh Huck will assume ambassadorial duties until a successor is chosen.
Meanwhile, Guilfoyle’s departure is expected to cause delays in agreements between Greece and the US.
These include the so-called “Rubio package”, comprising approximately $4 billion in arms deals finalised only days before the secretary of state’s arrival.
Several procedural steps still remain before the contracts can be signed.
In Athens, opposition parties are demanding answers. Dimitris Mantzos of PASOK called for a detailed briefing on the agreements reached during Rubio’s visit.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
