Connect with us

Diplomacy

BRICS ministers champion multilateralism amid Trump trade war

Published

on

The foreign ministers of the expanded BRICS group of countries, initially formed by Brazil, Russia, India, and China, pledged to strengthen multilateralism and promote peace amid intensifying global conflicts and increasing economic turbulence stemming from US trade policies.

At the opening of the meeting held in Rio de Janeiro on Monday, Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira stated the bloc should serve as “a force for good” in an increasingly fragmented world.

“The path to peace is neither easy nor straight,” Vieira said. “BRICS must lead by example, reaffirming our belief in a multipolar world where security is everyone’s right, not a minority’s privilege,” he added.

Vieira emphasized the expanded role of the group, which has reached 11 full members with its recent expansion, representing approximately half of the world’s population and about 40% of global GDP.

“With its geographical and cultural diversity, BRICS is uniquely positioned to promote dialogue, development, and stability,” he remarked.

The summit took place at a time when trust in international institutions has decreased and armed conflicts have become widespread due to aggressive trade measures implemented under the leadership of US President Donald Trump.

BRICS ministers were negotiating a joint statement that criticized “unilateral measures” related to trade and reaffirmed the central role of multilateral negotiations, which the bloc of leading developing markets has long advocated.

Although China was reportedly pushing for stronger language in response to US tariffs on Chinese goods, which recently reached up to 145%, a source told the South China Morning Post that the final statement would criticize this move but “would not use confrontational language.”

Meanwhile, according to Reuters, Brazilian officials are expected to shelve plans for a single currency and focus on promoting trade in local currencies to reduce dependence on the US dollar.

Ahead of the summit, the Chinese Foreign Ministry described BRICS as a new “cooperation backbone” for the Global South.

On Wednesday in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated China would work with BRICS members to build a “more comprehensive” partnership, promote multilateralism, and support “justice and equality” in the global order.

Guo said, “The BRICS cooperation mechanism emerged during the collective rise of the Global South and meets the international community’s expectations to preserve world peace, promote common development, and improve global governance.”

At Monday’s meeting, Vieira condemned the violence in Gaza, calling Israel’s military operations “devastating” and demanding the full withdrawal of Israeli forces, the release of hostages, and the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid.

Regarding Ukraine, Brazil’s top diplomat called for “a diplomatic solution based on the principles of the UN Charter.”

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov met during the summit, pledging to strengthen cooperation through BRICS to accelerate the reshaping of the global order.

Wang praised the “unity and cooperation” of BRICS members and said the group would contribute to building “a more just and rational global governance system.”

Lavrov agreed, stating that China, Russia, other BRICS members, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization “are active participants in this transformation and are at the forefront of the movement for justice and equality.”

Additionally, climate finance was one of the focal points of Monday’s discussions. Brazil rejected attempts to shift financial obligations to developing countries, emphasizing that wealthy nations should fulfill their responsibility to finance climate adaptation and mitigation efforts.

The day began with officials arriving at Brazil’s historic foreign ministry building, Itamaraty Palace, in Rio.

While Russia and China sent their top diplomats, one person’s absence was notable: Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar did not attend the meeting.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is assessing how to respond to an armed terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 that killed more than 25 people.

India blamed Pakistan for the incident and announced it would give “an appropriate response.” Jaishankar was represented by New Delhi’s BRICS sherpa Dammu Ravi.

China, a close ally of Pakistan and a founding member of BRICS, called for a neutral investigation and urged South Asian countries to de-escalate tensions.

Farwa Aamer from the Asia Society, a US-based non-profit organization, suggested that Jaishankar’s absence from the BRICS meeting could have both practical and strategic reasons.

While staying in place after the Kashmir attack could be a factor, Aamer said, “part of it could be to convey the seriousness of the issue from India’s perspective to other BRICS members and the international community, especially China, which recently supported Pakistan.”

Tensions between India and China have long complicated BRICS dynamics, and there are concerns that bilateral issues could spill over into the bloc’s agenda.

Nevertheless, Aamer said there is “an interest in the group moving as cohesively as possible,” and this will largely depend on the 17th BRICS leaders’ summit in Rio in July.

BRICS ministers will continue bilateral consultations until Tuesday, and the outcomes are expected to shape the discussions in July.

Diplomacy

Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks

Published

on

US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.

According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.

This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.

US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.

Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”

According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.

Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.

Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.

In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.

Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.

Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.

Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.

Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.

On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.

Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.

On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”

The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”

Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.

On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.

According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”

Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Ukraine faces demographic collapse as fertility rates slide

Published

on

British magazine The Economist reported that mobilization, conflict casualties, and pervasive uncertainty have left Ukraine confronting the threat of demographic collapse.

According to data cited by the magazine, Ukraine’s fertility rate has declined from 1.2 children per woman in 2020 to between 0.8 and 0.9.

This rate marks a lower level than that of any major nation except South Korea.

In the first half of 2026, the number of deaths in Ukraine surpassed the number of newborn babies threefold.

The report noted that ever since independence was gained in 1991, the number of births in the country has lagged behind the number of deaths every year.

The Economist emphasized that the demographic collapse driven by the ongoing fighting constitutes an “existential threat.”

The magazine identified mass refugee migration as the principal driver of the population loss.

More than 5 million Ukrainians reside abroad, predominantly in Europe.

The proportion of those wishing to return among those who left the country is also steadily shrinking.

According to data from the Centre for Economic Strategy (CES), the share of those seeking to return dropped from 74% in 2022 to 43%.

The fact that the majority of refugees consist of Ukrainian children and women under the age of 44 further aggravates the demographic picture.

The Kyiv government decided to exempt men under the age of 25 from mobilization to alleviate the demographic decline.

The magazine reported, however, that many young people have fled the country, while those who remain do not plan to start families.

Projections cited in the report indicate that even if hostilities cease in the coming years, Ukraine can, at best, expect merely a deceleration of depopulation.

Olga Duhnich, an expert at the Ukraine-based think tank Frontier Institute, stated that the generation born in the 1990s and 2000s is the least populous in Ukraine’s modern history, meaning the country cannot expect a post-conflict baby boom.

The United Nations (UN) projects that Ukraine’s population will decline by 0.7% to 0.9% each year over the next two decades.

Under this projection, Ukraine’s population will fall to approximately 25 million by 2040.

If hostilities drag on, people are expected to abandon plans to have children, deepening the crisis even further.

Beyond exempting men under 25 from mobilization, the Kyiv government is rolling out various support packages to boost birth rates.

Under legislation enacted in the country, parents who have children receive a direct payment of 50,000 hryvnias (around $1,100).

Parents are also paid 7,000 hryvnias each month during the first year.

Other state programmes subsidize childcare costs, while Ukrainian soldiers are granted free freezing of egg and sperm cells.

Ukrainian Minister of Social Policy Denis Ulyutin said in May to the Livyi Bereh media outlet that roughly 22 to 25 million people lived in government-controlled territories.

Ulyutin characterized the prevailing picture by saying: “This is a catastrophe.”

Ella Libanova, Director of the Institute for Demography and Quality of Life Research, estimated the population at 29 million during the same period.

Libanova attributed the steep fall from a population of 30 million in 2025 to high death rates and the demographic crisis.

In a statement in October, Libanova announced that Ukraine’s population had slipped to 28.5 million.

Institute Director Libanova said: “The population is already at 28.5 million; we lost half a million people. We lost them, but thankfully this was still caused by migration rather than casualties.”

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Armenian opposition urged to form joint front against constitution

Published

on

Narek Karapetyan, a lawmaker and head of the Strong Armenia faction in the Armenian parliament, has urged opposition parties to unite around four core principles set out in a joint declaration.

The key points of the declaration include resisting territorial concessions and blocking the adoption of a new constitution, which the opposition has termed the “Aliyev constitution”.

According to a report by Aysor.am, Narek Karapetyan stated that the opposition meeting was originally planned to be led by his uncle, businessman and Strong Armenia movement leader Samvel Karapetyan.

“We initiated the meeting, but the authorities took preemptive steps to prevent Samvel Karapetyan from launching the national unification process,” Narek Karapetyan said.

Noting that, despite these events, opposition representatives convened and signed a joint declaration based on four agreed articles, Narek Karapetyan invited other opposition forces and members of the public to join the alliance.

“We will not allow them to implement the Aliyev constitution in Armenia. We must unite,” Karapetyan said.

Ahead of these developments, Armenian National Security Service personnel detained Strong Armenia Party leader Samvel Karapetyan following a search of his home.

The party’s press secretary, Agavni Sukiasyan, announced that on the morning of the same day, the Investigative Committee of Armenia searched the homes of both Samvel Karapetyan and Narek Karapetyan.

In a report citing the Investigative Committee, Armenpress stated that Samvel Karapetyan was detained as part of a case involving allegations of causing large-scale financial damage to the Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA) company, embezzling entrusted property, and money laundering.

According to committee figures, the total damage inflicted on the company exceeds $179 million.

Narek Karapetyan’s home was also searched at the end of July as part of a criminal case.

On 22 July, Armenia’s Central Electoral Commission approved the Prosecutor General’s request to strip Narek Karapetyan of his parliamentary immunity, and Karapetyan was charged with large-scale money laundering.

According to information reported by Sputnik Armenia, the investigation is linked to charges brought against Strong Armenia supporter Aleksan Aleksanyan.

Investigative authorities allege that Aleksanyan received approximately $4.4 million and €230,000 from the Karapetyan-owned Tashir Foundation under the guise of gifts and loans.

Several criminal cases had previously been opened against Samvel Karapetyan.

In 2025, Karapetyan was charged with publicly calling for the violent seizure of power after backing the Armenian Apostolic Church, which had been criticized by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

In January, legal proceedings were also launched against Karapetyan on charges of large-scale tax evasion and money laundering.

Separately, in early July 2025, the Armenian parliament approved a bill enabling the nationalization of the Electric Networks of Armenia company.

In March, Armenia’s Constitutional Court ruled that the nationalization process in question complied with the law.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey