America
DOJ releases documents detailing sexual assault allegations against Trump
The US Department of Justice has released records containing sexual assault allegations against President Donald Trump, stemming from an interview with a woman who claims she was introduced to him by Jeffrey Epstein.
According to the summary of the FBI interview, the woman’s primary allegation is that Trump struck her after she bit his penis while he was attempting to force her to perform oral sex.
These three files were released amid an investigation by Democrats into whether the Department of Justice deliberately withheld materials concerning sexual assault allegations against Trump.
Trump has denied any wrongdoing regarding the Epstein allegations and has not been charged with any crimes in connection with them.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt characterized the allegations as “completely baseless accusations from a deeply troubled woman with a history of extensive criminal activity, which are supported by zero credible evidence.”
“These accusations are entirely baseless, a fact further supported by the reality that Joe Biden’s Department of Justice was aware of them for four years and did nothing because they knew President Trump had done absolutely nothing wrong,” Leavitt said. “As we have stated countless times, President Trump has been completely exonerated by the release of the Epstein Files.”
In the files, which were prepared between August and October 2019, the woman—whose identity remains redacted—claims that between the ages of 13 and 15, Epstein took her to New York or New Jersey and introduced her to Trump in “a very high building, in massive rooms.”
The woman claimed that Trump remarked he did not like her being a “boy-girl.” The interview notes interpret this as a reference to a tomboy.
The woman stated that other people were present, though she could not recall their identities.
According to the interview notes, Trump asked the others to leave the room, then said something to the effect of, “Let me teach you how little girls should be.”
The woman recalled that Trump then unzipped his pants and forced her head “toward his penis.” She stated that she “bit it,” and in response, Trump pulled her hair and struck the side of her head.
The woman remembered Trump saying, “Get this little bitch out of here.” At that moment, she said, others returned to the room.
The FBI interview notes contain no information regarding how the incident concluded or how the woman managed to extricate herself from the situation.
In one of the interviews, the woman explained that she had begun working with attorneys and wanted to be transparent about a pending lawsuit “in case the agents decided there might be a conflict of interest.”
The woman stated that she or her relatives had received a series of threatening phone calls, one of which had been left on a colleague’s phone but was directed at her.
She told the FBI she believed these calls were related to Epstein, and, according to the interview notes, whispered, “If it’s not Epstein, then perhaps it is ‘the other one.’” When the agents asked who she meant, the notes indicate she said, “Trump.”
In the final interview, the agents asked again about her allegations regarding Trump, noting in the document that he was “the current US president.”
According to the interview summary, the woman asked, “What would be the point of providing this information when there is a strong possibility that nothing can be done about it at this point?”
Trump has faced numerous allegations of sexual assault and harassment in the past, including accusations from multiple women that surfaced during his 2016 presidential campaign.
The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating whether documents related to Epstein were improperly withheld from the public.
Ranking member of the committee, Democrat Robert Garcia, stated last week, “For the last few weeks, Oversight Democrats have been investigating how the FBI handled sexual assault allegations made by a survivor against President Donald Trump in 2019.”
In response to this statement, the Department of Justice posted on social media, stating that Oversight Democrats should “stop misleading the public by whipping up outrage from the radical anti-Trump base.” The statement added, “NOTHING was deleted.”
“If we temporarily removed files to redact victim identities or personal identifying information, those documents are immediately restored online and made public. ALL relevant documents have been produced, unless a document fell into one of the following categories: duplicates, classified, or part of an ongoing federal investigation.”
The documents emerged as the Trump administration continues to grapple with criticism regarding the processing of the files, roughly 3.5 million of which were released at the end of January.
In addition to accusations that it withheld certain records, the Department of Justice has faced criticism from lawmakers for allegedly exposing the identities of victims and redacting the names of certain men.
On Wednesday, a House committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify regarding the handling of the Epstein files.
America
US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land
Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.
For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.
Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:
“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”
The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.
Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.
Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.
Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.
Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.
Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.
Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market
The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.
Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.
The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.
Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.
Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.
Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.
William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.
Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.
America
US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies
An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.
Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.
Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.
Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.
Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.
When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.
The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.
Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.
Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war
In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.
Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.
Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.
American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.
Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.
Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.
Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise
The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.
Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.
Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.
Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.
Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.
Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.
America
Anthropic posts $80.7bn loss ahead of IPO as computing costs soar
Anthropic, developer of the artificial intelligence model Claude, reported a net loss of $80.7 billion for the first six months of 2026 ending 30 June.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal citing the company’s draft initial public offering prospectus, this recorded loss nearly doubled the $42 billion loss incurred across the entirety of 2025.
The vast majority of that enormous figure, accounting for $72 billion, stemmed from accounting-driven book-value write-downs.
In contrast, the company saw a sharp surge in revenue, with turnover in the first half of the year climbing to $16.3 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period of the prior year.
During this period, Anthropic spent approximately $9 billion on computing power and infrastructure needs, surpassing in just six months the $7.3 billion spent across the whole of 2025.
The company has commitments to pay roughly $450 billion over the next seven to 10 years under cloud service contracts.
Under these obligations, contracts are planned for $111 billion with Google Cloud, $110 billion with Amazon Web Services, and $31 billion with Microsoft.
Anthropic will also spend up to $86 billion by 2033 and 2034, respectively, to lease Nvidia chips through smaller AI-focused cloud providers Nscale and Lambda.
The company could spend an additional $750 billion in the coming years to expand its computing capacity.
Roughly a third of the draft IPO prospectus was dedicated directly to risk factors.
The document highlighted the possibility that models could cause tangible real-world harm, noting that artificial intelligence could exhibit a “self-preservation” tendency and produce responses resembling “blackmail”.
Anthropic warned that the scale of damage caused by an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could render insuring against such risks impossible.
According to market expectations, Anthropic’s IPO could rank among the largest transactions in history, potentially surpassing SpaceX’s record.
Following the market debut, the company’s market valuation is projected to reach up to $2 trillion.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
