Connect with us

Diplomacy

Ex-UN rapporteur Alfred de Zayas delivers message to Palestine conference in Istanbul

Published

on

Former United Nations Special Rapporteur Alfred de Zayas sent a message to the international conference titled “From Genocide to the Establishment of the Palestinian State,” held in Istanbul on September 6.

The conference brought together leading experts from Palestine, Türkiye, Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Norway, and Denmark.

Speakers assessed the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which they described as genocide, the challenges in Palestine’s statehood process, and the role of the international community. The conference emphasized the need to overcome internal divisions in Palestine and increase diplomatic pressure on Israel.

Alfred de Zayas’s message is as follows:

“On August 31, the International Association of Genocide Scholars issued a resolution confirming that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and calling for international action to protect the rights of Palestinians.

The Gaza Tribunal in Sarajevo held in May that Israel was committing genocide. On August 18, 2024, it issued a resolution in Istanbul calling on the international community to take concrete action to stop the genocide. Not only civilians but also journalists, medics, and staff members of UN agencies, including UNRWA, have been killed.

Richard Falk, the tribunal’s president, an emeritus professor of international law at Princeton University and a former UN special rapporteur on Palestinian human rights (2008-2014), warned that failure to act would represent “a historic failure of humanity.” He urged world governments to bypass the UN Security Council and empower the General Assembly to authorize armed intervention without delay, emphasizing that decisive measures were needed to prevent further civilian casualties.

The International Court of Justice has held in its Advisory Opinion of July 19, 2024, that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza is illegal and that it must withdraw from these territories and pay compensation to the victims.

The UN General Assembly endorsed the ICJ ruling by an overwhelming majority and adopted a resolution on September 18, 2024, giving Israel 12 months to implement the Advisory Opinion.

Israel has not only ignored the Advisory Opinion and the GA resolution but has intensified the genocide on the civilian population of Gaza, the bombardment of schools, hospitals, mosques, and churches, and shown contempt for the orders issued by the ICJ in connection with the pending case South Africa v. Israel.

On November 21, 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Minister of War Yoav Gallant, which to this day have not been implemented.

The Trump Administration has imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court to obstruct its work.

What does this mean for the authority and credibility of the United Nations? What does it entail for the obligations of all UN member states under the UN Charter and under the 1948 Genocide Convention?

This conference should adopt a resolution to be forwarded to Antonio Guterres and Volker Türk to be taken into account at the opening of the 80th session of the General Assembly. This resolution should endorse the reports of the UN Rapporteur on Palestine, professor Francesca Albanese, and demand the implementation by Israel of the Advisory Opinions of the ICJ of July 9, 2004, and July 19, 2024. It should invoke the Responsibility to Protect doctrine and endorse the humanitarian work of all UN agencies, including UNRWA and UNICEF, and support the SUMUD humanitarian flotilla.

The resolution and the outcome document of this conference must call for the adoption by the General Assembly of a Uniting for Peace Resolution calling on states to take joint and individual actions to stop the genocide on the basis of the obligation to prevent to which all parties of the Genocide Convention are bound.

If the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect means anything, it means saving Palestine.

The conference should urge the General Assembly to invoke Article 6 of the UN Charter, which provides for the expulsion of members. The article stipulates:

“A Member of the United Nations who has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

No UN member state has ever violated more General Assembly and Security Council Resolutions than Israel; no member state has shown as much contempt for the UN and for international judicial institutions as Israel, with the complicity of the US. Both are in open rebellion against the UN Charter and international law.

In the immediate term, the General Assembly should withdraw the accreditation given to Israeli diplomats, as the GA withdrew the accreditation of the diplomats of the Apartheid regime in South Africa during the 1970s and 1980s. This would be symbolic and complete the isolation of Israel in the international community.

The General Assembly should call on all member states to break not only diplomatic relations but all commercial relations with the genocidal state.

In the long term, the General Assembly should adopt a resolution requesting an Advisory Opinion by the International Court of Justice to rule on the issue of complicity in genocide.

The Geneva International Peace Research Institute submitted two legal briefs in 2024 to the International Criminal Court under Article 15 of the Rome Statute, asking the Prosecutor to start investigations into the criminal complicity of European institutions and individuals like Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas in the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

A new multipolar world is emerging. The hope of humanity is no longer with the “collective West” but with the Global Majority in Africa and Asia. The crucial problem today is that the institutions created to defend our rights have been hijacked by Washington and Brussels and that they do not work for humanity but to maintain an unjust world order.

For that reason, I wrote my human rights trilogy: Building a Just World Order, Countering Mainstream Narratives, and The Human Rights Industry, with concrete, pragmatic, implementable recommendations, including my 25 Principles of International Order.”

Diplomacy

CSTO strips Armenia of voting rights over two-year budget debt

Published

on

Members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) have stripped Armenia of its voting rights and its ability to appoint representatives to official positions due to a two-year debt to the organization’s budget.

Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, “This decision was taken based on the organization’s charter due to Armenia’s failure to fulfil its obligations for several years.”

Prior to the CSTO leaders’ summit in Moscow, Peskov had stated that member states would “react” to the Caucasus country’s non-participation in the organization’s activities.

Ahead of the Moscow summit, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said his country’s “interest has run out” regarding the CSTO. Through his press spokesperson, he announced that he would travel to Türkiye on 11 November to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) instead of going to Russia.

The CSTO leaders’ meeting was held with the participation of Russian President Vladimir Putin alongside the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.

The leaders jointly took the decision to revoke Armenia’s voting rights.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the participants also signed a joint declaration.

The declaration stated: “We confirm our unconditional commitment to the goals set out in the CSTO treaty and charter towards creating favourable and stable conditions for the comprehensive development of member states.”

Pashinyan had frozen Yerevan’s de facto participation in the CSTO in February 2024, citing the organization’s failure to aid the Armenian side during the armed clashes in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023.

Having referred to the CSTO as a “soap-bubble alliance” since that time, Pashinyan accused the organization’s members of “planning war” together with Baku. He stated that Armenia would not return to active work within the alliance at least “over the next five years”, adding that he would welcome it if the country were expelled from membership.

Relations between Armenia and Russia grew tense once again in the spring of 2026, after Yerevan moved closer to the European Union (EU) and the Kremlin responded with a trade war.

In May, Pashinyan refused to travel to Moscow to attend the Victory Day parade and declared that he did not support Russia on the Ukraine issue.

In response, Putin called on Yerevan to determine its foreign policy course through a referendum, advising Armenian authorities not to forget the fate of Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

US urges Russia to draft proposals for new European security pact

Published

on

The US administration has reportedly called on Russia to submit proposals for a prospective security treaty with Europe that would include measures to ease tensions between European nations and Moscow.

According to a report by news site Axios citing sources familiar with the matter, the US side conveyed the request during trilateral negotiations held in Abu Dhabi.

During the talks, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that the Russian delegation prepare a fresh proposal outlining its security concerns and demands.

The US delegation reportedly asked that this proposal clarify what kind of “symmetrical steps” Moscow is prepared to take to de-escalate tensions and “provide non-aggression guarantees to Europe”.

Another source familiar with the White House’s approach said the Trump administration aims to run the processes for a new European security architecture and a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine simultaneously.

Under this plan, the actual implementation of the security understandings would take effect only after the signing of an accord ending the conflict in Ukraine.

Assessing the approach to the process, the source said: “[Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy will not agree to any compromise without knowing what will happen next regarding security guarantees. Putin also wants to see the exact same picture clearly. This is precisely why the security portfolio is so decisive.”

The same official noted that the US will not reach a security agreement with Russia without the support of Europe and Ukraine, adding that Washington will not grant Moscow veto power over European security decisions.

Vladimir Medinsky, aide to the Russian president and head of the delegation in the Ukraine negotiations, previously stated that the fundamental objective was building a comprehensive new security system in Europe.

Medinsky noted that the structure in question must take on the character of “a fair, new, modern Yalta and Potsdam that carries the spirit of Helsinki 1975 and responds to contemporary realities”.

The Russian official argued that if such a system were established, peace lasting for decades, or even centuries, could be secured in Europe.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also announced that Moscow possesses its own position paper on how a new security architecture in Eurasia should take shape.

Lavrov stated that Russia hopes the Washington administration will “maintain its determination to pursue dialogue aimed at achieving an honest balance of interests where nobody’s security is impaired”.

Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the country has no intention of attacking Europe.

Pointing out that they have no reason to fight NATO countries, Russian President Vladimir Putin previously said: “We have no interest whatsoever, neither geopolitical nor economic, political nor military.”

In a statement in October, Putin said Russia has no plans to attack anyone “in 2029, in 2030, or in the year 2050”.

On the other hand, Putin claimed that “all NATO countries are fighting Russia” and stated that the Russian military is currently the most combat-ready armed force in the world.

Following the contacts in Abu Dhabi, Kushner announced that he and Witkoff would travel to Moscow.

Explaining that they plan to meet Putin during the visit to discuss European participation in negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict, Kushner argued that the parties could make “far greater progress” if the Russian leader consents to such involvement.

Yury Ushakov, aide to the Russian president, stated that the US special envoys will arrive in Moscow on 12 November, with the planned meeting with the Russian president scheduled for the first half of the day.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks

Published

on

US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.

According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.

This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.

US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.

Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”

According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.

Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.

Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.

In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.

Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.

Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.

Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.

Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.

On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.

Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.

On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”

The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”

Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.

On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.

According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”

Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey