Diplomacy
International experts in Istanbul chart a path for Palestinian statehood beyond genocide
Palestinian and international experts convened in Istanbul for the international conference titled From Genocide to the Building of the Palestinian State, bringing together specialists from Palestine, Türkiye, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Europe. Speakers addressed the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which they described as a genocide, the challenges in Palestine’s state-building process, and the role of the international community. The conference emphasized the need to overcome internal Palestinian divisions and increase diplomatic pressure on Israel. Former High Representative of European Union Joseph Borrell sent his greetings to the conference.
Palestinian opinion leaders, academics, and regional experts from various countries gathered for the international conference, From Genocide to the Building of the Palestinian State.
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the Palestinian statehood process, and the role of the international community were discussed in a multifaceted manner at a conference jointly organized in Istanbul by Harici Media, the Palestinian Dialogue Group, and the Center for International Relations and Diplomacy (MID).
In his opening speech, Tunc Akkoc, Editor-in-Chief of Harici, highlighted the two contrasting aspects of the Palestinian issue.
“On one hand, we are witnessing perhaps the greatest tragedy in the history of the Palestinian people. On the other, critical steps are being taken towards the international recognition of a legitimate Palestinian state,” Akkoc said.
Describing the Palestinian issue as one of the world’s most pressing problems, Akkoc stated that they would address it from various perspectives. “We aim to make a small contribution to the solution by reaching a wide audience through the power of media and online publications,” he commented.
Head of Palestinian Dialogue Group Sadeq Abu Amer, said in his opening speech, “The Palestinian people have been facing genocide, ethnic cleansing, and attempts to erase their identity for a century; today, this tragedy has reached its most dangerous stage in Gaza.” Drawing attention to the double standards of the international system, Abu Amer said, “However, the unprecedented solidarity among peoples around the world could become a new tool for political pressure.” He emphasized, “The Palestinian cause is not only the responsibility of Palestinians, but also the shared humanitarian responsibility of everyone who believes in freedom and justice.”
Mehmet Rakipoglu, Information Production and Publishing Coordinator of MID, noted that Israel’s genocide has been registered by international institutions. “We must now focus on the question of ‘what can we do next, how can Palestinian statehood be achieved?'” he stated.
Rakipoglu argued that not only Israel’s military power but also its system of knowledge and thought must be dismantled. “For this reason, we must build an epistemological Al-Aqsa Flood,” he said.
“The Palestinian national movement has lost its ability to evaluate its mistakes”
Researcher and journalist Yusuf Fakir al-Din drew attention to the internal problems within the Palestinian national movement. “The Palestinian national movement has lost its ability to evaluate and correct its own mistakes. Division has intensified accusations, accelerating national dissolution and weakening the resistance,” he assessed.
He emphasized that national dialogue is the most urgent priority to end the war and regain the initiative.

“Europe must no longer remain on the sidelines”
Professor Kalypso Nicolaidis from the European University Institute stated that the meeting, held before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, was of critical importance.
“Many countries, including France and the United Kingdom, are joining the 147 states that recognize Palestine. This step has the potential to change the balance in the Security Council,” Nicolaidis said.
She noted that Europe must no longer remain on the sidelines and should approach the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with a more decisive plan.
Nicolaidis also said that former High Representative European Union Joseph Borrell had sent his greetings to the conference.

“Israel’s goal is to expel Palestinians”
Khalil Shaheen, Director of the Palestinian Center for Policy Research and Strategic Studies (MASARAT), analyzed the objectives of the political transformation in Israel.
“The transformation that has been ongoing in Israel for three decades, with the rise of the religious Zionist right, aims for the forced expulsion of Palestinians. The attempt at forced migration and altering the demographic balance in Gaza is being pursued just as dangerously in the West Bank,” he explained.
Palestinian researcher and journalist Sameer Al Zapen expressed that the Palestinian issue has become incomprehensible due to the endless division between Hamas and Fatah.
“Today, the Palestinian issue has become incomprehensible; political discourse is now detached from real meaning. After the Al-Aqsa Flood, the Palestinian cause faces either liquidation or a transformation similar to the 1948 Nakba,” al-Zaben said.
“Türkiye’s mediation was rejected by Israel”
Professor Husam al-Dajani from Ummah University in Gaza discussed mediation efforts. “Türkiye’s mediation attempt was categorically rejected by Israel. The circle of mediation remained between Egypt, Qatar, and the US, with Washington not advancing the process without Israel’s approval,” he shared.
Al-Dajani said that previous mediations did not address the occupation, which is the root of the problem, and that any solution must begin with stopping the genocide.
“Words are not enough to describe Gaza”
Mohammed Shehadeh from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) stated that there are no words left to describe the situation in Gaza. “Words are not enough to describe Gaza; catastrophe, apocalypse, dystopia—none are sufficient to convey what is happening. UN reports first described Gaza as a ‘graveyard for children,’ then a ‘disaster zone,’ and finally said, ‘there are no words left,'” he expressed.
Shehadeh said that Israel is emptying words like “genocide” of their meaning and highlighted the importance of international activism.
“A European official told me, ‘If you want to mobilize us, protest day and night in front of our ministry, take us to court.’ If activism slows down, they will gain time to make people forget the genocide,” he added.

“The issue is not Palestine, but an Israel problem”
Professor Dr. Mehmet Ozkan from the Turkish National Defence University, argued that the problem needs to be correctly identified. “We should no longer be talking about a Palestinian issue in our region, but directly about an Israel problem; its aggressive and expansionist policies have become clear,” he said.
Ozkan recalled that Türkiye has been one of the countries showing the strongest reaction against Israel from the very beginning.
Dr. Khalil A. al-Khalil from Saudi Arabia said that the Palestinian cause has a universal character and that Israel is becoming increasingly isolated in the international arena.
Hamid Azimi from the Iran Mersad Strategic Research Center noted that the recognition of a Palestinian state is a tool, while the existence of the people and their land is what truly matters.
“Public reaction in Europe has not been reflected in policy”
Dr. H.A. Hellyer from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) stated that the United Kingdom and many European countries are preparing to recognize a Palestinian state, but this should not be seen as a reward or punishment.
“Public opinion in Europe is clearly opposed to what Israel is doing in Gaza, but this reaction has not yet been fully reflected in state policies and practices,” Hellyer noted.
Stephan Ossenkopp from the Schiller Institute expressed that the world’s transition to a multipolar order offers an opportunity for a just solution for Palestine, but Germany has not changed its policy of full support for Israel.
“Germany is violating its ‘Never again’ pledge”
Former member of the German Bundestag, Zaklin Nastic, said that Germany is openly violating its “Never again!” pledge by complicity in the genocide in Gaza through arms shipments and political support.
“When they say ‘Never again!’, we ask: For whom? The responsibility for universal human rights and the protection of the oppressed is being abused in Germany today,” she stated.
Russian academic and diplomat Aleksandr Sotnichenko noted that liberal utopias have collapsed and that the siege of Gaza can be compared to the 1941-44 siege of Leningrad.
Professor Dr. Hasan Unal from Baskent University predicted that the world is moving towards a multipolar order no longer dominated by the West, and this will weaken Western support for Israel over time.
“Israel’s policy of declaring everyone an enemy is not sustainable,” he added.

Diplomacy
CSTO strips Armenia of voting rights over two-year budget debt
Members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) have stripped Armenia of its voting rights and its ability to appoint representatives to official positions due to a two-year debt to the organization’s budget.
Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, “This decision was taken based on the organization’s charter due to Armenia’s failure to fulfil its obligations for several years.”
Prior to the CSTO leaders’ summit in Moscow, Peskov had stated that member states would “react” to the Caucasus country’s non-participation in the organization’s activities.
Ahead of the Moscow summit, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said his country’s “interest has run out” regarding the CSTO. Through his press spokesperson, he announced that he would travel to Türkiye on 11 November to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) instead of going to Russia.
The CSTO leaders’ meeting was held with the participation of Russian President Vladimir Putin alongside the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.
The leaders jointly took the decision to revoke Armenia’s voting rights.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the participants also signed a joint declaration.
The declaration stated: “We confirm our unconditional commitment to the goals set out in the CSTO treaty and charter towards creating favourable and stable conditions for the comprehensive development of member states.”
Pashinyan had frozen Yerevan’s de facto participation in the CSTO in February 2024, citing the organization’s failure to aid the Armenian side during the armed clashes in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023.
Having referred to the CSTO as a “soap-bubble alliance” since that time, Pashinyan accused the organization’s members of “planning war” together with Baku. He stated that Armenia would not return to active work within the alliance at least “over the next five years”, adding that he would welcome it if the country were expelled from membership.
Relations between Armenia and Russia grew tense once again in the spring of 2026, after Yerevan moved closer to the European Union (EU) and the Kremlin responded with a trade war.
In May, Pashinyan refused to travel to Moscow to attend the Victory Day parade and declared that he did not support Russia on the Ukraine issue.
In response, Putin called on Yerevan to determine its foreign policy course through a referendum, advising Armenian authorities not to forget the fate of Ukraine.
Diplomacy
US urges Russia to draft proposals for new European security pact
The US administration has reportedly called on Russia to submit proposals for a prospective security treaty with Europe that would include measures to ease tensions between European nations and Moscow.
According to a report by news site Axios citing sources familiar with the matter, the US side conveyed the request during trilateral negotiations held in Abu Dhabi.
During the talks, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that the Russian delegation prepare a fresh proposal outlining its security concerns and demands.
The US delegation reportedly asked that this proposal clarify what kind of “symmetrical steps” Moscow is prepared to take to de-escalate tensions and “provide non-aggression guarantees to Europe”.
Another source familiar with the White House’s approach said the Trump administration aims to run the processes for a new European security architecture and a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine simultaneously.
Under this plan, the actual implementation of the security understandings would take effect only after the signing of an accord ending the conflict in Ukraine.
Assessing the approach to the process, the source said: “[Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy will not agree to any compromise without knowing what will happen next regarding security guarantees. Putin also wants to see the exact same picture clearly. This is precisely why the security portfolio is so decisive.”
The same official noted that the US will not reach a security agreement with Russia without the support of Europe and Ukraine, adding that Washington will not grant Moscow veto power over European security decisions.
Vladimir Medinsky, aide to the Russian president and head of the delegation in the Ukraine negotiations, previously stated that the fundamental objective was building a comprehensive new security system in Europe.
Medinsky noted that the structure in question must take on the character of “a fair, new, modern Yalta and Potsdam that carries the spirit of Helsinki 1975 and responds to contemporary realities”.
The Russian official argued that if such a system were established, peace lasting for decades, or even centuries, could be secured in Europe.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also announced that Moscow possesses its own position paper on how a new security architecture in Eurasia should take shape.
Lavrov stated that Russia hopes the Washington administration will “maintain its determination to pursue dialogue aimed at achieving an honest balance of interests where nobody’s security is impaired”.
Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the country has no intention of attacking Europe.
Pointing out that they have no reason to fight NATO countries, Russian President Vladimir Putin previously said: “We have no interest whatsoever, neither geopolitical nor economic, political nor military.”
In a statement in October, Putin said Russia has no plans to attack anyone “in 2029, in 2030, or in the year 2050”.
On the other hand, Putin claimed that “all NATO countries are fighting Russia” and stated that the Russian military is currently the most combat-ready armed force in the world.
Following the contacts in Abu Dhabi, Kushner announced that he and Witkoff would travel to Moscow.
Explaining that they plan to meet Putin during the visit to discuss European participation in negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict, Kushner argued that the parties could make “far greater progress” if the Russian leader consents to such involvement.
Yury Ushakov, aide to the Russian president, stated that the US special envoys will arrive in Moscow on 12 November, with the planned meeting with the Russian president scheduled for the first half of the day.
Diplomacy
Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks
US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.
According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.
This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.
US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.
Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”
According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.
White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.
Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.
Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.
In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.
Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.
Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.
Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.
Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.
On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.
Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.
On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”
The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”
Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.
On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.
According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”
Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSecular dress code dispute exposes deeper Türkiye-Azerbaijan strains
-
Europe7 days agoEU urges citizens to prepare 72-hour survival kits for crises
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina expands Africa arms sales, displacing France and Western rivals
-
America2 weeks agoBolsonaro reportedly leaves Brazil on jet linked to scandal-hit firm
-
Diplomacy1 week agoProtesters storm Kyiv site holding soldiers over torture allegations
-
Russia2 weeks agoPutin proposes Arctic energy cooperation to US to ease gas sanctions
-
Europe1 week agoPro-Ukraine Republicans in US Congress dwindle after departures
-
Europe1 week agoLow EU gas stocks risk stoking global prices, IEA report warns
