Middle East
Qatar, a small country but a big player

Qatar is a small country on the Persian Gulf – it has neither a large population nor a vast land. Despite the fact that a large population and the size of the land are traditionally considered the main criteria for measuring the power of governments, but Qatar is totally different. Qatar’s population is estimated at over 2.8 million people, and the land has a total area of 11,610 km. But it is worth mentioning that there are other small countries with less population that were able to emerge as regional and sometimes international powers. Among them are the United Arab Emirates, Israel, and Singapore which are small and sparsely populated countries but have a lot of political and economic power. Qatar is also on the same page and has been able to maintain power while having no large population and vast territory. Qatar has been considered small compared to many countries in the Middle East.
However, these small countries, including Qatar, play roles in the region and the world that large and vast governments are incapable of doing so. The roles that Qatar is taking on today and playing well should have been played by Saudi Arabia, Iran and other countries, which are considered as the great powers in the Middle East. Qatar had just hosted the World Cup and it also hosts hostile groups and countries to mediate between them to end their hostilities. Doha also hosts meetings that are launched to address major human crises. The latest example is the organization of a meeting led by the Secretary General of the United Nations regarding the Afghanistan crisis.
The question that is raised about Qatar is, what factors have caused this small country to become a big player in the region and the world? Here we try to explore some factors that caused Qatar to become a powerful country.
Qatar believes and uses soft power
One of the factors that have brought Qatar to the stage of being the most trusted partner to the world, can be found in this country’ successful use of soft power.
The big countries always want to use a carrot and stick approach to resolve an issue, and if a big country wants to force a small country to change its behavior, it either threatens it with military force or considers economic restrictions.
But soft power is the opposite of “hard” power. Soft power emphasizes more on culture, value, norm and procedure, which is what Qatar is doing today.
Soft power does not deal with coercion; That is, it can be said that it is a kind of non-coercive force that relies on persuasion and satisfaction. At the same time, the expansion of the phenomenon of globalization and the information and media revolution has made soft power more visible. The use of soft power has given small countries the opportunity not to accept every legal/illegal demands of the bigger countries.
For that cause, Qatar has resorted to the use of soft power in order to keep herself away from the danger of the influence of rival neighbors.
The power of media
Indeed, the media outlets are considered as the most important, simple and effective means of spreading soft power. Qatar has used this tool well so far. Qatar uses Al-Jazeera, a big, famous and spectacular media to benefit its country.
Al Jazeera has been able to spread Qatar’s soft influence not only in the region, but also in the world. Today, this media has become one of the biggest international media and has many branches all over the world.
Two factors have contributed to the growth of this media – one is that it had a critical view of the situation in the Arab world. Before, there was no reliable media in the Arab countries and if it existed, it would serve the rulers, not the people.
But Al Jazeera broke the tradition of the ruling media and criticized the rulers and political systems ruling the Arab countries.
Second, Al Jazeera did well in critical coverage of the war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine and also the Arab Spring in 2011. It also had a critical view of the US military attack on Afghanistan and Iraq, which was able to direct public opinion in the Islamic world towards supporting this media.
Similarly, it has repeatedly reflected the killing of Palestinians by the Israeli army with a critical view and emphasis on the Arab-Islamic identity.
The establishment of Al Jazeera and its unflinching support has helped Qatar to expand its soft power while no other Arab countries owned any media outlet instead hell-bent on its suppression.
Sports, another key soft power
Sports and the latest launch of the football world cup are another means of expanding soft power that Qatar has the capacity to use. Important to mention that Qatar pays special attention to sports, especially football, as a major global game, and welcomes the launch of sports competitions in different forms.
Football cannot be called only a sport in today’s world. It is true that football is a kind of sport, but it is a sport whose value cannot be denied in the political relations of the world.
It is difficult to separate between sports and politics, especially football. This difficulty is either due to the influence of politics on sports or sports on politics.
It can be said that football has gone beyond the field of sports and has surrounded the field of politics as well. Countries try to use sports for the benefit of politics. Any country that shines in the field of sports also affects its brilliance in the field of politics. For example, consider holding the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.
Qatar proved to be a good host for launching such big tournaments. It was the first time that the World Cup was held in an Arab country and Qatar’s brilliant hosting shocked the countries of the region.
The public opinion across the world was more on Qatar as a host country rather than the winner and loser of this big tournament.
Less population
Interestingly, Qatar’s small population has been more of an advantage than a disadvantage. It is true that a large population can demonstrate the “hard” power of a government, but if the proportion between large population and economic growth is not established, it becomes an “Achilles’ heel” that can lead to the downfall. But in regards to China, it is a different story with its number one population in the world. Top secret of China’s success lies in its ability to balance a large population with economic growth.
The advantage of Qatar is that it has a small population, low diversity, but high accumulation of wealth. High population is not compatible with low accumulation of wealth and if the population grows it does not fit the society and will lead to the government’s failure to provide adequate services to the people and provide economic welfare. It was difficult for Qatar to deal with a population existing in Iraq and Lebanon.
Worth mentioning that less population and low diversity have caused Qatar to effectively use its natural resources, including oil and gas.
It has been said that Qatar ranks third in gas exports after Russia and Iran and thirteenth in oil exports in the world.
Meanwhile, there is general satisfaction with the ruling political system in Qatar. This satisfaction is owed to the government’s success in providing economic welfare for the citizens.
Another important point about Qatar is that it has no internal rifts and that’s why it focuses more on world issues. As can be seen, Qatar is less concerned with domestic issues and spends most of its energy on foreign affairs.
Qatar opens office for Taliban
In 2013, Qatar established an office for the Taliban, the current ruler of Afghanistan. Taliban returned to power in15 August 2021 after the hasty withdrawal of foreign troops.
Taliban still maintains its office in Doha, and is busy carrying out political activities, including meetings with top foreign diplomats. The Taliban and the US also signed the Doha agreement under which a republic system in Afghanistan which was supported by the US and western countries in the past 20 years has collapsed and its army has been disintegrated.
Qatar, for many years, hosted talks between Taliban members and US delegation to negotiate over safe withdrawal with foreign troops from Afghanistan.
Qatar had also hosted delegations of the Taliban and the previous government of Afghanistan as part of peace talks.
Success in holding political talks as well as sports events and interaction with the countries of the region has been able to increase Qatar’s role-playing power.
Despite the fact that this country is at odds with some of its neighbors and countries in the region, it has never stopped interaction with them and didn’t let these difference become larger.
Middle East
US proposes UAE model for Iran nuclear program

The UAE model prohibits the domestic production of enriched uranium needed for nuclear facilities while permitting its import.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the US could allow Iran to operate civilian nuclear reactors but opposed its enrichment of its own uranium, ahead of the third round of indirect negotiations between Washington and Tehran this weekend.
Appearing on a podcast program published in The Free Press, Rubio said that Iran, like the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and some other countries, could import low-enriched uranium for civilian purposes.
Rubio stated, “If Iran wants a civilian nuclear program, they can do it like many other countries; that is, they import enriched uranium. If they really want this, there is a path to a peaceful, civilian nuclear program. But if they insist on enriching uranium, they would be the only country without a nuclear weapons program that enriches uranium, which creates a problem.”
According to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), this proposal represents a significant step back from the demand for “complete termination of the nuclear program” voiced last month by National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. According to Rubio’s statements, Iran would be able to continue operating its nuclear reactors, but the path to nuclear weapons production would be blocked by the prohibition on uranium enrichment.
This proposal could also put the US at odds with Israel, which insists on the “Libya model” that envisions the complete termination of Iran’s nuclear program.
Although the US proposal grants Iran the right to a “civilian nuclear program,” it also foresees Iran becoming dependent on external sources for nuclear fuel. This could mean a political and strategic step back for Tehran.
Ali Shamkhani, a senior advisor to Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, rejected this proposal during talks in Rome, explicitly stating that they did not accept the “UAE model.” The UAE imports uranium instead of enriching it domestically to provide assurance that its nuclear program will remain civilian.
According to Seyyed Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian official and nuclear policy expert at Princeton University, Tehran was ready to accept importing enriched uranium in the 1980s and early 1990s if the US allowed European countries to provide the fuel, but Washington rejected this offer.
Richard Nephew, who served as a negotiator in the Obama and Biden administrations, said that similar ideas were discussed during the process leading to the 2015 agreement, but Iran always maintained its desire to produce its own fuel and did not trust imports. Nephew told the WSJ, “Joint ventures and international nuclear fuel supply issues have been discussed for decades. But the issue always comes back to the same point: Iran does not trust that the fuel will be provided to them on time.”
According to Gary Samore, head of the Middle East Studies Center at Brandeis University, it is highly unlikely that Iran will completely abandon its uranium enrichment program. In this case, he argued, the Trump administration would either have to accept limited enrichment under strict inspection mechanisms or consider the military option.
Under the 2015 nuclear agreement, Iran had agreed to limit its uranium enrichment rate to 3.67% until 2031. However, after the US withdrew from this agreement in 2018, encouraged by Israel, it is stated that Iran is currently enriching uranium up to 60%. Uranium used in weapons needs to be enriched to at least 90%.
Iran is currently reported to possess enough highly enriched uranium to produce at least six nuclear bombs.
Middle East
Russia: NATO’s return to Afghanistan poses risk of new instability

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has warned against renewed attempts to return NATO military infrastructure to Afghanistan, saying such actions could become a dangerous source of future conflict.
According to Russian media, Lavrov in a press conference in Samarkand, Uzbekistan said that Western countries have launched a new format of consultations in Doha through the United Nations.
“The attempt to return the military infrastructure of NATO countries to Afghanistan under various pretexts is unacceptable, and such efforts are underway,” he added.
“We are witnessing the West actively trying to re-enter the Afghanistan game, a game it left after the Taliban returned. We have no problem with this, but the West presence should be fair and without hidden agendas,” Lavrov added.
He said that these efforts will create a new “time bomb,” and perhaps not even a “slow bomb”, he added.
He has said that Moscow is closely monitoring Western efforts to “influence Central Asia and other strategic regions.”
Lavrov furthered, “We are resolutely opposed to the politicization of cooperation and the imposition of ideological programs, especially the attempts of some Western countries to dominate this and other geopolitical spaces.”
This comes when the Taliban Foreign Ministry also said that Russia has agreed to accept Taliban’s diplomat at the ambassadorial level.
Middle East
Seven-year Gaza ceasefire proposal emerges

A new ceasefire proposal for Gaza, presented by Egypt and Qatar, envisions Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza and the official end of the war. Hamas has indicated its readiness to hand over control.
According to a BBC report, citing a senior Palestinian official, Egypt and Qatar, who are mediating between Israel and Hamas for a ceasefire and prisoner exchange, have put forward a new proposal that includes a long-term ceasefire and Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza.
The report states that the proposal encompasses a ceasefire lasting five to seven years, the official termination of the war, the complete withdrawal of the Israeli army from Gaza, and “the exchange of all Israeli hostages for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails.”
According to the Palestinian official, Hamas has expressed willingness to transfer the administration of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority or a newly established Palestinian entity. The official described Hamas as showing “unprecedented flexibility.”
The British broadcaster reported that Israel has not yet commented on this plan and that a high-level Hamas delegation will travel to Cairo for consultations. The report indicates that the delegation will include the head of the Hamas Leadership Council, Mohammed Darwish, and the organization’s chief negotiator, Khalil al-Hayya.
The Qatar-based Al-Araby Al-Jadeed also reported that an Israeli delegation traveled to Cairo on Sunday evening to discuss the new proposal presented by the mediators.
Last week, Hamas rejected an Israeli ceasefire offer that had been conveyed to them but stated that they were open to discussing proposals that included an end to the war.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared over the weekend that he would not end the war until Hamas is destroyed and all hostages are returned.
-
Middle East1 week ago
Syria may recognize Israel by 2026, claims former UK diplomat
-
America2 weeks ago
US and Panama sign agreement for free passage of warships
-
Europe2 weeks ago
Germany’s coalition agreement: Potential ministers in Merz’s cabinet
-
Interview2 weeks ago
The international system through China’s eyes: An in-depth interview with academics in Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Beijing
-
Interview1 week ago
EU late in Central Asia initiative, says expert
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
HTS-led Syria forms ties with South Korea
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Japanese yen hits 7-month high amid trade war fears
-
America2 weeks ago
Pentagon cancels $4 billion in it contracts amid spending review