Connect with us

Asia

Why did India and Russia increase their engagements with the Taliban?

Published

on

India and Russia have become more active in engaging with the Taliban these days. Recently, Indian External Affairs S Jaishankar had a telephonic conversation with Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi.

This dialogue is important for two reasons: 1- This is the first time that India has held talks with the Taliban at the level of foreign minister; 2- It is taking place in the midst of New Delhi’s tensions with Islamabad. According to some reports, Ibrahim Sadr, the Taliban’s deputy interior minister and a figure loyal to the group’s leader, also traveled to New Delhi during the recent war between Pakistan and India.

Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s deputy prime minister for economics, also led a delegation to the “Russia-Islamic World Summit” held for several days in the city of Kazan, Russia. In addition, it is said that Muttaqi is scheduled to travel to China next week and he already went to Iran today.

As for India, its foreign minister’s phone call with Muttaqi shows that New Delhi understands the importance of engaging with the Taliban. It would understand better if it were at war with Pakistan. If this call had been made in a normal situation, it might not have been of much importance. It can also be said that the Taliban acted in a way that satisfied both sides in the face of the Pakistan-India war, and Jaishankar called Muttaqi for this reason and praised the group’s apparently impartial stance, which led to the condemnation of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir.

So that Pakistan would not be left out, the Taliban agreed to host a meeting in Kabul, where special representatives from Islamabad and Beijing for Afghanistan were present and met and discussed with the Taliban’s officials. Russia has also become more active than before, with Mullah Baradar’s visit to Kazan and his warm meetings with Russian officials and autonomous republics being a clear example that cannot be taken lightly. Furthermore, Zamir Kabulov, Russia’s special representative for Afghanistan, announced that the Taliban have nominated an ambassador to Moscow, the approval process of which is being reviewed by the host country’s foreign ministry.

These two recent events are the result of the suspension of the Taliban from Russia’s list of “prohibited groups.” Kabulov has also repeatedly said that the suspension of the Taliban from the blacklist leaves Moscow free to interact with the group in all areas. In this sense, Russia has crossed the line of interaction with the Taliban and has reached the edge of “official recognition” of the group; but it does not dare to carry the heavy burden of the regime’s official recognition of the group alone.

Why expand interaction?

It is true that India, in competition with Pakistan, is trying to compromise with the Taliban so that the group does not serve Islamabad’s interests and does not erase New Delhi’s footprint in Afghanistan. Similarly, Russia, in competition with the United States, is trying to win the hearts of the Taliban so that the group does not pave the way for Washington’s renewed presence in Afghanistan.

This is true in its place, but the more effective factor is the forces opposing the Taliban, which are considered too weak in the view of Moscow and New Delhi. If these forces are strong and working with them is not a waste of time, India and Russia, in opposition to Pakistan and the United States, will give ground to the currents opposing this group instead of giving value to the Taliban, and in this way, perhaps a door will open to remove the political blockage in the country.

India and Russia’s engagement with the Taliban is very important because in the past they strongly supported movements that fought against the group. While the engagement of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, etc. with the Taliban is neither new nor causes concern.

UNAMA plan unveiled amid increased engagement between regional governments and the Taliban

In the days when the competition among regional countries to engage with the Taliban has heated up, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has apparently come up with a plan to overcome the current situation in Afghanistan, in which it has also sought the opinions of countries near and far.

The important point is that so far there has been no united and unified opposition from the anti-Taliban forces against this plan, and these forces have not even secretly tried to neutralize it. As usual, UNAMA is pursuing its mission, ignoring the concerns of the opposition to the Taliban, and is trying to implement the plan it has in hand.

Now, given the prevailing desire of countries to engage with the Taliban, it is not unlikely that what UNAMA has put on the table as a plan will be approved, and thus the opposing fronts of this group will be confronted with the action taken and, because of the past and present, will be unable to do anything to defend themselves.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey