Connect with us

Asia

Stockholm Syndrome: Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party

Published

on

The 79th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was commemorated at a time of heightened fears of nuclear war. Around 150,000 people were killed on 6 August 1945 when the United States mercilessly dropped the bomb with a nuclear warhead called “Little Boy”.

On that painful day, which is remembered as a day of catastrophe for Japan and the whole world, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida refrained from naming the perpetrator. In his speech, Kishida said that nuclear threats from Russia had created an ‘increasingly serious’ environment for nuclear disarmament.

In another statement, Kishida, of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), expressed his commitment to nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, while relying on the US extended deterrence, known as the nuclear umbrella, to allay concerns and deter the growing nuclear capabilities of China, North Korea and Russia.

So why is the ‘murderer’ protected?

The LDP is a party that emerged after the American post-war occupation of Japan. After the left-wing parties merged into a single Socialist Party of Japan in 1955, Japanese conservatives, backed by the US CIA, decided to merge the two main conservative parties, the Liberal Party and the Democratic Party of Japan. The new LDP gained the upper hand and oversaw Japan’s economic miracle. It also benefited from an electoral system that favoured rural areas, where the party’s influence was strong. Factions within the party’s big tent competed as regime change came from within. This LDP dominance, known as the “1955 system”, ended in 1993 when a group of powerful LDP figures left the party and formed an alternative coalition government with opposition parties. This unruly coalition dissolved the following year, but not before electoral reform had paved the way for the emergence of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), whose victory over the LDP in 2009 was seen as a harbinger of a period of genuine intra-party competition.

The main figure in the aforementioned “1955 system” was Kishi Nobusuke, who was listed as a Class A war criminal after World War II, but whom the US government did not indict or even prosecute, but chose as the best man to lead Japan in a pro-American direction. The Kishi family would now become a name that would shape Japanese politics with the support of the US. Shinzo Abe, who would shape Japanese politics for years to come, followed in his own grandfather Kishi’s footsteps and maintained strong ties with the US. However, in a Japan that could not break free of its traditionalist structure, Abe was the leader of the Japanese people who, as stated in Article 9 of the Constitution, ‘The Japanese people, sincerely desiring international peace based on justice and order, permanently renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force to settle international disputes. Accordingly, no army, navy, air force or other armed force shall be maintained. No right of war is recognised for the State”, and he died as a result of an assassination attempt.

1 July 1957 Nobusuke Kishi with his two grandsons Hironobu Abe (in Indian dress) and Shinzo Abe (on his lap)

The US-led policy in Japan sought to change the pacifist defence strategy and legitimise an aggressive policy with constitutional support. After all these attempts were blocked, the eyes were interpreted as a sign that the Japanese “deep state” structure was acting against the US leadership.

Shinzo Abe was one of the strongest proponents of the Indo-Pacific concept. As early as 2007, in a speech to the Indian parliament, he had stressed the importance of the ‘Indo-Pacific’, speaking of the region’s future geopolitical rise and pushing for closer quadrilateral cooperation with the US, Australia and India. In August 2016, in his keynote speech at TICAD VI in Kenya, Prime Minister Abe announced to the world for the first time the concept of a ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’. This plan has been interpreted in the region as a geostrategic planning programme entirely in the interests of US ideals. The development that will make this interpretation realistic was confirmed by the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy” to be announced by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2021. In this statement, the US pointed to the common problem in the region by stating that “a free and open Indo-Pacific means stronger ties within and beyond the region, allowing us to work together as a regional community to solve our common challenges.

Undoubtedly, the People’s Republic of China is the countervailing power to this alliance, which the US calls a ‘common problem’ and of which Japan is the flag bearer. China, which is growing stronger not only in the region but also globally, is seen as a power that will shake US hegemony. At this point, the US is trying to implement the ‘containment of China’ strategy by pursuing joint policies with the governments in the region under its leadership.

Today, Fumio Kishida’s hiding the name of the murderer is actually a strategy to maintain a tradition and policy of his party. The deep function of the US on the states of the region shows us an effect more frightening than the nuclear bomb.

Asia

China’s DeepSeek prepares for 2027 mainland IPO, aims for $71 billion valuation in new funding round

Published

on

DeepSeek, the China-based startup developing artificial intelligence models, has begun preparations for an initial public offering (IPO).

According to a Bloomberg report citing sources familiar with the matter, the company plans to file its IPO application either this year or early next year.

The sources noted that the filing timeline will depend on the readiness of the company’s financial reports, with DeepSeek projected to go public on a mainland Chinese stock exchange in 2027.

Prior to the IPO, DeepSeek also aims to conduct a new funding round. In this second investment round, the company reportedly plans to raise at least 10 billion yuan (approximately $1.48 billion), a process expected to push its market valuation to at least 480 billion yuan (approximately $71 billion).

The AI startup, which secured $7.4 billion in its first funding round, saw its market valuation exceed $50 billion, rendering DeepSeek the most valuable artificial intelligence company in China.

The company’s founder, Liang Wenfeng, personally invested $3 billion of his own capital into the DeepSeek project. According to data from the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Liang’s stake in the company fell from 90% to 78% following the latest investment round.

Despite this decline, Liang’s personal wealth more than doubled, rising from $16.7 billion to approximately $36 billion.

This surge has positioned Liang as the wealthiest founder of an AI model-developing company in the world.

According to earlier reports by Reuters, the investment round was structured under an unusual partnership model that allows founder Liang Wenfeng to maintain administrative control over the company.

Under this framework, which requires investors to provide funds to a limited liability partnership managed by the company’s general manager rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, backers are not granted voting rights. Furthermore, the provided funds are locked and cannot be withdrawn for a period of five years.

The China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund was the sole institution exempted from these strict rules, investing approximately $150 million directly into DeepSeek.

Based in Hangzhou, China, DeepSeek was founded by Liang Wenfeng in 2023.

The company was structured as a unit within Zhejiang High-Flyer Asset Management, a hedge fund specializing in artificial intelligence that Liang launched alongside two former university classmates.

In early 2025, DeepSeek released a new artificial intelligence model offering performance comparable to US rivals such as OpenAI, but at a significantly lower operating cost.

Following these developments, founder Liang Wenfeng stated that the company will continue to develop open-source artificial intelligence models, emphasizing that their ultimate global objective is to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Continue Reading

Asia

Ending Western reliance on China requires $23.6 trillion in investment by 2050, study shows

Published

on

Western efforts to reduce reliance on China across strategic supply chains could cost the US, the eurozone, and the UK more than $23 trillion over the next quarter-century, according to a study highlighting the immense economic challenge confronting Western policymakers.

Economic analysis indicates that European and US authorities and corporations will need to invest an additional $23.6 trillion over the next 25 years to successfully end their dependence on China in critical sectors such as manufacturing and technology.

The consultancy EY-Parthenon calculated that rebuilding infrastructure, research, software, manufacturing, and supply chains currently reliant on China will cost the US $13.7 trillion, the eurozone $9.1 trillion, and the UK $800 billion by 2050.

For the US, the required annual capital expenditure from the government and private sector to decouple from China is estimated at $550 billion. This sum is roughly equivalent to the $600 billion major US technology companies are projected to invest in data centers in 2025. For the EU, EY-Parthenon estimated that the necessary spending would require nearly doubling the bloc’s annual budget.

The scale of investment required to substitute Chinese resources and materials, on which advanced economies are currently dependent, underscores the formidable challenge Western governments face as they attempt to curb Beijing’s dominance in strategic supply chains.

“Localizing supply chains without creating unbearable costs for taxpayers and consumers will be one of the most difficult challenges confronting both companies and governments in the coming years,” said Mats Persson, a former UK Prime Minister’s adviser who is now a partner at EY-Parthenon.

EY-Parthenon analysts wrote that an average collective additional investment of $940 billion annually over 25 years was, in theory, “not insurmountable.” However, this expenditure would need to be made on top of existing investments in energy, technology, defense, and infrastructure. Persson noted that initial annual outlays would start lower but would escalate as the transition expanded.

The vulnerability of European and US economies to Chinese leverage was exposed last year when Beijing introduced export controls on critical rare earth metals in response to US President Donald Trump’s threat to impose a 145% tariff on Chinese imports.

Automotive production lines in both economies ground to a near-standstill before a truce was reached between Beijing and Washington. The disruption accelerated efforts by the US and Europe to de-risk their relations with China, which included an EU plan to stockpile rare earth elements.

According to assessments by the International Energy Agency, China is projected to supply more than 60% of the world’s refined lithium and cobalt—materials vital to the transition to cleaner energy sources—and approximately 80% of battery-grade graphite and rare earth elements until 2035.

Alicia García-Herrero, chief Asia-Pacific economist at the investment bank Natixis, said that Beijing’s tight grip on many critical industrial materials meant the West could not decouple from China in the short term, even with massive investment.

“It is not just a question of how much it will cost,” García-Herrero said. “It is also China’s capacity to intervene to block such decoupling, given its current control over supply in everything from rare earth processing to active pharmaceutical ingredients.”

According to the EY-Parthenon analysis, Chinese-made goods generally benefit from a factory-gate price advantage of between 20% and 100% compared to Western competitors. Consequently, reducing dependence on Chinese manufacturing is expected to drive up prices and increase inflation.

The EY-Parthenon report noted that Europe cutting its reliance on China could raise prices in critical sectors by 1% to 2.5%. Citing an analysis by the European Central Bank, the report warned this could cause inflation rates to remain permanently above the 2% targets set by the European Central Bank and the Bank of England.

According to the report, Western economies seeking a meaningful reduction in China dependence will need to invest heavily in factory and physical infrastructure, as well as workforce training and the automation of production processes.

Given the scale of the challenges, Persson said that “partial decoupling” was a more probable outcome. Under this scenario, companies would need to be selective about where they allocate resources to build resilience against potential bottlenecks controlled by China.

Continue Reading

Asia

China and Russia deploy submarines together in “Joint Sea-2026” drills

Published

on

The joint deployment and first-ever combined visual capturing of Chinese and Russian submarines during a bilateral military exercise marks a major breakthrough in underwater coordination and signals an unprecedented level of mutual strategic trust between the two powers, according to military analysts.

The maritime phase of the joint naval exercise “Joint Sea-2026,” conducted by China and Russia, concluded on Saturday. According to China Bugle, the official media organ of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) News and Media Center, submarines from both the Chinese and Russian navies were photographed together in the same frame for the first time during the drills.

Speaking to the Global Times, a military affairs expert said the development demonstrates a high level of mutual trust that goes far beyond ordinary bilateral relations.

During the exercises, Chinese and Russian naval units conducted drills covering submarine rescue, strikes on surface targets, air defense, and anti-missile operations. China Bugle reported that both sides deepened mutual trust and further enhanced their joint operational capabilities through highly effective coordination.

The drills employed a flexible planning approach and applied rigorous standards to operational coordination. The joint maneuvers were conducted without predetermined, fixed scenarios; instead, operations were dynamically adapted to real-time battlefield conditions, hydrometeorological factors, and other variable elements.

Participating forces were organized into mixed formations. By utilizing sea, air, and submarine platforms, the two militaries established a multi-domain, integrated combat system.

According to China Bugle, this integrated structure effectively tested both sides’ capabilities in joint reconnaissance and early warning, command coordination, and firepower strikes within complex electromagnetic environments.

During the air defense and anti-missile drills, Chinese and Russian vessels operated in close coordination with a clear division of tasks. Leveraging the distinct strengths of their respective weapon platforms, the forces successfully intercepted incoming targets in the shortest possible time, demonstrating the combined combat capability of the joint Chinese-Russian naval force.

Held regularly since 2012, the “Joint Sea” exercises have become a cornerstone platform for naval cooperation between China and Russia.

According to official statements, both sides deployed elite forces for this iteration of the drills, encompassing surface, underwater, aerial, and support assets. In particular, the participation of submarines and submarine rescue vessels indicates that bilateral naval cooperation continues to expand from surface operations to integrated surface and underwater combat.

Following reports that Chinese and Russian submarines had been captured in the same frame for the first time, Chinese military expert Wang Yunfei told the Global Times on Sunday that the event represents an extraordinary level of mutual trust.

Wang noted that joint submarine operations are exceptionally rare worldwide. By their very nature, submarines operate on the principle of stealth, and their acoustic signatures are guarded by every country as highly classified intelligence.

Pointing out that such vessels are rarely shown in close proximity to one another, Wang said the joint sighting of the two submarines indicates they were operating in close quarters.

Under these conditions, the expert noted, the acoustic signatures of the submarines—including not only their noise levels but also their frequency characteristics—could mutually expose secrets to one another.

Official footage of the exercise revealed that Russia’s improved Kilo-class conventional submarine, the Ufa, participated in the drills, while the Chinese side deployed an improved Type 039B conventional submarine.

According to Wang, when China previously operated Russian-built Kilo-class submarines alongside identical Russian vessels, the implications were different because the acoustic signatures of those platforms were already known to both parties.

However, Wang emphasized that on this occasion, China showcased its domestically developed Type 039B submarine—widely considered state-of-the-art globally—to Russia, reflecting a level of mutual trust that goes beyond standard military exchanges.

Wang also pointed out that the participation of submarines in joint exercises involves communication and data exchange, which serves as another key indicator of high-level mutual trust.

Communication between submarines is highly complex, Wang said, explaining that one method involves raising an antenna above the water’s surface at communication depth. The other method is underwater acoustic communication, where a connection is maintained using specialized equipment—a method that is technically far more challenging.

Regardless of the method used, Wang noted that both sides must share their technical communication characteristics, methods, and tactics with one another.

This level of sharing enables the parties to achieve a high degree of tactical coordination when facing common adversaries, the expert said.

It remains extremely rare for two submarines to participate in joint exercises, share communication data, and coordinate strikes against targets.

Wang said that the ability of China and Russia to achieve this reflects not only the high level of mutual trust between the two sides but also the strong self-confidence of the Chinese military in its own capabilities.

The expert added that this milestone serves as a positive starting point for increasing the depth and intensity of future joint maneuvers.

Following the conclusion of the drills, China Bugle reported that some of the participating forces will conduct joint naval patrols in relevant areas of the Pacific Ocean to continue contributing to regional and international peace and stability.

According to China’s official state news agency, Xinhua, China and Russia launched the “Joint Sea-2026” exercise on July 6 at a military port in Qingdao, located in eastern China’s Shandong province.

A joint command consisting of task forces from both countries’ navies was established to oversee the drills.

Xinhua reported that the exercise would be carried out in three distinct phases: the assembly of forces, port-based planning, and maritime operations.

With the maritime operations phase of the China-Russia “Joint Sea-2026” exercise now concluded, the Chinese Ministry of Defense issued a statement on Sunday.

The ministry stated that both parties will continue to adhere to the principles of openness, transparency, and mutual trust, while further expanding the scope and depth of their joint training.

The ministry added that both nations will make greater contributions to building a maritime community with a shared future and safeguarding global peace and stability.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey