ASIA
Syrian government collapse – future of foreign jihadists against and in favor of Assad
Published
on
Syria is one of the centers of gathering of people and extremist Islamic jihadist groups that have been fighting against each other for at least a decade with the support or opposition of the government under the leadership of Bashar Assad. These groups played a significant role in the emergence and suppression of ISIS and also in the Syrian civil wars and all its consequences.
The fall of the government of the Assad family, which had become a full-fledged dictator, and his treatment of some of his opponents was extremely disappointing and far from human values, has so far brought a smile to the faces of a large number of Syrian citizens and hope for change among some political circles. But can the opposition of Assad, led by the Syrian Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), bring the broken ship of this country to a safe shore where there is peace in the shadow of democratic values? This is a question that time will answer.
According to independent evaluations and the opinion of some security experts, proxy groups and foreign mercenaries played the same role as the army and internal opposition forces in supporting and opposing the Assad government. In this article we attempt to make briefly investigate the future of proxy and mercenary jihadist groups on both sides of the front and what role these groups will play in the future of Syria and to what extent they will affect the security of the Middle East and the international region.
Who are the foreign jihadist forces?
At outset, Assad’s supporters:
The government led by Bashar Assad, which was effectively overthrown on December 8, 2024, had various supporters, including governments (Russia and the Islamic Republic of Iran) and proxy mercenary groups. In this article, how governments support official channels will not be discussed, but proxy groups will be emphasized.
Militant groups composed of foreign citizens were mainly created, equipped and supported under the leadership of the Quds branch of the Revolutionary Guards of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The four important groups that seriously supported the Assad government in the civil war and the fight against ISIS include the Fatemiyoun Army, the Zainabiyoun Army, the Hosseinyoun Army, and Hezbollah.
Fatemiyoun army
“Lashkar Fatemiyoun”, based on the information published by the commanders and the group itself, consisted of Afghan immigrant citizens who were looking for jobs in different sectors such as construction, stone cutting, etc. before joining this group in Iran. The living conditions for Afghan immigrants in Iran were getting worse day by day due to various reasons, including economic pressures on the Iranian government and society and the unofficial anti-immigrant policy of the Iranian government and citizens.
Although some of the Iranian media close to the Iranian government stated that the presence of these people was spontaneous among the members of the Mohammad Corps (which was created to fight the Soviet Union forces in Afghanistan) and claimed that this group was formed to defend the shrine of Hazrat Zainab. There are reports that show that with the deterioration of the situation in the Middle East, especially the emergence of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, Iran, using economic compulsions and occasionally using religious motives, tried to recruit people from among the Afghan immigrants and formed the Fatemiyoun Army to fight.
Fatemiyoun, whose number is not precisely known, is still present in the Middle East and is known as an important proxy military capacity of Iran. However, as seen in the recent clashes and the attack by the HTS, no fronts have been reported from this group. Some videos of the presence of members of this group in Syria were published on social networks, but Fatemiyoun has not reported any kind of resistance or support to the Assad government. Reports indicate that Iran has transferred all members of this group to Iraq.
It is noteworthy that during the entire period of activity of this group, there was no official and confirmed report of their presence in Afghanistan, and the security forces of the previous government of Afghanistan did not record any anti-government and security activities by the members of this group inside Afghanistan.
Zainebiyoun Brigade or Zainbyoun’s army
Lashkar Zainbyoun is composed of Pakistani citizens, which was formed under the leadership of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to fight against ISIS and support the Assad government. The recruitment of the members of this group was different from the members of Fatemiyoun. Unlike Fatemiyoun, whose members were recruited from among Afghan immigrants living in Iran, members of Lashkar Zainbyoun were mainly recruited from Pakistani citizens, especially from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Karachi and Lahore regions.
The government of Pakistan declared this group as a banned terrorist group and arrested several of its important members in the last two years. The information published on social networks shows that the people applying for membership in Lashkar Zainbion should be between 15 and 35 years old and they are supposed to be paid 120,000 Pakistani rupees per month, which was equivalent to 1,200 US dollars in 2015.
This group also played a prominent role in the war against Daesh in Syria and Iraq alongside the government and proxy forces, but like Fatemiyoun, no resistance or support to the Assad government was reported in the recent conflicts in Syria. Due to the fact that the members of this group are known as a terrorist group, they will no longer be able to return to their country.
Hosseiniun army, Azerbaijani Armed Forces
Hosseiniyon group, consisting of citizens of the Republic of Azerbaijan, under the leadership of Tawheed Ebrahimi (Ibrahim Bailey), a Shia cleric trained in Mashhad seminary, was active in Syria along with other proxy groups of Iran.
This group also played a serious role in the war against ISIS along with other government and proxy forces in Syria and Iraq. Similar to other groups, it has always been used to secure the interests of Iran and the Syrian government.
Due to its relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the government of the Republic of Azerbaijan has monitored the activities of this group inside its country as an illegal armed group and has arrested a number of its members.
There are reports that show that no reaction or resistance was observed from this group in the recent conflicts in Syria, and the leader of this group is currently inside Iran, according to Iranian media reports.
Syrian Hezbollah
Although some analysts claim that the members of this group are Syrian citizens, the available information shows that a large part of the members of this group were Lebanese citizens. This group, like other proxy groups, played an important role in defending the Assad government during the civil war and the war with ISIS, but no reaction has been reported from it in the recent conflicts that led to the fall of the Assad government.
Now, the opponents of Assad’s regime
The opposition front of Assad is also made up of a large gathering of Sunni extremist Islamists. Along with groups such as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the current ruler of Syria, Jaysh al-Watani and others, a significant number of citizens of Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uighurs from China and Pakistan are actively present.
Although these groups did not independently have separate organizations and fronts from HTS, like Assad’s supporters and proxy groups of Iran, extensive information in the mass media shows that foreign citizens played a significant role in Tahrir al-Sham’s rise to power and the fall of the Assad government.
These groups mainly include the following outfits.
Citizens of Afghanistan
Simultaneously with the advance of the Tahrir al-Sham group in Syria, many videos and visual and textual information about the presence of Afghan citizens with the members of Tahrir al-Sham were published. These citizens, who mainly spoke Pashto, published messages of congratulations and happiness in front of their compatriots in front of the Assad government, which in many cases referred to that government as “apostate”. These videos and images were widely reproduced by Taliban members and supporters on social networks.
Citizens of Pakistan
Pakistani citizens, especially residents of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, were also widely present in support of Assad’s opponents. Many videos and pictures of the presence of these people were published on social networks.
In the Pashto language, they called the successive victories of their train mates “Jihad against the “apostate” and even said in a strong tone in one of the videos: “I will kill every Shiite I catch.” There is no exact information on the exact number of Pakistani citizens who were present with the HTS group, but the activity and moment-to-moment dissemination on social networks shows that the presence of these people was significant.
Katibat al Tawhid wal Jihad
This group is made up of citizens of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, who have been in northern Syria for a few years alongside Jabhat al-Nusra and Tahrir al-Sham, and even some of its members have been with ISIS. The members of this group, to show their presence and power, informed their progress moment by moment while wearing regular military uniforms.
This group was included in the list of terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council and the United States Department of State two years ago due to its subversive activities and connection with terrorist organizations such as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.
Imam Bukhari Jammat
Although most of the activities of members of Imam Bukhari’s Jammat have been reported in Afghanistan and this group is considered one of the allies of the Taliban, some reports have reported the presence of members of this group, who are mainly citizens of Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia, alongside Tahrir al-Sham.
The United States Department of State, in the explanation it published about this group, introduced it as one of the large groups of Uzbek citizens in Syria that work in close cooperation with Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda. This group has also been recognized as a terrorist organization by the United Nations Security Council and the United States Department of State.
East Turkestan Islamic Movement
According to reliable reports, including the report of the United Nations Security Council, the leadership base of this group is in Afghanistan, but some analysts also confirm the large presence of this group in Syria.
This group consists of Uyghurs who believe that they are fighting for the independence of China’s Xinjiang, which is also referred to as Eastern Turkestan. But the activities of this group show that this issue is just a slogan and in fact it has done the least activity inside or against the interests of China and the majority of its activities are in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria in association with other terrorist groups such as the Taliban, al-Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra and It has recently been reported alongside Tahrir al-Sham.
The members of this group were widely active alongside the Tahrir al-Sham group to overthrow the Assad government. This group is also on the list of terrorist organizations of the United Nations Security Council and the United States Department of State.
Jaish al-Jihad of Imam Abu Hanifah
This group is composed of citizens of Tajikistan, which works alongside extremist Islamist groups such as Tahrir al-Sham in Syria. Some analysts who have followed the activities of this group say that the members of this group advertise more on social networks to attract and attract people from among the citizens of Tajikistan, and they have become more active in the recent war between Tahrir al-Sham and the government of Bashar Assad.
There is not much information about the activities of this group in Afghanistan or Tajikistan, but so far the most famous jihadist group among the citizens of Tajikistan is the Ansarullah Movement, which operates as one of the supporters of the Taliban in Afghanistan.
What will be the fate of foreign jihadist groups?
With the fall of the Assad government and the presence of extremist Islamist groups led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the region and the world expect the new Syrian government to form a government based on the people’s vote and remove any threat against the region and the world.
However, a review of the activity records of groups aligned with Tahrir al-Sham and this group itself shows that democratic principles and government formation based on people’s votes are alien to the views of these groups.
Currently, power is in the hands of a coalition of extremist Islamist groups that are listed as terrorist organizations by the United Nations and many countries around the world, mainly because of their subversive activities.
It is clear that Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, contrary to its claim, alone and relying only on its human and financial resources was not able to achieve this amazing success and is not able to maintain it even now.
This group owes the cooperation and assistance of its allied groups, which mainly consist of foreign citizens and members of radical Islamic groups, just as the Afghan Taliban owes the cooperation of regional and international terrorist groups such as TTP, al-Qaeda, Ansarullah, Jaish al-Adl, Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and … etc…
Considering the dependency and need of the HTS for the support of these groups to achieve victory, this group needs these groups for its survival and will not be able to exclude them from its side.
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is well aware of the ability and cruelty of the hearts of each member of these groups and understands that surrendering to any kind of democratic value that is considered blasphemous by Islamists will lose its basic foundations and must then face the allies.
On the other hand, this group knows very well that the establishment of a Taliban-Afghanistan regime in Syria is not acceptable not only for the citizens of this country who have lived in the shadow of freedom with the taste of dictatorship for years, but also its neighboring countries such as Jordan, Lebanon and Israel cannot have such a regime alongside itself.
The HTS’s leader Al-Jolani, like all radical jihadist leaders, is now at an important crossroads, and choosing any of these paths will create new supporters and opponents for him.
On the other hand, Al-Jolani knows very well that his foreign allies have no foothold in their countries except Afghanistan. Citizens of Central Asian countries, who played an important role in his victory, are not even able to enter their country. The citizens of Afghanistan and Pakistan will be the only ones who, if they receive a rejection, can go back home or unite with ISIS and al-Qaeda in the Middle East, depending on the atmosphere in their country.
On the other side of the story, there are Iranian proxy groups that are approaching their expiration date with the fall of the Assad government. These groups were attracted under the pretext of defending the shrine, but now the shrine is not under their control.
On the other hand, the lack of proper access to disabled people and their families inside Iran (although they have been given some privileges in the media), the possibility of moving them inside Iran and keeping them as a reserve force is very low, because the Iranian government’s treatment of these forces inside without using them is like a worker who must be engaged in hard work.
The breaking of the “Shiite Crescent” in Syria with Tahrir al-Sham gaining power as one of the serious opponents of the presence of Iranian forces in the region and an opponent of the Shia has destroyed the ground for the ground transfer of these forces to Lebanon, unless Iran has transferred these forces to Lebanon by air. And to fill the void in the ranks of Hezbollah with the explosion of Israeli pagers and airstrikes and keep them as a threat to Israel.
The second possibility is to send these forces to Yemen to strengthen the Houthis and use them in the next equations in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab. But this option has little probability, because Iran’s interests are secured more in Lebanon than in Yemen and the maritime region, considering the combat capabilities of these people.
Conclusion
The presence of radical jihadist individuals and groups in Syria, either in opposition or in support of Tahrir al-Sham, can be considered a real and continuous threat to the security of Syria and the Middle East as a whole. It seems that the victory of these groups tomorrow will not taste so sweet for the people of Syria and neighboring countries.
As a whole, the continuous presence of groups supporting Hayat Tahrir al-Sham in Syria can be considered a serious problem for the security of the region and an opportunity for Hamas.
You may like
-
Will the Taliban hand over the Wakhan Corridor to Pakistan?
-
Lebanon finally got a president
-
Reasons for US withdrawal from Afghanistan
-
Does India take advantage of current rising tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan?
-
Pakistan’s spy chief calls on Tajik President aimed rising tensions with Taliban
-
Ahmad Sharia and Mullah Haibatullah; Why are their (Islams) so different?
According to a survey conducted by Japan’s Nikkei Asia, South Korea’s Maeil Business Newspaper, and China’s Global Times, nearly 40% of Chinese business executives expect the country’s relations with the US to improve if Donald Trump returns to the White House. This optimism contrasts with the views of their counterparts in Japan and South Korea, who are less hopeful about a Trump presidency.
In the survey, 38% of Chinese executives predicted that US-China relations would improve significantly or slightly after Trump’s inauguration, while only 8% anticipated a deterioration. During Trump’s first term, China successfully negotiated tariff reductions with the US, leading many Chinese business leaders to believe they could achieve better outcomes under a Trump administration compared to the current Biden administration.
Expectation of rapprochement with neighbors
Chinese business leaders also foresee stronger ties with neighboring countries. Chen Fengying, former director of the World Economic Research Institute at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, noted, “As the Trump administration implements its ‘America First’ policies, Japan and South Korea will feel they cannot rely on the US and will increase economic cooperation with China.”
In contrast, 83% of Japanese executives expect no change in their country’s relations with the US, while only 2% predict improvement and 15% anticipate a decline. South Korean executives were the most pessimistic, with 40% expecting relations to worsen and only 14% foreseeing improvement.
Kang Seoggu, director of the research department at the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, emphasized the need for South Korea to adapt to Trump’s trade policies: “South Korean companies should revamp their business structures, stabilize domestic politics as soon as possible, and adopt policies to support businesses.”
Global economic outlook
The survey also revealed differing views on the global economic outlook. In South Korea, 44% of respondents predicted a deteriorating global economy, while 22% expected growth. In contrast, 51% of Japanese executives and 43% of Chinese executives anticipated global economic expansion.
When asked about their own country’s economic prospects, nearly 80% of Japanese executives and 50% of Chinese executives expressed optimism. In South Korea, only 18% expected economic growth, while 42% predicted a downturn. These views may have been influenced by President Yoon Suk Yeol’s brief imposition of martial law and ongoing political instability.
The survey, conducted annually since 1995, gathered responses from 287 companies across China, Japan, and South Korea between December 2 and 18.
ASIA
Ousted South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol arrested for questioning
Published
7 hours agoon
15/01/2025Ousted South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested and questioned by authorities on Wednesday in connection with an investigation into an alleged uprising. Yoon stated that he cooperated with what he called an illegal investigation “only to avoid violence.”
The arrest marks a historic development in South Korea, a country with a history of prosecuting and imprisoning former leaders. Yoon had been staying in his hilltop residence, guarded by personal security that thwarted an earlier arrest attempt, since lawmakers voted to remove him from office following his brief declaration of martial law on December 3.
Yoon agreed to appear for questioning early Wednesday after more than 3,000 police officers marched to his residence. “I decided to respond to the CIO’s investigation—even though it is an illegal investigation—to avoid unpleasant bloodshed,” Yoon said in a statement, referring to the Corruption Investigation Office for Senior Officials (CIO), which is conducting the criminal probe.
A prosecutor accompanied Yoon from his home in Seoul’s upscale Beverly Hills area to the CIO’s austere offices. Yoon entered through a back door, avoiding the press. Authorities have 48 hours to question him, after which they must obtain permission to detain him for up to 20 days or release him.
However, a CIO official stated that Yoon refused to speak during questioning and declined to have his interviews videotaped. Yoon’s lawyers argued that the arrest warrant was illegal, claiming it was issued by a court outside the correct jurisdiction and that the investigative team lacked legal authority. A search warrant at Yoon’s residence, reviewed by Reuters, referred to him as the “ringleader of the uprising.”
Presidential bodyguards are present on the CIO floor where Yoon is being questioned, but he will likely be held at the Seoul Detention Centre, where other high-profile figures, such as former President Park Geun-hye and Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee, have also been detained.
Yoon’s declaration of martial law shocked South Koreans, destabilizing Asia’s fourth-largest economy and triggering unprecedented political turmoil in one of Washington’s key regional security partners. Lawmakers voted to impeach him shortly afterward on December 14.
Separate from the criminal investigation, the Constitutional Court is debating whether to uphold parliament’s impeachment decision, which would permanently remove Yoon from office, or restore his presidential powers.
A White House National Security Council spokesperson stated that the United States would continue to work with the South Korean government and appreciated efforts by the government and citizens to “act in accordance with the Constitution.” Yoshimasa Hayashi, Japan’s top government spokesman, said Tokyo was monitoring developments in South Korea with “special and serious interest.”
The arrest attempt, which began before dawn, captivated the nation as hundreds of thousands tuned into live broadcasts showing busloads of police arriving near the presidential residence. Officers pushed past Yoon’s supporters and marched toward the gates of the compound carrying ladders and wire cutters.
Crowds of protesters gathered outside the CIO offices, waving South Korean and American flags and carrying posters with the slogan “Stop the Steal,” referencing Yoon’s unsubstantiated allegations of election fraud. This slogan, familiar from the US elections, drew parallels between Yoon’s case and that of former US President Donald Trump, who has also claimed voter fraud contributed to his 2020 election defeat.
Kim Woo-sub, a 70-year-old retiree protesting Yoon’s arrest, said, “I still have great expectations for Trump to support our president. Election fraud is their common ground, but at the same time, the US needs South Korea to fight China.”
Polls indicate that a majority of South Koreans disapprove of Yoon’s declaration of martial law and support his impeachment. However, the ruling People’s Power Party (PPP) has seen a slight revival in recent weeks. In the latest Realmeter poll, support for the PPP stood at 40.8%, while the main opposition Democratic Party garnered 42.2% support.
The Wakhan Corridor is a mountainous region in the northeast of Afghanistan that plays an important role in the geostrategy of the region. Wakhan is important for China, Pakistan and Afghanistan for various reasons, including its unique location and natural features.
The importance of Wakhan for Afghanistan
The Wakhan Corridor is a strategic area that plays an important role in controlling military and trade routes. Access to the corridor helps the military power and trade system. Afghanistan is connected to China only through the Wakhan route. China is currently one of the world’s great powers in the economic sector. Afghanistan’s neighborhood with that country is influential in the development of Afghanistan’s trade and economy.
The establishment of communication and commercial infrastructure in this region will help in the economic development of Afghanistan, especially in the northeastern regions. In the past, the Silk Road was also connected to China through the Wakhan Corridor.
Due to its location on the border of China and Pakistan, this corridor can be a safe route for extremist groups, rebels and smugglers. Access to Wakhan is a must for Afghanistan in order to prevent the presence of these groups and their activities.
The importance of Wakhan for China
The Wakhan Corridor provides the basis for China’s access to Central Asian countries. China is an export country and needs the market of Central Asian countries for its commercial goods.
In addition, Wakhan is located in the neighborhood of China’s “Xinjiang” province in terms of geographical location. The presence of extremist groups in this region is unacceptable for Beijing. China does not lose control of this region by using its penetration tools.
On the other hand, China seeks to expand the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI), which the Wakhan Corridor provides the basis for this initiative. The Wakhan Corridor is a good area for China to expand its economic partnership with neighboring countries in this region.
The importance of Wakhan for Pakistan
Pakistan’s rivalry with India has forced Pakistan to increase its influence on Afghanistan and Central Asian countries. Due to the sensitive geography of Wakhan, this region provides a favorable environment for Pakistan to reach the trade markets of Central Asian countries.
Pakistan is also trying to strengthen its relationship with China through joint economic and trade projects. Therefore, any kind of access of Pakistan to this region will affect the economic development of this country.
Due to its rivalry with India, Pakistan is worried about the presence of insurgent groups from Afghanistan, especially in the Wakhan region.
Besides this, the Wakhan Corridor reduces the distance between Pakistan and Central Asian countries to 13km and is one of the important transit passages for Pakistan.
Central Asian republics with oil and gas resources have attracted Pakistan’s attention. On the other hand, Pakistani officials also believe that the Wakhan Corridor, along with access to the resources of Central Asian countries, provides work for thousands of citizens of that country.
Pakistani officials also believe that the increase in trade through the Wakhan Corridor to Gwadar port will increase the relations between Pakistan, China and especially the countries of Central Asia.
Considering the importance of the Wakhan Corridor for Pakistan, will the Taliban trade this area with Pakistan?
Pakistan has been eyeing the Wakhan region for a long time. Pakistan’s plans against Afghanistan have been hostile and focused on that country’s interests. Therefore, it has always supported rebel and extremist groups to secure its interests.
Pakistan, which cooperated with the US in overthrowing the Taliban regime, behind the scenes provided a safe haven to the Taliban leaders so that it could use them at the right time.
After many years of presence in Afghanistan, the US had finally decided to withdraw its soldiers from Afghanistan. This American decision was a green light for Pakistan to expand its support to the Taliban in order to provide the ground for direct negotiations between the Taliban and the United States.
On the back of all this support, Pakistan also achieved its goals in addition to being paid by America. One of Pakistan’s goals is instability in Afghanistan and the establishment of a system aligned with the interests of that country. The Taliban, who owe Pakistan’s support, have been ready for any kind of access by this country to Afghanistan, except for some of their figures.
Although reliable sources are not available in this case, it is widely believed that the Taliban have promised to provide the Wakhan Corridor to Pakistan. Although after the Taliban came to power, Pakistan has started building military bases on the Wakhan route, but due to several reasons, this will be done gradually.
Here are some points
First
Differences between the members of the Taliban leadership (Kabul and Kandahar): Those Taliban leaders who are present in Kabul played a key role in the negotiations with the US and have also made promises to the parties involved.
Undoubtedly, these promises were made with lasting consultations of Pakistan. It is possible that Pakistan took the Wakhan Corridor from the Taliban in return for those promises. But it is the leader of the Taliban and a group of traditional Taliban from Kandahar who make the main decisions within the Taliban, not those who played a role in the negotiations with America.
The Kandahar group turned its back on all the things that the Taliban members had promised during the negotiations with the Americans and insisted on implementing the predetermined policy. This may be one of the reasons why Pakistan does not have full access to the Wakhan Corridor.
Second
Being judged: During the war with America, the Taliban have motivated their forces to liberate the country from occupation. Therefore, if the Taliban officially and continuously hand over the Wakhan Corridor, they may face opposition from their own people. Therefore, the Taliban use caution in this regard.
Third
Guarantee for survival in power: The Taliban want the survival of their regime from Pakistan in exchange for handing over the Wakhan Corridor. According to the experience of 2001, the Taliban know that if they give in to Pakistan’s demand without guarantees, Pakistan may cooperate in dismantling their regime.
Fourth
The judgment of history: It is too late and the Taliban have been judged by history. There are narrations that Pakistan asked the Taliban in the previous round to recognize the Durand Line as an official border, but Mullah Mohammad Omar, the leader of the Taliban at that time, had rejected this request of Pakistan. This is another challenge that has prevented the Taliban from taking action.
On the other hand, forced deportation of immigrants, carrying out military attacks on the border points of Afghanistan, spreading differences between the leadership members of this group and inciting them against each other, hosting Taliban opponents and expressing various opinions and holding regional conferences such as the meeting of Islamic countries in Pakistan can be considered as levers of pressure on some Taliban leaders who are not aligned with the interests of Pakistan.
But sometimes these positions of Pakistan are to change the public opinion so that it can cover the progress of that country in the Wakhan region and put the Taliban in opposition to that country. As John Achakzai, the former Minister of Information of Balochistan province of Pakistan, warned Afghanistan on March 20 on his X page: “If the attacks against Pakistani troops from Afghanistan continue, Pakistan will immediately attack Afghanistan and seize the Wakhan Corridor.” His statements indicate that Pakistani soldiers are present in some areas of Wakhan.
Finally, the Wakhan Corridor is a strategic area that connects several countries. This corridor is actually a part of the geography of Afghanistan, but it is also very important for Pakistan and China.
Pakistan has tried hard to access the corridor and has achieved some success – but officially, no document, at least so far, has been published in the media to confirm the transfer of that region to Pakistan.
But Pakistani forces are building military bases. Of course, Pakistan, China and Central Asian countries are aligned and agree with this goal. Sooner or later, the Taliban will give in to Pakistan’s demand. For the Taliban, handing over and keeping Wakhan will be a choice between survival and the overthrow of this group.
EU reconsiders investigations into US tech giants amid political pressure
Friedrich Merz prioritizes economy over climate in Germany
Historic UK-Iraq trade and defense agreement worth £12.3 billion signed
Emerging market stocks decline amid Trump trade tariff concerns
Trump’s return could boost China-US ties, survey finds
MOST READ
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
Pakistan’s spy chief calls on Tajik President aimed rising tensions with Taliban
-
AMERICA5 days ago
California wildfires destroy area the size of San Francisco
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
WHO calls on China to share COVID-19 origin data
-
EUROPE1 week ago
Poland’s EU Presidency Begins: ‘Security and Defence’
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
Indonesian and Malaysian brands rise on Israeli consumer boycott
-
RUSSIA1 day ago
Gazprom plans to lay off 1,600 employees amid record losses
-
AMERICA2 weeks ago
The Finance Committee in the U.S. Congress is dominated by Silicon Valley
-
INTERVIEW2 weeks ago
‘Europe can be a bridge between the Global South and the US’