Connect with us

Asia

Terrorism in Pakistan has intensified

Published

on

Relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan authorities are under growing stress. The relations are almost fragile in the wake of cross-border attacks and violent actions by Pakistani Taliban (TTP). Pakistan has been skeptical that Taliban is supporting TTP against Pakistan, while the Taliban assured Pakistan of having a cordial relation.

On December 11, at least eight Pakistani were killed in a border clash between Afghan and Pakistani border forces in Chaman.  On December 15, another Pakistani border guard was killed, reflecting an uptick in border tension that resulted in temporary closure of the crossing point. Several incidents have been triggered at all five border crossings between the two countries.

Some incidents have come in response to disputes over the border fence erected by Pakistan along much of the frontier. Pakistan strongly condemned these attacks, and tried to show relations with Afghanistan remain normal and stable. Pakistan, who supported the Taliban, has continued in global forums to call for greater international engagement with Taliban authorities and urge financial assistance for Afghanistan.

There were also some 60 meetings on commercial issues between the two countries since the Taliban seized power last year, and also trade has improved significantly. Despite the achievement there are many difficulties between the two neighbors.

Relations are not well at all

Last month, Pakistan expressed frustration and openly criticized the Taliban, showing a significant departure from the all-is-well public stance. This came while Mohammed Sadiq, Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan, in the meeting of Moscow Format member states on Nov 16 in Russia, painted a gray picture of Afghanistan under Taliban control.

Presenting a “progress report” of 16 months of Taliban rule, he said the expectations of Pakistan and the international community had not been met on key issues. On political inclusivity, “there is little to show”; “the rights of women and girls also appear to have regressed”; and “the footprint of terrorist organizations in Afghanistan” had yet to be eradicated.

His remarks were an acknowledgment that Pakistan is no more happy with the Taliban’s ruling. Relations further chided when Pakistan’s ambassador and its diplomatic mission in Kabul came under attack, in which a security guard was seriously wounded and evacuated to Pakistan for treatment.

Complicated Bannu attack

Dozens TTP fighters, who stormed an office of the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) in Bannu city of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), seek safe exit to Afghanistan via airway. Despite the passage of more than 19 hours, the fighters still inside the CTD and one police officer have so far been confirmed dead in the gun battle.

In a video clip, the TTP fighters are demanding a safe airlift to Afghanistan from the Pakistani authorities, otherwise, they threaten to kill all the hostages and also go out to the Bannu city and kill anyone they found.  Internet services have been suspended in Bannu and the roads leading to and from the Bannu Cantonment have also been blocked.

Spokesperson of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, Mohammad Ali Saif said that talks between Pakistani officials and the leadership of TTP are underway in Afghanistan.

Spokesman of the outlawed (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and said that its members had taken CTD staff and security officials hostage. He added that the militants — in a previous video statement — had demanded safe passage but “mistakenly mentioned Afghanistan”.

Meanwhile, three people, including a Pakistan Army soldier were killed while another person was injured as a result of a suicide blast near a security forces vehicle in Miranshah, North Waziristan.

“A suicide attack targeting security forces took place near the Tal bridge in North Waziristan. The terrorist attack on CTD in Bannu cantt is yet to end. Pakhtunkhwa is under attack and there is no sense of alarm and urgency in the mainstream about it,” Mohsin Dawar, a Member National Assembly said.

TTP – the core reason of contention

Taliban and TTP are good friends, and Taliban enjoys good relations with Pakistan as well. Taliban has been in doldrums as Pakistan wants Kabul to stop supporting TTP, a difficult decision as Taliban are thankful to TTP’s support in the fight against foreign forces in the past 20 years. Anyways, escalation in cross-border terror attacks by TTP continues to test relations between the Kabul and Islamabad. Pakistan’s expectations that the Taliban’s return to power would enable Pakistan to secure its western border have not been met.

It got reversed as Pakistan’s security concerns have mounted with the spike in cross-border attacks by the TTP since the Taliban seized power in 2021. More than 140 Pakistani security personnel have been killed in these attacks in the past year or so.

TTP and Pakistan also failed to reach a ceasefire agreement mediated by Taliban, and despite Kabul’s insistence for resumption of the talks, Islamabad has been no longer interested in such talks which Islamabad see as an effort to only emboldened the group.

Mr. Khan again spoke

Blaming the coalition government for the terrorist attack in Bannu, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan Monday said the “imported government” has failed to deal with cross-border attacks by “security forces of a “friendly” Afghan government”.

“Apart from running our economy to the ground, this imported govt. has failed to deal with the 50% increase in terrorism in Pak with incidents from Chaman to Swat to Lakki Marwat to Bannu; They have also failed to deal with attacks from the international Pak-Afghan border by security forces of a ‘friendly’ Afghan govt,” former Prime Minister Khan said.

Pakistan former Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Khan said that while Pakistani soldiers, police and local people are giving daily sacrifices with their lives, the worst part is that this increasing terrorist threat and attacks from across Western border are finding no space in the discourse of this govt. of a “cabal of crooks.”

He went on to say that the Pakistan Democratic Movement-led government is only interested in their NRO II and its preservation.

“Therefore, despite the economy tanking they are petrified of holding elections which is the only way to stabilize the economy through political stabilization,” he said renewing his demand for early elections.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey