Asia
Attacks on Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese are beginning of a new pattern
Over one year after the Taliban’s ascent to power in Afghanistan, the security situation has somehow been getting inferior and more attacks against foreign missions have occurred. The economic situation is dire too and there is continuing migration and internal displacement as well.
Since seizing power on August 15 2021, the Taliban have repeatedly claimed they have achieved full territorial control, established security and removed “islands of illegitimate power”.
However, while physical security has improved by some measures but a significant rise in attacks by the Islamic State (IS) also known as Daesh group, targeting Shia and other minorities is one of many reminders that Afghanistan is far from secure. IS also carried suicide attacks mimicking Taliban tactics to target high-profile Taliban members and supporters.
Taliban had once said that they will eliminate Daesh within a month and assured of a strong war against the group. But the situation is quite different at the moment. The Daesh, besides Afghan targets, also carried out deadly attacks against Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese.
Vicious nature of the ongoing conflict
Indeed, Afghanistan is in a transition period, and new non-state actors are emerging. IS is a cover umbrella at the moment, and there is not enough understanding or evidence of the new actors, which is complicating the already vicious nature of the ongoing conflicts in the war-hit country. Undoubtedly, attacks on Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese are the beginning of a new pattern.
Just one day before the attack on a Chinese hotel in downtown Kabul, China’s Ambassador to Afghanistan Wang Yu met with Taliban’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Stanekzai and called for improved security at the embassy in Kabul. Stanekzai said at the meeting the security of foreign diplomatic missions in Afghanistan is their priority.
The meeting was necessary if we take note of the patterns of the recent attacks on Russian and Pakistan embassies. Two Russian embassy staff was among at least six people killed in a suicide bombing in 5th September. Many more were wounded. The attack is the first on a foreign mission in Afghanistan since the Taliban swept to power last year.
The second bombing was against the Pakistani embassy in December 3 that claimed by the Daesh group. The Taliban claimed they have arrested a member of the militant Islamic State group behind the shooting that left one security guard critically injured.
The target was Head of Mission Ubaidur Rehman Nizamani, who remained unhurt in the attack, and Pakistan strongly condemned the attack, but added the embassy would continue to function normally and there were no plans to withdraw diplomats from Kabul.
After these two attacks, China was worried, knowing that Daesh has a history of complicated untraceable attacks and China could be the next target.
China urged citizens to leave Afghanistan
China advised its citizens in Afghanistan to leave the country “as soon as possible,” following a coordinated attack again carried out by Daesh militants on a Chinese-owned hotel in the heart of Kabul.
The evacuation order is aimed at a great setback for Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers who seek foreign investments to improve its fragile economy. China is among few embassies that remained open and active in Afghanistan since Taliban takeover of the country more than a year ago.
Daesh, a key rival of the Taliban, posted pictures of its two fighters who carried out Monday’s attack on Longan Hotel, which left three assailants dead. Emergency hospital said they received 21 casualties, where three of them died upon arrival. Five Chinese citizens were among those wounded in the attack.
Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin called the attack “egregious in nature” and said China was “deeply shocked.”
Wang called for a “thorough investigation” and urged the Taliban government “to take resolute and strong measures to ensure the safety of Chinese citizens, institutions and projects in Afghanistan.”
“In view of the current security situation in Afghanistan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs once again advised Chinese citizens and institutions in Afghanistan to evacuate from Afghanistan as soon as possible,” Wang said.
China’s interest in Afghanistan
The Taliban has to maintain security of the Chinese firms who have tentatively sought to pursue opportunities in exploiting Afghanistan’s vast, undeveloped resource deposits, especially the Mes Aynak mine that is believed to hold the world’s largest copper deposit.
In October, Taliban government spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid highlighted China as a key part of Afghanistan’s economic development. In return, China vowed to help improve Afghanistan’s economy and called on the United States to unfreeze Afghan assets held abroad and end sanctions on the Taliban government.
China also has economic and mining interests in Afghanistan. China apparently showed willingness to help Taliban in the most proper way in almost all areas, but Beijing wants Taliban commitments to prevent China’s Uyghur opponents from setting up operations in Afghanistan. However, before receiving any threat from the specific group, Daesh was the first to announce hostility with China. Though the Daesh attack did not cause much harm, it was significant as it marked the first major attack on Chinese interests in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. Taliban need to deal with the group as several hundreds have been killed in Daesh attacks since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan last year.
Afghanistan needs an anti-terror security belt
As we said that Afghanistan is in a transition period, and there are many non-state actors where the Taliban really don’t have enough knowledge about them, have made it difficult for the Taliban to follow the security dynamics in the context of changing the geopolitical environment of Asia on a daily basis. The Taliban are also so busy in other issues that they can’t just examine the threats, or cannot predict specific targets based on intelligence information. Afghanistan needs an anti-terror security belt to fight Daesh group.
Meanwhile, the US providing Taliban with $40 millions UN managed cash per months to counter terrorism. It is understandable that the US want to contain and control the Taliban; however, this could be backfiring sans a proper mechanism and analyzing of security threats.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
