America
US House panel unanimously passes bill to shield consumers from AI data center energy costs
Amid growing pushback in the US Congress over the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure, a bipartisan bill aimed at capping the impact of data centers on residential electricity bills is gaining momentum in the House of Representatives.
The Ratepayer Protection Act mandates that state utility regulators evaluate standards that would shift the burden of electricity costs from individual consumers onto technology companies.
The proposed legislation cleared the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a unanimous 52-0 vote—a result demonstrating that public and political resistance to data center construction has breached party lines.
Designed to codify commitments made by tech executives to the White House earlier this year, the text requires state regulatory bodies to hold formal proceedings on the issue.
The measure mandates the consideration of a standard under which large data centers would be required to absorb the expenses of new power generation or transmission capacity necessitated by their electricity consumption; however, it stops short of compelling states to ultimately adopt those standards.
In a statement following the vote, Representative Brett Guthrie, the Republican chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said: “When evaluating the industry as a whole, it has become clear that there is only one body capable of standing alongside the families and communities who pay electricity bills—and that is this committee, along with our colleagues in Congress.”
The legislation has also found traction in the upper chamber. Republican Senator Jon Husted introduced a companion measure in the Senate last week. A spokesperson for Husted noted that the senator was pleased with the House committee’s approval and its bipartisan support, adding that he would continue working to pass the bill through the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee toward final enactment.
Despite its accelerating legislative pace, whether the measure will ultimately become law remains uncertain.
Matt VanHyfte, a spokesperson for the Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, noted in an emailed statement that he remains confident the bill will continue its advance following its successful committee passage.
Clara Summers, director of the Consumers for a Better Grid campaign at the Citizens Utility Board, observed that while the bill does not impose direct mandatory standards on states, directive language from Congress serves a useful purpose.
“There are states that have not addressed this issue proactively. Therefore, a signal from Congress stating, ‘You must at least place this topic on your agenda within a specified timeframe,’ represents a constructive incentive,” Summers said.
Summers emphasized that the standards submitted for state evaluation under the bill would hold data centers accountable for generation, transmission, distribution, and other associated costs, though the final determination on whether to act rests entirely with state authorities.
While supporting the measure, several Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee characterized the legislation as merely an initial step rather than a comprehensive solution.
Democratic Representative Nannette Barragán noted that while the bill recognizes a critical principle, it falls short of what is required. “We must do more to protect families from soaring electricity costs while simultaneously addressing the attendant health and environmental impacts,” Barragán said.
Data centers—the backbone of artificial intelligence development—are encountering intensifying grassroots resistance as technology firms push to construct new server warehouses and expand their computing power.
Local communities are challenging projects over rising electricity rates, high water consumption, and potential environmental pollution. Certain analysts also link this opposition to broader public anxieties regarding AI, including job displacement.
Public enthusiasm for data center developments, which until last year were widely viewed by both Democrats and Republicans as prime economic investments, is visibly eroding.
According to a survey published by Politico, 41% of Americans now oppose the construction of a data center in their local area, compared to 24% who support it. In January, opposition stood at 28%, with support at 36%.
Democratic Representative Kathy Castor, a co-sponsor of the bill, argued that the legislative package before the committee does not go far enough to resolve the underlying crisis.
Pointing to the Republican majority in the House, Castor said: “I believe the majority must take more decisive action right now to lower household electricity bills. Bipartisan bills are a good first step, but they fall short in this period of energy inflation.”
Castor expressed regret that her own proposal, which would require federal regulators to accelerate the grid interconnection process for new power sources, was not brought up for consideration by the committee.
Nevertheless, Castor commended the bill for sending a clear message to developers: “If a company wants to build a data center, it must pay for the power and grid upgrades it requires.”
Camden Weber, a senior climate and energy policy specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity, told The Hill that congressional focus on affordability was welcome, though incomplete. “It is positive that Congress is addressing pricing issues. We are experiencing an affordability crisis; people are struggling to pay their bills, particularly energy bills. However, concerns surrounding data centers extend well beyond this. There are environmental issues, water scarcity, and air pollution. While this bill appears well-intentioned, it does not go far enough,” Weber said.
Weber further criticized the legislation for establishing an optional framework for states rather than a binding mandate.
Conversely, several lawmakers view this structural flexibility as a primary strength of the text.
Democratic Representative Troy Carter emphasized during the committee markup that the federal government should refrain from overreach. “The key point is that Washington is not dictating terms to Louisiana. This bill does not force state regulatory commissions to adopt a specific rate structure. It establishes a federal standard for state public utility commissions to evaluate, leaving the ultimate implementation strategy to their discretion,” Carter said.
Carter added that local regulators are best positioned to assess the specific requirements of their own jurisdictions.
Responding via email regarding the policy impact of the legislation, Republican committee spokesperson Ben Mullany stated that lawmakers are working in tandem with states and utility providers to ensure grid efficiency.
“The Ratepayer Protection Act sends a strong signal from Congress to the states. States need to examine these massive computing loads and work to ensure that residential customers do not bear the financial burden of generating and transmitting the power required for these data centers,” Mullany said.
The proposed legislation has drawn resistance from the technology sector. The Data Center Coalition, an industry group backed by major tech firms, voiced strong opposition to recent modifications that narrowed the scope of the bill exclusively to data centers.
Josh Levi, president and chief executive officer of the Data Center Coalition, stated that while the organization initially supported the original version and intent of the legislation, the latest revisions were counterproductive.
“The amendments introduced by the Energy and Commerce Committee narrow the scope of the bill to target the data center industry exclusively. This leaves consumers unprotected against the costs associated with substantial load additions driven by other expanding sectors across the United States,” Levi said.
America
Paraguay President Peña resigns over catastrophic bank collapse
Paraguay President Santiago Peña has announced his resignation after the collapse of a major bank with close links to his administration.
The banking scandal had left half of the country’s population of six million unable to access their money.
In a video statement released online yesterday, Peña, a conservative economist, stated that he was stepping down from his post to ensure stability.
Calling the decision “one of the most difficult moments of his life”, Peña said: “I apologise to the public if I have disappointed you. It was never my intention to betray the trust you placed in me.”
Peña was facing an impeachment vote in the lower house of Congress in connection with the bank’s collapse, which lawmakers characterised as “systematic dereliction of duty”.
Minutes after his announcement, lawmakers voted unanimously to proceed with the impeachment process.
Earlier on Thursday, the prosecutor general’s office announced that it was evaluating a formal criminal complaint filed against the president by lawmakers.
Elected in 2023, the 47-year-old Peña was a staunch South American ally of the Trump administration.
Ueno Bank, which sits at the centre of the scandal, was taken over by the Central Bank of Paraguay early on Tuesday after regulators determined that the lender was no longer solvent.
Millions of Paraguayans soon realized that they could no longer withdraw cash, make digital payments, or use their debit cards for grocery shopping.
“When I woke up on Tuesday, I was completely helpless, without a single peso in my pocket,” said Benicia Sosa, 56, who joined a protest outside the Congress building on Wednesday night.
A day labourer from Luque, on the outskirts of the capital Asunción, Sosa said that her husband and eight children were all locked out of their Ueno accounts.
Sosa said she had been drawn by Ueno’s promotional offer, which provided cardholders with up to 40% cashback at supermarkets.
Sosa also noted that she regretted voting for Peña, who had pledged to revive the economy and create half a million jobs.
“I was foolish. The economy is going to hell,” the worker said during the demonstration at the presidential palace.
Over a few decades, Ueno evolved from a loan-sharking business operating out of a dilapidated market in Asunción into a youth-oriented banking app and a major financial player at times compared to Revolut or Nubank.
However, sceptics have long argued that this rags-to-riches rise was achieved through public resources and high-level connections.
When Peña assumed office in August 2023, he appointed Ueno’s former chairman, Carlos Carvallo, as head of the Central Bank.
Months later, the Central Bank officially granted Ueno a licence to operate as a brick-and-mortar bank. Carvallo also stepped down on Tuesday.
As of the end of October, Ueno, which is not capitalised in company filings and roughly translates to “good”, announced that it had approximately 2.9 million customers.
It also held more than $800 million in public funds, which included around 10% of the state pension fund.
Ueno sponsored the Paraguay national football team, alongside dozens of other businesses and brands.
Its sister company, Itti, expanded by securing dozens of public procurement contracts involving citizens’ data.
Last year, Peña announced that he had officially divested from another affiliated entity, Ueno Holding, following criticism that his shares gave rise to a conflict of interest. Peña maintained that nothing illegal had occurred.
Even so, analysts pointed out that the bank’s proximity to power aroused regulatory suspicions and attracted hostility from rivals.
Concerns surfaced in September when lawmakers loyal to Horacio Cartes, a powerful former president, demanded that the Central Bank answer questions regarding Ueno.
Cartes also leads the Colorado Party, which has governed Paraguay for almost all of the past 80 years.
Peña previously served as finance minister under Cartes, a tobacco magnate sanctioned by the Biden administration over corruption allegations.
According to Paraguayan-American political scientist Miguel Carter, however, the two men fell out over who would lead the party into the 2028 elections.
Reports emerging in October indicated that Ueno had extended roughly $150 million in loans to small firms connected to its own executives and employees.
This situation risked breaching banking regulations and endangering its balance sheet.
Worried about solvency, foreign investors began offloading Ueno’s bonds.
This month, Ueno offered additional perks to savers holding cash in their accounts.
Last week, the company announced that it had raised $100 million from investors and its Luxembourg-registered holding company, denying reports of an imminent intervention.
The speed of Ueno’s collapse surprised even its critics, evoking memories of the 1995 crisis that wiped out half of Paraguay’s banks.
Speaking at a press conference, Central Bank Governor Carvallo, who resigned on Tuesday, stated that the broader financial system was secure and that Ueno customers would be able to recover their funds “as soon as possible”, up to a limit of approximately $38,000.
Analysts observed that this threshold also applies to businesses, meaning that companies holding substantial cash deposits in the bank could also face bankruptcy.
Next in line to succeed Peña is Vice-President Pedro Alliana, who is likewise a member of the Colorado Party.
Yet some lawmakers argued that Peña should not be permitted to leave the presidency so easily.
Under the constitution, should his resignation be accepted, Peña would become an honorary senator entitled to parliamentary immunity. That status would shield him from investigations.
Local media reports suggested that Peña might be considering fleeing the country with US assistance, emulating the escape of Flávio Bolsonaro, the candidate who lost Brazil’s presidential election last month.
Last night, the presidential office dismissed the circulating “rumours” without going into detail. The US Embassy in Asunción referred inquiries to the State Department.
America
Republican push raises prospect of House vote to impeach Hegseth
An impeachment resolution drafted in the US House of Representatives against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth could be approved next week, according to claims reported by Fox News.
Citing several Republican lawmakers, the television network reported that the resolution is planned to be brought to a vote once Congress resumes its work.
Republican Representative Thomas Massie told the network that he intends to call a vote on the impeachment resolution when Congress reconvenes, unless Hegseth resigns beforehand.
Speaking to Fox News regarding the measure prepared by Massie, one Republican lawmaker said, “If he introduces the bill, it passes.”
Two other Republican lawmakers interviewed by the network shared the same view.
Massie aims to utilize a procedural rule that allows a resolution to be brought to the floor despite the wishes of the majority leadership.
Under this procedure, once the resolution is introduced, the House of Representatives must hold a vote within two legislative days.
Lawmakers can also vote to end debate on the measure or refer the text to the relevant committee before proceeding to a direct impeachment vote.
An official speaking to the network noted that voter turnout on the House floor could determine the outcome of the vote.
It is reported that some Republican lawmakers who lost their elections might not return to the House before the end of the year.
Because the party holds a very narrow majority in the House of Representatives, if Democrats vote unanimously in favor of the resolution, the absence of just a few lawmakers could be enough for the measure to pass.
Fox News reported that the majority of Republicans still oppose impeaching Hegseth.
One lawmaker, meanwhile, expressed doubts regarding the likelihood of the effort succeeding.
Even if the House of Representatives approves the impeachment resolution, the decision does not result in the immediate removal of the Secretary from office.
Following the impeachment proceedings, the matter must move to the Senate to be taken up there.
A report by CNN yesterday also detailed Massie’s plan to initiate an impeachment vote against Hegseth.
According to sources who spoke to the network, a segment of Republicans holds the Secretary of War responsible for the party’s defeat in the midterm elections on November 3.
Some figures within the party accused Hegseth of convincing President Donald Trump to launch a military operation against Iran without taking into account how the process would conclude or its political fallout.
In a statement on November 4, Trump stated that he would not dismiss Hegseth.
Trump maintained that the Secretary of War was doing a “great job.”
Department of War Spokesperson Sean Parnell rejected claims that the Secretary might resign, speaking to Fox News.
Parnell noted that Hegseth has no intention of backing down before politicians seeking to score internal party points or launch baseless investigations.
America
US imposes new Cuba sanctions targeting Chinese military suppliers
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has announced new sanctions against Cuba, with Chinese suppliers working with the Cuban military among those added to the blacklist.
In a statement, Rubio said: “Cuba’s ruling elites are monopolizing the island’s energy, maritime shipping, and tech resources for their own enrichment, while everyday Cubans are left to deal with power outages, shortages, and a stagnant economy.”
Arguing that the “Marxist regime” in Havana relies on a network of state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, and offshore intermediaries to sustain the system, the US secretary of state said: “The regime’s foreign enablers provide military equipment that sustains the regime’s military forces and enables brutal repression, while also backing its persistent efforts to threaten, infiltrate, and subvert the US homeland.”
Rubio announced that the new sanctions are being implemented pursuant to President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14404, entitled “Imposing Sanctions on Persons Responsible for Repression in Cuba and Threats to US National Security and Foreign Policy.”
The new sanctions designate ten targets, including additional “Cuban elites”, a crude oil shipping network, state-owned import and technical support entities, and China-based suppliers servicing Cuba’s military forces.
In addition, Rubio identified five associated vessels as “blocked property”.
Rubio continued:
“Today’s targets include GUILLERMO FAUSTINO RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ CALLEJA, who is part of an extensive offshore network of maritime shipping companies that moves Cuban crude oil shipments to and from the island. I am also sanctioning ANY RODRIGUEZ LASTRES, the daughter of previously sanctioned Grupo de Administración Empresarial (GAESA) President Ania Guillermina Lastres Morera.”
Additionally, the US Department of the Treasury issued a determination under Executive Order 14404 authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions against any foreign person determined to operate, or to have operated, in the electronics, manufacturing, maritime, and technology sectors of the Cuban economy.
According to Rubio, while the Cuban leadership “channels the island’s resources to its military elite”, while “regime insiders and family members benefit from opaque offshore networks”, and while “Cuba continues to serve as a base for a global coalition of hostile, anti-American actors to convene, threaten, spy, and conspire against the US and its interests”, the Trump Administration will not stand by.
-
Diplomacy4 days agoSecular dress code dispute exposes deeper Türkiye-Azerbaijan strains
-
Europe1 week agoMerz visits Asia to seek new markets for German defence firms
-
Russia1 week agoUS and Russia weigh energy deals and corporate return in peace talks
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD drops Dexit to back single market in new Europe strategy
-
Interview2 weeks ago“The AfD is an expression of internal contradictions within German big capital”
-
Europe2 weeks agoSerbia opposition wins snap vote as Vucic concedes defeat
-
America2 weeks agoPentagon prepares US bases for 90-day siege in global war plan
-
Middle East2 weeks agoUS envoy says Syria interim leader Sharaa seeks Israel normalization
