Connect with us

Middle East

Washington Post reveals Israel’s secret weapon shipments to Druze militias in Syria

Published

on

The Washington Post, one of the leading media organizations in the US, has reported that Israel has been providing weapons, ammunition, and military equipment to the Druze minority in Syria through covert methods since the overthrow of the Bashar al-Assad administration last year. According to the newspaper’s report, a faction within the Israeli security bureaucracy advocates for transforming the Druze in Syria into an official proxy force loyal to Tel Aviv.

Weapons concealed in aid packages

The report stated that Israel sent aid shipments to the Druze community following the commencement of the occupation process in southern Syria in December 2024. Two former Israeli officials speaking to the newspaper confirmed that weapons were smuggled into the region under the guise of humanitarian aid. The officials stated, “Hidden among pallets of humanitarian aid were 500 rifles, ammunition, and ballistic vests. These were secretly air-dropped by Israel to arm a Druze militia group known as the Military Council.”

Druze sources in Syria and Israeli officials reported that Tel Aviv continues to air-drop non-lethal military equipment, such as ballistic vests and medical supplies, to Druze militias. It was pointed out that this move undermines the capacity of the Ahmed al-Sharaa administration to establish central authority in the country. The same sources also alleged that Israel makes monthly payments ranging from $100 to $200 to approximately 3,000 Druze militiamen.

‘Proxy force’ strategy and Hassun’s admissions

According to the report, this support stems from the mistrust Israel harbors toward the new Syrian government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, the founder of Al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch and leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).

Hassun Hassun, a Druze former brigadier general in the Israeli army, revealed in a statement to the Washington Post that he personally participated in the aid process described in the report as “covert cooperation.” Stating that he, along with certain figures within Israeli security institutions, advocated for increasing support to the Druze, Hassun noted that they aim to transform these groups into an official armed proxy force loyal to Tel Aviv.

“Israel needs to shift gears and position itself as a strategic power. It must form alliances with all types of people and proxy actors, make them loyal to itself, and be loyal to them in return,” Hassun said.

‘Naive’ criticism of the Western approach

The report emphasized that Israeli officials base the arming of the Druze on two fundamental justifications. Accordingly, Tel Aviv finds the cooperation initiatives of the US and the European Union (EU) with the al-Sharaa administration to be “naive.” The Israeli side evaluates al-Sharaa as an “unreformed Islamist militant” who would pose a threat to them if he were to gain power. Additionally, it is claimed that there is a felt “moral responsibility” to protect the Syrian members of the Druze community, which holds an influential position in Israel.

It was reported that Israel’s support for the Druze in Syria peaked in April but began to decline from August onwards after Tel Aviv turned toward negotiations with the al-Sharaa government. During the same period, it was stated that Israel expressed doubts regarding the “reliability and the viability of the goals of the Druze separatists in Syria.”

Clashes in Suwayda and airstrikes on Damascus

In July, violent clashes occurred in the city of Suwayda in southern Syria between al-Sharaa’s forces and Druze militias. During this process, Israel carried out attacks on Damascus, targeting the Syrian Ministry of Defense and the Presidential Palace. It was argued that these attacks were conducted on the grounds of “protecting the Druze community.” It was alleged that hundreds of Druze civilians were executed by Damascus forces during the clashes in July.

Negotiations stalled

It is stated that Tel Aviv and the new Syrian administration have been conducting direct contacts for months to establish a security arrangement. While the Syrian government has declared it does not want conflict with Israel, it allegedly pledged coordination with Tel Aviv against Iran, Hezbollah, and the “Axis of Resistance.”

However, the talks, which were noted to have made significant progress in recent months, are reported to be stalled at this stage. It was noted that Israel refuses to withdraw its soldiers from the country and demands the complete demilitarization of southern Syria. It is stated that Tel Aviv conditions a potential withdrawal on a comprehensive peace agreement.

Past relations with the Nusra Front

Although Israeli officials frequently criticize al-Sharaa and his government, defining them as a threat to Tel Aviv, it is known that the Israeli army previously provided support to the al-Sharaa-led, Al-Qaeda-linked Nusra Front during the US-backed regime change war.

It was recalled that in the early years of the war, Nusra members were treated in Israeli hospitals in the Golan Heights, and air support was provided by Israel to the organization during clashes with the Syrian army and Hezbollah in 2014.

The Nusra Front changed its name several times over the years, transforming into Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in 2017. HTS overthrew the Assad administration in December 2024 and today constitutes a large part of Syria’s administrative and military structure.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey