America
Zuckerberg and AI therapists: Watch your minds!
Statements made by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg regarding future virtual relationships with artificial intelligence (AI) companions and AI therapists are currently a hot topic.
First, his comments on Dwarkesh Patel’s podcast drew attention. Zuckerberg was discussing the future of AI friends, therapists, and girlfriends.
According to Meta’s founder, while Americans, on average, have only three friends, they “wanted fifteen friends.” He then argued that although emotional bonds with AI bots are not currently socially accepted, society would eventually “find the words” to understand that people using AI to fill the loneliness and void in their lives are “rational.”
Zuckerberg continued to touch upon this subject. The Meta CEO’s less-noticed remarks, made a few days prior on Ben Thompson’s “Stratechery” podcast, further elaborate on his vision of how AI companionship might function.
Many interpreted Zuckerberg’s words to mean that you would have AI friends instead of real friends, and in fact, that’s more or less what he meant:
“There’s an interesting sociological finding: the average American has fewer than three friends, and the average American wants to have more than three friends. So, ideally, you want to enable people to connect with the right people, and that’s something we try to help people with. When they’re not physically together, they can stay connected through our apps, keep in touch with people, meet new people. But going forward, I think there’s going to be a dynamic where you’re interacting with different people on different topics.”
However, there’s something more significant (and ominous) that the tech billionaire implied between the lines: the fact that Meta has an AI strategy built on knowing much more about your friends and family.
In his interview with Thompson, Zuckerberg stated:
“I think one of the things that I’m most focused on is how AI can help you be a better friend to your friends. There are so many things that I don’t remember about people I care about, that I could be more thoughtful. There are issues like, I’m a ‘plan at the last minute’ kind of person, and then issues arise like, ‘I don’t know who’s around, and I don’t want to bother people.’ An AI that has good context on what’s going on with the people you care about can help you with that.
Good personalized AI isn’t just about having some basic information about your interests; a good assistant or good personalization is about having a theory of mind about how you think about things. So, this is what we do with all of our friends. It’s not just like, ‘Okay, this is my friend Bob, and he likes this thing.’ You deeply understand what’s going on in that person’s life, what your friends are going through, what their challenges are, and what the interplay is between these different things.”
Elsewhere in the interview, Zuckerberg points out how interaction provided on Facebook has changed with tools like Instagram. “It used to be that you would interact with the people you were connected to in the feed,” explains the Meta CEO, “for example, someone would share something, and you would comment, and that’s how your interaction would happen.”
So, what’s the situation now? Zuckerberg explains clearly:
“Today, we see Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and I guess now the Meta AI app, and many other things we do, as discovery engines. Most of the interaction doesn’t happen in the feed. The app works like a discovery engine algorithm to show you interesting things, and then the real social interaction happens when you find something interesting and add it to a group chat with your friends or a one-on-one chat. So, there’s a flywheel effect between messaging, where the real, deep, and nuanced social interaction happens, and the feed apps, which are increasingly just becoming discovery engines.”
The Meta CEO doesn’t hide that they are designing this as a “business model.” This model perhaps represents the pinnacle of subjecting both the worker and society as a whole to the “logic of capital”:
“[We] want to use AI to basically enable any business that wants to achieve a certain business outcome to come to us and get service without needing to produce any content or have any information about their customers. They should just be able to say, ‘This is the business outcome I want, this is the fee I’m willing to pay, I’ll connect you to my bank account, I’ll pay you for the business results you achieve’… I think this is a redefinition of the advertising category. If you think about what percentage of GDP advertising is today, I would expect that percentage to increase.”
This is a rather critical statement. Zuckerberg is essentially saying: Businesses will not have to produce any content or know anything about their customers. Meta, or rather Meta’s AI bot, will take over the connection between businesses and customers and most decisions related to branding. It will have more data, a larger scale, more connections, and the world’s largest black box. In the future, marketing and advertising for all companies will mean delegating commerce to an automated infrastructure controlled by a single person (or bot).
What better “social engineering” could there be?
This “business model” also points to a future that will eliminate the “public-private distinction,” one of the hallmarks of bourgeois civilization. Zuckerberg mentioned back in 2010 that he wasn’t hiding his vision of such a “humanity”:
“The days of you having a different image for your work friends or co-workers and for the other people you know are probably coming to an end very quickly. Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity… It’s a big challenge to get people to a point where they can be more open. But I think we’ll get there.”
Let me remind you that Zuckerberg has taken quite a few steps in this regard. For example, in 2007, he launched Beacon, which automatically added your Facebook purchases to your feed. This application exposed users’ HIV statuses and which engagement rings they bought.
Moreover, recently, the Wall Street Journal published a story: Meta’s chatbots were talking about fantasy sex with children.
Meta allows “synthetic personalities” to offer full-scale social interaction, including bantering via text, sharing selfies, and even engaging in live voice chats with users.
What is happening once again confirms one of Marx’s analyses regarding the behavior of capital. In Capital, Marx distinguishes between “formal” and “real” forms of subsumption. Initially, capital absorbs the existing labor process—that is, the techniques, markets, means of production, and workers—into itself. Marx calls this “formal” subsumption.
In this process, the entire labor process continues as before, but the capitalist, who monopolizes the means of production and thus the workers’ means of subsistence, forces the worker to submit to wage labor and can accumulate capital using existing markets.
However, capitalism cannot develop on the limited foundations of existing productive forces. The preconditions for the actual capitalist labor process can only be created by capital itself. Thus, capital gradually transforms social relations and forms of labor until they are completely intertwined with the nature and requirements of capital, and the labor process becomes truly, really subsumed under capital.
Therefore, for capital to accumulate, to ensure that property owners do not become propertyless, it must develop models and labor processes that subject not only wage labor but all of society to itself.
Your relationships with friends, what you experience with your family, even information about your mental health, must therefore be laid out before capital:
“Personally, I believe everyone should have a therapist. A therapist is like someone they can talk to throughout the day, or if not throughout the day, about whatever they are worried about. For people who don’t have a therapist, I think everyone will have an AI assistant.”
America
US national debt hits record $40 trillion as borrowing accelerates
The US national debt has reached a record $40 trillion as borrowing expanded at a historic pace.
The development has heightened investor concern over the state of US public finances, despite Donald Trump’s pledge to bring spending under control.
Gross federal debt crossed the threshold on Tuesday, according to Treasury Department data published on Wednesday.
Calculations by the Financial Times show that debt climbed by $3 trillion over the past year, registering the fastest rate of increase in history outside the pandemic period.
Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget think tank, said:
“This is like a giant, flashing ‘check engine’ light. It doesn’t mean your engine will melt down tomorrow, but it is a clear sign that things have gotten quite out of hand. And it’s not just the size of the number; it’s the speed at which we’ve reached it.”
The US national debt has surged over the past two decades, climbing from below $6 trillion at the start of the century (about $12 trillion in 2026 dollar terms) as massive public spending during the financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic compounded enormous budget deficits.
In the past 10 years alone, the total debt load has doubled. Debt held by the public—a key gauge tracked by markets that excludes intra-governmental holdings—now exceeds $32 trillion, roughly equal to the size of the US economy.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office expects debt held by the public to surpass the post-Second World War record of 106% of GDP by the end of the decade and to reach 120% by 2036.
As borrowing increased, investors began demanding a higher premium to hold US bonds.
This has driven interest rates higher, leaving debt servicing costs larger than national defence spending.
The situation has created unease in Washington. On Wednesday, prior to the release of the debt data, the Treasury Department announced it would double its buybacks of long-term government debt in a bid to halt a recent sell-off.
Last week, the US paid its highest borrowing costs since 2001 to sell 30-year bonds.
Wednesday’s 10-year Treasury auction produced the highest yields since 2007 as investors fretted over the scale of the debt.
Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, said: “That is an awful lot of money being borrowed. It is going to feed on itself with interest expenses. If interest rates rise because of concerns about the high debt load, that will lead to even more interest expense. It’s a vicious cycle.”
Trump returned to office in 2025 promising to rein in “wasteful” government spending.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pledged to reduce the budget deficit to 3% of GDP by the end of Trump’s term.
However, measures to trim spending in some areas were offset by broad tax cuts in the president’s signature 2025 fiscal legislation, the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which will add more than $4 trillion to the debt by 2034.
Trump also requested an increase of more than 50% in annual defence spending, seeking $1.5 trillion in the largest budget request in US history.
The deficit fell to 5.9% of GDP in 2025 from 6.3% the previous year. The CBO expects the deficit to decline to 5.8% this year. The US national debt comprises years of accumulated deficits compounded by interest charges.
Analysts noted that both US political parties missed opportunities during periods of economic expansion to take significant steps toward curbing spending.
Calculations by the Congressional Joint Economic Committee indicate that over the past year, total national debt grew by roughly $7.9 billion a day, or approximately $91,000 per second.
Budget specialists said they hoped crossing the $40 trillion threshold would spur politicians from both parties to take meaningful steps to bring borrowing back under control.
Michael Peterson, head of the Peterson Foundation, a think tank dedicated to returning debt to a sustainable trajectory, said:
“My hope is that this serves as a national alarm and wake-up call to address our fiscal future. If we keep borrowing this much, we are going to face a day of reckoning in financial markets… People will wake up one day and decide: ‘You know what? I’m more worried about the United States now. I’m going to demand higher interest rates, or I’m going to put my money somewhere else.'”
America
Independent US oil firms set to sign output deals in Venezuela
Several independent US oil producers are expected to sign production contracts with Venezuela’s state-owned oil company in the coming days.
According to sources who spoke to Politico on condition of anonymity because details of the event have not yet been made public, a signing ceremony involving several small US producers and Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) was scheduled to take place in Houston on Tuesday (18 August) evening.
One source said Venezuela’s oil minister and the head of PDVSA’s exploration division were scheduled to attend the ceremony. Another source added that the event could be postponed until Wednesday morning.
The White House, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, was not expected to be officially involved in Tuesday’s ceremony.
However, the development follows a visit by senior officials to Caracas in late April, where they signed memorandums of understanding that established the framework for formal production agreements in the country, which holds some of the world’s largest oil reserves.
Despite the tailwind provided by high crude prices, negotiations had stalled over key details such as dispute resolution, while officials in Caracas contended with two devastating earthquakes in June that claimed thousands of lives.
Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, announced new regulations last month that offer more favourable fiscal terms to international oil companies.
According to an industry source close to the negotiations, the signing of the contracts comes after the Trump administration renewed pressure on Rodríguez to ensure PDVSA concludes agreements with American firms.
The source said these efforts included outreach by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to discuss how increased oil revenues could assist the country following the devastating earthquake earlier this summer.
The source added:
“Delcy reached a renewed awareness that increased oil production is the way to rebuild after the earthquakes and to achieve what her government wants to do for the people suffering from the earthquakes.”
David Goldwyn, president of the international energy consultancy Goldwyn Global Strategies, said investments from independent oil producers and boosting output from existing fields would serve as the “primary source of new oil growth for the next few years” for Venezuela.
“While the oil majors are trying to buy time to see how the political situation clarifies and whether they can cherry-pick the best assets, independent companies can de-risk their projects in the short term,” Goldwyn said.
However, Goldwyn noted that these investments would add no more than 300,000 barrels per day to the country’s oil production over the next year, falling far short of the multi-million-barrel increase that officials in Caracas and Washington wish to see.
“Until the framework improves, electricity is restored, and the political picture becomes clear, all we will see is incremental production growth,” the strategist said.
America
US-Brazil rift widens over proposed sanctions and trade tariffs
Diplomatic tensions between the two countries remain at a peak as the US government considers new sanctions targeting a judge on Brazil’s Supreme Court.
According to sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the Financial Times (FT), the Trump administration is evaluating new measures against Justice Alexandre de Moraes, whom it sanctioned last year on human rights grounds before subsequently rescinding that decision.
Washington’s renewed focus on the magistrate threatens to widen the rift between Brazil and the US across trade and political spheres, casting a shadow over upcoming elections in Latin America’s largest nation.
A little over a year ago, De Moraes was subjected to sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Act. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused him at the time of engaging in a “repressive censorship campaign, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions,” including measures directed at former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.
Bolsonaro, an ally of Donald Trump, was sentenced last year to 27 years in prison for plotting a coup.
However, sanctions targeting the judge, his wife, and a company owned by his family were lifted in December following a meeting and phone conversations between Trump and his Brazilian counterpart, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
According to a source familiar with the matter who requested anonymity, US interest in De Moraes was revived partly due to a case that ignited a debate over press freedom in Brazil.
The judge authorized police raids against a journalist and two sources as part of an investigation into media coverage concerning a Supreme Court justice and his family.
De Moraes defended the action, arguing that the information in question had been illegally obtained and disclosed, thereby endangering the safety of the justice’s family.
The judge gained global prominence several years ago following a public conflict with Elon Musk, which briefly led to the billionaire’s X platform being blocked in Brazil.
Supporters say he “helped protect Brazilian democracy against a wave of misinformation.”
However, critics, including the Trump administration, view him as violating free speech rights.
“He went after the president’s supporters. Not just Elon Musk, but MAGA supporters in Brazil as well. Even if we want to build good relations with Brazil, it is clear that this man is an adversary,” said a person familiar with the US government’s thinking.
Another person stated that the reimposition of Magnitsky sanctions is “under evaluation,” noting that such sanctions entail the freezing of US-based assets and a prohibition on American companies and individuals conducting business with targeted parties.
While it remains unclear whether or when a decision will be reached, any such move would intensify an escalating retaliatory spiral between the two most populous countries in the Americas.
Tensions initially erupted more than a year ago when Trump imposed a 50% tariff on Brazil while demanding that prosecution proceedings against Bolsonaro be dropped.
That tariff was subsequently invalidated by the US Supreme Court.
A brief period of de-escalation since then has drawn to a close, with the US applying a 25% import tariff on numerous Brazilian products in July.
Last month, Brazil denied entry to two Trump envoys over concerns regarding potential interference in its upcoming October elections. Washington rejects those allegations.
Lula, who is seeking re-election for a fourth presidential term, suggested that the US might act to support his main opponent, Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, the jailed former leader’s son.
The 80-year-old president has also engaged in a sharp public exchange of words with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
On Sunday, thousands of supporters gathered to welcome Lula at a stadium in Sao Bernardo do Campo, an industrial suburb of Sao Paulo, for the official launch of his election campaign.
Lula originally achieved prominence in the area during the late 1970s as a union leader heading metalworkers’ strikes.
Speaking at the venue, Lula said, “I thank the working men and women of this country who believed that someone like themselves could achieve more than someone different from them. As long as I am alive, I will not stop fighting, and I will not allow the right [to prevail].”
-
Interview6 days agoDaniel Davis warns US strategy fails against Iranian defense grid
-
Diplomacy6 days agoErdogan blocked CIA-Mossad plan for armed Kurdish uprising in Iran, report says
-
America6 days agoAIPAC super PAC pours millions into key Democratic primary races
-
Middle East6 days agoUS considers land blockade on Iran involving Türkiye and neighbours
-
Interview2 weeks agoQuincy Institute expert says the United States had no plan B
-
Europe6 days agoUkraine uses British drones for long-range strikes deep inside Russia
-
Opinion2 weeks agoThe U.S. Economy and NATO’s Function
-
America6 days agoUS-Brazil rift widens over proposed sanctions and trade tariffs
