Connect with us

Diplomacy

EU official accuses US of ‘blackmail’ in tech regulation dispute

Published

on

EU representative Teresa Ribera has launched a sharp attack on the Trump administration, claiming that Washington is using “blackmail” to force the EU to soften its technology rules.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stated in Brussels on Monday that the US might change its approach to steel and aluminum tariffs if the EU reconsiders its digital regulations.

European officials interpreted this statement as targeting the EU’s flagship technology regulations, including the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

“This is blackmail. Just because that is their intention does not mean we will accept this kind of blackmail,” Ribera, a Spanish member of the European Commission, said in an interview with POLITICO on Wednesday.

Ribera, who ranks second to Ursula von der Leyen as a vice-president of the Commission, said the EU’s digital rules should have nothing to do with trade negotiations.

Donald Trump’s team wants to revise the framework trade agreement he signed with von der Leyen at his Scottish golf resort in July.

This intervention comes at a sensitive time in the ongoing trade talks. Washington finds the DMA discriminatory because the major tech platforms it regulates, such as Microsoft, Google, or Amazon, are almost all American.

Furthermore, it objects to the Digital Services Act (DSA), which aims to restrict illegal online speech, believing the law is designed to constrain social networks like X.

Ribera said the rules are a matter of sovereignty and should not be included in the scope of trade negotiations.

“We respect the rules they set for their market: the digital market, the health sector, steel, whatever… cars, standards. That’s their issue. It’s their regulation and sovereignty. The situation is the same here,” the EU official said.

Ribera, along with EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen, oversees the DMA, which supervises the conduct of large digital platforms and aims to protect fair competition.

Reacting strongly to Lutnick’s comments after he met with EU officials and ministers on Monday, she said, “European digital rules are not up for negotiation.”

Virkkunen reiterated this view on Tuesday. On Monday, she presented the EU’s simplification package, which includes the digital omnibus proposal, to her American counterparts.

The package was presented as an EU-based initiative to reduce bureaucracy, but it has been interpreted by some as an attempt to address the regulatory concerns of large US tech companies.

When asked why she made such a strong statement, Ribera said Lutnick’s words were “a direct attack on the DMA.”

“It is my responsibility to defend a well-functioning digital market in Europe,” the Commission representative added.

Despite Ribera’s uncompromising response, solidarity among EU countries on the DMA has begun to show fine cracks.

Lutnick said after Monday’s meeting that some EU trade ministers were not as resistant as the Commission to the idea of reviewing the bloc’s digital rules.

“I see a lot of ministers… some are more open-minded than others,” the US secretary said, adding that Europe must change its regulatory model if it wants US investment.

At least one European participant seemed to agree with this view. Speaking on the sidelines of the meeting, Germany’s Katherina Reiche told reporters that she was in favor of further loosening the EU’s digital rules.

“Germany has made it clear that we want opportunities to play a role in the digital world,” Reiche said, specifically referencing the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act.

Washington’s lobbying to weaken the EU’s digital rules is part of a broader global effort by the US to undermine digital laws in foreign jurisdictions.

This month, South Korea bowed to the Trump administration’s lobbying efforts and withdrew its own digital competition regime proposal.

The US Trade Representative is preparing its 2026 report and will launch another round of consultations in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, the Commission is pressing ahead with its evaluation of the rules under the “Digital Fairness Fitness Check” and the ongoing DMA review.

But with Washington’s salvos and the breaking of ranks among EU countries, the question seems to be not just what the review will say, but whether the DMA can survive the trade war.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey