Middle East
Afghanistan-China resumes flights after a 3-year pause
Afghanistan and China resumed direct flights with the state owned Ariana Afghan Airlines landed in the Chinese city of Urumqi following a three-year pause due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
This is an important development because now there is a totally different government in Afghanistan. The republic system was in power three years ago when the flights were stopped, but now the Taliban, who fought against the republic and its foreign supporters for the last 20 years, are ruling the country.
Taliban overtake power in August 2021 following the hasty withdrawal of US forces, but since that no country has formally recognized the government of Taliban. Almost all foreign missions suspended their activities except China, Pakistan, Iran, Russia and some others.
Speaking at the flight-resumption ceremony, Ghulam Jailani Wafa, Taliban Deputy Minister of Transport and Civil Aviation (MTCA) expressed happiness on the resumption of flights, and called it an important development to boost up the country’s economy.
“Beside commercial ties, the resumption, which also includes passenger flights, will help improve political ties between the two countries,” Wafa said.
Wafa also said that technical work has been underway in the airport in order to bolster up more capabilities for air corridors for domestic and international companies.
Chinese trade market in Afghanistan
The head of the Afghanistan Chamber of Commerce and Investment, Mohmmad Younos Mohmmand had expressed the Islamic Emirate’s readiness to create a trade market for the Chinese in Afghanistan.
Afghanistan has a great potentiality to attract more Chinese investments as well as to improve bilateral trade ties in different areas, he said.
Meanwhile, the Chinese consul general in Kabul said that economic and trade relations with Afghanistan are developing on a daily basis.
The official seems happy with the level of trade between the two countries which is more than one billion dollars annually, and said there are good opportunities for Afghan businessmen in China. He also called on the Chinese investors to invest in Afghanistan.
“We resumed direct flight from Kabul to Urumqi, and this is an important step in Afghanistan-China relations as both the countries have strong will to strengthen ties,” he added.
Afghanistan ready to maintain security for Chinese investor
Taliban Prime Minister and Deputy for Political Affairs, Mawlavi Abdul Kabir held a detailed discussion with the Chinese ambassador in Kabul, Mr. Wang Yu, and said that Afghanistan is seeking good ties with all its neighboring countries.
Kabir assured Wang that Afghanistan’s soil will not be used against any countries, and hinted toward the ancient ties history between Afghanistan and China. Kabir also thanked China for providing facilities to Afghan businessmen, saying that Taliban is ready to provide all facilities to Chinese investors, and maintained their security in Afghanistan.
Apparently, Wang was satisfied with the security situation in Afghanistan, and expressed Beijing’s desire for a peaceful and stable Afghanistan.
Wang called peace in Afghanistan in the best interest of the region, neighboring countries, and China. “With joint efforts of Kabul and Beijing in the economic sector, we can achieve great success in the future,” Wang added.
Taliban Interior Minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani also met with Wang, and praised the realistic position of China, saying justice is extremely important when it comes to international interaction and ties.

Taliban Interior Minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani met with Chinese Ambassador Wang Yu in Kabul.
Haqqani said that Taliban believe in good relations and this is top priority of the Islamic Emirate as they expect the same from other countries.
On his part, Wang said that China stands with Afghanistan and believes that the development of nations is only possible in a free and independent environment and Afghans are now currently on that path.
Wang also clarified that China does not support the policies of sanctions, pressure and interference in other countries.
Both sides also evaluated the results of the recent meeting of Afghanistan-Pakistan-China foreign ministers in Islamabad as positive, and pushed for improving relations in all areas.
Kabul airport is restored
The US forces turned the Kabul airport into a complete ruin at the end of August 2021, when their last troops left Kabul after 20 years of presence. The airport was blocked by the US forces and all of its installations were damaged intentionally. The first task for the Taliban was to immediately operationalize the Kabul airport, and it has been operating smoothly.
Abdul Hadi Mohammad, head of Kabul Airport said that Afghan air aviation system has been improved a lot, adding that a “D-check process,” that previously cost $1.5 million to $1.7 million, is now possible inside Afghanistan with the cost of $200,000.
“We are not able to do the D-Check process inside the country as previously it was being conducted in other countries that also took five to eight months,” Hadi Mohammad added.
Around 90,000 people including 5,000 foreigners have traveled abroad in the past one month, according to Hadi Mohammad, who said that 200 cargo flights were also conducted.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe4 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy4 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
